Effective bilirubin reduction by single-pass albumin dialysis in liver failure

Successful use of single-pass albumin dialysis in the correction of severe hyperbilirubinemia in a case of acute hepatitis E

INTRODUCTION

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare syndrome defined by the rapid loss of liver function in the absence of pre-existing liver disease, which may be secondary to hepatitis A virus, hepatitis E virus (HEV), or to drugs in about 50% of cases. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis enables the elimination of albumin-bound toxins that accumulate in liver failure.

METHODS

We report a case of ALF secondary to HEV associated with severe hyperbilirubinemia. Patient was treated with four consecutive sessions of single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) carried out setting the following parameters: time: 300 min, Qb: 60 mL/min, Qd: 800-1000 mL/min, dialysate containing 4% albumin, citrate: 3-4 mmol/L.

RESULT

SPAD documented good support of liver function. Bilirubin levels were reduced from 22 to 14 g/dL after four treatments. Pruritus was the first clinical sign of improvement.

CONCLUSION

SPAD system can represent a safe and effective therapeutic option.

Efficacy of hemoperfusion with Seraph-100 in series with single pass albumin dialysis in acute hepatitis B infection: A case report

Acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure is a cause of death in patients suffering from viral hepatitis, and many cases need liver transplantation. Infection from hepatitis B virus may range from asymptomatic to severe acute and fulminant hepatitis. In this setting, treatment is mainly supportive as there is no consensus on antiviral therapy based on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Single-pass albumin dialysis is a liver-support technique for patients suffering from liver failure, that has shown effectiveness in the removal of both water-soluble and albumin-bound toxins, which accumulate due to impairment of the liver's cleansing function. We report here the case of a 62-year-old male who presented with a severe acute hepatitis B infection, liver failure, and marked hyperbilirubinemia. Treatment with single-pass albumin dialysis combined with a hemoperfusion device was successful in improving clinical, physiological, and laboratory parameters.

Bile acid nephropathy induced by anabolic steroids: A case report and review of the literature

Bile acid nephropathy also known as cholemic nephropathy is a rare and overlooked form of acute kidney injury that occurs in the setting of severe hyperbilirubinemia. The exact etiology remains unknown, and there is a lack of treatment guidelines for this clinical condition. Anabolic steroids are known to cause hepatoxicity occasionally leading to acute kidney injury. We report the case of a 27-year-old male patient who developed bile acid nephropathy as a result of severe hyperbilirubinemia secondary to anabolic steroids-induced liver injury. He was conservatively managed. We review the current literature touching on the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of bile acid nephropathy in an attempt to shed light on this clinical condition, which may present as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Extracorporeal Albumin Dialysis in Liver Failure with MARS and SPAD: A Randomized Crossover Trial

INTRODUCTION

Liver failure is associated with hepatic and extrahepatic organ failure leading to a high short-term mortality rate. Extracorporeal albumin dialysis (ECAD) aims to reduce albumin-bound toxins accumulated during liver failure. ECAD detoxifies blood using albumin dialysis through an artificial semipermeable membrane with recirculation (molecular adsorbent recirculating system, MARS) or without (single-pass albumin dialysis, SPAD).

METHODS

We performed a randomized crossover open trial in a surgical intensive care unit. The primary outcome of the study was total bilirubin reduction during MARS and during SPAD therapies. The secondary outcomes were conjugated bilirubin and bile acid level reduction during MARS and SPAD sessions and tolerance of dialysis system devices. Inclusion criteria were adult patients presenting liver failure with factor V activity <50% associated with bilirubin ≥250 μmol/L and a complication (either hepatic encephalopathy, severe pruritus, or hepatorenal syndrome). For MARS and SPAD, the dialysis flow rate was equal to 1,000 mL/h.

RESULTS

Twenty crossovers have been performed. Baseline biochemical characteristics (bilirubin, ammonia, bile acids, creatinine, and urea) were not statistically different between MARS and SPAD. Both ECAD have led to a significant reduction in total bilirubin (-83 ± 67 μmol/L after MARS; -122 ± 118 μmol/L after SPAD session), conjugated bilirubin (-82 ± 61 μmol/L after MARS; -105 ± 96 μmol/L after SPAD session), and bile acid levels (-64 ± 75 μmol/L after MARS; -56 ± 56 μmol/L after SPAD session), all nondifferent comparing MARS to SPAD.

CONCLUSION

A simple-to-perform SPAD therapy with equal to MARS dialysate flow parameters provides the same efficacy in bilirubin and bile acid removal. However, clinically relevant endpoints have to be evaluated in randomized trials to compare MARS and SPAD therapies and to define the place of SPAD in the liver failure care program.

Artificial liver support systems

Artificial liver systems are used to bridge between transplantation or to allow a patient's liver to recover. They are used in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure. There are five artificial systems currently in use: molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, selective plasma filtration therapy, and hemodiafiltration. The aim is to compare existing data on the efficiency of these devices. A literature search was conducted using online libraries. Inclusion criteria included randomized control trials or comparative human studies published after the year 2000. A systematic review was conducted for the five individual devices with a more detailed comparison of the biochemistry for the SPAD and MARS systems. Eighty-nine patients were involved in the review comparing SPAD and MARS. Results showed that there was an average reduction in bilirubin (-53 μmol/L in MARS and -50 μmol/L in SPAD), creatinine (-19.5 μmol/L in MARS and -7.5 μmol/L in SPAD), urea (-0.9 mmol/L in MARS and -0.75 mmol/L in SPAD), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (-0.215 μmol/L·s in MARS and -0.295 μmol/L·s in SPAD) in both SPAD and MARS. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in the two systems. This review demonstrated that both MARS and SPAD aid recovery of ALF. There is no difference between the efficiency of MARS and SPAD. Because of the limited data, there is a need for more randomized control trials. Evaluating cost and patient preference would aid in differentiating the systems.

Bile cast nephropathy: when the kidneys turn yellow

Kidney injury is a common finding in patients with liver disease. Bile cast nephropathy (also known as cholemic nephropathy) is an overlooked cause of renal injury in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. It can occur as a result of the toxic effects of bilirubin and bile acids on the renal tubules via several mechanisms. Bile cast nephropathy has characteristic histopathological changes consisting of bilirubin cast deposition in the distal nephron along with tubular epithelial cell injury. Treatment is based on the reversal of liver injury. This review aims to describe bile cast nephropathy in terms of its clinical and morphological features and to shed light on diagnostic techniques. In addition, we present data on management of such nephropathy while reviewing all the reported cases of bile cast nephropathy.

Single-pass albumin dialysis in a child aged six months with phenobarbital poisoning

A girl aged six months was hospitalized because of resistant seizures and was discharged with phenobarbital and carbamazepine therapy. She was admitted to a state hospital with symptoms of inability to waken and difficulty in breathing. It was learned that phenobarbital had been used incorrectly and the patient was sent to our pediatric intensive care unit because of severe phenobarbital overdose. The decision was taken for hemodialysis. Single-pass albumin dialysis was planned because phenobarbital can bind to high levels of plasma protein. The process was undertaken with 1% albumin-containing dialysate, which was prepared manually. After 6 hours of dialysis, the phenobarbital blood level measured 62 mcg/mL (>140 mcg/mL on admission) and the patient's clinical findings were markedly regressed. There are no case reports about phenobarbital overdose treated with single-pass albumin dialysis in the literature. We conclude that single-pass albumin dialysis may be a useful treatment, especially with intoxications of drugs that bind protein at high levels.

Recipient Hyperbilirubinemia May Reduce Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury but Fails to Improve Outcome in Clinical Liver Transplantation

Background. Exogenous bilirubin may reduce experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) due to its antioxidant properties. We studied if early graft exposure to high bilirubin levels in the recipient affects the early IRI and outcomes after liver transplantation (LTx). Methods. In 427 LTx patients, the AUROC curve based on bilirubin and AST at day 1 identified a cutoff of 2.04 mg/dL for the recipient pretransplant bilirubin. Recipients were grouped as having low (group L, n = 152) or high (group H, n = 275) bilirubin. Both groups had similar donor-related variables (age, preservation time, donor BMI > 28, and donor risk index (DRI)). Results. Alanine (ALT) and aspartate (AST) aminotransferase levels were higher in group L at day 1; ALT levels remained higher at day 2 in group L. LTx from high risk donors (DRI > 2) revealed a trend towards lower transaminases during the first two days after transplantation in group H. One month and 1-year patient survival were similar in groups L and H. High preoperative bilirubin did not affect the risk for early graft dysfunction (EGD), death, or graft loss during the first year after transplantation nor the incidence of acute rejection. LTx using donors with DRI > 2 resulted in similar rates of EGD in both groups. Conclusion. Increased bilirubin appears to reduce the early IRI after LTx yet this improvement was insufficient to improve the clinical outcome.

Albumin dialysis in artificial liver support systems: open-loop or closed-loop dialysis mode?

In artificial liver support systems, the open-loop albumin dialysis mode (OLM) is usually used to remove protein-bound toxins from the blood of patients with liver failure. However, there is still interest in the closed-loop albumin dialysis mode (CLM) because this mode may enable not only the regeneration and reuse of albumin but also the miniaturization of artificial liver systems. In this article, we compared the two modes under a fixed amount of albumin in dialysate experimentally and theoretically. The results show that according to the detoxification efficiency in the 3 hour dialysis for removing albumin-bound bilirubin, CLM is better than OLM. The usage efficiency of albumin in CLM is also higher. Moreover, the advantage of CLM is more significant when the concentration of bilirubin in blood is lower. Under a given amount of albumin in dialysate, if the concentration of bilirubin in blood is high, one may further increase the performance of CLM by means of increasing the flow rate of the albumin dialysate or using the highly concentrated albumin dialysate.

Extracorporeal liver support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The mortality in patients suffering from liver failure decreased in line with medical progress over the past decades. However, it still remains unacceptably high and liver transplantation still provides the only definite treatment for many patients. The goal of extracorporeal liver support systems is to improve the clinical condition of patients waiting for liver transplantation and/or enhance the regeneration of native injured liver. Nonbiological liver support systems with pure detoxification and biological liver support systems with assumed synthesis and metabolism in addition to detoxification are currently under clinical investigation. Since patient survival is the most significant outcome parameter, we focus in this review on prospective randomized trials with survival rate as primary outcome parameter.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although a short-term outcome benefit in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure was shown in some of these trials, long-term outcome has not been improved significantly with either of the support systems. In spite of more favourable but yet limited data in patients with acute liver failure, it is too early to draw definite conclusions.

SUMMARY

The future development of liver support systems may provide different combinations of new adsorbents, integrated regional citrate anticoagulation and eventual substitution of irreversibly damaged albumin.

Evaluation of the Hepa Wash® treatment in pigs with acute liver failure

Background

Mortality of patients with acute liver failure (ALF) is still unacceptably high. Available liver support systems are still of limited success at improving survival. A new type of albumin dialysis, the Hepa Wash^® system, was newly introduced. We evaluated the new liver support system as well as the Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) in an ischemic porcine model of ALF.

Methods

In the first study animals were randomly allocated to control (n=5) and Hepa Wash (n=6) groups. In a further pilot study, two animals were treated with the MARS-system. All animals received the same medical and surgical procedures. An intraparenchymal intracranial pressure was inserted. Hemodynamic monitoring and goal-directed fluid therapy using the PiCCO system was done. Animals underwent functional end-to-side portacaval shunt and ligation of hepatic arteries. Treatment with albumin dialysis was started after fall of cerebral perfusion pressure to 45 mmHg and continued for 8 h.

Results

All animals in the Hepa Wash group survived the 13-hour observation period, except for one that died after stopping treatment. Four of the control animals died within this period (p=0.03). Hepa Wash significantly reduced impairment of cerebral perfusion pressure (23±2 vs. 10±3 mmHg, p=0.006) and mean arterial pressure (37±1 vs. 24±2 mmHg, p=0.006) but had no effect on intracranial pressure (14±1 vs. 15±1 mmHg, p=0.72). Hepa Wash also enhanced cardiac index (4.94±0.32 vs. 3.36±0.25 l/min/m2, p=0.006) and renal function (urine production, 1850 ± 570 vs. 420 ± 180 ml, p=0.045) and eliminated water soluble (creatinine, 1.3±0.2 vs. 3.2±0.3 mg/dl, p=0.01; ammonia 562±124 vs. 1382±92 μg/dl, p=0.006) and protein-bound toxins (nitrate/nitrite 5.54±1.57 vs. 49.82±13.27 μmol/l, p=0.01). No adverse events that could be attributed to the Hepa Wash treatment were observed.

Conclusions

Hepa Wash was a safe procedure and improved multiorgan system failure in pigs with ALF. The survival benefit could be the result of ameliorating different organ functions in association with the detoxification capacity of water soluble and protein-bound toxins.

Liver support systems--a review

Liver failure is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate and is the seventh leading cause of death worldwide. Orthotopic liver transplantation remains the definitive treatment; however, because of the limited number of available organs many patients expire while on the transplant list. Currently, there are no established means for providing liver support as a means of bridging patients to transplantation or allowing for recovery from liver injury. Analogous to the clinical situation of renal failure, there is great interest in developing liver support systems that replace the metabolic and waste removal functions of the liver. These support systems are of two general types: artificial and bioartificial livers. In this review, based on a presentation from the 57th American Society of Artificial Internal Organs Annual Meeting (Washington, D.C., June 2011), we review the current status of liver support systems.

Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group

Introduction

Renal dysfunction is a common complication in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. Since the original publication of the definition and diagnostic criteria for the hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), there have been major advances in our understanding of its pathogenesis. The prognosis of patients with cirrhosis who develop HRS remains poor, with a median survival without liver transplantation of less than six months. However, a number of pharmacological and other therapeutic strategies have now become available which offer the ability to prevent or treat renal dysfunction more effectively in this setting. Accordingly, we sought to review the available evidence, make recommendations and delineate key questions for future studies.

Methods

We undertook a systematic review of the literature using Medline, PubMed and Web of Science, data provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the bibliographies of key reviews. We determined a list of key questions and convened a two-day consensus conference to develop summary statements via a series of alternating breakout and plenary sessions. In these sessions, we identified supporting evidence and generated recommendations and/or directions for future research.

Results

Of the 30 questions considered, we found inadequate evidence for the majority of questions and our recommendations were mainly based on expert opinion. There was insufficient evidence to grade three questions, but we were able to develop a consensus definition for acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis and provide consensus recommendations for future investigations to address key areas of uncertainty.

Conclusions

Despite a paucity of sufficiently powered prospectively randomized trials, we were able to establish an evidence-based appraisal of this field and develop a set of consensus recommendations to standardize care and direct further research for patients with cirrhosis and renal dysfunction.

Human serum albumin: from bench to bedside

Human serum albumin (HSA), the most abundant protein in plasma, is a monomeric multi-domain macromolecule, representing the main determinant of plasma oncotic pressure and the main modulator of fluid distribution between body compartments. HSA displays an extraordinary ligand binding capacity, providing a depot and carrier for many endogenous and exogenous compounds. Indeed, HSA represents the main carrier for fatty acids, affects pharmacokinetics of many drugs, provides the metabolic modification of some ligands, renders potential toxins harmless, accounts for most of the anti-oxidant capacity of human plasma, and displays (pseudo-)enzymatic properties. HSA is a valuable biomarker of many diseases, including cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, ischemia, post-menopausal obesity, severe acute graft-versus-host disease, and diseases that need monitoring of the glycemic control. Moreover, HSA is widely used clinically to treat several diseases, including hypovolemia, shock, burns, surgical blood loss, trauma, hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary bypass, acute respiratory distress syndrome, hemodialysis, acute liver failure, chronic liver disease, nutrition support, resuscitation, and hypoalbuminemia. Recently, biotechnological applications of HSA, including implantable biomaterials, surgical adhesives and sealants, biochromatography, ligand trapping, and fusion proteins, have been reported. Here, genetic, biochemical, biomedical, and biotechnological aspects of HSA are reviewed.

Review article: Renal support in critical illness

PURPOSE

This review provides a focused and comprehensive update on established and emerging evidence in acute renal replacement therapy (RRT) for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There have been considerable technological innovations in the methods and techniques for provision of extracorporeal RRT in critical illness. These have greatly expanded our capability to provide both renal and non-renal life-sustaining organ support for critically ill patients. Recent data suggest earlier initiation of RRT in AKI may confer an advantage for survival and renal recovery. Two large trials have recently shown no added benefit to augmented RRT dose delivery in AKI. Observational data have also suggested that fluid accumulation in critically ill patients with AKI is associated with worse clinical outcome. However, several fundamental clinical questions remain to be answered, including issues regarding the time to ideally initiate/discontinue RRT, the role of high-volume hemofiltration or other blood purification techniques in sepsis, and extracorporeal support for combined liver-kidney failure. Extracorporeal support with RRT in sepsis, rhabdomyolysis, and liver failure are discussed, along with strategies for drug dosing and management of RRT in sodium disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that this field will continue to expand to promote research and innovation, hopefully for the benefit of sick critically ill patients.

Liver support systems today

A májelégtelenség – akár korábbi májbetegség fennállása nélkül alakult ki (akut májelégtelenség), akár krónikus májbetegség akut dekompenzációja („akut a krónikuson” májelégtelenség) következménye – magas halálozással jár. A végállapotú májbetegségek következtében kialakult májelégtelenség egyetlen kuratív megoldása ma a májtranszplantáció. Ennek fő gátját a rendelkezésre álló donorszervek hiánya képezi, emiatt sok, várólistán szereplő beteg exitál. A transzplantáció korlátai tették szükségessé olyan májtámogató rendszerek kifejlesztését, amelyek alkalmasak a beteg életben tartására a szervátültetésig vagy a máj regenerációjáig. A korai próbálkozások (hemodialízis, hemoperfúzió, cseretranszfúzió, kereszthemodialízis, keresztkeringés, plazmaferézis stb.) elégtelennek bizonyultak. Napjainkban a májpótló kezelésnek két fő iránya alakult ki: a sejtalapú, úgynevezett bioarteficiális és a nem sejtalapú, úgynevezett arteficiális rendszerek. A bioarteficiális rendszerek élő állati májsejteket vagy emberi májtumorsejteket tartalmaznak. Jellegzetességük, hogy a beteg vérét vagy szeparált plazmáját a májsejteket tartalmazó bioreaktoron áramoltatják át. Elviekben a májműködést ezek a metodikák modellezik a legtökéletesebben, mert a máj szintetizáló- és detoxikálófunkcióját egyaránt pótolják. Jelenlegi formájukban azonban még távol állnak az ideális megoldástól, alkalmazásuk számos immunológiai, infektológiai, onkológiai és financiális problémát vet fel, ezért egyelőre csak kísérleti célra állnak rendelkezésre. Az arteficiális rendszerek a klinikum számára már elérhetőek, bár széles körben még nem terjedtek el. Csak a máj detoxikálófunkcióját pótolják, a szintetikus funkció részben a hiányzó anyagok (plazmaproteinek, alvadási faktorok) szubsztitúciójával pótolható. Idetartozik a hemodiabszorpció, amely az Amerikai Egyesült Államokban terjedt el (liver dialysis unit), valamint a főleg Európában használatos albumindialízis és a legújabban kifejlesztett frakcionált plazmaszeparáció és -adszorpció (FPSA). Az albumindialízis egyszerű módszere a „single pass albumin dialysis” (SPAD), ennek továbbfejlesztett változata a „molecular adsorbent recirculating system” (MARS). Az FPSA high-flux hemodialízissel kiegészített változata a Prometheus-rendszer. Bár a felsorolt módszerek hatásosságát számos kísérleti és klinikai tanulmány támasztja alá, a konzervatív kezeléssel szemben a túlélésre kifejtett előnyös hatásuk bizonyítására még nagy esetszámot felölelő, randomizált, kontrollált vizsgálatok elvégzésére van szükség.