1
|
Wagrees W, Kelani H, Salamah HM, Mahmoud A, Khlidj Y, Abdelraouf MR, Sharaf B, Elnewishy M, Albaramony N, Naeem A, Elazim AA, El-Ghanem M, Greene-Chandos D, Jadidi M, Lerner DP, Kay AD, Merlin LR, Brock C. The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and Meta-Regression. Eur J Pain 2025; 29:e4796. [PMID: 39985117 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has strong anti-spasmodic and analgesic effects, suggesting that its local muscular injection can reduce CLBP compared to other therapies. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A on patients with CLBP. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing BoNT-A to other therapies in terms of functional improvement and pain improvement as measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and clinically significant improvement in pain (50% or greater reduction in VAS score). We employed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to confirm the findings. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the overall quality of the evidence. RESULTS The search yielded nine studies, seven randomised clinical trials (RCTs), and two prospective observational studies. Compared to the control, BoNT-A increased the incidence of clinically significant improvement in pain (RR = 4.82, 95% CI (3.00, 7.76), p < 0.00001) and functional improvement (RR = 3.81, 95% CI (2.40, 6.04), p < 0.00001) (low-certainty evidence), and reduced VAS score (MD = -1.62, 95% CI (-3.13, -0.11), p = 0.04) (very low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis showed that BoNT-A is effective against normal saline (moderate-certainty evidence), and it was comparable to steroids and local anaesthetics (very low-certainty evidence). TSA confirmed the findings regarding clinical improvement in pain and functional improvement. CONCLUSION BoNT-A is a tolerable and effective treatment for CLBP with a longer duration of action. Future high-quality studies are needed to confirm our findings. SIGNIFICANCE This paper provides good evidence that BoNT-A may be employed in patients suffering from resistant chronic low back pain not responding to normal saline injection due to its higher efficacy and longer duration of action. Compared to steroids and local anaesthetics injections, there is not enough data to draw a firm conclusion and future studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waseem Wagrees
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Hesham Kelani
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University at One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Yehya Khlidj
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria
| | | | - Bahaa Sharaf
- Faculty of Molecular Biotechnology, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt
| | | | | | | | - Ahmed Abd Elazim
- Department of Neurology, University of South Dakota Sanford Medical Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
| | - Mohammad El-Ghanem
- Department of Clinical Science, HCA Houston-Northwest Medical Center, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Diana Greene-Chandos
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mohammad Jadidi
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University at One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - David P Lerner
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University at One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Arthur D Kay
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University at One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Lisa R Merlin
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University at One Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Charles Brock
- Department of Neurology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruffilli A, Cerasoli T, Barile F, Manzetti M, Viroli G, Traversari M, Filardo G, Faldini C. Injective Treatments for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop 2024; 58:637-649. [PMID: 38812868 PMCID: PMC11130093 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01164-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Background The most effective injective treatment approach for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain remains unclear. Aim of this study was to quantify the safety and effectiveness of the available injective strategies to address SIJ pain. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases from inception until January 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English, comparative and non-comparative studies regardless of the minimum follow-up, and case series on SIJ injections. Safety and efficacy of the different injection therapies for the SIJ were quantified. A meta-analysis was conducted on the available data of the documented injective therapies. The "Checklist for Measuring Quality" by Downs and Black was used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of papers. Results The literature search retrieved 43 papers (2431 patients): 16 retrospective case series, 2 retrospective comparative studies, 17 prospective case series, 3 prospective comparative studies, and 5 randomized controlled trials. Of the selected studies, 63% examined the effect of steroid injections, 16% of PRP injections, while 21% reported other heterogeneous treatments. The failure rate was 26% in steroid injections and 14% in PRP injections. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in pain with the VAS score for both steroids and PRP: steroids improvement at mid-term 3.4 points (p < 0.05), at long-term 3.0 (p < 0.05), PRP improvement at mid-term 2.2 (p = 0.007), at long-term 2.3 points of the VAS pain scale (p = 0.02). Conclusions Steroids are the most documented injective approach, with studies showing an overall safety and effectiveness. Still, the high number of failures underlined by some studies suggest the need for alternative procedures. Early PRP data showed promise, but the limitations of the current literature do not allow to clearly define the most suitable injective approach, and further studies are needed to identify the best injective treatment for SIJ patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Ruffilli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - T. Cerasoli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - F. Barile
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Manzetti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Viroli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Traversari
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Filardo
- Applied and Translational Research Center (ATRc), IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - C. Faldini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Salvatore S, Russo F, Vadalà G, Pascarella G, Papalia GF, Ambrosio L, Ruggiero A, Migliorelli S, Carassiti M, Papalia R, Denaro V. Interventional treatments for low back pain due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review of the literature. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:1407-1423. [PMID: 38329572 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08130-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aimed to report the current evidence in the literature about the efficacy of interventional treatments in the management of low back pain (LBP) due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction. METHODS A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL bibliographic databases were searched. The search was performed from October to December 2021, and articles from the inception of the database to December 2021 were searched. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Five studies used the traditional radiofrequency approach (tRF), five studies used cooled radiofrequency approach (cRF), one study used botulinum toxin (BT), two studies used steroid injection, triamcinolone (TA) and local anesthetics injections, and one study used pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) denervation. Two studies used sham as a comparator. CONCLUSIONS Cooled radiofrequency seems to be the most effective treatment in improving pain and functionality, while intra-articular injections are helpful only as diagnostic tools. However, due to the lack of high-quality studies, it was not possible to draw significant conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio De Salvatore
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics, Children's Hospital Bambino Gesù, 00165, Palidoro, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Russo
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Vadalà
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pascarella
- Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Francesco Papalia
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Ambrosio
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ruggiero
- Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabrina Migliorelli
- Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Massiliano Carassiti
- Unit of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toyohara R, Hiramukai T, Kurosawa D, Hammer N, Ohashi T. Numerical analysis of the effects of padded pelvic belts as a treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Biomed Mater Eng 2022:BME221490. [DOI: 10.3233/bme-221490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain related to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) accounts for low back pain in 15%–30% of patients. One of the most common treatment options is the use of pelvic belts. Various types of pelvic belts exist; however, the mechanisms underlying treatment and their effectiveness remain unclear to date. OBJECTIVE: To analyze stress distribution in the pelvis when a pelvic rubber belt or a padded pelvic belt is applied, to assess the effectiveness of treatment from a numerical biomechanical perspective. METHODS: The pressure distribution at the pelvic belts was measured using a device and subsequently modeled with the finite element method of a pelvis with soft tissues. The stress environment when wearing a pelvic belt in a double-leg stance was simulated. RESULTS: With the application of pelvic belts, the innominate bone rotated outward, which was termed an out-flare. This caused the SIJ to compress and cause reduction in sacrotuberous, sacrospinous, interosseous, and posterior sacroiliac ligament loading. Padded pelvic belts decreased the SIJ displacement to a greater extent than in pelvic rubber belts. CONCLUSION: Pelvic belts aid in compressing the SIJ and reduce its mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Niels Hammer
- , , Medical University of Graz, , Austria
- , University of Leipzig, , Germany
- , Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (IWU), , Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calodney AK, Azeem N, Buchanan P, Skaribas I, Antony A, Kim C, Girardi G, Vu C, Bovinet C, Vogel RS, Li S, Jassal N, Josephson Y, Lubenow TR, Girardi N, Pope JE. Six Month Interim Outcomes from SECURE: A Single arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Clinical Study on a Novel Minimally Invasive Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:451-461. [PMID: 35724479 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2090244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sacroiliac joint disease is a prominent diagnosis across the world. A novel fixation technique employing a posterior approach, single point, bone allograft tranfixation has proven to be helpful anecdotally. The purpose of this is study is to investigate prospectively the safety and efficacy of this approach. METHODS A multicenter, prospective, single arm study was performed after patient identification and treatment with the novel posterior fusion, single-point transfixation system and followed for 24 months. Target enrollment is 100 patients. Interim results on the first 69 consecutive patients at 6 months is presented. Primary endpoint at 6-month analysis was Pain Intensity reduction by visual analogue scale and functional improvement by Oswestry Disability Index. Adverse events were assessed for safety analysis. RESULTS : 69 patients were identified for this analysis. At 6 months, a mean improvement of 34.9 was identified by a reduction in VAS and functional improvement was demonstrated by a mean reduction in ODI of 17.7. There were three adverse events, all unrelated to the device. CONCLUSION The posterior single point transfixation is safe and efficacious for the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction with statistical improvements in pain and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nomen Azeem
- Florida Spine and Pain Specialists, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Buchanan
- Spanish Hills Interventional Pain Specialists, Camarillo, CA, USA
| | | | - Ajay Antony
- The Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Chau Vu
- Evolve Restoration Center, Santa Rosa, CA USA
| | | | - Rainer S Vogel
- Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management, Henderson, Nevada, USA
| | - Sean Li
- National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | - Naveep Jassal
- Spine and Pain Institute of Florida, Lakeland, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
[Therapeutic injections and manual medicine in low-back pain : Bimodal synergies between evidence and empiricism]. DER ORTHOPADE 2022; 51:307-324. [PMID: 35238966 PMCID: PMC8967746 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-022-04235-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Angelehnt an die zielorientierte Therapieplanung und -führung in der Versorgung chronisch Rheumakranker, plädiert der Autor bei Patienten mit (chronischem) degenerativem tiefem Rückenschmerz (TRS), orientiert an den differenzialtherapeutischen Grundsätzen der Manuellen Medizin (MM), und unter Kenntnis von Techniken und Evidenzen therapeutischer Lokalinfiltrationen (TLI), für die Etablierung eines strukturierten mechanismenbasierten Therapiekonzeptes im Sinne des „treat to target“ (T2T) im ambulanten schmerztherapeutischen Versorgungsbereich. Diagnostik Dies setzt eine konsequente (Primär‑)Diagnostik mit Schmerzanalyse unter der Prämisse, dass TRS, wenn strukturell-funktionell bedingt, immer spezifisch ist, voraus. Eine breite biopsychosoziale Anamnese und strukturbezogene klinisch-bildgebende (Ausschluss‑)Diagnostik mit funktioneller Differenzierung nach MM-Grundsätzen und ggf. interventionelle Blocks, sollten am Ende zur Formulierung einer 3‑Ebenen-Diagnose als Voraussetzung zu einer mechanismenbasiert-zielorientiert-hierarchischen Stufentherapie bei TRS führen. Diese wird in diesem Artikel pragmatisch fallorientiert, unter Implementierung von Techniken und Evidenzen der TLI und MM, vorgestellt.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hegmann KT, Travis R, Andersson GBJ, Belcourt RM, Carragee EJ, Eskay-Auerbach M, Galper J, Goertz M, Haldeman S, Hooper PD, Lessenger JE, Mayer T, Mueller KL, Murphy DR, Tellin WG, Thiese MS, Weiss MS, Harris JS. Invasive Treatments for Low Back Disorders. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:e215-e241. [PMID: 33769405 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000001983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This abbreviated version of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Low Back Disorders guideline reviews the evidence and recommendations developed for invasive treatments used to manage low back disorders. METHODS Comprehensive systematic literature reviews were accomplished with article abstraction, critiquing, grading, evidence table compilation, and guideline finalization by a multidisciplinary expert panel and extensive peer-review to develop evidence-based guidance. Consensus recommendations were formulated when evidence was lacking and often relied on analogy to other disorders for which evidence exists. A total of 47 high-quality and 321 moderate-quality trials were identified for invasive management of low back disorders. RESULTS Guidance has been developed for the invasive management of acute, subacute, and chronic low back disorders and rehabilitation. This includes 49 specific recommendations. CONCLUSION Quality evidence should guide invasive treatment for all phases of managing low back disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt T Hegmann
- American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Elk Grove Village, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu W, Zhao Q, Ma R, Liu Z, Zhao J, Liu Z, Chen J, Zhang R, Zheng Z, Xu Y, Deng S, Cheng L, Li Q. Anatomical study of the innervation of different parts of the posterior ligamentous region of the sacroiliac joint. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46:410-415. [PMID: 33619182 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The periarticular sacroiliac joint (SIJ) technique has become an important area of focus, and the quartering of the SIJ posterior ligamentous region has been proposed as a way to refine this technique. However, detailed nerve distribution combined with the division of the SIJ posterior ligamentous region is lacking. We aimed to explore the innervation of the SIJ posteriorly based on the quartering of the SIJ posterior ligamentous region. METHODS Sixteen SIJs from eight embalmed cadavers were studied. Each SIJ posterior ligamentous region was equally divided into areas 0-3 from top to bottom. The origin, distribution, quantity, transverse diameter, spatial orientation, relation with bony structures, and the number of identifiable terminal nerve branches in each area were examined. RESULTS Areas 0-1 were innervated by the lateral branches of the dorsal rami of L4-L5 directly in all specimens. Areas 2-3 were innervated by that of both lumbar and sacral nerves via the posterior sacral network (PSN), with L5 contributing to the PSN in all specimens and L4 in 68.75%. The number of identifiable terminal nerve branches were significantly higher in areas 2-3 than in areas 0-1. CONCLUSIONS The inferior part of the SIJ posterior ligamentous region seems to be the main source of SIJ-related pain and is innervated by lumbar and sacral nerves via the PSN. However, the superior part directly innervated by lumbar nerves should not be neglected, and further clinical verification is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijia Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qinghao Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Runxun Ma
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zezheng Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianjun Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zexian Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junjie Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Rusen Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhiyang Zheng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yejie Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shangxi Deng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qingchu Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Ko GD, Mindra S, Lawson GE, Whitmore S, Arseneau L. Case series of ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injections for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2017; 30:363-370. [PMID: 27392848 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-160734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Two-thirds of adults worldwide will experience low back pain at some point in their life. In the following case series, we present four patients with sacroiliac (SI) joint instability and severe chronic low back pain, which was refractory to other treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE We investigated the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, a novel orthobiologic therapy, for reducing SI joint pain, improving quality of life, and maintaining a clinical effect. METHODS Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Oswestry Low Back Pain and Disability Index were used for evaluation of treatment at pretreatment, 12-months and 48-months after treatment. RESULTS At follow-up 12-months post-treatment, pooled data from all patients reported a marked improvement in joint stability, a statistically significant reduction in pain, and improvement in quality of life. The clinical benefits of PRP were still significant at 4-years post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Platelet-rich plasma therapy exhibits clinical usefulness in both pain reduction and for functional improvement in patients with chronic SI joint pain. The improvement in joint stability and low back pain was maintained at 1- and 4-years post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon D Ko
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the Canadian Centre for Integrative Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sean Mindra
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Gordon E Lawson
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Canadian Centre for Integrative Medicine, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
The effect of intra-articular botulinum toxin A on substance P, prostaglandin E 2, and tumor necrosis factor alpha in the canine osteoarthritic joint. BMC Vet Res 2017; 13:74. [PMID: 28327134 PMCID: PMC5359943 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-0990-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, intra-articular botulinum toxin A (IA BoNT A) has been shown to reduce joint pain in osteoarthritic dogs. Similar results have been reported in human patients with arthritis. However, the mechanism of the antinociceptive action of IA BoNT A is currently not known. The aim of this study was to explore this mechanism of action by investigating the effect of IA BoNT A on synovial fluid (SF) and serum substance P (SP), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in osteoarthritic dogs. Additionally, the aim was to compare SF SP and PGE2 between osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic joints, and investigate associations between SP, PGE2, osteoarthritic pain, and the signalment of dogs. Thirty-five dogs with chronic naturally occurring osteoarthritis and 13 non-osteoarthritic control dogs were included in the study. Osteoarthritic dogs received either IA BoNT A (n = 19) or IA placebo (n = 16). Serum and SF samples were collected and osteoarthritic pain was evaluated before (baseline) and 2 and 8 weeks after treatment. Osteoarthritic pain was assessed with force platform, Helsinki Chronic Pain Index, and joint palpation. Synovial fluid samples were obtained from control dogs after euthanasia. The change from baseline in SP and PGE2 concentration was compared between the IA BoNT A and placebo groups. The synovial fluid SP and PGE2 concentration was compared between osteoarthritic and control joints. Associations between SP, PGE2, osteoarthritic pain, and the signalment of dogs were evaluated. Results There was no significant change from baseline in SP or PGE2 after IA BoNT A. Synovial fluid PGE2 was significantly higher in osteoarthritic compared to control joints. Synovial fluid PGE2 correlated with osteoarthritic pain. No associations were found between SP or PGE2 and the signalment of dogs. The concentration of TNF-α remained under the detection limit of the assay in all samples. Conclusions The results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of IA BoNT A in the joint might not be related to the inhibition of SP nor PGE2. Synovial fluid PGE2, but not SP, could be a marker for chronic osteoarthritis and pain in dogs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Proliferative injection therapy for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2017; 41:671-679. [PMID: 28190092 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3422-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically analyse randomised controlled trials (RCTs) about efficacy and safety of proliferative injection therapy (prolotherapy) for treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS CENTRAL, Embase and MEDLINE were searched. Two reviewers independently conducted screening and data extraction. RCTs were assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Type of treatment, study design, dosing, efficacy outcomes and safety outcomes were analysed. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016035258). RESULTS Seven RCTs were included, with 393 participants aged 40-75 years and mean OA pain duration from three months to eight years. Follow-up was 12 weeks to 12 months. Studies analysed OA of the knee joint (n = 5), first carpometacarpal joint (n = 1) and finger joints (n = 1). Various types of prolotherapy were used; dextrose was the most commonly used irritant agent. All studies concluded that prolotherapy was effective treatment for OA. No serious adverse events were reported. The studies had considerable methodological limitations. DISCUSSION Limited evidence from low-quality studies indicates a beneficial effect of prolotherapy for OA management. The number of participants in these studies was too small to provide reliable evidence. CONCLUSIONS Current data from trials about prolotherapy for OA should be considered preliminary, and future high-quality trials on this topic are warranted.
Collapse
|
13
|
El Abd O, Amadera JED, Pimentel DC, Bhargava A. Nonsurgical Treatment (Indications, Limitations, Outcomes): Injections. HIP JOINT RESTORATION 2017:299-314. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0694-5_28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
14
|
Ferrandiz-Huertas C, Mathivanan S, Wolf CJ, Devesa I, Ferrer-Montiel A. Trafficking of ThermoTRP Channels. MEMBRANES 2014; 4:525-64. [PMID: 25257900 PMCID: PMC4194048 DOI: 10.3390/membranes4030525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Revised: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
ThermoTRP channels (thermoTRPs) define a subfamily of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channels that are activated by changes in the environmental temperature, from noxious cold to injurious heat. Acting as integrators of several stimuli and signalling pathways, dysfunction of these channels contributes to several pathological states. The surface expression of thermoTRPs is controlled by both, the constitutive and regulated vesicular trafficking. Modulation of receptor surface density during pathological processes is nowadays considered as an interesting therapeutic approach for management of diseases, such as chronic pain, in which an increased trafficking is associated with the pathological state. This review will focus on the recent advances trafficking of the thermoTRP channels, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV4, TRPM3, TRPM8 and TRPA1, into/from the plasma membrane. Particularly, regulated membrane insertion of thermoTRPs channels contributes to a fine tuning of final channel activity, and indeed, it has resulted in the development of novel therapeutic approaches with successful clinical results such as disruption of SNARE-dependent exocytosis by botulinum toxin or botulinomimetic peptides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sakthikumar Mathivanan
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante 03202, Spain.
| | - Christoph Jakob Wolf
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante 03202, Spain.
| | - Isabel Devesa
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante 03202, Spain.
| | - Antonio Ferrer-Montiel
- Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante 03202, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- E Bizzi
- Operative Unit of Rheumatology, S.Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital , Rome , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buchanan P, Mehta A, Gerstman B. Interventional Treatments for Sacroiliac Joint Pain. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-014-0042-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
17
|
Heikkilä HM, Hielm-Björkman AK, Morelius M, Larsen S, Honkavaara J, Innes JF, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM. Intra-articular botulinum toxin A for the treatment of osteoarthritic joint pain in dogs: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Vet J 2014; 200:162-9. [PMID: 24675370 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2013] [Revised: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intra-articular (IA) botulinum toxin A (IA BoNT A) for the treatment of osteoarthritic joint pain in dogs. The study was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial with parallel group design and 12-week follow-up. Thirty-six dogs with chronic lameness due to stifle, hip or elbow osteoarthritis were randomized to receive an IA injection of 30IU of BoNT A or placebo. The main outcome variables were vertical impulse (VI) and peak vertical force (PVF) measured with a force platform, and Helsinki chronic pain index (HCPI). Subjective pain score and the need for rescue analgesics were secondary variables. The response to treatment was assessed as the change from baseline to each examination week. The variables were analyzed by ANOVA with repeated measurements and results were considered statistically significant if P ⩽ 0.05. The improvement from baseline to 12 weeks after baseline was statistically significant in VI, PVF and HCPI in the treatment group (P=0.001, P=0.054 and P=0.053, respectively). Additionally, there were statistically significant improvements in VI in the treatment group at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after baseline (P=0.037, P=0.016 and P=0.016, respectively). The difference between groups in improvement in VI was statistically significant at 12weeks after baseline (P=0.005). There was no significant change in the subjective pain score or in the requirement for rescue analgesics in either group. No major adverse events thought to be related to trial protocol were detected. These results suggest that IA BoNT A has some efficacy in reducing osteoarthritic pain in dogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Heikkilä
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
| | - A K Hielm-Björkman
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Morelius
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Larsen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, 0033 Oslo, Norway
| | - J Honkavaara
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - J F Innes
- Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Aging and Chronic Disease and School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Chester High Road, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
| | - O M Laitinen-Vapaavuori
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O. Box 57, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spiker WR, Lawrence BD, Raich AL, Skelly AC, Brodke DS. Surgical versus injection treatment for injection-confirmed chronic sacroiliac joint pain. EVIDENCE-BASED SPINE-CARE JOURNAL 2013; 3:41-53. [PMID: 23526911 PMCID: PMC3592770 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review. Study rationale: Chronic sacroiliac joint pain (CSJP) is a common clinical entity with highly controversial treatment options. A recent systematic review compared surgery with denervation, but the current systematic review compares outcomes of surgical intervention with therapeutic injection for the treatment of CSJP and serves as the next step for evaluating current evidence on the comparative effectiveness of treatments for non-traumatic sacroiliac joint pain. Objective or clinical question: In adult patients with injection-confirmed CSJP, does surgical treatment lead to better outcomes and fewer complications than injection therapy? Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1970 and June 2012. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating surgery or injection treatment for injection-confirmed CSJP. Studies involving traumatic onset or non-injection–confirmed CSJP were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Results: We identified twelve articles (seven surgical and five injection treatment) meeting our inclusion criteria. Regardless of the type of treatment, most studies reported over 40% improvement in pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale or Numeric rating Scale score. Regardless of the type of treatment, most studies reported over 20% improvement in functionality. Most complications were reported in the surgical studies. Conclusion: Surgical fusion and therapeutic injections can likely provide pain relief, improve quality of life, and improve work status. The comparative effectiveness of these interventions cannot be evaluated with the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Ryan Spiker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones JC, Gonzalez LM, Larson MM, Freeman LE, Werre SR. Feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2012; 53:446-54. [PMID: 22548612 DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01920.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2011] [Accepted: 12/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Frozen cadaver specimens from three dogs were used to create a sectional anatomic atlas of the sacroiliac region. Frozen/thawed cadaver specimens from 12 dogs were used to develop an ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection technique. Accuracy of the technique was tested in 15 additional canine cadaver specimens, using injectate containing blue dye and iodinated contrast medium. Sonoanatomic landmarks for consistently identifying a caudodorsal window into the canine sacroiliac joint space included the L7-S1 articular process joints, ilial wing, sacral wing, sacral lamina, and median sacral crest. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection was not significantly affected by operator, but was affected by the tissue location targeted and the reference standard used for calculations. Accuracy of the technique was good for placing injectate into either the synchondrosis component, dorsal sacroiliac ligament or ventral sacroiliac ligament; fair to poor for placing injectate into the synovial component; and poor for placing injectate into all four sacroiliac soft tissue structures. Concurrent placement of injectate into extraarticular tissues occurred frequently. We conclude that ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection is feasible for evaluation as a treatment method for lumbosacral region pain in dogs, but is not sufficiently accurate for localizing pain to the sacroiliac joint alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeryl C Jones
- West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bellows BK, Biskupiak J. Methodological Challenges of Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pain: Implications for Investigators, Clinicians, and Policy Makers. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother 2011; 25:267-74. [DOI: 10.3109/15360288.2011.599482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|