Left ventricular mechanical support with the Impella Recover left direct microaxial blood pump: a single-center experience

Research focus and theme trend on fulminant myocarditis: A bibliometric analysis

Aims

This study intends to explore the research focus and trends of fulminant myocarditis (FM) to have a better understanding of the topic.

Materials and methods

The data were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) database using the topic (TS) advanced search strategy. Many instruments were used to extract, analyze, and visualize the data, such as Microsoft Excel, HistCite Pro, GunnMap, BibExcel, and VOSviewer.

Results

From 1985 to 2022, 726 documents were indexed in the WoS. The United States and Columbia University were the most productive country and institutions. Keywords co-occurrence was carried out and four research themes were identified. In addition, the top three prolific authors, the first three highly cited authors, and the core authors of the author co-citation network were identified. The topics that they kept an eye on were analyzed, and the research areas of key authors were similar to the results of keyword co-occurrence. The hot topics of FM were related to the mechanical circulatory support, etiology, diagnosis, and the disease or therapy associated with FM.

Conclusion

This study carried out a systematic analysis of the documents related to FM from 1985 to 2022, which can provide a guideline for researchers to understand the theme trend to promote future research to be carried out.

Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated with the Impella Device

The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts) device is increasingly used for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to treat acute severe cardiogenic shock (CS). Initial and continued determination of the appropriate degree of MCS is challenging. This study evaluates predictors of mortality in patients treated with the Impella for acute severe CS and outcomes associated with prolonged Impella use. This retrospective single-center study included 204 patients treated with the Impella 2.5, Impella CP, or Impella 5.0 from 2011 to 2018 for acute severe CS. The primary end point was all-cause in-hospital mortality. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 45.1%. Nonsurvivors had a lower initial pH (7.24 vs 7.32, hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, p <0.0001), lower serum CO₂ (19.1 vs 21.3 mmol/L, HR 1.08, p = 0.002), higher lactate (6.8 vs 3.3 mmol/L, HR 1.17, p <0.0001), and used a greater number of vasopressors and inotropes (4.3 vs 2.6, HR 1.44, p <0.0001). Patients with the Impella >4 days (n = 45) had a longer intensive care unit stay (12.6 vs 6.9 days, p <0.001), longer total hospital stay (16.4 vs 11.6 days, p = 0.03), longer mechanical ventilation use (7.8 vs 4.4 days, p = 0.002), and trend toward increased mortality (57.8 vs 41.5%, p = 0.051). In conclusion, in patients treated with the Impella for acute severe CS, initial biochemical parameters and need for vasopressors and inotropes are significant predictors of mortality that can serve as valuable indicators of whether the Impella or higher level of MCS is more appropriate. Patients treated with the Impella beyond 4 days have poorer outcomes and may benefit from escalation of care.

Myocardial depression induced by severe sepsis: successful rescue using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation from initial phase of severe sepsis

A 60-year-old man was diagnosed with severe sepsis caused by pyelonephritis. During transfer to the hospital room, he suddenly developed ventricular fibrillation and the patient recovered after electrical defibrillation. After this cardiac event, his haemodynamics collapsed despite administration of crystalloid fluid. Transthoracic echocardiography was immediately performed showing the oedema and reduced left ventricular wall motion. Since the haemodynamic collapse was too severe to maintain with conventional septic shock therapy, we introduced extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, bridging to administration of antibiotics. As a result of these combined therapies, the patient was successfully resuscitated. From this clinical course, we finally diagnosed that the severe sepsis was concomitant with myocardial depression. Introduction of mechanical support, including extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be recommendable in cases of severe sepsis with myocardial depression resulting in haemodynamic collapse, however, the option of introduction of an invasive approach needs further examination.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes

Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currently, several options exist for temporary MCS. We review the indications, contraindications, clinical applications, and evidences for a variety of temporary circulatory support options, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), CentriMag blood pump, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), specifically the TandemHeart and Impella.

Usage of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Clinical Practice and High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients who require coronary revascularization and present with poor left ventricular function and complex coronary anatomy are at high risk for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Some of these patients are poor surgical candidates because of previous cardiac surgery or significant comorbidities. The recent approval and availability of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices has created an opportunity for the highest risk patients. This article reviews currently available mechanical circulatory support systems and portable extracorporeal oxygenation, describing hemodynamic and physiologic rationales, indications, strategies, and available evidence for their use in high risk PCI.

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

Myocardial dysfunction is one of the main predictors of poor outcome in septic patients, with mortality rates next to 70%. During the sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction, both ventricles can dilate and diminish its ejection fraction, having less response to fluid resuscitation and catecholamines, but typically is assumed to be reversible within 7-10 days. In the last 30 years, It´s being subject of substantial research; however no explanation of its etiopathogenesis or effective treatment have been proved yet. The aim of this manuscript is to review on the most relevant aspects of the sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction, discuss its clinical presentation, pathophysiology, etiopathogenesis, diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies proposed in recent years.

Using the Impella 5.0 with a Right Axillary Artery Approach as Bridge to Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Assistance

Purpose

Impella 5.0 is a short-term left ventricle assist device (LVAD), inserted retrograde into the left ventricle across the aortic valve through a surgical peripheral access. Impella has been utilized for various indications but in the setting of bridge-to-bridge application there are limited reports.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational analysis of Impella utilization at our institution as bridge to long-term LVADs. The primary end-point was survival during Impella support.

Results

Between December 2010 and February 2012, we implanted 20 Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock and, among these, 5 were implanted as bridge to long-term LVADs. In this latter group, mean age at the time of implantation was 44 ∓ 15.6 (range 27-68) years and there was a prevalence of males (80%). Etiology of cardiogenic shock was: decompensated anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (n = 1), myocardial infarction (n = 4). There was no major bleeding requiring surgical revision or infectious complications at the right axillary access. One patient required Impella replacement due to a pump stop. After a mean period of 14.2 ∓ 9.0 (range 6-27) days of Impella support, patients were switched to a long-term LVAD (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 3). One patient died 70 days after implantation of the long-term LVAD due to multi-organ failure, while the remaining patients are still alive after a mean period of follow-up of 108.6 ∓ 66.2 (range 19-191) days.

Conclusions

Our experience shows that an Impella 5.0 implanted through the right axillary artery approach is a valid option as bridge to long-term LVADs.

Optimization of Impella 5.0 implantation using mini-sternotomy approach in postmyocardial infarction cardiogenic shock

The Impella Recover LP 5.0® (Abiomed, Inc. Danvers, MA, USA) is an aortic transvalvular microaxial pump designed to unload the left ventricle and to ensure a systemic flow in severe left ventricular dysfunction. Surgical implantation using femoral or right subclavian approach may be difficult in certain circumstances, such as encountered in peripheral vascular disease, patients with small vessels or during substantial use of vasoactive drugs responsible for vasospasm. We propose a simple and effective technique for implantation of the Impella 5.0 LVAD by means of a mini-sternotomy in patients with postinfarction refractory cardiogenic shock.

The effect of combined treatment with Impella(®) and landiolol in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock is associated with a high mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We developed a new treatment approach named heart rest therapy (HRT) for complete revascularization in the early stage of AMI using an ultra-short-acting β-blocker (landiolol) and an Impella(®) left ventricular assist device and verified the effect of this therapy in a swine model. In 18 male pigs, AMI was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion at the level of the second diagonal branch for 120 min, followed by 240 min of reperfusion. The animals were divided into three groups: group A had no support, group B was supported with the Impella(®), and group C was treated with HRT from 90 min after ischemia to 240 min after reperfusion. Infarct ratio (percentage of the infarct area relative to the area at infarct risk) was significantly reduced in group C (group A 65.38 ± 6.07, group B 39.66 ± 11.16, group C 21.78 ± 7.29), with a significant difference between groups A and B (P < 0.001), A and C (P < 0.001), and B and C (P = 0.006). Heart rates were significantly lower in group C at 30 min (P = 0.01), 60 min (P = 0.022), and 240 min (P = 0.032) after reperfusion compared with group B, without development of hypotension. HRT at the early stage in AMI stabilized the hemodynamic conditions and reduced infarct size and complications in a swine model. These results suggest that HRT can improve the prognosis of patients with AMI.

Emergency cardiac surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a review of the evidence and perioperative implications of medical and mechanical therapeutics

Patients with acute coronary syndromes who require emergency cardiac surgery present complex management challenges. The early administration of antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs has improved overall survival for patients with acute myocardial infarction, but to achieve maximal benefit, these drugs are given before coronary anatomy is known and before the decision to perform percutaneous coronary interventions or surgical revascularization has been made. A major bleeding event secondary to these drugs is associated with a high rate of death in medically treated patients with acute coronary syndrome possibly because of subsequent withholding of antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapies that otherwise reduce the rate of death, stroke, or recurrent myocardial infarction. Whether the added risk of bleeding and blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients receiving such potent antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy before surgery specifically for acute coronary syndromes affects long-term mortality has not been clearly established. For patients who do proceed to surgery, strategies to minimize bleeding include stopping the anticoagulation therapy and considering platelet and/or coagulation factor transfusion and possibly recombinant-activated factor VIIa administration for refractory bleeding. Mechanical hemodynamic support has emerged as an important option for patients with acute coronary syndromes in cardiogenic shock. For these patients, perioperative considerations include maintaining appropriate anticoagulation, ensuring suitable device flow, and periodically verifying correct device placement. Data supporting the use of these devices are derived from small trials that did not address long-term postoperative outcomes. Future directions of research will seek to optimize the balance between reducing myocardial ischemic risk with antiplatelet and antithrombotics versus the higher rate perioperative bleeding by better risk stratifying surgical candidates and by assessing the effectiveness of newer reversible drugs. The effects of mechanical hemodynamic support on long-term patient outcomes need more stringent analysis.

Peripheral insertion techniques for the Impella 5.0 circulatory support system

OBJECTIVE

The Impella 5.0 is a peripherally inserted short-term left ventricular assist device. It is typically inserted through a large peripheral artery such as the common femoral artery. We describe both a graft technique and a purse-string technique in detail.

METHODS

In the course of introducing this technology to our hospital, we independently developed two techniques for the insertion of the device. These novel insertion techniques are different from those described by the manufacturer.

RESULTS

The techniques described have distinct advantages that may be helpful to physicians inserting the device. Common areas of difficulty with insertion of the device and solutions to these problems are also described.

CONCLUSIONS

Insertion techniques for the Impella 5.0 are described in detail.

Mechanical circulatory support in the ICCU

The mortality of acute heart failure (AHF) remains high despite advances in treatment. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be applied in AHF, refractory to conventional measures, to improve outcomes. This article aims to describe the current and the prospective role of MCS in the treatment of AHF. The support strategies and the indications of MCS are continuously evolving, including situations considered as contraindications in the past. Appropriate patient selection, advanced device technology and improved patient management have contributed to the substantially improved results. Evolution in device technology results in evolution of the clinical applications of MCS. Earlier application of MCS, with novel, flexible and individualized support strategies is now feasible. Bridging to recovery is the most intriguing support strategy and bridging to future treatments is feasible with long-term support. The progressively expanding role of MCS in the treatment of heart failure is not reflected in the existing guidelines. Being reserved for refractory heart failure, MCS has been applied to the sickest patients who were less amenable to randomization. This explains the lack of robust evidence, but also highlights the value of the progressively improving results. The anticipated wider application of MCS should be better defined, systematically recorded, and guided.