Four-dimensional computed tomography-based respiratory-gated whole-abdominal intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ovarian cancer: a feasibility study

Helical tomotherapy versus conventional radiation to deliver abdominopelvic radiation

While whole abdominopelvic radiation (APRT) provided satisfactory radiation dosimetry for the treatment of cancers with peritoneal dissemination, APRT was abandoned due to unsatisfactory tumor control from necessary radiation shielding of vital organs. Our goal was to develop a helical tomotherapy (TOMO) abdominopelvic radiation technique improving target tissue coverage while dose-limiting vital organs, especially hematopoietic bone marrow. This study reports our clinical development of a TOMO abdominopelvic radiation technique for treatment of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Novel chemoradiosensitizing agent clinical trials incorporating our TOMO abdominopelvic radiation technique for treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer are under development.

Management of the baseline shift using a new and simple method for respiratory-gated radiation therapy: detectability and effectiveness of a flexible monitoring system

PURPOSE

In respiratory-gated radiation therapy, a baseline shift decreases the accuracy of target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) sparing. The effectiveness of audio-feedback and audio-visual feedback in correcting the baseline shift in the breathing pattern of the patient has been demonstrated previously. However, the baseline shift derived from the intrafraction motion of the patient's body cannot be corrected by these methods. In the present study, the authors designed and developed a simple and flexible system.

METHODS

The system consisted of a web camera and a computer running our in-house software. The in-house software was adapted to template matching and also to no preimage processing. The system was capable of monitoring the baseline shift in the intrafraction motion of the patient's body. Another marker box was used to monitor the baseline shift due to the flexible setups required of a marker box for gated signals. The system accuracy was evaluated by employing a respiratory motion phantom and was found to be within AAPM Task Group 142 tolerance (positional accuracy <2 mm and temporal accuracy <100 ms) for respiratory-gated radiation therapy. Additionally, the effectiveness of this flexible and independent system in gated treatment was investigated in healthy volunteers, in terms of the results from the differences in the baseline shift detectable between the marker positions, which the authors evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

The movement of the marker on the sternum [1.599 +/- 0.622 mm (1 SD)] was substantially decreased as compared with the abdomen [6.547 +/- 0.962 mm (1 SD)]. Additionally, in all of the volunteers, the baseline shifts for the sternum [-0.136 +/- 0.868 (2 SD)] were in better agreement with the nominal baseline shifts than was the case for the abdomen [-0.722 +/- 1.56 mm (2 SD)]. The baseline shifts could be accurately measured and detected using the monitoring system, which could acquire the movement of the marker on the sternum. The baseline shift-monitoring system with the displacement-based methods for highly accurate respiratory-gated treatments should be used to make most of the displacement-based gating methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated radiation therapy facilitates margin reduction for the planning target volumes and the OARs, but highly accurate irradiation is needed to achieve target coverage and OAR sparing with a small margin. The baseline shifts can affect treatment not only with the respiratory gating system but also without the system. Our system can manage the baseline shift and also enables treatment irradiation to be undertaken with high accuracy.

Whole-abdominal IMRT for advanced ovarian carcinoma: planning issues and feasibility

INTRODUCTION

Despite enormous efforts to improve therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, outcome remains poor even with the advent cisplatinum-based chemotherapy regimen or taxanes with over 70% of patients developing local failure. Several trials were able to establish the potential benefit of adjuvant whole abdominal RT (WAI) though at the cost of sometimes marked side-effects. New technologies like IMRT have the potential of sparing normal tissues thus also potentially limiting treatment-related toxicity, hence a phase I trial was initiated to evaluate potential clinical benefit of WAI with IMRT. We intended to demonstrate that whole-abdominal IMRT is feasible and can be used in a routine clinical setting.

METHODS

A water-equivalent phantom containing OARs was created simulating organ shape of the upper abdomen to investigate the necessary number of beams for the upper abdominal target irrespective of the number of segments and hence treatment times. We prescribed a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions to the median of the target. IMRT treatment plans for three patients with advanced ovarian cancer were created using 2 isocentres and between 12 and 14 beams while restricting the number of segments so as to restrict treatment times to less than 45 min. Dose to OARs such as kidneys and liver was strictly limited even below established maxima.

RESULTS

In the phantom plans, no clear indication as to the optimum number of beams could be shown though there seems to be a slight trend toward a higher number of beams yielding better results. Examples demonstrating clinically inacceptable dose distributions for plans using only 9 beams. Acceptable treatment plans for real patients could be achieved using 12-14 beams and 2 isocentres. Treatment plans consisted of 264-286 segments resulting in an overall treatment time of approximately 37-45 min. Mean doses to the kidneys could be limited to 29.3% [23.1-33.2%] (right), and 26.8% [21-30.4%] (left). 50% of the liver received less than 72.4% [61-83%].

CONCLUSION

IMRT for whole abdominal irradiation in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma is applicable and feasible though treatment planning is complex and time-consuming. There is a significant reduction of dose to critical organs by using IMRT while maintaining target volume coverage.

Whole abdomen radiation therapy in ovarian cancers: a comparison between fixed beam and volumetric arc based intensity modulation

Purpose

A study was performed to assess dosimetric characteristics of volumetric modulated arcs (RapidArc, RA) and fixed field intensity modulated therapy (IMRT) for Whole Abdomen Radiotherapy (WAR) after ovarian cancer.

Methods and Materials

Plans for IMRT and RA were optimised for 5 patients prescribing 25 Gy to the whole abdomen (PTV_WAR) and 45 Gy to the pelvis and pelvic nodes (PTV_Pelvis) with Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) technique. Plans were investigated for 6 MV (RA6, IMRT6) and 15 MV (RA15, IMRT15) photons. Objectives were: for both PTVs V_90% > 95%, for PTV_Pelvis: D_max < 105%; for organs at risk, maximal sparing was required. The MU and delivery time measured treatment efficiency. Pre-treatment Quality assurance was scored with Gamma Agreement Index (GAI) with 3% and 3 mm thresholds.

Results

IMRT and RapidArc resulted comparable for target coverage. For PTV_WAR, V_90% was 99.8 ± 0.2% and 93.4 ± 7.3% for IMRT6 and IMRT15, and 98.4 ± 1.7 and 98.6 ± 0.9% for RA6 and RA15. Target coverage resulted improved for PTV_Pelvis. Dose homogeneity resulted slightly improved by RA (Uniformity was defined as U_5-95% = D_5%-D_95%/D_mean). U₅-_95% for PTV_WAR was 0.34 ± 0.05 and 0.32 ± 0.06 (IMRT6 and IMRT15), 0.30 ± 0.03 and 0.26 ± 0.04 (RA6 and RA15); for PTV_Pelvis, it resulted equal to 0.1 for all techniques. For organs at risk, small differences were observed between the techniques. MU resulted 3130 ± 221 (IMRT6), 2841 ± 318 (IMRT15), 538 ± 29 (RA6), 635 ± 139 (RA15); the average measured treatment time was 18.0 ± 0.8 and 17.4 ± 2.2 minutes (IMRT6 and IMRT15) and 4.8 ± 0.2 (RA6 and RA15). GAI_IMRT6 = 97.3 ± 2.6%, GAI_IMRT15 = 94.4 ± 2.1%, GAI_RA6 = 98.7 ± 1.0% and GAI_RA15 = 95.7 ± 3.7%.

Conclusion

RapidArc showed to be a solution to WAR treatments offering good dosimetric features with significant logistic improvements compared to IMRT.

Treatment planning of epithelial ovarian cancers using helical tomotherapy

Whole abdomen radiotherapy (WAR) for epithelial ovarian cancer, though effective, has been used sparingly due to inadequate target coverage and poor sparing of organs at risk (OAR) leading to significantly higher toxicities. Newer radiation techniques have shown potential for significant improvement in the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this study was to evaluate helical tomotherapy (HT) for WAR. The objective parameters were to obtain uniform and adequate target coverage with maximum OAR sparing. HT plans were generated for five patients with field width of 5.0/2.5 cm, modulation factor of 3.5/3.0, and a pitch of 0.3. A dose of 25 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the abdomen with a simultaneous boost of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis. Dose‐volume parameters and various indices were analyzed and compared. Mean volume (standard deviation) of abdominal and pelvic PTV (planning target volume) was 6630 ± 450 cm3 and 1235 ± 98 cm3, respectively. Mean length of PTV in cranio‐caudal direction was 41 ± 4 cm. Volume receiving 95% and 107% of the prescription dose (V95% and V107%) was 95.6 ± 2.7% and 2.6 ± 0.5% for abdominal‐PTV, and 95.7±2.4% and 0% for pelvic‐PTV, respectively. Homogeneity and conformity indices were 17.5±1.7,1.2±0.03 for abdominal PTV, and 5.2±0.7,1.1±0.02 for pelvic‐PTV, respectively. Median dose received by the kidneys, liver and bone marrow was 9.6±1.2Gy,17±2.7Gy and 22±1.4Gy, respectively. HT achieves an excellent coverage of WAR target with simultaneous pelvic boost and better organ (kidneys and liver) sparing. HT for WAR has the potential as consolidative therapy; this is being evaluated further in a phase II cohort study in epithelial ovarian cancers.

PACS number: 87.53 Kn, 87.55. D‐, 87.55.dk.