Dermatitis artefacta in a 12-year-old girl mimicking cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Dermatitis Artefacta in Childhood: A Retrospective Analysis of 44 Patients, 1976-2006

BACKGROUND

Dermatitis artefacta (DA) consists of self-inflicted skin lesions that the patient denies having produced.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a single-center retrospective clinical review of children and adolescents diagnosed with DA.

METHODS

From 1976 to 2006, data were collected on children diagnosed with DA who were seen in the Department of Dermatology in our hospital. Clinical and epidemiologic features are described. Forty-four children (mean age 12.9 yrs) were selected, representing 21.9% of the total patients with DA recorded (n = 201) during this period.

RESULTS

The most frequent clinical forms were excoriations (16 [36.4%]) and ulcers (10 [22.7%]), followed by blisters (7 [15.9%]), burns (3 [6.8%]), contact dermatitis (3 [6.8%]), hematomas (2 [4.5%]), panniculitis (1 [2.3%]), cheilitis (1 [2.3%]), and hyperpigmentation (1 [2.3%]). Sixteen were located exclusively on the face and neck, whereas 28 also had other locations (upper limbs, n = 10; lower limbs, n = 9; thorax, n = 5; abdomen, n = 4). Cutaneous lesions were treated with occlusive bandages using zinc paste or a plaster splint when necessary.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of DA in childhood. This complicated psychodermatologic condition requires correct diagnosis, appropriate management, and psychiatric assessment.

Facial self-mutilation: an analysis of published cases

OBJECTIVES

Facial self-mutilation is rare. It is usually discussed from the psychiatric or psychoanalytic perspectives but has little prominence in general medical literature. Our objective was to describe facial self-mutilation in terms of its comorbidities, and to outline the different types of facial mutilation, as well as the basic approach to the patients with facial self-mutilation.

METHODS

We undertook a review of all published cases of facial self-mutilation (1960-2011).

RESULTS

We identified 200 published cases in 123 relevant papers. Four major groups of comorbidities emerged: psychiatric, neurological and hereditary disorders, and a group of patients without identified comorbidities. There were three general patterns of facial self-mutilation: (1) major and definitive mutilation, with the ocular globe as primary target--seen in patients with psychotic disorders; (2) stereotypical mutilation involving the oral cavity and of variable degree of severity, most often seen in patients with hereditary neuropathy or encephalopathy; (3) mild chronic self-mutilation, seen in patients with non-psychotic psychiatric disorders, acquired neurological disorders, and patients without comorbidities. About 20% of patients that mutilated their face also mutilated extra-facial structures. Patients with psychiatric conditions, especially those with psychotic disorders, had significantly higher (p<0.05) rates of permanent facial self-mutilation than others. Most treatment plans were very individually based, but some principles, such as prevention of irreversible loss of function and structure, or development of infection are applicable to all patients with facial self-mutilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial self-mutilation is a potentially severe manifestation of diverse conditions. Several aspects of facial self-mutilation remain to be fully characterised from a clinical perspective.