Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer

Radiomics and radiogenomics: extracting more information from medical images for the diagnosis and prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the most lethal gynecological malignancies globally. Despite the implementation of various medical imaging approaches for OC screening, achieving accurate differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors continues to pose significant challenges due to variability in image performance, resulting in a lack of objectivity that relies heavily on the expertise of medical professionals. This challenge can be addressed through the emergence and advancement of radiomics, which enables high-throughput extraction of valuable information from conventional medical images. Furthermore, radiomics can integrate with genomics, a novel approach termed radiogenomics, which allows for a more comprehensive, precise, and personalized assessment of tumor biological features. In this review, we present an extensive overview of the application of radiomics and radiogenomics in diagnosing and predicting ovarian tumors. The findings indicate that artificial intelligence methods based on imaging can accurately differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors, as well as classify their subtypes. Moreover, these methods are effective in forecasting survival rates, treatment outcomes, metastasis risk, and recurrence for patients with OC. It is anticipated that these advancements will function as decision-support tools for managing OC while contributing to the advancement of precision medicine.

Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian, Endometrial, Gastric, and Bladder Cancers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes as it aids in staging, provides prognostic data, and influences the patient's options for adjuvant therapy. However, there is still contention over its potential in treating cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to look into the published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that have reported the effectiveness of lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Five different electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Clinical trials.gov, ICTRP, and Embase, were used to conduct a comprehensive search. Original RCTs reporting on the impact of lymphadenectomy on the overall survival in various cancers were included. Information related to the study population, intervention, type of cancer, primary endpoints, and key findings of the study were extracted. Quality assessment of the selected studies was conducted using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Rob 2 for randomized trials.

RESULTS

A total of 1693 citations, with 1511 from PubMed, 80 from the Cochrane Library, 67 from Embase, 18 from ICTRP, and 17 from Clinicaltrials.gov were retrieved. Preliminary screening was performed, and after applying selection criteria, nine articles were included in the final qualitative analysis. The total number of patients was 4231, and the sample size ranged from 70 to 1408. Among these nine studies, four studies were on genital cancers (two ovarian cancers, one endometrial cancer, and one cervical cancer); four on digestive cancers (advanced gastric cancers); and one on urinary cancer (advanced bladder cancer). These studies reported that para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve overall survival and disease-free survival in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers, advanced gastric, and bladder cancers. All of the studies had a low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not advised in advanced ovarian cancers, early endometrial cancers with low risks, advanced gastric cancers, and bladder cancers. SNB could be an alternative to lymphadenectomy for ovarian cancer in the future. Clinicians should inform patients regarding the benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in terms of survival and the potential risks associated with it.

Contribution of the cadaveric recirculation system in the anatomical study of lymphatic drainage of the ovary: applications in the management of ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The present knowledge about lymphatic drainage of the ovary is based on carcinological studies, but it has only rarely been studied under physiological conditions. However, it is one of the preferential routes of dissemination in ovarian cancer, and understanding it is therefore vital for optimal carcinological management.Our purpose was to evaluate the feasibility of an innovative technique to study the lymphatic drainage territories of the ovary using a recirculation module on the cadaveric model.

METHODS

We injected patent blue into the cortex of twenty "revascularised" cadaver ovaries with the Simlife recirculation model. We observed the migration of the dye live and described the drainage territories of each ovary.

RESULTS

We observed a staining of the lymphatic vessels and migration of the dye in all the subjects, systematically ipsilateral to the injected ovary. We identified a staining of the lumbo-aortic territory in 65% of cases, with a preferential lateral-caval involvement (60%) for the right ovary and lateral-aortic territory (40%) for the left ovary. A common iliac involvement was observed in only 10% of cases. In 57% of cases, the staining of the lumbo-aortic territory was associated with a staining of the suspensory ligament. The pelvic territory was involved in 50% of cases, with an external iliac staining in 25% of cases and internal in 20%.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides for a better understanding of lymphatic drainage of the ovary using a new detection method, and allows the possibility of improving the teaching for operators with a realistic model. Continuation of this work could lead to considering more targeted and thus less morbid lymph node sampling for lymph node staging in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Effect of different treatment modalities on the prognosis of stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of the SEER database

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer is often poor. Although there are several treatment options for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer, it is not clear which treatment will benefit the patient's prognosis.We conducted an analysis using the SEER database to compare the impact of different treatment modalities on the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The present study conducts a retrospective analysis of relevant data from the SEER database pertaining to patients diagnosed with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2011 and 2020 (n = 5345). Statistical methods including Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox regression analysis are employed to ascertain the impact of different treatment regimens on the prognosis of patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Among patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer, age ≥ 60 and the presence of lung metastases or multiple metastases were identified as poor prognostic factors. Conversely, being Asian or Pacific Islander, married, and testing negative for CA125 were associated with favorable prognoses. In terms of the choice of treatment for patients, surgery plus chemotherapy was the best treatment modality, and timely surgery could significantly improve the prognosis of patients, but there was no difference between chemoradiotherapy alone and the surgery group among patients with lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer is influenced by many factors. In terms of the choice of treatment, patients with surgery plus chemotherapy have the best prognosis. In cases where lung metastases are inoperable, a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy can be used. In other cases, radiotherapy does not improve outcomes in patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. This study provides a basis for the choice of treatment for patients with stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Patterns of spread and genetic alterations of primary endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to characterize the rate of lymph node involvement in a cohort of patients with primary ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Additionally, we sought to quantify the recurrence rate, genetic alterations, and impact of lymphadenectomy on survival in this group of patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with primary endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary without synchronous carcinomas of the female genital tract between 2012 and 2021 were identified. Demographic and disease-related data were collected from pathology reports and clinical records. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using log rank test and Cox regression was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 (range 22-90) years. Histologic grade was 1 in 20 (32%), 2 in 27 (43%), and 3 in 16 (25%) tumors. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage after surgery included IA/B (n=20, 32%), IC (n=23, 37%), II (n=16, 25%), and III (n=4, 6%). Forty-one (65%) patients had pelvic and 33 (52%) had both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. All assessed lymph nodes were negative for metastatic carcinoma. No patients with clinically pelvis-confined disease had tumors upstaged by either lymphadenectomy or omentectomy. Twenty-eight patients (44%) had germline mutational status documented; two had a germline BRCA mutation, confirmed to be pathogenic by molecular studies. Complete staging did not significantly impact progression free or overall survival, after adjusting for age and histologic grade in a Cox proportional hazards model. The recurrence rate was 15% for patients with grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma, 7% for grade 2, and 31% for grade 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no lymph node metastases in patients with comprehensively staged primary endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Staging did not impact survival and may be omitted, regardless of grade. Germline BRCA mutations are rare in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma compared with reported rates in high-grade serous carcinomas.

A Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Objective: To develop a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: Between December 2012 and August 2022, patients with EOC who received computed tomography (CT) and serological examinations and were treated with upfront staging or debulking surgery were included. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify significant risk factors associated with LNM. A nomogram was then constructed to assess the risk of LNM, which was evaluated with respect to its area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and clinical usefulness. Results: Of 212 patients enrolled in this study, 78 (36.8%) had positive LNs. The nomogram integrating CT-reported LN status, child-bearing status, tumour laterality, and stage showed good calibration and discrimination with an AUC of 0.775, significantly improving performance over the CT results (0.699, p = 0.0002) with a net reclassification improvement of 0.593 (p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement of 0.054 (p < 0.001). The decision curve analysis showed the nomogram was of clinical use. Conclusions: A nomogram was constructed and internally validated, which may act as a decision aid in patients with EOC being considered for systemic lymphadenectomy.

Impact of substage and histologic type in stage I ovarian carcinoma survival: a multicenter retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

This international study aimed to investigate the impact of substage, histological type and other prognostic factors on long-term survival for stage I ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Our study was a retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (IA-IC3) ovarian carcinoma treated at four European referral centers in Germany and Italy. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves we compared overall and disease-free survival between the different stage I groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1115 patients were included. Of these, 48.4% (n=540) were in stage IA, 6.6% (n=73) stage IB, and 45% (n=502) stage IC, of the latter substage IC1, 54% (n=271), substage IC2, 31.5% (n=158), and substage IC3, 14.5% (n=73). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for the entire cohort were 94% and 86%, respectively, with no difference between stage IA and IB. However, there was a significantly better overall and disease-free survival for stage IA as compared with stage IC (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed incomplete/fertility-sparing staging (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.99, and HR 3.54; 95% CI 1.83 to 6.86, respectively), and stage IC (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.63 to 3.75) as independent risk factors for inferior disease-free survival, while low-grade endometrioid (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.72) and low-grade mucinous (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.44) histology had superior disease-free survival. Considering overall survival, stage IC (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.01) and older age (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.46 to 3.95) were independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Although stage I ovarian carcinoma exhibited excellent outcomes, the prognosis of patients with stage IA differs significantly compared with stage IC. Sub-optimal staging as an indicator for quality of care, and tumor biology defined by histology (low-grade endometrioid/mucinous) independently impact disease-free survival.

The impact of omentectomy on cause-specific survival of Stage I-IIIA epithelial ovarian cancer: A PSM-IPTW analysis based on the SEER database

Objective

Routine omentectomy is generally performed during surgery for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The current study aims to evaluate the impact of omentectomy on cause-specific survival of Stage I-IIIA EOC patients.

Methods

Patients who presented with clinical Stage I-IIIA serous, clear cell, endometrioid, and mucinous ovarian cancers were selected from the SEER Database for the period between 2004 and 2018. We extracted clinicopathological data and surgical information with the focus on the performance of omentectomy and lymphadenectomy. Binary logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses were conducted to identify the significant factors for the performance of omentectomy during surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) techniques were utilized to balance confounding factors. Multivariate, exploratory subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of omentectomy on cause-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 13,302 patients with EOC were enrolled in the study. The cohort comprised 3,569 endometrioid, 4,915 serous, 2,407 clear cell, and 2,411 mucinous subtypes. A total of 48.62% (6,467/13,302) of patients underwent the procedure of omentectomy during primary surgery, and only 3% absolute improvement in CSS at the individual level was observed, without statistical significance based on multivariate analysis. According to the regression-tree model with recursive partitioning analysis, the procedure of lymphadenectomy was found to be the strongest factor to distinguish the performance of omentectomy, followed by the tumor stage. Patients who underwent omentectomy were more likely to be managed in Stage I than those who underwent lymphadenectomy. After PSM-IPTW adjustment, the inclusion of omentectomy in the initial surgical procedure did not demonstrate a beneficial impact on CSS compared with those who did not undergo the procedure. Exploratory subgroup analysis indicated that the performance of omentectomy improved 5-year CSS in Stage II-IIIA patients. In the sensitive analyses for various tumor stages, omentectomy appeared to benefit only Stage II patients. However, patients across various stages seemed to benefit from the performance of lymphadenectomy, irrespective of the performance of omentectomy on them.

Conclusion

Routine omentectomy may not be associated with survival benefit for patients with a grossly normal-appearing omentum, especially for those with clinical Stage I epithelial ovarian cancers.

CUP-syndrome: Inguinal high grade serous ovarian carcinoma lymph node metastases with unknown primary origin – a case report and literature review

Objective

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) often presents lymph node involvement. According to the paths of lymphatic drainage, the most common site of nodal metastasis is in the aortic area. However, pelvic lymph nodes are also involved and inguinal metastases are less frequent.

Methods

Our report concerns the case of a 78-year-old woman with an inguinal lymph node relapse of HGSC, with the prior positivity of a right inguinal lymph node, after the primary surgery. Ovaries and tubes were negative on histological examination. A comprehensive search of the literature published from January 2000 to October 2021 was conducted on PubMed and Scopus. The papers were selected following the PRISMA guidelines. Nine retrospective studies were evaluated.

Results

Overall, 67 studies were included in the initial search. Applying the screening criteria, 36 articles were considered eligible for full-text reading of which, after applying the exclusion criteria, 9 studies were selected for the final analysis and included in the systematic review. No studies were included for a quantitative analysis. We divided the results according to the relapse location: loco-regional, abdominal, and extra-abdominal recurrence.

Conclusions

Inguinal node metastasis is a rare but not unusual occurrence in HGSC. A reasonable level of suspicion should be maintained in patients with inguinal adenopathy and high CA125 values, especially in women with a history of gynecologic surgery, even in the absence of negative imaging for an ovarian origin.

Impact of lymph node staging in presumed early-stage ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the prevalence of lymph node metastasis in early-stage ovarian carcinoma after systematic lymph node dissection and its impact on indication of adjuvant chemotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated a series of 765 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment from February 2007 to December 2019. Patients with peritoneal disease and incomplete surgical staging were excluded. All cases underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels.

RESULTS

A total of 142 cases were analyzed. Median pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissected were 30 (range, 6-81) and 21 (range, 3-86), respectively. Twelve (8.4%) patients had metastatic lymph nodes - high-grade serous, 10.4% (5/48); clear cell, 17.2% (5/29) and endometrioid, 5.7% (2/35). Any other histology (low grade serous, mucinous, carcinosarcoma or mixed) had lymph node metastasis. Notably, 50% of patients with positive lymph nodes had preoperative suspicious lymph nodes in imaging. The median hospital stay length was 6 days (range, 2-33) and 4.2% cases had grade ≥ 3 complications. A total of 110 (77.6%) patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and all cases had indication of adjuvant chemotherapy after histological type, despite the lymph node status. After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, we noted 24 (16.9%) recurrences. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 86.4% and 98.1%, respectively. High grade histology was the only variable that negatively impacted disease-free survival in univariate analysis [HR 4.70 (95%CI: 1.09-20); p = 0.037].

CONCLUSIONS

We found a positive lymph node rate of less than 10% after lymphadenectomy in presumed early-stage ovarian carcinoma. Lymph node status was not determinant for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for gynecologic cancers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of the current knowledge and recent advances of sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment in uterine, cervical, vulvar, and ovarian cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

In endometrial cancer, SLN evaluation has become increasingly utilized as part of the treatment of early-stage disease, with data showing improved detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis. In cervical cancer, SLN biopsy has also gained increasing traction with studies demonstrating the feasibility and accuracy of SLN detection. Evaluation with frozen section, however, remains limited in the detection of metastases. The prognostic significance of positive SLN in vulvar cancer is currently being investigated, with preliminary data showing lower recurrence rates in patients receiving adjuvant radiation.

SUMMARY

SLN evaluation remains standard of care to detect lymph node metastasis in early-staged endometrial cancer. In cervical cancer, SLN biopsy has been shown to be reliable, while decreasing morbidity without impacting disease-free survival in select patients. The technique and high sensitivity of SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer has been demonstrated in large prospective trials. There are no randomized controlled trials in ovarian cancer that evaluate the role of SLN biopsy on treatment and outcome; current SLN evaluation remains investigational.

Preoperative Predictors of Optimal Tumor Resectability in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Background

Several studies have shown that whether complete tumor resection can be achieved during debulking surgery depends on various patient-related factors. However, none of these studies was conducted among patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in sub-Saharan Africa. In this study, we aimed to determine the preoperative predictors of optimal tumor resectability (OTR) during primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients with EOC.

Methodology

In this study, we reviewed all patients with histologically diagnosed EOC who underwent PDS between January 2011 and December 2020. We included 83 patients with complete clinical records for subsequent data analysis. Descriptive statistics were computed for patients’ data, and binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the strength of associations between patients’ preoperative characteristics and OTR.

Results

The overall rate of OTR was 53.0%, while the rate in advanced EOC patients was 36.1%. In the univariate analyses, pleural effusion, ascites, tumor bilaterality, size of the largest tumor, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, omental caking, peritoneal thickening, significant extrapelvic tumor, serum cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels, and hemoglobin levels were recorded as the predictors of OTR. However, after adjusting for covariates in the final multivariate models, we found that the absence of moderate-to-large pleural effusion (odds ratio (OR) = 5.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.32, 23.71) and having serum CA-125 levels of ≤370 U/mL (OR = 6.80; 95% CI = 1.19, 38.79) were the overall independent predictors of OTR while not having any preexisting comorbidity (OR = 18.21; 95% CI = 2.40, 38.10), and the absence of pleural effusions (OR = 13.75; 95% CI = 1.80, 24.85) or enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes (OR = 11.95; 95% CI = 1.35, 16.07) were predictors of OTR in advanced EOC patients.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the radiological absence of pleural effusions and enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes and having no preexisting medical morbidity and serum CA-125 levels of ≤370 U/mL were the independent predictors of OTR during PDS. The preliminary data generated from this study can be used to develop variables for a prediction model in a future validation study.

Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis and pattern of repartition in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Aim: To determine the rate, repartition and risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the pathological and clinical data of 184 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon. Results: 88% of patients received a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. 70% of patients presented LN metastases at both pelvic and para-aortic levels, while isolated pelvic or para-aortic LN metastases were seen in 16 and 14% of cases, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the rate of positive LNs was higher in patients with serous histology (65 vs 33%; p < 0.001), high-grade tumors (68 vs 26%; p < 0.001), bilateral adnexal involvement (74 vs 27%; p < 0.001), advanced clinical stage (p < 0.001), interval debulking surgery (63.2 vs 36.8%; p = 0.003) and positive peritoneal cytology (79 vs 26%; p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the rate of LN involvement was significantly higher in patients with higher grade, advanced clinical stage and positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion: Serous histology, grade 3 tumors, positive peritoneal cytology, advanced clinical stage, interval surgery and bilateral adnexal involvement can predict LN metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery for advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy is debated in patients with ovarian cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS).

METHODS

A retrospective, unicentric study including all patients undergoing NACT and IDS was carried out from 2005 to 2018. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy were compared in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates.

RESULTS

We included 203 patients. Of these, 133 had a lymphadenectomy (65.5%) and 77 had involved nodes (57.9%). Patients without a lymphadenectomy were older, had a more extensive disease and less complete CRS. No differences were noted between the lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy group concerning 2-year RFS (47.4% and 48.6%, p = 0.87, respectively) and 5-year OS (63.2% versus 58.6%, p = 0.41, respectively). Post-operative complications tended to be more frequent in the lymphadenectomy group (18.57% versus 31.58%, p = 0.09). In patients with a lymphadenectomy, survival was significantly altered if the nodes were involved (positive nodes: 2-year RFS 42.5% and 5-year OS 49.4%, negative nodes: 2-year RFS 60.7% and 5-year OS 82.2%, p = 0.03 and p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy during IDS does not improve survival and increases post-operative complications.

Sentinel lymph node identification in early stage ovarian cancer: is it still possible after prior tumor resection?

Objective

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in ovarian cancer is feasible when tracers are injected before the pathological ovary is resected. This study aims to investigate whether the SLN identification is also feasible in patients whose ovarian tumor has already been resected with injection of the tracer into the ovarian ligaments stumps, i.e. in the event that a frozen section confirms malignancy.

Methods

Patients who underwent laparotomy with frozen section confirming an ovarian malignancy, and those who underwent a second staging laparotomy after prior resection of a malignant ovarian mass, were included. Blue dye and a radioactive isotope were injected in the stumps of the ligamentum ovarium proprium and the ligamentum infundibulo-pelvicum. After an interval of at least 15-min, the sentinel node(s) were identified using either the gamma-probe and / or blue dye.

Results

A total of 11 patients were included in the study, the sentinel node (SLN) procedure was completed in all 11 patients. At least one SLN was identified in 3 patients, resulting in a rather low detection rate of 27,3%.

Conclusion

In this study we showed that SLN procedure after (previous) resection of the tumor seems inferior to detect sentinel nodes when compared to injection of the tracer in the ovarian ligaments before tumor resection.

Trial registration

NCT02540551

Factors associated with the involvement of lymph nodes in low-grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluating nodal metastases in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) patients.

METHODS

Women with LGSOC who had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery comprising systematic pelvic-paraaortic lymphadenectomy were included. Data were obtained retrospectively from 12 oncology centers.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight women with LGSOC who had undergone comprehensive surgical staging were included. Seventy-one (48.0%) patients had metastatic lymph nodes. Preoperative serum CA-125 levels of ≥170 U/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-12.07; p = 0.021) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (OR: 13.72; 95% CI: 3.36-55.93; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of nodal metastasis in LGSOC. Sixty (40.5%) patients were classified to have apparently limited disease to the ovary/ovaries. Twenty (33.3%) of them were upstaged after surgical staging. Twelve (20.0%) had metastatic lymph nodes. Presence of LVSI (OR: 12.96; 95% CI: 1.14-146.43; p = 0.038) and preoperative serum CA-125 of ≥180 U/ml (OR: 7.19; 95% CI: 1.35-38.12; p = 0.02) were independent predictors of lymph node metastases in apparent Stage Ⅰ disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians may consider to perform a reoperation comprising systematic lymphadenectomy in patients who had apparently limited disease to the ovary/ovaries and had not undergone lymphadenectomy initially. Reoperation may be considered particularly in patients whose preoperative serum CA-125 is ≥180 U/ml and/or whose pathological assessment reported the presence of LVSI.

The Development and Validation of a CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram to Preoperatively Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Purpose

To develop and validate a radiomics model for predicting preoperative lymph node (LN) metastasis in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

Materials and Methods

From May 2008 to January 2018, a total of 256 eligible HGSOC patients who underwent tumor resection and LN dissection were divided into a training cohort (n=179) and a test cohort (n=77) in a 7:3 ratio. A Radiomics Model was developed based on a training cohort of 179 patients. A radiomics signature (defined as the Radscore) was selected by using the random forest method. Logistics regression was used as the classifier for modeling. An Integrated Model that incorporated the Radscore and CT_reported LN status (CT_LN_report) was developed and presented as a radiomics nomogram. Its performance was determined by the area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve. The radiomics nomogram was internally tested in an independent test cohort (n=77) and a CT-LN-report negative subgroup (n=179) using the formula derived from the training cohort.

Results

The AUC value of the CT_LN_report was 0.688 (95% CI: 0.626, 0.759) in the training cohort and 0.717 (95% CI: 0.630, 0.804) in the test cohort. The Radiomics Model yielded an AUC of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.696, 0.837) in the training cohort and 0.753 (95% CI: 0.640, 0.866) in the test. The radiomics nomogram demonstrated favorable calibration and discrimination in the training cohort (AUC=0.821), test cohort (AUC=0.843), and CT-LN-report negative subgroup (AUC=0.82), outperforming the Radiomics Model and CT_LN_report alone.

Conclusions

The radiomics nomogram derived from portal phase CT images performed well in predicting LN metastasis in HGSOC and could be recommended as a new, convenient, and non-invasive method to aid in clinical decision-making.

Systematic Lymph Node Dissection May Be Abolished in Patients With Apparent Early-Stage Low-Grade Mucinous and Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether systematic lymph node dissection can confer clinical benefits in patients with apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients with apparent early-stage low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer seen at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with other histological types and those who did not receive necessary adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Data collection and long-term follow-up were performed. According to the removed lymph node number, three groups based on surgical methods were used: abnormal lymph node resection, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and systematic lymph node dissection to control surgical quality. Their effects on prognosis were analyzed in pathological subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were enrolled; 30.1% of patients had serous, 42.3% of patients had mucinous, and 27.6% of patients had endometrioid carcinoma, of which 51 (26.0%), 96 (49.0), and 49 (25.0%) patients were treated with the above surgical methods, respectively. The occult lymph node metastasis rate was 14 (7.1%), and only five (2.6%) of apparent early-stage patients were upstaged due to lymph node metastasis alone. Systematic lymph node dissection did not benefit progression-free survival or disease-specific overall survival of apparent early-stage low-grade mucinous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer but prolonged progression-free survival of apparent early-stage low-grade serous patients (OR, 0.231, 95% CI, 0.080, 0.668, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic lymph node dissection may be abolished in patients with apparent early-stage low-grade mucinous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer but may be considered for apparent early-stage low-grade serous patients.

Endometrial Cancer Lymphadenectomy Trial (ECLAT) (pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with high risk of recurrence; AGO-OP.6)

BACKGROUND

The impact of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence is not reliably documented. The side effects of this procedure, including lymphedema and lymph cysts, are evident.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the effect of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the absence of bulky nodes on 5 year overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II) and a high risk of recurrence.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy will increase 5 year overall survival from 75% (no lymphadenectomy) to 83%, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.65.

TRIAL DESIGN

Open label, randomized, controlled trial. In arm A, a total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is performed. In arm B, in addition, a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein is performed. For all patients, vaginal brachytherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) are recommended.

MAJOR INCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer stages pT1b-pT2, all histological subtypes, and pT1a endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcomas can be included when bulky nodes are absent. When hysterectomy has already been performed (eg, for presumed low risk endometrial cancer), study participation is also possible.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients with pT1a, G1 or 2 of type 1 histology or uterine sarcomas (except for carcinosarcomas), endometrial cancers of FIGO stage III or IV (except for microscopic lymph node metastases) or visual extrauterine disease.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Overall survival calculated from the date of randomization until death.

SAMPLE SIZE

640 patients will be enrolled in the study.

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

At present, 252 patients have been recruited. Based on this, accrual should be completed in 2025. Results should be presented in 2031.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03438474.

Outcomes of comprehensive lymphadenectomy for patients with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma and rare histologic sub-types

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy at the time of primary debulking surgery for patients with rare histologic sub-types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and clinically advanced stage disease who underwent complete gross resection.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with stage III-IV clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous, and low-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery and achieved complete gross resection were identified. Patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy and those who underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy (defined as at least 20 lymph nodes removed) were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test and a Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients were identified; 133 (34.9%) patients underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy while 248 (65.1%) patients did not. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patient race, age, presence of co-morbidities, type of treatment facility, disease stage, histology, and extent of intra-abdominal disease (p>0.05). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo comprehensive lymphadenectomy (p=0.42); median overall survival was 51.48 and 47.38 months, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, insurance status, presence of co-morbidities, intra-abdominal tumor spread, stage and histology, performance of systematic lymphadenectomy was not associated with better survival (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.35).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive lymphadenectomy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with rare histologic sub-types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and advanced stage disease who underwent primary debulking surgery and complete gross resection.

Role of Lymphadenectomy During Interval Debulking Surgery Performed After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Objective

The role of lymphadenectomy in interval debulking surgery (IDS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in advanced ovarian cancer remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in IDS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the data of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent NACT followed by IDS.

Results

In 303 patients receiving NACT-IDS, lymphadenectomy was performed in 127 (41.9%) patients. One hundred and sixty-three (53.8%) patients achieved no gross residual disease (NGRD), and 69 (22.8%) had residual disease < 1 cm, whereas 71 (23.4%) had residual disease ≥ 1cm. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed between the lymphadenectomy group and the no lymphadenectomy group in patients with NGRD, residual disease < 1 cm, and residual disease ≥ 1 cm, respectively. The proportions of pelvic, para-aortic and distant lymph node recurrence were 7.9% (10/127), 4.7% (6/127) and 5.5% (7/127) in the lymphadenectomy group, compared with 5.7% (10/176, P = 0.448), 4.5% (8/176, P = 0.942) and 5.1% (9/176, P = 0.878), respectively, in no lymphadenectomy group. Multivariate analysis identified residual disease ≥ 1 cm [hazard ratios (HR), 4.094; P = 0.008] and elevated CA125 levels after 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.883; P = 0.004) were negative predictors for OS.

Conclusion

Lymphadenectomy may have no therapeutic value in patients with advanced ovarian cancer underwent NACT-IDS. Our findings may help to better the therapeutic strategy for advanced ovarian cancer. More clinical trials are warranted to further clarify the real role of lymphadenectomy in IDS.

Current and Futuristic Roadmap of Ovarian Cancer Management: An Overview

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy among women worldwide. In most cases, it is diagnosed late at an advanced stage and does not respond well to existing therapies leading to its poor prognosis. In addition, other factors including epidemiological, complex histological diversity, multiple molecular alterations, and overlapping signaling pathways are also important contributors to poor disease outcome. Efforts have continued to develop a deeper understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and altered signaling nodes that provide hope for better clinical management through the development of novel approaches for early diagnosis, disease subtyping, prognosis, and therapy. In this chapter, we provide a detailed overview of OC and its histological subtypes and discuss prevalent molecular aberrations and active signaling pathways that drive OC progression. We also summarize various diagnostic and prognostic markers and therapeutic approaches currently being employed and discuss emerging findings that hold the potential to change the future course of OC management.

Intraoperative Clinical Examination for Assessing Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

After the publication of the Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) trial results, lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with primary complete cytoreductive surgery is considered indicated only for women with suspicious lymph nodes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer during primary complete cytoreductive surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for January 1990 to May 2019 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer during primary complete cytoreductive surgery, with histology as the gold standard. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled diagnostic accuracy was calculated, and hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was constructed. The potential sources of heterogeneity were analyzed by meta-regression analysis. Deek’s funnel plot test for publication bias and Fagan’s nomogram for clinical utility were also used. This meta-analysis included five studies involving 723 women. The pooled sensitivity of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases was 0.79, 95% CI (0.67–0.87), and its specificity 0.85, 95% CI (0.67–0.94); the area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was 0.86, 95% CI (0.83–0.89). In the meta-regression analysis, patient sample size, mean age, and type of cancer included were significant covariates explaining the potential sources of heterogeneity. Deek’s funnel plot test showed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.25). Fagan’s nomogram indicated that intraoperative clinical examination increased the post-test probability of lymph node metastases to 79% when it was positive and reduced it to 16% when negative. This meta-analysis shows that the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination during primary complete cytoreductive surgery for detecting lymph node metastases in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is good.

Effects of pretreatment radiological and pathological lymph node statuses on prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer who underwent interval debulking surgery with lymphadenectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

AIM

To analyze whether radiological and pathological lymph node statuses affected prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery.

METHODS

In total, 82 patients undergoing interval debulking surgery, including systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, were eligible for this study. We retrospectively analyzed the association among radiological diagnosed retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy by computed tomographic scan before (rLN) and after (yrLN) neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological lymph node metastasis (pLN) and prognosis. Patient survival distribution was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 36 rLN+ cases (44%); there were no significant differences between rLN+ and rLN- with respect to progression-free survival and overall survival. Progression-free survival and overall survival did not differ between yrLN+ cases and yrLN- cases. Thirty-nine cases (47.5%) were pLN+, and both progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in pLN+ cases than in pLN- cases (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). In univariate analysis, FIGO stage, pLN and surgical completion were prognostic factors for overall survival. Moreover, in multivariate analysis, pLN+ was the independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.911-15.69), and pLN and surgical completion were the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival (P = 0.046, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Radiological lymph node status may not be a prognostic factor in patients with ovarian cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Pathological lymph node metastasis affects progression-free survival and overall survival.

Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Survival of Patients with Serous Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A French National Multicenter Study (FRANCOGYN)

Background: The population of interest to this study comprised individuals with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma who were exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Those who had not received systematic lymphadenectomy (SL; Group 1) were compared to those who had received SL (Group 2). Outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and surgical complications. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study in nine referral centers of France between January 2000 and June 2017. OS analysis using the multivariate Cox regression model was performed. PFS and surgery-related morbidity were analyzed. Results: Of the 255 patients included, 100 were in Group 1 and 155 in Group 2. Patient majority was, on average, younger and less comorbid, with predominant R0 surgery in Group 2. Dindo–Clavien score was similar between the two groups (p = 0.15). Median OS was 26.8 months in Group 2 and 27.6 months in Group 1. SL was not statistically significant on OS (p = 0.7). Median PFS was 18.3 months in Group 2 and 16.6 months in Group 1. SL had positive impact on PFS (p = 0.005). Conclusions: patients who had received SL (Group 2) had significantly higher PFS regardless of node-positivity status when compared to those who had not received SL (Group 1).

How to manage lymph nodes in ovarian cancer

The indication for staging lymphadenectomy in patients with ovarian cancer (both early- and late-stage disease) has been a major topic of debate in the last decades. Because the Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) study has recently demonstrated that systematic lymphadenectomy is not beneficial to patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the discussion has become more complex for patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. Further factors, such as differences in the lymph node metastasis rates of different histologic subtypes, which were not known in the past, need to be taken into account. This review is focused on the available evidence concerning lymphadenectomy in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.

The value of systematic lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy during debulking surgery for ovarian cancer remains controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to evaluate the significance of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients treated with optimal cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.

Method

The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched up to October 2019. Only English-language publications of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the role of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with ovarian cancer were selected for this analysis. For overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; for complications rate, we calculated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using both the I² and chi-square tests. In cases of I² being larger than 50%, a random-effect model was used, otherwise a fixed-effect model was used.

Results

Four RCTs involving 1607 patients were included in the present analysis. There was no difference in OS between systematic lymphadenectomy and unsystematic lymphadenectomy (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.94, 1.07; p = 0.90). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in PFS between these two groups (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.87, 1.08; p = 0.62). And postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the systematic lymphadenectomy group (RR = 1.50; 95% CI = 1.34, 1.68; p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer was not associated with longer overall or progression-free survival than unsystematic lymphadenectomy and was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Should We Abandon Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare disease that accounts for 5% of all ovarian cancers and requires surgical complete debulking. To date, the prognostic value of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy remains unclear in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of LGSOC was registered in the Tumeurs Malignes Rares Gynécologiques national network, between January 2000 and July 2017, at 25 centers. All LGSOC were confirmed after pathological review and operated by primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT-IDS). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included, 86.1% were stage III/IV, and 74.6% underwent lymph node dissection (LND). According to the Completeness of Cancer Resection (CCR) score, 83.7% had complete resection. Median OS was 130 months, and median PFS was 41 months. Pelvic and paraaortic LND had no significant impact on OS (p = 0.78) or DFS (p = 0.93), and this was confirmed in subgroups (advanced stages FIGO III/IV, CCR score 0/1 or 2/3, and timing of surgery PDS or NACT-IDS). Histological positive paraaortic lymph nodes had a significant negative impact on PFS in the whole population (HR 2.21, 1.18-4.39, p = 0.02) and in the CC0/CC1 population (HR, 2.28, 1.13-4.59, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic LND in patients with LGSOC improved neither overall nor PFS. A prospective trial would be necessary to validate these results but would be difficult to conduct due to the rarity of this disease.

Metastasis to para-aortic lymph nodes cephalad to the renal veins in patients with ovarian cancer

Background

In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, whether metastasis to para-aortic lymph nodes located cephalad to the renal veins (supra-renal PAN) should be classified as regional lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis remains controversial. This study was a preliminary retrospective evaluation of the pattern of supra-renal PAN metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

The subjects were 25 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian tube cancer who underwent systematic dissection of the para-aortic nodes, including the supra-renal PAN, and pelvic lymph nodes (PLN). Patient factors, perioperative factors, the number of dissected lymph nodes, and pathological lymph node metastasis were investigated.

Results

Supra-renal PAN metastasis was found in 4/25 patients (16.0%). None of the 14 patients with pT1 or pT2 disease had supra-renal PAN metastasis, while 4/11 patients (36.4%) with pT3 or ypT3 disease had such metastases. None of the patients had isolated supra-renal PAN metastasis, while patients with supra-renal PAN metastasis also had multiple metastases to the infra-renal PAN and PLN.

Conclusions

In patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, supra-renal PAN metastases might be considered to be distant rather than regional metastases. Further studies are needed to better define the clinical significance of supra-renal PAN metastasis.

Prognostic Significance of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Patients With Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: The effect of systematic lymphadenectomy (SL) on survival in patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer remains unclear. We evaluated the therapeutic value of SL in advanced ovarian cancer patients who underwent primary optimal debulking surgery.

Methods: A meta-analysis was carried out using articles retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between patients who underwent SL and those who underwent unsystematic lymphadenectomy (USL).

Results: Seven studies that included 2,425 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were included in the meta-analysis. The overall analyses indicated significantly improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.84, P < 0.01] but not PFS (HR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.69–1.15, P = 0.38) in patients who underwent SL compared to those who underwent USL. Subgroup analyses based on study type, study quality, total numbers of patients, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage provided similar results. However, subgroup analysis of patients with no residual tumor revealed that SL was not associated with improved OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66–1.00, P = 0.05) or PFS (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.91–1.30, P = 0.33).

Conclusions: In patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer, SL may improve OS but not PFS. However, SL does not provide a survival advantage when macroscopically complete resection of all visible tumors is achieved.

Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Cancer: Is It Still Justified?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to determine, in the light of recent evidences, the role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The lymphadenectomy in ovarian neoplasms (LION) trial reports no better outcomes and higher complication and mortality rates associated with lymphadenectomy. Even if performed by expert hands, lymphadenectomy has a cost in terms of longer operative time, blood loss, higher rates of transfusions, and intensive unit care. If on the one hand retroperitoneal staging is not correlated to survival benefits both in early and advanced ovarian cancer, on the other hand it is associated with an increased surgery-related morbidity. Surgical treatment of isolated nodal recurrences seems to be feasible and associated with survival benefits.

[Are there still indications of lymph node dissection in epithelial ovarian cancers after the LION trial?]

In March 2019, Harter et al. published the results of the LION study (Lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms) which raises the question of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). These results influenced the new French recommendations published in December 2018 by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). Thus, it no longer seems consistent to perform a systematic lymphadenectomy for patients for whom there is no argument for nodal involvement, when a macroscopic complete peritoneal cytoreductive surgery has been performed. The question of preoperative lymph node assessment is therefore essential, whereas more than half of the patients in the LION study had metastatic lymph node involvement that was histologically proven. For the assessment of lymph node status by imaging, superior sensitivity for Positron Emission Tomography is demonstrated in comparison with CT-scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nevertheless, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT-scan with contrast injection remains the gold standard for this indication. In the absence of suspected involvement, supra-renal, mesenteric, coelio-hepatic, and cardio-phrenic lymphadenectomy are not recommended. Lymphadenectomies should always be performed in the other situations of EOC management apart from the rare case of stage 1 expansile subtype mucinous carcinoma. The aim of this review is to discuss lymphadenectomy indications for the surgical management of EOC by taking into account new data from the scientific literature.

Impact of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in ovarian cancer - time for paradigm shift?

Ovarian cancer is the second most common malignant neoplasm of the genital tract. Staging procedures for ovarian cancer include longitudinal laparotomy, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and infragastric omentectomy as well as systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. In general, the goal of this primary procedure is to achieve the maximum cytoreduction of all abdominal diseases; a residual disease <1 cm defines optimal cytoreduction, however, a maximal effort should be made to remove all gross disease as this offers superior survival outcomes. The role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer has been the focus of gynecological oncologists during recent years. The core issue of the controversy is whether the removal of lymph nodes should be performed only to stage the disease or if the removal itself improves survival. To further comprehend the issue, one must take into account that several studies have shown that systematic lymphadenectomy is associated with a risk of vascular injury, lymph cyst formation, pulmonary embolism and increased post-operative mortality even when performed by surgeons with extensive experience. We present an extensive review of the available literature on the matter, hoping to provide some insight into the true need for such a procedure.

Comparison of survival outcomes in optimally and maximally cytoreduced stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: Women with only peritoneal tumor burden versus women with both peritoneal and lymphogenous dissemination

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the survival outcomes of stage IIIC ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients with both peritoneal and lymphatic dissemination (IP+/RP+) who had undergone maximal or optimal cytoreduction followed by intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy compared to those women with stage IIIC ovarian HGSC with only peritoneal involvement (IP+/RP-) who were treated similarly.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study with the participation of five gynecological cancer centers. First, the stage IIIC ovarian HGSC patients were classified into optimally or maximally debulked cohorts. Then, in each cohort, the patients were divided into two groups; the IP+/RP- group included those women with transcoelomic spreading outside the pelvis with no nodal disease, and the IP+/RP+ group included those patients with transcoelomic dissemination outside the pelvis in addition to a positive nodal status. The survival outcomes were compared between the two groups in each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 405 ovarian HGSC patients were analyzed. In the optimally debulked cohort (n = 257), the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) medians for the IP+/RP- group (n = 69) were 24 and 57 months, respectively, compared to 21 and 58 months, respectively, for the IP+/RP+ group (n = 188) (P = 0.78 and P = 0.40, respectively). In the maximally debulked cohort (n = 148), the PFS and OS medians for the IP+/RP- group (n = 55) were 35 and 63 months, respectively, compared to 25 and 51 months, respectively, for the IP+/RP+ group (n = 93) (P = 0.49 and P = 0.31, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated no survival differences between the IP+/RP- and the IP+/RP+ groups.

A Randomized Trial of Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, although supporting evidence from randomized clinical trials has been limited.

METHODS

We intraoperatively randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB through IV) who had undergone macroscopically complete resection and had normal lymph nodes both before and during surgery to either undergo or not undergo lymphadenectomy. All centers had to qualify with regard to surgical skills before participation in the trial. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 647 patients underwent randomization from December 2008 through January 2012, were assigned to undergo lymphadenectomy (323 patients) or not undergo lymphadenectomy (324), and were included in the analysis. Among patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, the median number of removed nodes was 57 (35 pelvic and 22 paraaortic nodes). The median overall survival was 69.2 months in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 65.5 months in the lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio for death in the lymphadenectomy group, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.34; P = 0.65), and median progression-free survival was 25.5 months in both groups (hazard ratio for progression or death in the lymphadenectomy group, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.34; P = 0.29). Serious postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the lymphadenectomy group (e.g., incidence of repeat laparotomy, 12.4% vs. 6.5% [P = 0.01]; mortality within 60 days after surgery, 3.1% vs. 0.9% [P = 0.049]).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who had undergone intraabdominal macroscopically complete resection and had normal lymph nodes both before and during surgery was not associated with longer overall or progression-free survival than no lymphadenectomy and was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications. (Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Austrian Science Fund; LION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00712218.).

Tumor Laterality in Early Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Left-Right Asymmetry of Pelvic Lymph Nodes

Aim and background

To determine whether left-right asymmetry was present in cases of early ovarian cancer and whether or not the difference between number of removed lymph nodes on both sides of the pelvis is associated with tumor laterality.

Methods and study design

We extracted from the medical data base cases of early ovarian cancer with lymphadenectomy who had been treated between 1994 and 2008. The sample was divided in three groups according to the left-right laterality of the tumor in the pelvis (bilateral, left sided, right sided). For each case, we subtracted the number of dissected lymph nodes on the left side from the number of dissected lymph nodes on the right side of the pelvis (NRightside - NLeftside). We used one sample t test to determine whether the mean of differences for each group was different from zero.

Results

We extracted 48 cases with early ovarian cancer who had undergone lymphadenectomy. The average number of dissected lymph nodes was 24 (SD, 12). In 3 cases, we confirmed the presence of lymph node metastasis (6.3%). In 2 of the up-staged cases, tumor and involved lymph nodes were on the right side of the pelvis. In the third case, the tumor was on the left side, whereas involved lymph nodes were on both sides of the pelvis. For bilateral tumors, tumors on the left, and those on the right side of the pelvis, the mean difference was −0.5 (95% CI, −9.9 to 8.9; t, −0.137; P= 0.90), 0.32 (95% CI, −3.8 to 4.5; t, 0.16; P = 0.87) and 3.5 (95% CI, 0.03 to 7.01; t, 2.09; P = 0.048), respectively.

Conclusions

When the tumor was on the left or on both sides of the pelvis, there was no significant difference in the number of removed lymph nodes. In contrast, when the tumor was on the right side, the number of removed lymph nodes was significantly higher on the right hemipelvis than on the left hemipelvis. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

Is lymphadenectomy necessary in mucinous ovarian cancer? A single institution experience

BACKGROUND

According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines, every patient diagnosed with ovarian cancer (OC) should undergo a complete staging procedure to adequately assess tumor spread. The role of lymphadenectomy in the initial management of primary early mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of pelvic and para-aortic node metastases in MOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients with MOC treated at our Institute during January 2005 to December 2011 were assessed. A descriptive and comparative analysis was conducted. Overall survival (OS) and diseases-free period (DFP) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of 31 patients with MOC, 14 (45.16%) underwent lymphadenectomy, obtaining 190 pelvic nodes, with a median of 9 pelvic lymph nodes removed per patient (interquartile range = 15). There was no evidence of metastatic disease in the dissected pelvic nodes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that complete surgical staging with lymph node dissection has no effect on recurrence, disease-free period, and overall survival of patients with early stage MOC.

Review article: Novel technologies in the treatment and monitoring of advanced and relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial Ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in females in the UK. It has long been recognized to be a set of heterogeneous diseases, with high grade serous being the most common subtype. The majority of patients with EOC present at an advanced stage (FIGO III-IV), and have the largest risk for disease recurrence from which a high percentage will develop resistance to chemotherapy. Despite continual advances in diagnostics, imaging, surgery and treatment of EOC, there has been little variation in the survival rates for patients with EOC. In this review we will introduce novel bioengineering advances in modelling the lymphatic system and real-time tissue monitoring to improve the clinical and therapeutic outcome for patients with EOC. We discuss the advent of the non-invasive "liquid biopsy" in the surveillance of patients undergoing treatment and follow-up. Finally, we present new bioengineering advances for palliative care of patients to lessen symptoms of patients with ascites and improve quality of life.

Incidence and Impact of Lymph Node Metastases in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Surgical Treatment

Background: This study aimed to clarify the impact of node involvement (affected to resected nodes) in optimally cytoreduced (residual tumour ≤1cm) stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer. Methods: 108 consecutive patients with primary stage IIIC/IV ovarian cancer underwent stage-related surgery and got adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up: 53.5 months. All patients got systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Clinical parameters were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were stratified into 3 groups to evaluate node affection: 1) no (0%), 2) minor (>0%, ≤50%) >0 and 3) major (>50% of affected nodes). Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value. Results: On average, 21.3 pelvic and para-aortic nodes were removed per patient (range 1-60 nodes). Minor nodal involvement (node ratio >0-≤0.5: (59%) was most often detected. Increasing node ratio leads to significant decreased overall survival (p<0.001). Significant best overall survival was associated with minor node involvement (node ratio >0 to ≤0.5). Complete cytoreduction correlated with node affection shows significant best prognostic impact in minor node affection compared to incomplete resection (R>0-≤1cm) independent to nodal status (OS p<0.001). Conclusion: Radical surgery is the main factor of improved overall and tumor free survival. Paraaortal and iliacal lymphadenectomy seems to play an important role for prognostic and therapeutic reasons: Prognostic in accurate staging and therapeutic in case of achieved optimal cytoreduction including lymph nodes with histology proven minor node involvement.

Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer without suspected lymph node metastasis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy during primary debulking surgery (PDS) on recurrence pattern and survival after recurrence in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) without suspected lymph node (LN) metastasis in preoperative imaging studies and intraoperative findings.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with FIGO stage III and IV EOC without suspected lymph node metastasis was performed. Patients with stage III EOC due to LN metastasis without peritoneal disease were excluded from this study. Survival comparisons for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and survival after recurrence were performed between patients with or without lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 261 EOC patients fulfilling inclusion criteria, 194 (74.3%) experienced relapse and a further 132 (50.6%) died within a median follow-up period of 48months (range, 6-139months). Patterns of recurrence and CA-125 level at recurrence were not different between patients with lymphadenectomy and without lymphadenectomy; however, patients with lymphadenectomy showed longer survival after recurrence than those without lymphadenectomy (43 vs. 32months, p=0.013). This difference was pronounced in the group with residual tumor <1cm (48 vs. 30months, p=0.010). The survival advantage of lymphadenectomy after recurrence remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy during PDS was associated with longer survival, especially survival after recurrence. The underlying mechanism should be elucidated in future studies.

Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in Apparent Early-Stage Low-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the incidence of lymph node (LN) metastases in presumed stage I-II low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE (time frame, 2015–1975), that analyzed patients with clinical or radiologic presumed early-stage EOC who underwent a complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as part of their surgical staging. The number and site of dissected and involved LNs and the correlation with overall outcome are analyzed. The termlow gradeand also the older termwell differentiatedwere used.

Results

Thirteen of 978 identified studies were selected, and 13 of 75 studies were identified as eligible. A total of 1403 patients were analyzed in these 13 retrospective studies. The final International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging after completed surgical staging was I to II in 912 patients (65%). A total of 338 patients (24%) had grade 1 tumors whereas 473 patients (34%) had grade 2, and 502 patients (36%) had grade 3 tumors. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in 1159 patients (83%), whereof 1142 (82%) were pelvic and para-aortic LN dissections.

In 185 patients (13%), an upstaging from an apparent clinical stage I-II to IIIC occurred because of LN involvement: 64 (35%) of the patients had only pelvic LNs metastases, 69 (37%) had only para-aortic LNs metastasis, and 51 (28%) had both a pelvic and para-aortic LN involvement. When analyzing only the patients with low-grade (grade 1 as the old classification) presumed early-stage disease (n = 273), only 8 patients (2.9%; range, 0–6.2) were identified with LNs metastases present.

Conclusions

The incidence of occult LN metastases in apparent early-stage low-grade EOC is 2.9% in a metaanalysis of retrospective studies. Future larger-scale prospectively assessed studies with established surgical quality of the LN dissection are warranted to establish the true incidence of LN metastasis in presumed early low-grade disease.