A hexamer origin of the echinoderms' five rays

Formation of Coelomic Cavities during Abbreviated Development of the Brittle Star Ophioplocus esmarki

AbstractIn brittle stars, the coelomic cavities that form during embryogenesis contribute to most of the internal organ systems of the juvenile. In the ancestral mode of development, the coelomic cavities begin with bilateral symmetry and play a minor role in the function of the ophiopluteus larva. However, the coelomic cavities undergo extensive changes during metamorphosis to set up the body systems of the juvenile brittle star. Many lineages of brittle stars have evolved life histories without the ophiopluteus larva. The non-feeding vitellaria larva has rapid development of juvenile structures. This work demonstrates the modifications to the origin and early development of the coelomic cavities in a vitellaria larva. Much of the archenteron forms an unpaired axocoel, hydrocoel, and somatocoel. The posterior-most portion of the archenteron forms the rudiment of the juvenile stomach. The right somatocoel and a portion of the left somatocoel form as invaginations of the lateral ectoderm. Later morphogenesis of the axocoel, the hydrocoel, and the two somatocoels is similar to what has been shown for brittle stars with an ophiopluteus larva. Confocal microscopy and three-dimensional modeling were used to show new details for the later morphogenesis of the coelomic cavities. The stone canal originates as an outgrowth of the hydrocoel between lobes 4 and 5. The hydrocoel lobes have minimal migration after they meet to complete the ring canal. The right somatocoel contributes to a component of the axial complex and perihemal system. A detailed description is given for how the left somatocoel contributes to multiple organ systems.

Opposite asymmetries of face and trunk and of kissing and hugging, as predicted by the axial twist hypothesis

The contralateral organization of the forebrain and the crossing of the optic nerves in the optic chiasm represent a long-standing conundrum. According to the Axial Twist Hypothesis (ATH) the rostral head and the rest of the body are twisted with respect to each other to form a left-handed half turn. This twist is the result, mainly, of asymmetric, twisted growth in the early embryo. Evolutionary selection tends to restore bilateral symmetry. Since selective pressure will decrease as the organism approaches symmetry, we expected a small control error in the form of a small, residual right-handed twist. We found that the mouth-eyes-nose (rostral head) region shows a left-offset with respect to the ears (posterior head) by up to 0.8° (P < 0.01, Bonferroni-corrected). Moreover, this systematic aurofacial asymmetry was larger in young children (on average up to 3°) and reduced with age. Finally, we predicted and found a right-sided bias for hugging (78%) and a left-sided bias for kissing (69%). Thus, all predictions were confirmed by the data. These results are all in support of the ATH, whereas the pattern of results is not (or only partly) explained by existing alternative theories. As of the present results, the ATH is the first theory for the contralateral forebrain and the optic chiasm whose predictions have been tested empirically. We conclude that humans (and all other vertebrates) are fundamentally asymmetric, both in their anatomy and their behavior. This supports the thesis that the approximate bilateral symmetry of vertebrates is a secondary feature, despite their being bilaterians.

An ancestral axial twist explains the contralateral forebrain and the optic chiasm in vertebrates

Among the best-known facts of the brain are the contralateral visual, auditory, sensational, and motor mappings in the forebrain. How and why did these evolve? The few theories to this question provide functional answers, such as better networks for visuomotor control. However, these theories contradict the data, as discussed here. Instead we propose that a 90-deg turn on the left side evolved in a common ancestor of all vertebrates. Compensatory migrations of the tissues during development restore body symmetry. Eyes, nostrils and forebrain compensate in the direction of the turn, whereas more caudal structures migrate in the opposite direction. As a result of these opposite migrations the forebrain becomes crossed and inverted with respect to the rest of the nervous system. We show that such compensatory migratory movements can indeed be observed in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) and the chick (Gallus gallus). With a model we show how the axial twist hypothesis predicts that an optic chiasm should develop on the ventral side of the brain, whereas the olfactory tract should be uncrossed. In addition, the hypothesis explains the decussation of the trochlear nerve, why olfaction is non-crossed, why the cerebellar hemispheres represent the ipsilateral bodyside, why in sharks the forebrain halves each represent the ipsilateral eye, why the heart and other inner organs are asymmetric in the body. Due to the poor fossil record, the possible evolutionary scenarios remain speculative. Molecular evidence does support the hypothesis. The findings may shed new insight on the problematic structure of the forebrain.