The lack of peripheral pathology in migraine headache

Effects of somatostatin, a somatostatin agonist, and an antagonist, on a putative migraine trigger pathway

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether somatostatin (SST) could be a cortico-brainstem neurotransmitter involved in producing the headache of migraine.

BACKGROUND

There is evidence to support the idea that a cortico-brainstem-trigeminal nucleus neuraxis might be responsible for producing migraine headache; we have suggested that SST may be one of the neurotransmitters involved.

METHODS

Rats were anesthetised and prepared for recording neurons in either the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) or nucleus raphe magnus (NRM), as well as the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). The dura mater and facial skin were stimulated electrically or mechanically. SST, the SST agonist L054264 and the SST antagonist CYN54806 were injected intravenously, by microinjection, or by iontophoresis into the PAG or NRM. Cortical neuronal activity was provoked by cortical spreading depression (CSD) or light flash (LF) and was monitored by recording cortical blood flow (CBF).

RESULTS

Intravenous injection of SST: (a) selectively decreased the responses of TNC neurons to stimulation of the dura, but not skin, for up to 5 h; (b) decreased the ongoing discharge rate of TNC neurons while simultaneously increasing the discharge rate of neurons in either brainstem nucleus and; (c) prevented, or reversed, the effect of CSD and LF on brainstem and trigeminal neuron discharge rates. CSD and LF decreased the discharge rate of neurons in both brainstem nuclei and increased the discharge rate of TNC neurons. These effects were reversed by L054264 and mimicked by CYN54806. Injections of L054264 into the PAG or NRM reduced the response of TNC neurons to dural stimulation and skin stimulation differentially, depending on the nucleus injected. Injections of CYN54806 into either brainstem nucleus potentiated the responses of TNC neurons to dural and skin stimulation, but without a marked differential effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that SST could be a neurotransmitter in a pathway responsible for migraine pain.

Exploring the Tryptophan Metabolic Pathways in Migraine-Related Mechanisms

Migraine is a complex neurovascular disorder, which causes intense socioeconomic problems worldwide. The pathophysiology of disease is enigmatic; accordingly, therapy is not sufficient. In recent years, migraine research focused on tryptophan, which is metabolized via two main pathways, the serotonin and kynurenine pathways, both of which produce neuroactive molecules that influence pain processing and stress response by disturbing neural and brain hypersensitivity and by interacting with molecules that control vascular and inflammatory actions. Serotonin has a role in trigeminal pain processing, and melatonin, which is another product of this pathway, also has a role in these processes. One of the end products of the kynurenine pathway is kynurenic acid (KYNA), which can decrease the overexpression of migraine-related neuropeptides in experimental conditions. However, the ability of KYNA to cross the blood-brain barrier is minimal, necessitating the development of synthetic analogs with potentially better pharmacokinetic properties to exploit its therapeutic potential. This review summarizes the main translational and clinical findings on tryptophan metabolism and certain neuropeptides, as well as therapeutic options that may be useful in the prevention and treatment of migraine.

Does somatostatin have a role to play in migraine headache?

Migraine is a condition without apparent pathology. Its cardinal symptom is the prolonged excruciating headache. Theories about this pain have posited pathologies which run the gamut from neural to vascular to neurovascular, but no observations have detected a plausible pathology. We believe that no pathology can be found for migraine headache because none exists. Migraine is not driven by pathology - it is driven by neural events produced by triggers - or simply by neural noise- noise that has crossed a critical threshold. If these ideas are true, how does the pain arise? We hypothesise that migraine headache is a consequence of withdrawal of descending pain control, produced by "noise" in the cerebral cortex. Nevertheless, there has to be a neural circuit to transform cortical noise to withdrawal of pain control. In our hypothesis, this neural circuit extends from the cortex, synapses in two brainstem nuclei (the periaqueductal gray matter and the raphe magnus nucleus) and ultimately reaches the first synapse of the trigeminal sensory system. The second stage of this circuit uses serotonin (5HT) as a neurotransmitter, but the neuronal projection from the cortex to the brainstem seems to involve relatively uncommon neurotransmitters. We believe that one of these is somatostatin (SST). Temporal changes in levels of circulating SST mirror the temporal changes in the incidence of migraine, particularly in women. The SST₂ receptor agonist octreotide has been used with some success in migraine and cluster headache. A cortical to PAG/NRM neural projection certainly exists and we briefly review the anatomical and neurophysiological evidence for it and provide preliminary evidence that SST may the critical neurotransmitter in this pathway. We therefore suggest that the withdrawal of descending tone in SST-containing neurons, might create a false pain signal and hence the headache of migraine.

The treatment of migraine patients within chiropractic: analysis of a nationally representative survey of 1869 chiropractors

BACKGROUND

While the clinical role of manual therapies in migraine management is unclear, the use of chiropractors for this condition is considerable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of chiropractors who frequently manage patients with migraine.

METHODS

A national cross-sectional survey of chiropractors collected information on practitioner characteristics, clinical management characteristics and practice settings. A secondary analysis was conducted on 1869 respondents who reported on their migraine caseload to determine the predictors associated with the frequent management of patients with migraine.

RESULTS

A large proportion of chiropractors report having a high migraine caseload (HMC) (n = 990; 53.0%). The strongest factors predicting a chiropractor having a HMC include the frequent treatment of patients with axial neck pain (OR = 2.89; 95%CI: 1.18, 7.07), thoracic pain (referred/radicular) (OR = 2.52; 95%CI: 1.58, 3.21) and non-musculoskeletal disorders (OR = 3.06; 95%CI: 2.13, 4.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Several practice-setting and clinical management characteristics are associated with chiropractors managing a HMC. These findings raise key questions about the therapeutic approach to chiropractic migraine management that deserves further examination. There is a need for more primary research to assess the approach to headache and migraine management provided by chiropractors and to understand the prevalence, burden and comorbidities associated with migraine found within chiropractic patient populations. This information is vital in helping to inform safe, effective and coordinated care for migraine sufferers within the wider health system.

Supraorbital Rim Syndrome: Definition, Surgical Treatment, and Outcomes for Frontal Headache

Background:

Supraorbital rim syndrome (SORS) is a novel term attributed to a composite of anatomically defined peripheral nerve entrapment sites of the supraorbital rim region. The SORS term establishes a more consistent nomenclature to describe the constellation of frontal peripheral nerve entrapment sites causing frontal headache pain. In this article, we describe the anatomical features of SORS and evidence to support its successful treatment using the transpalpebral approach that allows direct vision of these sites and the intraconal space.

Methods:

A retrospective review of 276 patients who underwent nerve decompression or neurectomy procedures for frontal or occipital headache was performed. Of these, treatment of 96 patients involved frontal surgery, and 45 of these patients were pure SORS patients who underwent this specific frontal trigger site deactivation surgery only. All procedures involved direct surgical approach through the upper eyelid to address the nerves of the supraorbital rim at the bony rim and myofascial sites.

Results:

Preoperative and postoperative data from the Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire were analyzed with paired t test. After surgical intervention, Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire scores decreased significantly at 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

SORS describes the totality of compression sites both at the bony orbital rim and the corrugator myofascial unit for the supraorbital rim nerves. Proper diagnosis, full anatomical site knowledge, and complete decompression allow for consistent treatment. Furthermore, the direct, transpalpebral surgical approach provides significant benefit to allow complete decompression.

Animal models of chronic migraine

Many animal models of migraine have been described. Some of them have been useful in the development of new therapies. All of them have their shortcomings. Animal models of chronic migraine have been relatively less frequently described. Whether a rigid distinction between episodic and chronic migraine is useful when their underlying pathophysiology is likely to be the same and that migraine frequency probably depends on complex polygenic influences remains to be determined. Any model of chronic migraine must reflect the chronicity of the disorder and be reliable and validated with pharmacological interventions. Future animal models of chronic migraine are likely to involve recurrent activation of the trigeminal nociceptive system. Valid models would provide a means for investigating pathophysiological mechanism of the transformation from episodic to chronic migraine and may also be used to test the efficacy of potential preventive medications.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP): a new target for migraine

Migraine is a neurological disorder that manifests as a debilitating headache associated with altered sensory perception. The neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is now firmly established as a key player in migraine. Clinical trials carried out during the past decade have proved that CGRP receptor antagonists are effective for treating migraine, and antibodies to the receptor and CGRP are currently under investigation. Despite this progress in the clinical arena, the mechanisms by which CGRP triggers migraine remain uncertain. This review discusses mechanisms whereby CGRP enhances sensitivity to sensory input at multiple levels in both the periphery and central nervous system. Future studies on epistatic and epigenetic regulators of CGRP actions are expected to shed further light on CGRP actions in migraine. In conclusion, targeting CGRP represents an approachable therapeutic strategy for migraine.

Cortical spreading depression and central pain networks in trigeminal nuclei modulation: time for an integrated migraine pathogenesis perspective

The role of the cortical spreading depression (CSD)-dependent trigeminovascular activation in migraine etiopathogenesis, long considered paradigmatic, has remained substantially unproven in humans. The parallel advancement of functional neuroimaging techniques promoted the extensive exploration of the brain networks involved in pain processing in search of a possible central migraine generator. However, despite initial enthusiasms, it has not been possible to clarify whether the functional central "markers" of pain observed in primary headaches could be considered as causative or just the neural correlates of the ongoing pain. Nonetheless, our knowledge on the complex interactions between CSD, neurogenic inflammation, peripheral trigeminovascular input, central cortico-trigeminal nuclei direct modulation and pain processing and limbic system networks has enormously grown, allowing the reconceptualisation of migraine from a neurovascular to a pure neurolimbic pain disorder, therefore relocating it in the much broader frame of the brain and whole organism homeostatic control. In this work, the available evidences currently supporting the relevance of CSD, of peripheral trigeminovascular input and of direct cortico-trigeminal nuclei modulation in migraine pathogenesis are reviewed in the light of a possible integrated migraine etiopathogenetic perspective.

CGRP and migraine: could PACAP play a role too?

Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder that affects about 12% of the population. In the past decade, the role of the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine has been firmly established by clinical studies. CGRP administration can trigger migraines, and CGRP receptor antagonists ameliorate migraine. In this review, we will describe multifunctional activities of CGRP that could potentially contribute to migraine. These include roles in light aversion, neurogenic inflammation, peripheral and central sensitization of nociceptive pathways, cortical spreading depression, and regulation of nitric oxide production. Yet clearly there will be many other contributing genes that could act in concert with CGRP. One candidate is pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), which shares some of the same actions as CGRP, including the ability to induce migraine in migraineurs and light aversive behavior in rodents. Interestingly, both CGRP and PACAP act on receptors that share an accessory subunit called receptor activity modifying protein-1 (RAMP1). Thus, comparisons between the actions of these two migraine-inducing neuropeptides, CGRP and PACAP, may provide new insights into migraine pathophysiology.

Irritable bowel syndrome and migraine: bystanders or partners?

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and migraine are distinct clinical disorders. Apart from the characteristics of chronic and recurrent pain in nature, these pain-related disorders apparently share many similarities. For example, IBS is female predominant with community prevalence about 5-10%, whereas that of migraine is 1-3% also showing female predominance. They are often associated with many somatic and psychiatric comorbidities in terms of fibromyaglia, chronic fatigue syndrome, interstitial cystitis, insomnia and depression etc., even the IBS subjects may have coexisted migraine with an estimated odds ratio of 2.66. They similarly reduce the quality of life of victims leading to the social, medical and economic burdens. Their pathogeneses have been somewhat addressed in relation to biopsychosocial dysfunction, heredity, genetic polymorphism, central/visceral hypersensitivity, somatic/cutaneous allodynia, neurolimbic pain network, gonadal hormones and abuses etc. Both disorders are diagnosed according to the symptomatically based criteria. Multidisciplinary managements such as receptor target new drugs, melantonin, antispasmodics, and psychological drugs and measures, complementary and alternatives etc. are recommended to treat them although the used agents may not be necessarily the same. Finally, the prognosis of IBS is pretty good, whereas that of migraine is less fair since suicide attempt and stroke are at risk. In conclusion, both distinct chronic pain disorders to share many similarities among various aspects probably suggest that they may locate within the same spectrum of a pain-centered disorder such as central sensitization syndromes. The true pathogenesis to involve these disorders remains to be clarified in the future.

Sumatriptan inhibition of N-type calcium channel mediated signaling in dural CGRP terminal fibres

The selective 5-HT₁ receptor agonist sumatriptan is an effective therapeutic for migraine pain yet the antimigraine mechanisms of action remain controversial. Pain-responsive fibres containing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) densely innervating the cranial dura mater are widely believed to be an essential anatomical substrate for the development of migraine pain. 5-HT₁ receptors in the dura colocalize with CGRP fibres in high density and thus provide a possible peripheral site of action for sumatriptan. In the present study, we used high-resolution optical imaging selectively within individual mouse dural CGRP nociceptive fibre terminations and found that application of sumatriptan caused a rapid, reversible dose-dependent inhibition in the amplitude of single action potential evoked Ca²⁺ transients. Pre-application of the 5-HT₁ antagonist GR 127935 or the selective 5-HT(1D) antagonist BRL 15572 prevented inhibition while the selective 5-HT(1B) antagonist SB 224289 did not, suggesting this effect was mediated selectively through the 5-HT(1D) receptor subtype. Sumatriptan inhibition of the action potential evoked Ca²⁺ signaling was mediated selectively through N-type Ca²⁺ channels. Although the T-type Ca²⁺ channel accounted for a greater proportion of the Ca²⁺ signal it did not mediate any of the sumatriptan inhibition. Our findings support a peripheral site of action for sumatriptan in inhibiting the activity of dural pain fibres selectively through a single Ca²⁺ channel subtype. This finding adds to our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the clinical effectiveness of 5-HT₁ receptor agonists such as sumatriptan and may provide insight for the development of novel peripherally targeted therapeutics for mitigating the pain of migraine.

Serotonin and CGRP in migraine

Migraine is defined as recurrent attack of headache that are commonly unilateral and accompanied by gastrointestinal and visual disorders. Migraine is more prevalent in females than males with a ratio of 3:1. It is primarily a complex neurovascular disorder involving local vasodilation of intracranial, extracerebral blood vessels and simultaneous stimulation of surrounding trigeminal sensory nervous pain pathway that results in headache. The activation of 'trigeminovascular system' causes release of various vasodilators, especially calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) that induces pain response. At the same time, decreased levels of neurotransmitter, serotonin have been observed in migraineurs. Serotonin receptors have been found on the trigeminal nerve and cranial vessels and their agonists especially triptans prove effective in migraine treatment. It has been found that triptans act on trigeminovascular system and bring the elevated serum levels of key molecules like calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) to normal. Currently CGRP receptor antagonists, olcegepant and telcagepant are under consideration for antimigraine therapeutics. It has been observed that varying levels of ovarian hormones especially estrogen influence serotonin neurotransmission system and CGRP levels making women more predisposed to migraine attacks. This review provides comprehensive information about the role of serotonin and CGRP in migraine, specifically the menstrual migraine.

Effect of cortical spreading depression on basal and evoked traffic in the trigeminovascular sensory system

AIM

To use an animal model to test whether migraine pain arises peripherally or centrally.

METHODS

We monitored the spontaneous and evoked activity of second-order trigeminovascular neurons in rats to test whether traffic increased following a potential migraine trigger (cortical spreading depression, CSD) and by what mechanism any such change was mediated.

RESULTS

Neurons (n = 33) responded to stimulation of the dura mater and facial skin with A-δ latencies. They were spontaneously active with a discharge rate of 6.1 ± 6.4 discharges s(-1). Injection of 10 µg lignocaine into the trigeminal ganglion produced a fully reversible reduction of the spontaneous discharge rate of neurons. Neuronal discharge rate returned to normal by 90 min. Lignocaine reduced the evoked responses of neurons to dural stimulation to 37% and to facial skin stimulation to 53% of control. Induction of CSD by cortical injection of KCl increased the spontaneous discharge rate of neurons from 2.9 to 16.3 discharges s(-1) at 20 min post CSD. Injection of 10 µg lignocaine into the trigeminal ganglion at this time failed to arrest or reverse this increase. Injection of lignocaine prior to the initiation of CSD failed to prevent the subsequent development of CSD-induced increases in discharge rates.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that there is a continuous baseline traffic in primary trigeminovascular fibres and that CSD does not act to increase this traffic by a peripheral action alone - rather, it must produce some of its effect by a mechanism intrinsic to the central nervous system. Thus the pain of migraine may not always be the result of peripheral sensory stimulation, but may also arise by a central mechanism.

Migraine pathophysiology

SUMMARY Our understanding of migraine pathophysiology is a work in progress, largely because of the absence of any identifiable cephalic pathology. There are currently two main theories on the genesis of migraine pain. One hypothesizes that the origin is in the periphery, requiring the activation of primary afferent nociceptive neurons that innervate cephalic tissue. The other theorizes that the origin of migraine pain is in the CNS, as a result of abnormal processing of sensory signals, rather than the activation of nociceptors. After briefly reviewing the clinical presentation and diagnosis of migraine, this article focuses on explaining the traditional and current theories of migraine pathogenesis.