Spinal cord stimulation and the pregnant patient-specific considerations for management: A case series and review of the literature

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for the Mitigation of Complications of Neurostimulation

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise and international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the mitigation of neuromodulation complications. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® project intends to update evidence-based guidance and offer expert opinion that will improve efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to October 2023. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant.

RESULTS

The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.

CONCLUSIONS

The NACC recommends best practices regarding the mitigation of complications associated with neurostimulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Management strategies for patients with neurologic stimulators during nonneurologic surgery: an update and review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to summarize the perioperative management of noncardiac implanted electrical devices (NCIEDs) and update the anesthesiologist on current recommendations for management when a NCIED is encountered during a nonneurosurgical procedure.

RECENT FINDINGS

Indications for NCIEDs continue to expand, and increasing numbers of patients with NCIEDs are presenting for nonneurosurgical procedures. Recent case reports demonstrate that NCIEDs may meaningfully affect perioperative management including use of electrocautery and neuromonitoring. This review highlights the importance of evaluating NCIED function (including lead impedance) prior to surgery, provides an update on the MRI compatibility and safety of these devices, and reviews the management of patients with altered respiratory drive because of vagal nerve stimulators.

SUMMARY

As the prevalence of NCIEDs in patients presenting for surgery increases, anesthesiologists will likely encounter these devices more frequently. To provide a well tolerated anesthetic, anesthesiologists should recognize the concerns associated with NCIEDs and how best to address them perioperatively.

Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Pregnancy: First Clinical Experiences

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. It is based on the delivery of electric impulses to the spinal cord, traditionally in a regular square-wave pattern ("tonic" stimulation) and, more recently, in a rhythmic train-of-five "BurstDR" pattern. The safety of active SCS therapy in pregnancy is not established, and recommendations are based on limited casuistic evidence. We present in this study clinical data on a case series of six women treated with burst SCS during pregnancy. In addition, we present the ultrasonographic flow measurements of fetal and uteroplacental blood flow in a pregnant patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were included if they had been implanted with a full SCS system at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 2006 and 2020 and received active burst SCS stimulation during a pregnancy. Telephone interviews were conducted, including details on SCS therapy, medication, pregnancy course and outcome, and health status of the offspring. In one patient, the uteroplacental and fetal blood flow was assessed in gestational week 29 by Doppler flow measurements performed during both ON and OFF phases of the SCS system.

RESULTS

Six patients were included with a total of 11 pregnancies. Three pregnancies ended in miscarriages, all in the same patient who had preexisting significant risk factors for miscarriage. Eight resulted in a live-born child with normal birth weight for gestational age; seven were born at term, and one was born late preterm, in gestational week 36. Ultrasonographic Doppler flow, measured in one patient, was normal and did not reveal any immediate changes between burst SCS ON and OFF. Seven children were reported healthy with normal neurodevelopment and one physically healthy but with developmental delays.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented in this study add to the accumulating evidence of the safety of SCS in pregnancy.

Sacral Neuromodulation in Pregnant Women—A Case Report and Literature Review

Millions of women around the world suffer from an overactive bladder and urinary retention. A significant number of them are of reproductive age. For 25 years, SNM has been an effective therapy for treatment-resistant hyperactive bladder and idiopathic urinary retention. The paper presents a case of a 35-year-old pregnant woman with an overactive bladder resistant to pharmacological treatment, who responded positively to sacral neuromodulation. The patient decided against deactivating the neuromodulator and, after an uneventful course of pregnancy, she gave birth by a caesarean section to a healthy female infant. The use of SNM in pregnant patients remains a constant clinical challenge. The current literature was reviewed, but published studies do not provide a clear answer. Further studies with a long follow-up period are necessary to determine more accurately the effects of SNM therapy on the fetus and the course of pregnancy. Currently, it is recommended to deactivate SNM during pregnancy. However, it seems that an individual approach to the patient with information on the risks and benefits of continuing or discontinuing therapy should be the current procedure.

Acute Pain Management of Chronic Pain Patients in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the widespread growth of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), the number and diversity of operations performed in the outpatient setting continue to increase. In parallel, there is an increase in the proportion of patients with a history of chronic opioid use and misuse undergoing elective surgery. Patients with such opioid tolerance present a unique challenge in the ambulatory setting, given their increased requirement for postoperative opioids. Guidelines for managing perioperative pain, anticipating postoperative opioid requirements and a discharge plan to wean off of opioids, are therefore needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Expert guidelines suggest using multimodal analgesia including non-opioid analgesics and regional/neuraxial anesthesia whenever possible. However, there exists variability in care, resulting in challenges in perioperative pain management. In a recent study of same-day admission patients, anesthesiologists correctly identified most opioid-tolerant patients, but used non-opioid analgesics only half the time. The concept of a focused ambulatory pain specialist on site at each ASC has been suggested, who in addition to providing safe anesthesia, could intervene early once problematic pain issues are recognized. This review focuses on perioperative pain management in three subsets of patients who exhibit opioid tolerance: those on large doses of opioids (including abuse-deterrent formulations) for chronic non-malignant or malignant pain; those who have ongoing opioid misuse; and those who were prior addicts and are now on methadone/suboxone maintenance. We also discuss perioperative pain management for patients who have implanted devices such as spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal pain pumps.

Sacral Neuromodulation in a Pregnant Patient With Fowler's Syndrome: A Case Report

Fowler's syndrome (FS) is a condition in which females face chronic urinary retention with abnormal electromyography (EMG) findings in the absence of structural anomalies. A sacral neuromodulation (SNM) device that restores urinary discharge is often used for treatment. It is advised to turn the device off during pregnancy. This is a case report of a 37-year-old pregnant female suffering from FS. The patient was on SNM and underwent two uneventful pregnancies despite the device being kept on throughout both pregnancies. There were no complications, and a healthy term baby was born on both occasions.

Do you really want to deactivate your sacral neuromodulation device during pregnancy? A single center case series

Introduction and hypothesis

The main objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) during pregnancy.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent SNM implantation in our center and subsequently became pregnant. The indication for SNM, timing of device de-activation (if performed), course of pregnancy and urological complications, duration of labor, childbirth term, delivery mode, congenital abnormalities and SNM dysfunctions after delivery were recorded.

Results

Fourteen pregnancies were recorded among 11 women undergoing SNM. Indications for device implantation were urinary retention (7 cases) and dysfunctional voiding (4 cases). Two patients carried on two and three pregnancies, respectively, with the device turned off since the first trimester. They both had to return to self-catheterization and developed recurring urinary tract infections. No major urological complications were recorded among the remaining nine women that kept the device on during pregnancy. A cesarean section was performed in four cases for obstetric reasons, and in seven cases it was planned by the urologist and gynecologist to avoid lead damage/displacement. Three pregnancies resulted in a vaginal delivery, and no association with term of delivery or duration of labor was observed. No congenital abnormalities related to SNM or lead displacement are reported, and only one patient required device removal because of significant loss of efficacy after childbirth.

Conclusions

The use of SNM during pregnancy appears to be safe, without morbidity for the fetus. Moreover, risks associated with switching the device off may be greater than benefits and justify maintaining the electrical stimulation throughout pregnancy.

"Please mind the gap": successful use of ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia for urgent cesarean section in a patient with implanted spinal cord stimulation system for giant chest wall arteriovenous malformation - a case report

Background

The use of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) system to treat medically refractory neuropathic pain is increasing. Severe neuropathic pain can be found in giant chest wall arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), exceedingly rare and debilitating abnormalities, rarely reported during pregnancy.

Case presentation

We present a report of a pregnant patient with implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) system because of painful thoracic AVM scheduled for an urgent cesarean section in which we used lumbar ultrasound (US) to rule out the possibility to damage SCS electrodes and to find a safe site to perform spinal anesthesia.

Conclusions

The use of lumbar US to find a safe site for a lumbar puncture in presence of SCS system in a patient affected by painful thoracic AVM makes this case a particularly unique operative challenge and offers a new possible use of ultrasound to detect a safe space in patients with SCS implant.

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Management: An Evaluation of the Risks and Benefits of Spinal Cord Stimulator Use in Pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

We present a case of a young woman diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) who underwent spinal cord stimulator (SCS) implantation. She had 2 successful pregnancies following implantation.

DESIGN

We evaluated the electronic medical records of the patient following SCS implantation and while pregnant with her second and third children. A phone interview was conducted after her third pregnancy to discuss her experience with SCS use during and after pregnancy.

SETTING

Physical medicine and rehabilitation pain management clinic and obstetrician clinic, affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

SUBJECT

A 26-year-old woman with history of CRPS type I.

RESULTS

This 26-year-old woman was diagnosed with CRPS type I after left knee surgery. All conservative treatments had failed prior to her undergoing SCS implantation after the birth of her first child. SCS implantation brought near complete resolution of her symptoms. When she became pregnant with her second child, she turned off her SCS. Her CRPS symptoms intensified, but she had a normal pregnancy. She turned the SCS back on postpartum and elected to continue its use throughout her third pregnancy. She had a normal pregnancy, and her CRPS symptoms were well controlled. The patient and her children are currently healthy. Her SCS remains functional and effective.

CONCLUSION

Both an SCS and many medications used for pain management in CRPS could cause harm to both mother and fetus in pregnancy. Further research must be done to determine the safety and efficacy of SCS use in pregnancy.

Spinal Cord Stimulation in Pregnant Patients: Current Perspectives of Indications, Complications, and Results in Pain Control: A Systematic Review

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been described as a valuable neuromodulator procedure in the management of chronic medically untreated neuropathic pain. Although the use of this technique has been published in many papers, a question still remains regarding its applicability in pregnant patients. The goal of this paper is to discuss the risks, complications, and results as well as the prognosis of SCS in pregnant patients. We performed a systematic review from 1967 to 2018 using the databases MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO, PubMed, and BIREME, utilizing language as selection criteria. Eighteen studies that met our criteria were found and tabulated. SCS is a reversible and adjustable surgical procedure, which results in patients that demonstrated a significant effect in the reduction of pain intensity in pregnant patients. The etiologies most frequent were complex regional pain and failed back pain syndromes, which together represented 94% of analyzed cases. The technical complications most frequent were lead migration (3%, n = 1). Regarding the risks, the authors did not show significative factors among the categorical variables that can suggest a teratogenicity, while the maternal risks have been associated to the consequences of technical complications due to, among other factors, improvement of abdominal pressure during pregnancy and delivery. Finally, although there are not significative cohorts of pregnant patients, the procedure is still an effective surgical approach of neuropathic pain associated to lower rates of complications and significative improvement in the quality of life of patients during pregnancy.

Chronic pain during pregnancy: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The majority of the reviews and studies on chronic pain in pregnancy have primarily focused on the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options. The purpose of our review was to identify evidence-based clinical research for the evaluation and management of preexisting chronic pain in pregnancy, chronic pain associated with pregnancy, and chronic pain in relation to mode of delivery.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken using the search engines PubMed, CINAHL, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science. Search terms used included "chronic pain" AND "pregnant OR pregnancy" OR "pregnancy complications" from inception through August 2016.

RESULTS

The basis of this review was the 144 articles that met inclusion criteria for this review. Based on our review of the current literature, we recommend 7 guidelines for chronic pain management during and after pregnancy: 1) complete history and physical examination; 2) monitor patients for alcohol, nicotine, and substance use; 3) collaborate with patient to set treatment goals; 4) develop a management plan; 5) for opioids, use lowest effective dose; 6) formulate a pain management plan for labor and delivery; and 7) discuss reproductive health with women with chronic pain.

CONCLUSION

The management of chronic pain associated with pregnancy is understudied. Obstetrical providers primarily manage chronic pain during pregnancy. Some general guidelines are provided for those health care providers until more information is available.

Spinal cord stimulation in pregnancy: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

  Currently, the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy is not recommended in pregnancy because the effects of SCS on the pregnancy and developing fetus are unknown. However, many SCS recipients are women of childbearing age who may later become pregnant. The purpose of the present report is to review and summarize the existing literature on the use of SCS therapy during the prenatal period.

METHODS

  We first present the case of a 38-year-old woman from our center who became pregnant after receiving an SCS implantation. We then provide a synopsis of previous reports that were identified in a literature search. We highlight the key findings from these cases as they relate to the course of pregnancy, fetal development, labor and delivery management, fertility, and technical complications.

RESULTS

  In our literature review, we identified 12 cases of pregnancy in 8 women. To these we add the present case.

CONCLUSIONS

  Women of childbearing age who are candidates for SCS implantation should be tested for pregnancy prior to implantation surgery. They also should be informed about the limited state of our scientific knowledge regarding the impact of this technology on reproductive health. For patients already implanted with SCS, decisions about ongoing use in the event of pregnancy should be made on an individual basis after a careful consideration of potential risks and benefits.