Refractory headache: historical perspective, need, and purposes for an operational definition

Rate and Predictors of Intractable Status Migrainosus among Patients Aged 13-18 Years

Purpose

To assess associations for intractable status migrainosus in the pediatric inpatient setting.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 1,805 patients presenting to the pediatric hospital in Dayton, Ohio with status migrainosus from 2017 to 2022, was performed. Among 1,805 patients, 159 received 3 lines of sequentially more aggressive abortive migraine treatment and were included in this analysis. Responders and non-responders were categorized based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain scores from time of admission to discharge with responders having a reduction of 50% or greater in VAS. Patient demographic information, migraine history, headache type, medication history, self-reported pain, anxiety level and co-morbidities were assessed.

Results

Out of 159 patients, 125 (78.6%) achieved the target pain control with decrease in VAS pain score by ≥ 50% from the baseline. The remaining 34/159 (21.4%) patients remained refractory to treatment. Non-responder patients had a longer hospital stay (6.1 days) and greater readmission rate within 7 days (17.6%) compared to responders (4.7 days and .8% respectively). Among the non-responder patients, 14/34 (41.2%) had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to the responder group in which 17/125 (13.6%) had ADHD. Among patients who had comorbidity of anxiety, non-responders had greater severe generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7 ≥15) (6/14, 42.9%) than responders (2/39, 5.1%).

Conclusion

ADHD and severe GAD are associated with poorer response to treatment in pediatric patients with refractory migraine admitted for inpatient therapy. This study highlights the prolonged hospital stay and modest clinical outcomes seen with intractable migraine in 13-18-year-old pediatric patients.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment

INTRODUCTION

It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity.

DEVELOPMENT

The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment

INTRODUCTION

It has been observed in recent years that levels of such molecules as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and, to a lesser extent, the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide are elevated during migraine attacks and in chronic migraine, both in the cerebrospinal fluid and in the serum. Pharmacological reduction of these proteins is clinically significant, with an improvement in patients' migraines. It therefore seems logical that one of the main lines of migraine research should be based on the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of this entity.

DEVELOPMENT

The Spanish Society of Neurology's Headache Study Group decided to draft this document in order to address the evidence on such important issues as the role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies and gepants; and to critically analyse the results of different studies and the profile of patients eligible for treatment with monoclonal antibodies, and the impact in terms of pharmacoeconomics.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical development of gepants, which are CGRP antagonists, for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies offer promising results for these patients.

Refractory migraine profile in CGRP-monoclonal antibodies scenario

Objective

Refractory migraine (Ref‐M) represents a conundrum that headache experts have to face with. We aim to investigate whether a peculiar profile may characterize patients with Ref‐M according to 2020 European Headache Federation criteria. Furthermore, to substantiate a dysfunctional dopaminergic pathway involvement in these patients, we explored the effectiveness of olanzapine.

Materials & Methods

Eighty‐four patients (fitting previous Ref‐M criteria of the 2014) were treated with erenumab for six months. Differences between clinical and demographic features of responder (Ref‐M according to 2014 criteria) and not‐responder (Ref‐M according to 2020 criteria) patients to CGRP‐mAbs were investigated and their predictive values assessed. In fifteen patients with Ref‐M not responders to CGRP‐mAbs, olanzapine was administered (5 mg/die) for 3 months and frequency and pain intensity of migraine attacks were estimated.

Results

Patients with Ref‐M not responsive to CGRP‐mAbs (29/84) when compared with Ref‐M responsive to CGRP‐mAbs showed higher baseline frequency of migraine attacks, medication overuse and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) scores. Logistic regression analyses showed that frequency of attacks, medication overuse and PCS score represent independent negative predictors of CGRP‐mAbs response. A ≥50% reduction of headache days/month was observed after olanzapine treatment in 67% of patients with Ref‐M not responsive to CGRP‐mAbs.

Conclusions

We outline that higher frequency of migraine attacks, medication overuse and pain catastrophizing characterize patients with Ref‐M not responsive to CGRP‐mAbs. In this frame, olanzapine effectiveness on frequency and pain intensity of migraine attacks supports the hypothesis that migraine refractoriness may be subtended by a prominent involvement of the dopaminergic pathway.

Real-life assessment of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine with medication overuse headache

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether erenumab is effective and safe in refractory chronic migraine with medication overuse headache.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentric, real-life study, chronic migraine with medication overuse headache patients who received erenumab were recruited. Study inclusion was limited to patients who previously failed onabotulinumtoxinA in addition to at least three other pharmacological commonly used migraine preventive medication classes.

RESULTS

Of 396 patients who received erenumab, 38% (n = 149) met inclusion criteria. After 3 months, 51% (n = 76) and 20% (n = 30) patients achieved ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% reduction in monthly headache days, respectively. Monthly pain medications intake decreased from 46.1 ± 35.3 to 16.8 ± 13.9 (p < 0.001), while monthly headache days decreased from 25.4 ± 5.4 to 14.1 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001). Increasing efficacy of erenumab over the study period was observed. Allodynia was a negative predictive factor of erenumab response (odds ratio = 0.47; p = 0.03). Clinical conversion to episodic migraine with no medication overuse was observed in 64% (n = 96) patients. No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Erenumab reduced significantly migraine frequency and pain medication intake in refractory chronic migraine with MOH patients.

OnabotulinumtoxinA for the prophylactic treatment of headaches in adult patients with chronic migraine: a safety evaluation

Introduction: Existing oral prophylaxis for chronic migraine (CM) are often ineffective or poorly tolerated. OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) is approved for headache prophylaxis in CM and ameliorates headaches in patients refractory to multiple preventatives.Areas covered: We appraise evidence regarding action mechanisms, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of onabotA in CM prophylaxis. We critically evaluate salient clinical and real-world studies demonstrating its efficacy in improving multiple aspects of CM. We discuss onabotA safety, tolerability, and adverse events (AEs) for CM prophylaxis from clinical trials, post-authorization studies and meta-analyses, including novel pregnancy safety data and comparisons with oral prophylactics. We explore areas of future interest, particularly onabotA safety and efficacy in the context of novel antibody-based prophylaxis.Expert opinion: Clinical and real-world evidence demonstrate onabotA safety, tolerability and efficacy for CM prophylaxis. Most AEs are mild/moderate and self-limiting, with few serious AEs and no treatment-related deaths. Common AEs include neck pain, ptosis, muscle weakness, and stiffness. Modifying existing responder-criteria enables more patients to benefit from onabotA. OnabotA shows superior safety and efficacy to oral preventatives, and appears safe in pregnancy. Future pregnancy-risk register will clarify pregnancy and lactation safety further. Future research comparing onabotA safety and efficacy with newly emergent antibody-based prophylaxis is keenly awaited.

Identifying and managing refractory migraine: barriers and opportunities?

The term refractory migraine has been used to describe persistent headache that is difficult to treat or fails to respond to standard and/or aggressive treatments. This subgroup of migraine patients are generally highly disabled and experience impaired quality of life, despite optimal treatments. Several definitions and criteria for refractory migraine have been published, but as yet, an accepted or established definition is not available. This article reviews the published criteria and proposes a new set of criteria. The epidemiology, pathophysiology and management options are also reviewed.

Endoscopic neural blockade for rhinogenic headache and facial pain: 2011 update

BACKGROUND

Over 45 million Americans suffer from recurrent headaches, and an estimated $11.9 million was spent on doctor's visits for rhinogenic pain last year. Sphenopalatine blocks have been described for various facial pain syndromes, but their use and the type of blockade agents remain controversial. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that endoscopic nerve blocks, using a mixture of bupivicaine and triamcinolone-40, injected into the anterior ethmoid or sphenopalatine regions, can be a relative safe and effective option for refractory pain.

METHODS

The charts of all patients undergoing endoscopic neural blockade, in a private practice setting from 1998 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 mixture of 0.5% bupivicaine and triamcinolone acetonide injectable suspension was injected into the patients' anterior ethmoid or sphenopalatine neural distribution, or both, depending on the pain distribution. Charts were reviewed to assess outcomes and any adverse events from nerve blocks.

RESULTS

A total of 882 nerve blocks were administered to 147 patients, over the course of 431 office visits. Four mild complications, 2 moderate complications, and no severe or permanent complications were noted. No permanent visual complications were observed. Of all the charts, 85% had documented effects of the nerve block at follow-up. Of those, 81.3% claimed improvement, 17.9% reported feeling the same, and 0.79% stated they had worse pain.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic neural blockade appears to be a relatively safe and viable option in the treatment of refractory headache and facial pain with a rhinogenic component.

Refractory migraine in a headache clinic population

BACKGROUND

Many migraineurs who seek care in headache clinics are refractory to treatment, despite advances in headache therapies. Epidemiology is poorly characterized, because diagnostic criteria for refractory migraine were not available until recently. We aimed to determine the frequency of refractory migraine in patients attended in the Headache Unit in a tertiary care center, according to recently proposed criteria.

METHODS

The study population consisted of a consecutive sample of 370 patients (60.8% females) with a mean age of 43 years (range 14-86) evaluated for the first time in our headache unit over a one-year period (between October 2008 and October 2009). We recorded information on clinical features, previous treatments, Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS), and final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall migraine and tension-type headache were found in 46.4% and 20.5% of patients, respectively. Refractory migraine was found in 5.1% of patients. In refractory migraineurs, the mean MIDAS score was 96, and 36.8% were medication-overusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractory migraine is a relatively common and very disabling condition between the patients attended in a headache unit. The proposed operational criteria may be useful in identifying those patients who require care in headache units, the selection of candidates for combinations of prophylactic drugs or invasive treatments such as neurostimulation, but also to facilitate clinical studies in this patient group.

Nerve blocks in the treatment of headache

Nerve blocks and neurostimulation are reasonable therapeutic options in patients with head and neck neuralgias. In addition, these peripheral nerve procedures can also be effective in primary headache disorders, such as migraine and cluster headaches. Nerve blocks for headaches are generally accomplished by using small subcutaneous injections of amide-type local anesthetics, such as lidocaine and bupivicaine. Targets include the greater occipital nerve, lesser occipital nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves, sphenopalatine ganglion, cervical spinal roots, and facet joints of the upper cervical spine. Although definitive studies examining the usefulness of nerve blocks are lacking, reports suggest that this area deserves further attention in the hope of acquiring evidence of effectiveness.