Effect of long-term anticonvulsant therapy on glucose metabolism in humans

Effects of Hepatic Drug-metabolizing Enzyme Induction on Clinical Pathology Parameters in Animals and Man

Hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) induction is an adaptive response associated with changes in preclinical species; this response can include increases in liver weight, hepatocellular hyperplasia and hypertrophy, and upregulated tissue expression of DMEs. Effects of DME induction on clinical pathology markers of hepatobiliary injury and function in animals as well as humans are not well established. This component of a multipart review of the comparative pathology of xenobiotically mediated induction of hepatic metabolizing enzymes reviews pertinent data from retrospective and prospective preclinical and clinical studies. Particular attention is given to studies with confirmation of DME induction and concurrent evaluation of liver and/or serum hepatobiliary marker enzyme activities and histopathology. These results collectively indicate that in the rat, when histologic findings are limited to hepatocellular hypertrophy, DME induction is not expected to be associated with consistent or substantive changes in serum or plasma activity of hepatobiliary marker enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma glutamyltransferase. In the dog and the monkey, published studies also do not demonstrate a consistent relationship across DME-inducing agents and changes in these clinical pathology parameters. However, increased liver alkaline phosphatase or gamma glutamyltransferase activity in dogs treated with phenobarbital or corticosteroids suggests that direct or indirect induction of select hepatobiliary injury markers can occur both in the absence of liver injury and independently of induction of DME activity. Although correlations between tissue and serum levels of these hepatobiliary markers are limited and inconsistent, increases in serum/plasma activities that are substantial or involve changes in other markers generally reflect hepatobiliary insult rather than DME induction. Extrahepatic effects, including disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, can also occur as a direct outcome of hepatic DME induction in humans and animals. Importantly, hepatic DME induction and associated changes in preclinical species are not necessarily predictive of the occurrence, magnitude, or enzyme induction profile in humans.

Induction of endogenous pathways by antiepileptics and clinical implications

The aim of this study was to review modifications of the endogenous pathways (e.g. enzyme elevations, normal body constituent depletion or higher formation/excretion of endogenous metabolites) which could be ascribed to enzyme induction by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Information on older (e.g. phenobarbital, phenytoin and carbamazepine) and newer drugs (where information is available) is discussed together with clinical implications. The enzymes involved in the endogenous pathways and induced by the AEDs will not be limited to the hepatic microsomal enzymes; extrahepatic enzymes and/or enzymes present in other subcellular fractions will also be discussed, if pertinent. The induction of endogenous pathways by AEDs has been taken into account in the past, but much less emphasis has been given compared with the extensive literature on induction by AEDs of the metabolism of concomitantly administered drugs, either of the same or of different classes. Not all of the endogenous pathways examined and induced by AEDs appear to result in serious clinical consequences (e.g. induction of hepatic ALP, increased excretion of d-glucaric acid or of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol). In some cases, induction of some pathways (e.g. increase of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or of conjugated bilirubin) might even be a beneficial side-effect, however enzyme induction is considered rather a detrimental aspect for an AED, as induction is generally a broad and a non-specific phenomenon. The new AEDs have generally less induction potential than the older agents. Yet some (felbamate, topiramate, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine) have the potential for inducing enzymes, whereas others (levetiracetam, gabapentin and vigabatrin) appear to be completely devoid of enzyme inducing characteristics, at least as far as the enzymes investigated are concerned.