Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: Preliminary Results of Long-Term Follow-up: A Case Series

A Definition of Neuromodulation and Classification of Implantable Electrical Modulation for Chronic Pain

OBJECTIVES

Neuromodulation therapies use a variety of treatment modalities (eg, electrical stimulation) to treat chronic pain. These therapies have experienced rapid growth that has coincided with escalating confusion regarding the nomenclature surrounding these neuromodulation technologies. Furthermore, studies are often published without a complete description of the effective stimulation dose, making it impossible to replicate the findings. To improve clinical care and facilitate dissemination among the public, payors, research groups, and regulatory bodies, there is a clear need for a standardization of terms.

APPROACH

We formed an international group of authors comprising basic scientists, anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, and engineers with expertise in neuromodulation. Because the field of neuromodulation is extensive, we chose to focus on creating a taxonomy and standardized definitions for implantable electrical modulation of chronic pain.

RESULTS

We first present a consensus definition of neuromodulation. We then describe a classification scheme based on the 1) intended use (the site of modulation and its indications) and 2) physical properties (waveforms and dose) of a neuromodulation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework will help guide future high-quality studies of implantable neuromodulatory treatments and improve reporting of their findings. Standardization with this classification scheme and clear definitions will help physicians, researchers, payors, and patients better understand the applications of implantable electrical modulation for pain and guide informed treatment decisions.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition that is associated with diminished physical function, poor mental health outcomes, and reduced quality of life. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an emerging modality that has been utilized to treat LBP. The primary objective of this systematic review is to appraise the level of evidence on the efficacy of PNS for treatment of LBP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Twenty-nine articles were included in this systematic review, consisting of 828 total participants utilizing PNS as the primary modality for LBP and 173 participants using PNS as salvage or adjunctive therapy for LBP after SCS placement. Different modalities of PNS therapy were reported across studies, including conventional PNS systems stimulating the lumbar medial branch nerves, peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS), and restorative neuromuscular stimulation of the multifidus muscles. All studies consistently reported positive modest to moderate improvement in pain intensity with PNS therapy when comparing baseline pain intensity to each study's respective primary follow-up period. There was a very low GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) quality of evidence supporting this finding. Inconsistency was present in some comparative studies that demonstrated no difference between PNS therapy versus control cohorts (sham or SCS therapy alone), which therefore highlighted the potential for placebo effect. This systematic review highlights that PNS, PNFS, and neuromuscular stimulation may provide modest to moderate pain relief in patients with LBP, although evidence is currently limited due to risk of bias, clinical and methodological heterogeneity, and inconsistency in data.

Efficacy of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain and Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Various approaches have been developed with a view to treating the back pain component in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Emerging evidence shows that peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) may be an efficacious therapeutic modality against axial low back pain. Hence, the aim of the review was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of PNFS, when used alone or as an adjunct to spinal cord stimulation (SCS), for managing CLBP and PSPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search for clinical studies on PNFS and PNFS + SCS used for the management of CLBP and/or PSPS was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE via Proquest, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included, of which four were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nine were observational studies, and two were case series. For patients receiving PNFS, a significant decrease in back pain intensity and analgesic consumption, together with a significant improvement in physical functioning, was observed upon implant of the permanent system. Meanwhile, the addition of PNFS to SCS in refractory cases was associated with a significant reduction in back and leg pain, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that PNFS, when used alone or in combination with SCS, appears to be effective in managing back pain. However, high-quality evidence that supports the long-term analgesic efficacy and safety is still lacking. Hence, RCTs with a larger patient population and of a longer follow-up duration are warranted.

Preoperative Elevated Levels for Depression, Anxiety, and Subjective Mental Stress Have No Influence on Outcome Measures of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain-A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. The treatment of low back pain strongly depends on psychological factors like anxiety, depression, and mental stress. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of such factors on outcome measures after lead- and implantable pulse generator-implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2014 and 2019, a prospective cohort study of 39 patients with chronic lumbar pain was conducted. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score was assessed at baseline to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression. Symptom checklist-90 (SCL-90) was used to measure subjective psychopathology. Pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale [NRS]), SF12v2 with Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed pre- and postoperatively as well as three and six months after PNFS implantation. Outcome values were compared to baseline data. Statistical analysis was performed using depending t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 39 patients (18 females, 21 males) with a median age of 61 years (IQR^25-75  = 52-67 years). NRS, ODI, and SF12v2 showed significant improvement in the whole follow-up period compared to baseline values (p < 0.05). Elevated HADS scores for anxiety were seen in 64.1%, for depression in 76.9% of the patients at baseline. SCL-90 was pathologic in 71.8% of the cases. A one-way ANOVA revealed no differences between elevated HADS- and SCL-90 values and all outcome measures after PNFS implantation in the whole follow-up period (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chronic low back pain is often associated with psychological distress. Our study showed highly elevated levels for anxiety and depression as well as subjective mental stress in patients with chronic low back pain without negative impact on NRS, ODI, and SF12v2 in the whole follow-up after PNFS implantation.

Peripheral subcutaneous field stimulation for the treatment of spinal cord injury at-level pain: case report, literature review, and 5-year follow-up

Spinal cord injury (SCI) frequently engenders chronic pain which may be classified as occurring above, at, or below the level of injury. Since patients with SCI may have a complex combination of nociceptive and neuropathic pain, pharmacological interventions often fail. Peripheral subcutaneous field stimulation (PSFS) is a novel neuromodulation surgery for pain in which subcutaneous electrodes designed for spinal cord stimulation are placed subcutaneously in a region of pain. We report the case of a 26-year-old man who was an unrestrained driver in a motor vehicle accident and suffered a complete ASIA A spinal cord injury with paraplegia due to a T4 three-column burst fracture. He underwent successful surgical fixation of the fracture (7/27/12) and developed severe at-level SCI-associated pain which failed all conservative measures. After a successful trial, two octrode leads (Abbott Medical, Plano, TX, USA) were placed for PSFS under general anesthesia and were connected to a right flank rechargeable pulse generator (11/6/13). At 60 months postoperative, the patient continues to use the peripheral field stimulation system on a daily basis and reports near complete relief of his at-level spinal cord injury pain. He noted instantaneous relief of his pain once ideal stimulation programming was achieved and has tolerated complete cessation of all narcotic use. His current programming settings are: Frequency of 50 Hz (Hz), Pulse Width of 350 μs (μsec), Amplitude of 0.00 miliamps (mA), Comf of 7.70 mA, and Perc of 4.50 mA. Chronic pain is a challenging and expensive sequela to manage in SCI patients and newer therapies are needed. Our case suggests that SCI at-level pain may respond durably to PSFS and provides the longest published follow-up on a case of PSFS. Peripheral subcutaneous field stimulation remains an investigational treatment for chronic pain syndrome and larger, long-term follow up studies are needed for the FDA and payers to approve this modality.

Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Back Pain: Therapy Outcome Predictive Factors

OBJECTIVE

To identify variables that influence pain reduction following peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) in order to identify a potential responder profile.

METHODS

Exploratory univariate and multivariate (random forest) analyses were performed separately on 2 randomized controlled trials and a registry; all included patients with chronic back pain, mainly failed back surgery syndrome. An international expert panel judged the clinical relevance of variables to identify responders by consensus.

RESULTS

Variables identified that may help predict PNFS success in patients with back pain include patient and pain characteristics (age, time since onset of pain and spinal surgery, pain medication history, position and size of pain area, pain severity, mixed nociceptive/neuropathic pain, health-related quality of life, depression, functional disability, and leg pain status), implant procedure variables (the number and position of leads, paresthesia coverage, and amount of pain relief during the trial), and programming (number of programs, cathodes, and anodes; pulse rate; pulse width; and percentage of device usage).

CONCLUSIONS

While these analyses are exploratory and restricted to a limited sample size, they suggest variables that may play a role in predicting a therapeutic response. These results, however, are informative only and should be cautiously interpreted. Future research to validate the variables in a clinical study is needed.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation as Add-On Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients

OBJECTIVE

Presently, there is only limited evidence about the cost-effectiveness of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) and no evidence to date on the cost-effectiveness of PNFS as an add-on therapy to spinal cord stimulation (SCS). In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, PNFS as add-on therapy to SCS demonstrated clinical effectiveness in treating chronic low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients. We report here the cost-effectiveness of PNFS as additional therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a health-care perspective using the general principles of cost-utility analysis, using empirical data from our multicenter randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of hybrid SCS + PNFS on low back pain in FBSS patients, who were back pain non-responders to initial SCS-therapy, over a time-horizon of three months. Outcome measures were costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Cost and QALYs were integrated using the net monetary benefit (NMB). Differences in costs, effects, and NMB were analyzed using multilevel regression. Uncertainty surrounding the NMB was presented by cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients implanted with both SCS and PNFS, randomly assigned to a group with PNFS either activated or inactive, completed the controlled part of the study. With mean total costs for the SCS + active PNFS group of €1813.86 (SD €109.78) versus €1103.64 (SD €123.43) for the SCS + inactive PNFS group at three months, we found an incremental cost-utility ratio of €25.311 per QALY gained and a probability being cost-effective of more than 80% given a willingness to pay for a QALY of about €40.000.

CONCLUSIONS

From a Dutch national health-care context, when the willingness to pay threshold is up to 60.000 Euros per QALY, PNFS as an add-on therapy to SCS for the treatment of low back pain in FBSS patients has a high probability of being cost-effective.

The Effect of Peripheral Neuromodulation on Pain From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To report a retrospective review of the longer-term results of peripheral neuromodulation in 12 patients with significant chronic sacroiliac joint pain who had previously failed multiple conservative and interventional pain therapies.

METHODS

To allow for the assessment of meaningful longer-term outcome, implants for all 12 patients had been in place for a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 36 months prior to the formal review.

RESULTS

Compared to the preimplantation baseline, the longer-term follow-up revealed a significant and sustained reduction in visual analog scale pain scores from 8.7T 1.1 to 1.1T 1.0 (p < 0.001), with a 75% reduction in analgesia requirement, and improvement in pain impact on daily function from 94.1% T 5.9% to 5.8% T 6.0% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This initial case series has highlighted that SIJ neuromodulation results in the reduction in pain intensity and improved functionality in patients who have already failed conventional medical management and interventional techniques, including RF denervation. These preliminary results merit a prospective randomized trial of peripheral neuromodulation.

Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain: A Two-year Single-center Study

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is challenging to treat. Minimal invasive neurostimulation therapies, such as subcutaneous peripheral nerve field stimulation (SPNS), improve pain relief and quality of life. The goal of the present study was to assess the usefulness, safety, and efficacy of SPNS in patients with CLBP. Twenty-six consecutive patients with CLBP were prospectively included in the study. For trial neurostimulation, two electrodes were implanted vertically at a depth of 1 cm into the subcutaneous tissue, ≤10 cm from the region of maximum pain. Trial neurostimulation was performed in all patients for 14 days. A successful outcome was defined as at least 50% pain relief. To monitor the effects of permanent neurostimulation, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L) were scored preoperatively and at 6-month and 24-month follow-ups. Thirteen patients responded to trial stimulation and had a permanent neurostimulator implanted. The use of pain medication, including opioid analgesics, was reduced in 92% of patients after 24 months. VAS, ODI, and EQ-5D-3L scores were significantly improved in these patients at the 24-month follow-up. The complication rate was 23% (3/13 patients). In non-responders, VAS and ODI at 24 months dropped significantly as well but the decrease was less pronounced compared to responders and had not led to a decrease in pain medication. SPNS is a novel, safe, and effective treatment for CLBP and may have advantages over interventional treatments including intrathecal therapy and spinal cord stimulation.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Back Pain Due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: The SubQStim Study

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of peripheral nerve stimulation utilizing a subcutaneous lead implant technique—subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) plus optimized medical management (SQS + OMM arm) vs. optimized medical management alone (OMM arm) in patients with back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome.

Patients and Methods

Patients were recruited from 21 centers, in Europe, Israel, and Australia. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to SQS + OMM or OMM arms. Those in the SQS arm were implanted with a neurostimulator and up to two subcutaneous percutaneous cylindrical leads in the area of pain. Patients were evaluated pre‐randomization and at one, three, six, and nine months post‐randomization. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity (“responder”) from baseline to nine months. Secondary outcomes included proportion of responders with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity at six months and ≥30% reduction at nine months, and the mean change from baseline in back pain intensity at six and nine months between the two arms.

Results

Due to the slow rate of recruitment, the study was terminated early with 116 subjects randomized. A total of 33.9% (19/56, missing: n = 20 [36%]) of subjects in the SQS + OMM arm and 1.7% (1/60, missing: n = 24 [40%]) in the OMM arm were responders at Month 9 (p < 0.0001). Secondary objectives showed a significant difference in favor of SQS + OMM arm.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the addition of SQS to OMM is more effective than OMM alone in relieving low back pain at up to nine months.

Bilateral Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Intractable Coccygeal Pain: A Case Study Using Dual Lead Intercommunication

Coccygeal pain is a difficult chronic pain problem with mixed response to various treatments. This is a report of a case of coccygeal pain that after failing various conservative and interventional procedures over five years was evaluated with a temporary peripheral sacral fascial lead followed by implantation of bilateral sacral paramedian leads for peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS). This resulted in marked pain control and resumption of full activity. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain score improved from eight pre-implant to one after implant and has remained at that level in follow-up. Peripheral nerve field stimulation has been reported for axial chronic back pain, post-laminectomy pain and sacroiliac joint pain either alone or in conjunction with epidural spinal cord stimulation. Both single and parallel leads have been used to provide wider stimulation but differences in location have not been examined. This is the first case report of the use of PNFS for treatment of intractable chronic coccygeal pain. The effectiveness of PNFS was established for this patient by using a prolonged 10-day temporary trial period followed by a 30-day interval without stimulation during which the pain returned to the pre-trial level before proceeding with permanent implantation, it was clear that in this case, PNFS was effective for pain control. Interestingly, the trial and permanent leads were both in the posterior sacral fascia but not in identical positions yet equally effective for pain control. The observation of the effectiveness of different positions may indicate that at least for peripheral field stimulation there may be significant current spread in the fascia. Two and three months after the implant, we examined the effect of different lead settings and the effect of unilateral stimulation compared with bilateral stimulation with and without interlead communication. The patient feedback in this case provides some understanding of the effect of field stimulation with different lead placements. A trial of a deep peripheral fascial lead for sacral and coccygeal field stimulation is a simple option and may be a reasonable approach to consider in the range of treatments for chronic coccygeal pain.

The Effect of Peripheral Neuromodulation on Pain from the Sacroiliac Joint: A Retrospective Cohort Study

We report here a retrospective review of the longer-term results of peripheral neuromodulation in 12 patients with significant chronic sacroiliac joint pain who had previously failed multiple conservative and interventional pain therapies. To allow for the assessment of meaningful longer-term outcome, implants for all 12 patients had been in place for a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 36 months prior to the formal review. Compared to the preimplantation baseline, the longer-term follow-up revealed a significant and sustained reduction in visual analog scale pain scores from 8.7 ± 1.1 to 1.1 ± 1.0 (P < 0.001), with a 75% reduction in analgesia requirement, and improvement in pain impact on daily function from 94.1% ± 5.9% to 5.8% ± 6.0% (P < 0.001). These preliminary results merit a prospective randomized trial of peripheral neuromodulation.

Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation Therapy for Patients With Thoracic Pain: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Relative to the number of patients suffering chronic lumbar and cervical pain, fewer patients suffer persistent thoracic pain. Consequently there is less literature, with smaller sample sizes, reporting treatment of this cohort. Here, we assess peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS) as a potential treatment for chronic thoracic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 20 consecutive chronic thoracic pain sufferers that responded successfully to PNfS trial. The patients were subsequently implanted with permanent eight-contact electrode linear percutaneous leads within their major area of pain. Patients were followed up at 12 months for outcome reporting. All 20 patients were considered in the statistical analysis, despite removal of three devices prior to follow up.

RESULTS

The average baseline pre-treatment Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score was 7.75 ± 1.4. Following PNfS, the mean NPRS score was 2.25 ±2.14, reflecting a significant average improvement of 5.5 ± 3.31. Three patients were explanted prior to follow up: the first gained excellent thoracic pain relief but pain at the Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG) site could not be overcome, the second achieved excellent pain relief but the PNfS was removed due to recurrent infection and in the final instance, the intervention offered only poor relief and the device removed.

CONCLUSION

PNfS is an effective intervention for intractable disabling thoracic pain, offering sustained and worthwhile pain relief, for the overwhelming majority of the cohort. This may be especially true when considering a combined treatment approach of PNfS and analgesic use to manage remnant pain.

Muscle Activation During Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation Occurs Due to Recruitment of Efferent Nerve Fibers, Not Direct Muscle Activation

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is a potential treatment for chronic low-back pain. Pain relief using PNFS is dependent on activation of non-nociceptive Aβ-fibers. However, PNFS may also activate muscles, causing twitches and discomfort. In this study, we developed a mathematical model, to investigate the activation of sensory and motor nerves, as well as direct muscle fiber activation.

METHODS

The extracellular field was estimated using a finite element model based on the geometry of CT scanned lumbar vertebrae. The electrode was modeled as being implanted to a depth of 10-15 mm. Three implant directions were modeled; horizontally, vertically, and diagonally. Both single electrode and "between-lead" stimulation between contralateral electrodes were modeled. The extracellular field was combined with models of sensory Aβ-nerves, motor neurons and muscle fibers to estimate their activation thresholds.

RESULTS

The model showed that sensory Aβ fibers could be activated with thresholds down to 0.563 V, and the lowest threshold for motor nerve activation was 7.19 V using between-lead stimulation with the cathode located closest to the nerves. All thresholds for direct muscle activation were above 500 V.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that direct muscle activation does not occur during PNFS, and concomitant motor and sensory nerve fiber activation are only likely to occur when using between-lead configuration. Thus, it may be relevant to investigate the location of the innervation zone of the low-back muscles prior to electrode implantation to avoid muscle activation.

The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee

INTRODUCTION

The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) of the International Neuromodulation Society (INS) evaluated evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of neurostimulation to treat chronic pain, chronic critical limb ischemia, and refractory angina and recommended appropriate clinical applications.

METHODS

The NACC used literature reviews, expert opinion, clinical experience, and individual research. Authors consulted the Practice Parameters for the Use of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain (2006), systematic reviews (1984 to 2013), and prospective and randomized controlled trials (2005 to 2013) identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Neurostimulation is relatively safe because of its minimally invasive and reversible characteristics. Comparison with medical management is difficult, as patients considered for neurostimulation have failed conservative management. Unlike alternative therapies, neurostimulation is not associated with medication-related side effects and has enduring effect. Device-related complications are not uncommon; however, the incidence is becoming less frequent as technology progresses and surgical skills improve. Randomized controlled studies support the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in treating failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. Similar studies of neurostimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain, postamputation pain, postherpetic neuralgia, and other causes of nerve injury are needed. International guidelines recommend spinal cord stimulation to treat refractory angina; other indications, such as congestive heart failure, are being investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate neurostimulation is safe and effective in some chronic pain conditions. Technological refinements and clinical evidence will continue to expand its use. The NACC seeks to facilitate the efficacy and safety of neurostimulation.

Spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: current perspectives

Neuropathic pain constitutes a significant portion of chronic pain. Patients with neuropathic pain are usually more heavily burdened than patients with nociceptive pain. They suffer more often from insomnia, anxiety, and depression. Moreover, analgesic medication often has an insufficient effect on neuropathic pain. Spinal cord stimulation constitutes a therapy alternative that, to date, remains underused. In the last 10 to 15 years, it has undergone constant technical advancement. This review gives an overview of the present practice of spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain and current developments such as high-frequency stimulation and peripheral nerve field stimulation.

Peripheral neuromodulation: a review

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is likely the most diverse and rapidly expanding area of neuromodulation. Its expansion has become possible due to both technological and clinical advances in pain medicine. The first implantable systems were surgically placed. However, it is currently commonplace to use percutaneous leads, as this approach has become instrumental in its expansion. The first percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulators were reported in 1999. Cylindrical leads were implanted to stimulate the greater occipital nerve to manage intractable headache. It has been expanded into other individual nerves or nerve plexuses to treat neuropathic, visceral, cardiac, abdominal, low back and facial pain. The use of PNS in modulating organ function in treatment of syndromes such as epilepsy, incontinence and obesity with vagal, tibial and gastric stimulation is under extensive investigation. New technologies that allow easier and safer electrode placement are expected to further expand the uses of PNS. A noninvasive stimulation will open this treatment modality to more clinicians of varying backgrounds.

Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) in chronic low back pain: a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) for chronic low back pain (cLBP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter observational study, 118 patients were admitted to 11 centers throughout Austria and Switzerland. After a screening visit, all patients underwent a trial stimulation period of at least seven days before implantation of the permanent system. Leads were placed in the subcutaneous tissues of the lower back directly in the region of greatest pain. One hundred five patients were implanted with a permanent stimulating system. Patients' evaluation of pain and functional levels were completed before implantation and one, three, and six months after implantation. Adverse events, medication usage, and coverage of the painful area and predictive value of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were monitored.

RESULTS

All pain and quality-of-life measures showed statistically significant improvement during the treatment period. These included the average pain visual analog scale, the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, the Becks Depression Inventory, and the Short Form-12 item Health survey. Additionally, medication usage with opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anti-convulsants showed a highly significant reduction. Complications requiring surgical intervention were reported in 9.6% of the patients. The degree of coverage of painful areas seems to be an important criterion for efficacy of PNFS, whereas TENS is presumably no predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, multicenter study confirms that PNFS is an effective therapy for the management of cLBP. Significant improvements in many aspects of the pain condition were measured, and complications were minimal.

Subcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation with paddle lead for treatment of low back pain: case report

Introduction. Peripheral nerve stimulation has become a useful tool in neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic and intractable pain syndromes. Method. While most of the reports in the literature describe the use of a subcutaneously placed small diameter cylindric lead, we present a case report of a 37-year-old man who did not have adequate axial back stimulation with such a lead. Conclusion. He had excellent stimulation and reduction of his pain after the device was replaced with an insulated subcutaneous paddle lead.

Assessing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of subcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with predominant back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (SubQStim study): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic radicular pain can be effectively treated with spinal cord stimulation, but this therapy is not always sufficient for chronic back pain. Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (SQS) refers to the placement of percutaneous leads in the subcutaneous tissue within the area of pain. Case series data show that failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients experience clinically important levels of pain relief following SQS and may also reduce their levels of analgesic therapy and experience functional well-being. However, to date, there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of SQS in FBSS.

METHODS/DESIGN

The SubQStim study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing SQS plus optimized medical management ('SQS arm') versus optimized medical management alone ('OMM arm') in patients with predominant back pain due to FBSS. Up to 400 patients will be recruited from approximately 33 centers in Europe and Australia and will be randomized 1:1 to the SQS or OMM arms. After 9 months, patients who fail to reach the primary outcome will be allowed to switch treatments. Patients will be evaluated at baseline (prior to randomization) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients at 9 months with a ≥50% reduction in back pain intensity compared to baseline. The secondary outcomes are: back and leg pain intensity score, functional disability, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, patient global impression of change, healthcare resource utilization/costs, cost-effectiveness analysis and adverse events. Outcomes arms will be compared between SQS and OMM arms at all evaluation points up to and including 9 months. After the 9-month assessment visit, the main analytic focus will be to compare within patient changes in outcomes relative to baseline.

DISCUSSION

The SubQStim trial began patient recruitment in November 2012. Recruitment is expected to close in late 2014.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01711619.

Is yoga an effective treatment in the management of patients with chronic low back pain compared with other care modalities - a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess randomized-control trials (RCTs) to ascertain whether yoga is an effective treatment in the management of patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) compared with other care modalities.

METHODS

A search strategy was formulated with key concepts identified using the PICO process. Four databases were searched in June 2012. Appropriate eligibility criteria were set and implemented.

RESULTS

Four randomized control trials met the inclusion criteria. All four papers found that yoga lead to a significant improvement in back function, and three demonstrated a significant improvement in back pain when compared with certain care modalities. All papers had significant limitations identified, however.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations identified within the studies, the conclusions drawn must be considered conservatively. Although early results appear promising, but further well-designed RCTs are warranted, with multiple, specified comparator care modalities before firm conclusions can be gained.

Peripheral nerve field stimulation: is age an indicator of outcome?

Objective.  This study aims to assess peripheral nerve field stimulation as a treatment option for chronic pain and test for indicators of outcome. Materials and Methods.  We reviewed all patients permanently implanted with peripheral nerve field stimulators over the past 24 months. A questionnaire was used to assess outcomes. Results.  Twenty-seven questionnaires were sent out and 23/27 responded. A significant average decrease of 4.02 visual analog scale points was observed. The average pain decrease for the low back was 3.77 points and 5.9 for occipital implants. An age effect was detected; younger patients (<60 years) reported an average pain relief of 4.79 points while older patients (>61 years) reported an average pain relief decrement of only 2.83 points. Most patients reported decreases in analgesic use after treatment. Pain relief was significantly and highly correlated with reduced analgesic intake and patient satisfaction. Conclusion.  Peripheral nerve field stimulation is a safe, reversible, and effective treatment option for patients with chronic pain, particularly those under 60 years.

An innovative case report detailing the successful treatment of post-thoracotomy syndrome with peripheral nerve field stimulation

INTRODUCTION

The detrimental effects of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome is experienced worldwide; however, an effective treatment regimen remains elusive.

METHODS

We report a case of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome effectively treated with peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS).

RESULTS

In the presented case, the patient underwent permanent placement of the PSfS device after a successful trial period. Upon follow-up the patient has reported even better coverage over her painful areas and admits to 80% and higher reductions in her painful symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Although the data are limited, in the aforesaid case report, post-thoracotomy syndrome was effectively treated with the use of PNfS. This resulted in a significant pain perception reduction, increased quality of life and mobility, as well as decreased usage of oral pain medications. This adds to the accumulating case report and case series data that suggest PNfS is showing great promise as a pain reduction modality. Further, it is minimally invasive, can be trialled prior to implantation, and is reversible. Large prospective studies will be required in the future to further evaluate its efficacy before it can be widely accepted and adopted.

Subcutaneous peripheral neurostimulation for the treatment of severe chronic poststernotomy neuralgia

OBJECTIVE

Poststernotomy pain frequently develops after sternotomy in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, and may affect patients' quality of life. In some cases of severe poststernotomy neuralgia, pharmacologic therapy does not provide adequate relief.

CASE REPORT

We report on a 42- year-old woman who underwent sternotomy for aortic and mitral valve replacement. She developed severe chronic poststernotomy neuralgia that was refractory to medical treatment. After local anesthesia markedly but only transiently alleviated pain, we considered the option of subcutaneous peripheral neurostimulation (SPNS). Plate electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the parasternal region at the site of maximal pain. After a period of test stimulation, the electrodes were connected to a dual-channel implantable pulse generator. SPNS induced paresthesias in the painful area. Revision surgery was necessary twice because of electrode migration. Chronic SPNS markedly alleviated pain (visual-analog scale, VAS, 9/10 preoperatively, 2/10 postoperatively) and allodynia (VAS 9/10 preoperatively, 2/10 postoperatively) at the last available follow-up, 15 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

SPNS may be a viable treatment option in patients with severe chronic poststernotomy neuralgia.

Subcutaneous stimulation: how to assess optimal implantation depth

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous stimulation (peripheral nerve field stimulation) is a novel neuromodulation modality that has increased in its utilization during the last 10 years. It consists of introducing a lead in the subdermal level to stimulate the small nerve fibers in that layer. Unlike other neuromodulation techniques including direct peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, or deep brain stimulation, the precise target is not identified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To date, there is no clear guideline on the appropriate depth or a method to achieve reproducibility of the appropriate depth to place these leads. From clinical experience, we have found that when electrodes are placed in a layer that is too superficial, stimulation is often painful or lacks efficacy. Further, if they are too deep, the patient may not feel adequate paresthesia or get uncomfortable stimulation including, in some circumstances, muscle contractions.

RESULTS

In this small series, we demonstrate a novel concept using a radiofrequency stimulation probe to identify the appropriate depth to place the lead. Reproducibility of results will add clarity to the accumulating data and hopefully increase the chances of adequate stimulation coverage and pain relief.