Dihydroergotamine for Early and Late Treatment of Migraine With Cutaneous Allodynia: An Open-Label Pilot Trial

Acute Migraine Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Migraine is a disabling disease of attacks of moderate to severe pain with associated symptoms. Every person with migraine requires treatment for acute attacks. Treatments can range from behavioral management and nonspecific medications to migraine-specific medications and neuromodulation. For many with migraine, having a combination of tools allows for effective treatment of all types of attacks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past several years, four neuromodulation devices have been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of acute migraine, and three medications with novel mechanisms of action have been FDA approved. They add to the arsenal available to people with migraine and focus on migraine-specific pathways to allow for precise care with fewer side effects.

SUMMARY

This article discusses acute migraine therapy, focusing on best-level evidence.

Dihydroergotamine (DHE) - Then and Now: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a narrative review of clinical development programs for non-oral, non-injectable formulations of dihydroergotamine (DHE) for the treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND

Dihydroergotamine was one of the first "synthetic drugs" developed in the 20th century for treating migraine. It is effective and recommended for acute migraine treatment. Since oral DHE is extensively metabolized, it must be given by a non-oral route. Intravenous DHE requires healthcare personnel to administer, subcutaneous/intramuscular injection is challenging to self-administer, and the approved nasal spray formulation exhibits low bioavailability and high variability that limits its efficacy. Currently there are several attempts underway to develop non-oral, non-injected formulations of DHE.

METHOD

A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, then narrative review of identified reports, focusing on those published in the last 10 years.

RESULTS

Of 1881 references to DHE from a MEDLINE/PubMed search, 164 were from the last 10 years and were the focus of this review. Further cross reference was made to ClinicalTrials.gov for 19 clinical studies, of which some results have not yet been published, or are studies that are currently underway. Three nasal DHE products are in clinical development, reawakening interest in this route of delivery for migraine. Other routes of DHE administration have been, or are being, explored.

CONCLUSION

There is renewed appreciation for DHE and the need for non-oral, non-injected delivery is now being addressed.

The discovery and development of inhaled therapeutics for migraine

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a disabling primary headache disorder that requires effective treatments. Inhalation is currently being explored for the delivery of drugs for migraine. Pulmonary-route delivery of drugs shows potential advantages for its use as a treatment, particularly compared the oral route. Areas covered: The authors highlight the current state of the literature and review multiple therapies for migraine-utilizing inhalation as the route of administration. The following therapeutics are discussed: inhaled ergotamine, inhaled dihydroergotamine mesylate (MAP0004), inhaled prochlorperazine, and inhaled loxapine. Coverage is also given to normobaric oxygen, hyperbaric oxygen, and nitrous oxide therapies. Expert opinion: Inhalation of MAP0004 showed promising results in terms of efficacy for acute migraine treatment in phase 3 studies, together with a more favorable tolerability profile compared to parenteral dosing and a better pharmacokinetic profile versus oral or intranasal delivery. In phase 2 trials, inhaled prochlorperazine shows good pharmacokinetics and efficacy, in contrast to inhaled loxapine that did not provide encouraging results in terms of efficacy. The authors see the potential for the use of dihydroergotamine mesylate in clinical practice pending regulatory approval.

MAP0004, orally inhaled dihydroergotamine for acute treatment of migraine: efficacy of early and late treatments

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of MAP0004, an orally inhaled dihydroergotamine, for acute treatment of migraine when administered at various time points from within 1 hour to more than 8 hours after migraine onset.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This post hoc subanalysis was conducted using data from 902 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, phase 3, multicenter study conducted from July 14, 2008, through March 23, 2009. End points were 2-hour pain relief and pain-free rates in patients who treated a migraine in ≤1 hour, from >1 hour to ≤4 hours, from >4 to ≤8 hours, or in >8 hours after onset of migraine, given that patients may be unwilling or unable to initiate treatment at headache inception.

RESULTS

Treatment with MAP0004 was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving pain at all treatment points (≤1 hour after start of migraine: 66% [74/112] for MAP0004 vs 41% [48/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 60% [91/153] vs 35% [58/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 53% [36/68] vs 30% [16/54], P=.008; and >8 hours: 48% [25/52] vs 24% [11/46], P=.007). Pain-free rates were also significantly higher with MAP0004 than placebo for treatment within 8 hours after migraine onset (≤1 hour: 38% [43/112] for MAP0004 vs 13% [15/118] for placebo, P<.001; >1 to ≤4 hours: 28% [43/153] vs 10% [17/168], P<.001; >4 to ≤8 hours: 22% [15/68] vs 7% [4/54], P<.025) but not at >8 hours (19% [10/52] vs 9% [4/46], P=.106).

CONCLUSION

This post hoc subanalysis shows that MAP0004 was effective in treating migraine irrespective of the time of treatment, even more than 8 hours after onset of migraine pain.

Orally inhaled dihydroergotamine: reviving and improving a classic

Migraine pathophysiology continues to evolve, and additional therapeutic receptors influencing unrecognized neural networks within the cortex, brainstem and cerebral vasculature likely exist. Following the advent of the triptans, the use of dihydroergotamine (DHE) declined, because of the ease of use and improved side effect profiles of triptans. However, there remain many patients who respond poorly to triptans, yet respond significantly better to DHE. This may be due to the broader neuroreceptor targets that DHE interacts with, as opposed to the selective receptor activity of the triptans. Unfortunately, DHE is still infrequently utilized compared with other acute treatments such as triptans, primarily because of difficulty in administration and physician unfamiliarity and inexperience with its use. However, the new orally inhaled DHE appears to be as effective with a better side effect profile compared with intravenous DHE, thus eliminating the complexities typically associated with DHE administration.

Remarks on an educational training course on headache

In the last years several studies have been performed on migraine; however, only few topics have changed the clinical practice. Among these, there are physiopathological insights (e.g., allodynia and gastric stasis) or therapeutical evidences (e.g., topiramate) that become very important in the management of migraine and could clarify the different response to the therapies. The aim of a training school on headache should be to link research to practice without transferring contradictory data. To teach is not only to support notions with simple data: we think that knowledge has to be used according to the condition of the patient and the situation in which the migraineurs live.

Migraine: an endemic disease inside the blood–brain barrier

Migraine is a complex neurological disorder that in recent years has received more and more attention. Knowledge regarding this primary headache has increased substantially, both with respect to its pathogenesis and how to effectively treat its symptoms. Over the years, the proposed location of the onset of migraine has moved from the periphery of the nervous system toward deeper parts of the brain. Migraine can be viewed as an inherited failure of trigeminal sensory processing with abnormal neuronal excitability in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis, which, in turn, causes central sensitization and amplification of the pain. Increased activation of the trigeminal nerve during a migraine attack causes release of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inside and outside the BBB. Within the CNS, CGRP promotes trigeminal sensory input and facilitates central sensitization. The future introduction of CGRP antagonists in clinical practice could represent significant progress for acute migraine therapy.

Migraine, allodynia, and implications for treatment

Allodynia--perception of pain from non-noxious stimuli--is a common clinical feature in various pain syndromes. The significance for migraine has increasingly been recognized and the pathophysiology has been investigated in detail. Allodynia is a marker for sensitization of central trigeminal neurons. Intensity and persistence of allodynic symptoms are a function of duration of migraine attacks, frequency of attacks, and migraine history. It has been hypothesized that treatment success with triptans may be severely impaired in the presence of allodynia. However, randomized controlled trials did not confirm that. Treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors and dihydroergotamine does not seem to be limited by allodynia; these medications may be able to reverse allodynia. Data on the new class of calcitonin-gene related-peptide antagonists are not yet available. Additional and more refined randomized controlled trials, focusing on methodological issues pertaining to the determination of allodynia, are warranted to resolve the true relationship between allodynia and treatment response. Regardless--based on available randomized controlled trials--the recommendation prevails to initiate abortive treatment as soon as possible after attack onset when pain is still mild.