Tiagabine: the safety landscape

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: A critical view of the literature

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a sudden, unexpected, witnessed or unwitnessed, non-traumatic and non-drowning death, occurring in benign circumstances, in an individual with epilepsy, with or without evidence for a seizure and excluding documented status epilepticus in which postmortem examination does not reveal other causes of death. Lower diagnostic levels are assigned when cases met most or all of these criteria, but data suggested more than one possible cause of death. The incidence of SUDEP ranged from 0.09 to 2.4 per 1000 person-years. Differences can be attributed to the age of the study populations (with peaks in the 20-40-year age group) and the severity of the disease. Young age, disease severity (in particular, a history of generalized TCS), having symptomatic epilepsy, and the response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) are possible independent predictors of SUDEP. The pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully known due to the limited data available and because SUDEP is not always witnessed and has been electrophysiologically monitored only in a few cases with simultaneous assessment of respiratory, cardiac, and brain activity. The pathophysiological basis of SUDEP may vary according to different circumstances that make that particular seizure, in that specific moment and in that patient, a fatal event. The main hypothesized mechanisms, which could contribute to a cascade of events, are cardiac dysfunction (included potential effects of ASMs, genetically determined channelopathies, acquired heart diseases), respiratory dysfunction (included postictal arousal deficit for the respiratory mechanism, acquired respiratory diseases), neuromodulator dysfunction, postictal EEG depression and genetic factors.

Second Generation of Antiepileptic Drugs and Oxidative Stress

Epilepsy is a chronic disease of the central nervous system characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures. As a result of epileptic seizure or status epilepticus oxidants are excessively formed, which may be one of the causes of neuronal death. Given the role of oxidative stress in epileptogenesis, as well as the participation of this process in other neurological conditions, we decided to review the latest state of knowledge regarding the relationship between selected newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), also known as antiseizure drugs, and oxidative stress. The literature review indicates that drugs enhancing GABA-ergic transmission (e.g., vigabatrin, tiagabine, gabapentin, topiramate) or other antiepileptics (e.g., lamotrigine, levetiracetam) reduce neuronal oxidation markers. In particular, levetiracetam may produce ambiguous effects in this regard. However, when a GABA-enhancing drug was applied to the healthy tissue, it tended to increase oxidative stress markers in a dose-dependent manner. Studies on diazepam have shown that it exerts a neuroprotective effect in a "U-shaped" dose-dependent manner after excitotoxic or oxidative stress. Its lower concentrations are insufficient to protect against neuronal damage, while higher concentrations produce neurodegeneration. Therefore, a conclusion follows that newer AEDs, enhancing GABA-ergic neurotransmission, may act similarly to diazepam, causing neurodegeneration and oxidative stress when used in high doses.

Antiseizure Drugs and Movement Disorders

The relationship between antiseizure drugs and movement disorders is complex and not adequately reviewed so far. Antiseizure drugs as a treatment for tremor and other entities such as myoclonus and restless leg syndrome is the most common scenario, although the scientific evidence supporting their use is variable. However, antiseizure drugs also represent a potential cause of iatrogenic movement disorders, with parkinsonism and tremor the most common disorders. Many other antiseizure drug-induced movement disorders are possible and not always correctly identified. This review was conducted by searching for all the possible combinations between 15 movement disorders (excluding ataxia) and 24 antiseizure drugs. The main objective was to describe the movement disorders treated and worsened or induced by antiseizure drugs. We also summarized the proposed mechanisms and risk factors involved in the complex interaction between antiseizure drugs and movement disorders. Antiseizure drugs mainly used to treat movement disorders are clonazepam, gabapentin, lacosamide, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, pregabalin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Antiseizure drugs that worsen or induce movement disorders are cenobamate, ethosuximide, felbamate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. Antiseizure drugs with a variable effect on movement disorders are carbamazepine and valproate while no effect on movement disorders has been reported for brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, and stiripentol. Although little information is available on the adverse effects or benefits on movement disorders of newer antiseizure drugs (such as brivaracetam, cenobamate, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, and rufinamide), the evidence collected in this review should guide the choice of antiseizure drugs in patients with concomitant epilepsy and movement disorders. Finally, these notions can lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology and treatments of movement disorders.

Tiagabine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common neurological condition that affects up to 1% of the population. Nearly 30% of people with epilepsy are resistant to currently available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and require treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs in combination. Tiagabine is one of the newer AEDs that can be used as an adjunct (add-on) to standard AEDs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal seizures.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an updated Cochrane review, last published in 2014. For the latest update, we searched the following databases on 22 January 2019: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to January 21, 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We imposed no language restrictions. We also contacted the manufacturers of tiagabine and experts in the field to identify any ongoing or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised placebo-controlled add-on trials conducted in people of any age with focal epilepsy. The studies could be double-, single-, or unblinded and of parallel or cross-over design. They had to have a minimum treatment period of eight weeks. We also included trials using an active drug control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data according to the standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration for this review update. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, effects on cognition and quality of life. The primary analyses were performed by intention-to-treat. We calculated worst-case and best-case analyses for seizure outcomes. We evaluated dose response using regression models. Two review authors assessed risk of bias in each study using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool.

MAIN RESULTS

No further studies were added since the previous update in 2014. The review included six trials (four parallel-group and two cross-over group trials) consisting of 948 participants. For the main comparison, tiagabine versus placebo, all participants were aged between 12 and 77 years and the study treatment periods ranged from 12 to 22 weeks. The overall risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (tiagabine versus placebo) was 3.16 (95% CI 1.97 to 5.07; 3 trials; 769 participants; high-certainty evidence). Because of differences in response rates among trials, regression models were unable to provide reliable estimates of response to individual doses. The RR for treatment withdrawal (tiagabine versus placebo) was 1.81 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.62; 3 trials, 769 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Dizziness and tremor were significantly associated with tiagabine therapy. For cognitive and quality-of-life outcomes, the limited available data suggested no significant effects on cognition, mood, or adjustment. One trial comparing tiagabine with an active drug control group (tiagabine versus topiramate) found no significant differences between the two add-on drugs for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.58; 1 trial; 41 participants) or for treatment withdrawal (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.74; one trial; 41 participants). We judged two of the six included studies to have low risk of bias, three studies to have an unclear risk of bias, and one study to have a high risk of bias. Methods for randomisation sequence generation were the least reported trial design factor and generated the most concerns regarding risk of bias. We rated the overall certainty of the evidence as largely moderate to high using the GRADE approach. We rated the evidence for two of the adverse effect outcomes, nausea and tremor, as low certainty.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tiagabine reduced seizure frequency but was associated with some adverse effects when used as an add-on treatment in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The findings of the current review are mainly applicable to adults and adolescents, and may not necessarily be applicable to children as none of the trials included participants aged under 12 years. We found no significant differences between tiagabine and topiramate as add-on drugs; however, evidence was provided by a single trial and was therefore limited.

The Functional Role of Spontaneously Opening GABAA Receptors in Neural Transmission

Ionotropic type of γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABA_ARs) produce two forms of inhibitory signaling: phasic inhibition generated by rapid efflux of neurotransmitter GABA into the synaptic cleft with subsequent binding to GABA_ARs, and tonic inhibition generated by persistent activation of extrasynaptic and/or perisynaptic GABA_ARs by GABA continuously present in the extracellular space. It is widely accepted that phasic and tonic GABAergic inhibition is mediated by receptor groups of distinct subunit composition and modulated by different cytoplasmic mechanisms. Recently, however, it has been demonstrated that spontaneously opening GABA_ARs (s-GABA_ARs), which do not need GABA binding to enter an active state, make a significant input into tonic inhibitory signaling. Due to GABA-independent action mode, s-GABA_ARs promise new safer options for therapy of neural disorders (such as epilepsy) devoid of side effects connected to abnormal fluctuations of GABA concentration in the brain. However, despite the potentially important role of s-GABA_ARs in neural signaling, they still remain out of focus of neuroscience studies, to a large extent due to technical difficulties in their experimental research. Here, we summarize present data on s-GABA_ARs functional properties and experimental approaches that allow isolation of s-GABA_ARs effects from those of conventional (GABA-dependent) GABA_ARs.

Medicinal-Induced Behavior Disorders

Commonly used medications can have neuropsychiatric and behavioral effects that may be idiosyncratic or metabolic in nature, or a function of interactions with other drugs, toxicity, or withdrawal. This article explores an approach to the patient with central nervous system toxicity, depending on presentation of sedation versus agitation and accompanying physical signs and symptoms. The effects of antihypertensives, opioids, antibiotics, antiepileptic agents, steroids, Parkinson's disease medications, antipsychotics, medications for human immunodeficiency virus infection, cancer chemotherapeutics, and immunotherapies are discussed. A look at the prevalence of adverse reactions to medications and the errors underlying such occurrences is included.

Tiagabine-induced stupor in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: nonconvulsive status epilepticus or encephalopathy?

BACKGROUND

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus has been rarely reported with tiagabine (TGB) use.

METHODS

We report findings from continuous video-EEG monitoring and serial neurological examinations during prolonged episodes of stupor associated with TGB use in three patients who did not have epilepsy.

RESULTS

All three patients had emergence of new type of events after starting TGB treatment. All three patients had gradual decline in responsiveness to verbal stimuli, intermittent twitching of the upper extremities, and urinary incontinence. The corresponding EEG showed gradual build-up of generalized bisynchronous delta-wave activity with subsequent intermingled sharp transients. Two patients did not respond to IV lorazepam, one of whom also did not respond to IV phenytoin. The EEG slowly normalized in conjunction with associated clinical improvement. Habitual seizures were found to be psychogenic, with no interictal evidence for epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Tiagabine-related stupor may represent a form of toxic encephalopathy in some cases rather than nonconvulsive status epilepticus.

Antiepileptic drug effects on mood and behavior: molecular targets

With almost 100 years of clinical experience, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) remain the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. They suppress epileptic seizures by acting on a variety of mechanisms and molecular targets involved in the regulation of neuronal excitability. These include inhibitory-GABAergic and excitatory-glutamatergic neurotransmission, as well as ion (sodium and calcium) conductance through voltage-gated channels. On the other hand, accruing evidence indicates that these mechanisms and targets are also implicated in the regulation of mood and behavior, which may explain why each AED is associated with specific psychotropic effects. These effects, however, cannot be explained solely on the basis of the known mode of action of each AED, and other mechanisms or targets are likely to be implicated. In this article, we review positive and negative effects of AEDs on mood and behavior, discuss putative underlying mechanisms, and highlight knowledge gaps which should be addressed in future studies.

Tiagabine for acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder is a common recurrent illness with high levels of chronicity. Treatment resistance persists despite the use of established medications, such as lithium and valproate. New medications are required for the treatment of refractory cases. Some open-label reports have suggested that the anticonvulsant tiagabine may be efficacious in bipolar disorder. There is a need to clarify the evidence available, in the form of randomised controlled trials, for its use in the treatment of acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine in the treatment of acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder.

SEARCH METHODS

In this update, we searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) to October 2012. This register contains relevant randomised controlled trials from: The Cochrane Library (all years), EMBASE (1974 to date), MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). We examined reference lists of relevant papers and major textbooks of affective disorder. We contacted authors, other experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies for knowledge of suitable published or unpublished trials. We handsearched specialist journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, which compared tiagabine with placebo or with active agents in the treatment of any acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder in adults, male and female, aged 18 to 74 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors performed data extraction and methodological quality assessment independently. For analysis, we planned to use risk ratio for binary efficacy outcomes and mean difference or standardised mean difference for continuously distributed outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review we found no studies which fulfilled the Cochrane criteria for randomised controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no randomised controlled trials of tiagabine in the treatment of acute episodes of bipolar disorder. However, there are reports that a number of patients suffered episodes of syncope or seizure. Further investigation of the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine in the treatment of acute affective episodes of bipolar disorder should await the clarification of the nature of the reported episodes of syncope and seizure-like activity and an examination of the level of risk involved.

Tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Tiagabine, an anticonvulsant, has been reported to have efficacy in prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder in case reports and in case series.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine, relative to placebo, and other agents in the prevention or attenuation, or both, of episodes of bipolar disorder in adults. The efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine were considered in terms of mood symptoms, mortality, general health, social functioning, adverse effects and overall acceptability to participants.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis review group's specialised registers (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References) were searched to 1 October 2011. These registers contains relevant randomised controlled trials from: The Cochrane Library (all years to date), EMBASE, (1974 to date) MEDLINE (1950 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). Reference lists of relevant papers and major textbooks of affective disorder were examined. Authors, other experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for knowledge of suitable published or unpublished trials. Specialist journals and conference proceedings were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of tiagabine versus placebo, alternative mood stabilisers or antipsychotics, for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder in adults, male and female, aged 18 to 74 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were to be extracted from the original reports of included studies independently by two authors. The main outcomes to be assessed were:(1) the efficacy of tiagabine treatment in preventing or attenuating further episodes of bipolar disorder, including its efficacy in rapid cycling disorder; (2) the acceptability of tiagabine treatment to participants; (3) the prevalence of side effects; and (4) mortality, if any, on tiagabine treatment.Outcomes concerning relapse or recurrence were to be analysed excluding data from studies using discontinuation protocols, which were to be analysed separately. Subgroup analyses were to be performed to examine the effects of tiagabine treatment in rapid cycling bipolar disorder and previous mood stabiliser non-responders. Data were to be analysed using Review Manager 5.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised controlled trials of tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is an insufficient methodologically rigorous evidence base to draw any conclusions regarding the use of tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. There is a need for randomised controlled trials examining the therapeutic potential of this agent in bipolar disorder. There have been some reports of syncope or seizures, or both, when tiagabine has been used for the acute treatment of mania. It needs to be established if such adverse effects occur in the maintenance phase as well.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy in children

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUPEP) is the commonest cause of seizure-related mortality in people with intractable epilepsy. The incidence of SUDEP varies in different epilepsy populations, with lower rates in population-based studies, higher in referral populations and clinical trials of adjunct drugs for complex partial epilepsy, and highest rates for surgical series. Certain risk factors for SUDEP have been identified, with seizure activity being one of the strongest risk factor for SUDEP. Suspected underlying mechanisms include cardiac dysrhythmias, seizure-related apnoea and postictal respiratory arrest. Prevention of SUDEP has centred on seizure control, and SUDEP incidence has been reduced by epilepsy surgery in some studies. In this review, we present epidemiological data, and discuss risk factors and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms that are associated with SUDEP in children.

Psychotropic effects of antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs are important psychotropic agents that are commonly used to treat psychiatric disorders. The behavioral effects of antiepileptic drugs may differ between epilepsy and psychiatric patient populations. Randomized, double-blind, controlled data on the psychotropic efficacy of antiepileptic drugs are limited mainly to bipolar disorder.

Psychopharmacology of topiramate: from epilepsy to bipolar disorder

Topiramate (TPM) is one of the novel antiepileptic drugs and exhibits a wide range of mechanisms of action. Efficacy of TPM has been demonstrated in partial-onset seizures and primary generalized seizures in adults and children, as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. More recently, TPM has been proposed as an add-on treatment for patients with lithium-resistant bipolar disorder, especially those displaying rapid-cycling and mixed states. This paper reviews the multiple mechanisms of action and the tolerability profile of TPM in the light of its therapeutic potential in affective disorders. Studies of TPM in bipolar disorder are evaluated, and the efficacy and tolerability issues as a mood stabilizing agent are discussed.

Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs on Mood and Behavior

Psychiatric disorders in epilepsy have a multifactorial etiology, pharmacotherapy being only one of many risk factors, which can be both biological and psychosocial. Two important mechanisms of drug-induced psychiatric changes are seizure control/forced normalization in psychosis and GABA-ergic effects in depression. Among the psychiatric adverse events of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), behavioral problems are the most commonly reported, followed by affective disorders. Psychosis is a relatively rare, although severe, complication. Psychotropic effects of AEDs warrant further research because many relevant parameters related to pathological mechanisms, frequency, psychopathology, and prognosis are not well understood. Behavioral side-effect profiles of AEDs, both negative and positive psychotropic effects, should be considered in the choice of the optimal drug for an individual patient.

Tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders

BACKGROUND

Tiagabine, an anticonvulsant, has been reported to have efficacy in prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder in case reports and in case series.

OBJECTIVES

To review the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine, relative to placebo, and other agents in the prevention and/or attenuation of episodes of bipolar affective disorder. The efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine were considered in terms of mood symptoms, mortality, general health, social functioning, adverse effects and overall acceptability to patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following databases were searched on 13-10-2005. The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registers (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References),The Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CCCTR),EMBASE,MEDLINE,LILACS,PsycLIT andPsyndex. Reference lists of relevant papers and major textbooks of affective disorder were examined.Authors, other experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for knowledge of suitable published or unpublished trials. Specialist journals and conference proceedings were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials which compare tiagabine with placebo, alternative mood stabilisers or antipsychotics, where the stated intent of intervention was the maintenance treatment of bipolar affective disorder, were sought. Bipolar patients, male and female, of all ages were to be included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were to be extracted from the original reports if they met our inclusion criteria. The main outcomes to be assessed were:(1) The efficacy of tiagabine treatment in preventing or attenuating further episodes of bipolar affective disorder, including its efficacy in rapid cycling disorder.(2) The acceptability of tiagabine treatment to patients.(3) The prevalence of side effects.(4) Mortality, if any, on tiagabine treatment.Outcomes concerning relapse or recurrence were to be analysed excluding data from studies using discontinuation protocols, which were to be analysed separately. Sub-group analyses were to be performed to examine the effects of tiagabine treatment in rapid cycling bipolar disorder and previous mood stabiliser non-responders. Data were to be analysed using Review Manager version 4.2.8.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised controlled trials of tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is an insufficient methodologically rigorous evidence base to provide guidance on the use of tiagabine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. There is a need for randomised controlled trials examining the therapeutic potential of this agent in bipolar disorder, after the nature of reported episodes of syncope or seizure in tiagabine-treated bipolar patients has been established.

Tiagabine in the treatment of acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder: efficacy and acceptability

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder is a common recurrent illness with high levels of chronicity. Treatment resistance persists despite the use of established medications, such as lithium and valproate. New medications are required for the treatment of refractory cases. Some open-label reports have suggested that the anticonvulsant tiagabine may be efficacious in bipolar disorder. There is a need to clarify the evidence available, in the form of randomised controlled trials, for its use in the treatment of acute affective episodes in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine in the treatment of acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following databases were searched on 13-10-2005. The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registers (CCDANCTR-Studies and CCDANCTR-References),The Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CCCTR),EMBASE,MEDLINE,LILACS,PsycLIT andPsyndex. Reference lists of relevant papers and major textbooks of mood disorder were searched. Handsearches were done (specialist journals and conference proceedings). Authors, other experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for knowledge of suitable published or unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, which compared tiagabine with placebo or with active agents in the treatment of any acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder, were selected. Studies of participants with bipolar disorder were to be included. Subjects could be of either sex and of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. For analysis, relative risk was used for binary efficacy outcomes and the weighted mean difference or standardised mean differerence was used for continuously distributed outcomes

MAIN RESULTS

We did not find any studies which fulfilled the Cochrane criteria of randomised controlled trials. However, one uncontrolled open label study and one case series were found. There were also three case reports/series of acute treatment which were continued into maintenance therapy, and one open non-randomised study with this design. The results of these studies are inconsistent.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no randomised controlled trials of tiagabine in bipolar disorder. In the reported cases, a significant proportion of patients suffered episodes of syncope or seizure. There is a need for randomised controlled trials examining the efficacy and acceptability of tiagabine in the acute treatment of bipolar disorder, after the nature of these episodes has been clarified.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: evidence-based analysis of incidence and risk factors

PURPOSE

To provide an evidence-based analysis of the risk factors and incidence of SUDEP, and to assess methodological aspects and sources of variation in studies dealing with SUDEP.

METHODS

An expert in library resources and electronic databases comprehensively searched Medline, Index Medicus, and the Cochrane library. We included case-control or cohort studies focusing on SUDEP in children or adults, published in the English language. Two reviewers independently applied study eligibility criteria and extracted data, resolving disagreements through discussion.

RESULTS

Of 404 citations identified, 83 potentially eligible articles were reviewed in full text and 36 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria (29 cohort and 8 case-control studies). In studies using non-SUDEP deaths as controls the most consistent risk factors were a seizure preceding death, and subtherapeutic antiepileptic drug levels. In studies that used persons living with epilepsy as controls the main risk factors for SUDEP were youth, high seizure frequency, high number of antiepileptic drugs and long duration of epilepsy. The annual incidence of SUDEP ranged from 0 to 10:1000. It was highest in studies of candidates for epilepsy surgery and epilepsy referral centers (2.2:1000-10:1000), intermediate in studies including patients with mental retardation (3.4:1000-3.6:1000), and lowest in children (0-0.2:1000). The incidence was similar in autopsy series (0.35:1000-2.5:1000) and in studies of epilepsy patients in the general population (0-1.35:1000). The median proportion of SUDEP in relation to overall mortality in epilepsy was 40 and 4% in high- and low-risk groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although studies on SUDEP are heterogeneous in methodology, consistent patterns in incidence and risk factors emerge. Low- and high-risk patient groups are identified, which determine the relative contribution of SUDEP to overall mortality in epilepsy. In addition to patient population, risk factors for SUDEP depend on the type of controls used for comparison (dead versus live patients with epilepsy). Risk factors found in different studies are not necessarily contradictory, but are often complementary.

Treating refractory epilepsy with tiagabine: clinical experience

Epilepsy remains difficult to treat with more than 30% of patients being refractory to conventional anticonvulsant therapy. Combination therapy may improve seizure control in some of these patients. Tiagabine is a new anticonvulsant that has a unique mechanism of action as a selective gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) re-uptake inhibitor (SGRI). Twenty consecutive patients with refractory epilepsy were treated with tiagabine, and prior to tiagabine administration the mean number of anticonvulsants that each patient had taken was five. Tiagabine therapy was initiated at a dose of 5 or 10mg per day and was increased at weekly increments of 5 or 10 mg per day, respectively. Thirty-five percent of patients receiving tiagabine (20-40 mg per day, mean 34.29 mg per day) achieved a > or =50% reduction in seizure frequency. Tiagabine was effective when added to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, or oxcarbazepine. Tiagabine appeared more effective at higher doses. Side effects were predominately central nervous system-related, the most common being dizziness. For optimal results, tiagabine should be initiated at low doses and titrated slowly. This observational study has demonstrated tiagabine to be effective and safe in patients with refractory epilepsy.

Mood effects of antiepileptic drugs

This article reviews our knowledge about a specific subgroup of chronic CNS-related side effects of antiepileptic drugs (AED) treatment, i.e., the effects of AEDs on mood. In line with a recent hypothesis, using the experience of AED treatment in psychiatry, we examined whether mood effects are related to the known anticonvulsant mechanisms of action of the AEDs. Specifically we examined whether AEDs, acting through potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmitter release, have "sedating" effects on mood, whereas AEDs that act through the reduction of excitatory glutamate neurotransmitter release have "activating" effects on mood. The results of this review yield evidence that there are relationships between the known anticonvulsant mechanisms of action of the AEDs and mood effects. Mood effects occur especially when the drugs have a sustained effect on neuronal mechanisms, in particular when the inhibitory or excitatory neurotransmitter release is altered. Drugs with "use-dependent" impact on sodium or calcium channels probably have a more transient impact and do not lead to interictal stable mood effects. Drugs with multiple mechanisms of action seem to combine a favorable efficacy profile with an increased risk of severe mood problems. The quality of the evidence, however, is not conclusive and there are many paradoxical results. One reason for this lack of "fit" may be the use in this review of a simplified classification, based only on the predominant mechanism of action to classify a drug. Only a limited number of AEDs (ethosuximide, tiagabine) are characterized by a single anticonvulsant mechanism of action. Probably more detailed coupling of mechanisms of action (e.g., inspecting the type and route of impact on GABA release) and mood effects may give less confusing results. The use of magnetic resonance imaging techniques such as spectroscopy may provide interesting results.

Does epilepsy surgery lower the mortality of drug-resistant epilepsy?

Drug-resistant epilepsy has proved to be associated with an increased standardized mortality ratio (SMR), primarily due to seizure-related fatalities including sudden unexpected death (SUDEP). Recent studies have suggested that the surgical cure of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) was likely to normalize the SMR of patients suffering from refractory TLE. However, these studies raise a number of methodological issues, which have not always been fully addressed. Some conclusions have relied on previously reported data, indicating a SMR of approximately 5, and a SUDEP incidence of 9/1000 patient-years in drug-resistant epilepsy. In fact, as shown in this review, SMR varied considerably, from 2 to 16, in the various series of patients with refractory epilepsy, whereas the average SUDEP incidence in the same populations was calculated at 3.7/1000 patient-years. Other conclusions were based on the comparison of either surgically and medically treated patients, or cured and non-cured operated patients. In both situations, the two groups included a different proportion of excellent and poor surgical candidates. The biological differences that distinguish these two populations might explain part of the differences observed in their mortality rate, regardless of the effect of surgery. In particular, temporal-plus epilepsies involving the insula, the frontal orbital, or the frontal operculum region, might favour ictal arrhythmias, central apnoea and secondary generalization, which in turn would increase the risk of SUDEP. Future studies are thus warranted to specifically address these issues.

Risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a controlled prospective study based on coroners cases

We performed a controlled prospective study of pathologically verified sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a coronial setting, to identify risk factors. We prospectively studied coronial deaths of people with epilepsy in Vic., Australia, during a 21-month period. Fifty SUDEP and 50 subjects with epilepsy who died of other causes (controls) were collected sequentially. Clinical data was obtained shortly after death from questionnaires completed by treating doctors, discussion with family members and coronial files, including police reports of death, autopsy and toxicology reports. Factors assessed were age, sex, duration of epilepsy, type of seizure(s), seizure frequency, symptomatic epilepsy, including post-traumatic epilepsy, presence of structural brain lesion, idiopathic epilepsy, mental retardation, psychiatric illness, including dementia, recent stressful life event, particular antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and AED polytherapy, compliance with AED treatment, psychotropic drug prescription, alcohol and other substance abuse, place of death and evidence of terminal seizure. The SUDEP group was characterised by younger age and higher proportion found dead in bed and with evidence of terminal seizure compared to controls. The profile of patients at risk for SUDEP are young people with epilepsy. They are most likely to die in sleep and our data support the view that SUDEP is a seizure-related event. This, taken in conjunction with the finding that there was no increased risk associated with a particular AED in monotherapy or multiple AEDs suggests that attempts to better treat patients' epilepsy with AEDs might decrease the risk of SUDEP. Although the literature suggests that SUDEP is more frequent in patients with severe epilepsy, we did not find a correlation with seizure frequency suggesting that other clinical indices may be more important.

Clinical and EEG findings in six patients with altered mental status receiving tiagabine therapy

Tiagabine (TGB), a novel GABA reuptake inhibitor antiepileptic drug, has been reported to induce nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in patients with generalized or partial onset seizures. We describe six patients with refractory partial epilepsy treated with add-on TGB. They developed acute intermittent or progressive chronic confusion associated with diffuse slowing of the electroencephalogram (EEG), shortly after an increase in dose of TGB. This remitted in each situation after reduction of the daily dose. The possibility of nonconvulsive status epilepticus or toxic encephalopathy is discussed.

Psychiatric uses of antiepileptic treatments

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) possess potent negative or positive psychotropic effects. Clear evidence of benefit exists for valproate, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine in bipolar disorder. Reports of benefit from various AEDs in mood, anxiety, impulse control, and personality disorder are reviewed. Further research is needed to clarify which patients are likely to benefit. Clinicians must closely attend to the ongoing risk/benefit analysis and consider possible iatrogenic worsening of neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy

Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) accounts for 7-17% of deaths among people with epilepsy. Both cardiac and pulmonary derangement have been postulated as proximate causes. Patients with uncontrolled seizures are at greatest risk for SUDEP, and experiencing tonic-clonic seizures, taking multiple antiepileptic drugs and having coexisting neurologic disease further increase the risk.

Strategies for optimizing antiepileptic drug therapy in elderly people

The elderly take more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than all other adults. This extensive use directly correlates with an increased prevalence of epilepsy in a growing population of older people, as well as other neuropsychiatric conditions such as neuropathic pain and behavioral disorders associated with dementia and for which AEDs are administered. The agents account for nearly 10% of all adverse drug reactions in the elderly and are the fourth leading cause of adverse drug reactions in nursing home residents. Numerous factors associated with advanced age contribute to the high frequency of untoward drug effects in this population; however, strategies are available to ensure optimal outcomes.

Tiagabine in clinical practice

Among the newly introduced antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), tiagabine (TGB) stands out as a compound with a well-understood and documented mechanism of action. It is a lipophilic derivative of nipecotic acid that blocks gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake by inhibition of the GAT-1 transportation system, and that has no other significant pharmacodynamic effect. The relationship between intake and blood levels is linear. Usual daily maintenance doses range from 20 to 50 mg. It is completely absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, and its half-life is approximately 7-9 h. TGB is sensitive to enzyme induction: when coprescribed with enzyme-inducing AEDs, its half-life is shortened to 2-3 h, whereas the daily dosage has to be increased into the upper range. It should be given 3 times per day. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, add-on studies conducted in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsies have demonstrated its efficacy and overall safety. The clinical benefits appear to persist over time. Data on its use in monotherapy are scanty. The efficacy and tolerability of TGB in the pediatric age still remain to be investigated adequately. In daily practice, TGB appears to be a safe drug, but mild to moderate side effects are frequently seen, especially during titration: these include dizziness and fatigue, and are clearly abated when the drug is absorbed during meals. Titration should be especially slow, no faster than 5 mg weekly. Clinicians also should beware of the possible occurrence of confusion, which may be misdiagnosed as absence status, a short-lasting, quickly reversible central nervous system-related side effect that appears to be correlated with the peak plasma concentrations of TGB. Particularly beneficial indications for TGB and/or AED associations including TGB have not been pointed out, but there is a hint that it works best in temporal lobe epilepsies.

Therapeutic safety monitoring: what to look for and when to look for it

This review focuses on the safety problems associated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as revealed by laboratory testing and clinical examination. There are two classes of side effects: (a) common and mild and (b) rare and severe. Allergic reactions to AEDs are common and usually mild. However, on rare occasions, they can progress to more severe cutaneous disorders, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Severe allergic reactions to AEDs range from immune responses with fever to multiorgan dysfunction. Allergic rashes may be genetically or immunologically determined. Laboratory abnormalities produced by AEDs are common and mild, and include hepatic enzyme elevation associated with phenytoin and mild elevation in ammonia associated with valproate. Serious, although rare, idiosyncratic side effects, such as aplastic anemia, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia, have also occurred with AEDs. These reactions are largely confined to the "classic" AEDs. With the exception of felbamate, AEDs approved in the past decade have not been plagued by severe idiosyncratic reactions. Subtle endocrine abnormalities, including variations in thyroid function tests and bone metabolism, and the often subclinical effects on peripheral nerve conduction produced by phenytoin and carbamazepine, are also examined.

Lamotrigine Monotherapy Improves Depressive Symptoms in Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Valproate

Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. The antiepileptic drug lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective treatment for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder and to enhance mood and well-being in epilepsy patients. The effects of lamotrigine monotherapy on depressive symptoms in epilepsy have not been evaluated to date in a controlled clinical trial. A recently completed double-blind epilepsy trial comparing the effects of lamotrigine monotherapy and valproate monotherapy on weight change incorporated a battery of standard mood assessments. Mean screening Beck Depression Inventory scores showed that both lamotrigine and valproate groups suffered from mild depression at baseline. Lamotrigine monotherapy was reliably associated with earlier and larger improvements than valproate in mood assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States. Considered in the context of other data showing lamotrigine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression, these results suggest that lamotrigine improves mood in mildly depressed patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine may be particularly useful in treating epilepsy patients with comorbid depression, the most common psychiatric illness in epilepsy.

Tiagabine adjunctive therapy in children with refractory epilepsy: a single-blind dose escalating study

Tiagabine, a specific gamma-aminobutyric acid-uptake inhibitor, has been shown to be reasonably well tolerated and efficacious as adjunctive treatment for partial seizures in adults and is now being investigated in children. This 4-month, single-blind study evaluated the tolerability, safety and preliminary efficacy of ascending doses (0.25-1.5 mg/kg/day) of tiagabine add-on therapy in 52 children over the age of 2 years with different syndromes of refractory epilepsy. Adverse events, mostly mild to moderate, were reported by 39% of children during the single-blind placebo period and by 83% of children during tiagabine treatment. The events predominantly affected the nervous system with asthenia (19%), nervousness (19%), dizziness (17%) and somnolence (17%) being the most common. Only three children (6%) withdrew because of adverse events. Tiagabine appeared to reduce seizures more in localisation-related epilepsy syndromes than in generalised epilepsy syndromes. Twenty-three patients with localisation-related epilepsy syndromes were included and 17 of these patients entered the fourth dosing period. The 17 patients had a median reduction of seizure rate in the fourth month of treatment of 33% compared with baseline. In comparison, 13 of 22 children with seven different generalised epilepsy syndromes entered the fourth dosing period with a median change of seizure rate of 0%. Two patients experienced single episodes of status epilepticus during treatment; both cases resolved. Tiagabine showed efficacy mainly in localisation-related syndromes and was well tolerated by most children in a group of very refractory patients and warrants further study in children with epilepsy.

Tiagabine in the treatment of epilepsy--a clinical review with a guide for the prescribing physician

Tiagabine is currently recommended mainly as add-on therapy in adults and children above 12 years with partial epilepsy not satisfactorily controlled with other antiepileptic drugs. Based on available evidence and our clinical experience, tiagabine should be used preferably in patients sharing one or more of the following additional features, (i) a history of drug-induced cutaneous adverse events; (ii) mild to moderate epilepsy allowing for a slow titration and gradual onset of anticonvulsant action over a few weeks; (iii) patients for whom it is particularly important to avoid a deterioration in cognitive performance; and, (iv) patients who failed to respond to previous treatment with sodium channel blocker agents as they may particularly benefit from the introduction of tiagabine, due to its GABAergic mechanism of action. Tiagabine can also be used successfully in other patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Tiagabine is not indicated for patients with generalized or unclassified epilepsies and for patients with severely impaired liver function.

Safety of long-term treatment with tiagabine

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with tiagabine. We reviewed the case report forms of patients with refractory partial epilepsy who took tiagabine for longer than 6 months in two long-term studies. We classified all adverse events based on severity and persistence, and recorded the dose at onset of each adverse event. We then divided patients into those treated for 6-12 months, 12-24 months and > 24 months. We compared the adverse event profile and change in seizure frequency among the three groups. Forty-two patients took tiagabine for longer than 6 months. The mean duration of treatment was 22.6 months. The mean monthly seizure frequency was 12.7 at baseline and 8.1 at study termination (36% decrease). The most common adverse events were: tiredness (56%), headache (46%), dizziness (44%), visual symptoms (blurring, difficulty focusing, diplopia) (39%), altered mentation (32%), and tremor (31%). The adverse event profile was comparable among the three groups. Seizure frequency was significantly more improved in the > 24 months group. Long-term treatment with tiagabine is well tolerated. The most important predictor of long-term therapy with tiagabine was the degree of seizure improvement.

Epilepsy, vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP system, all-cause mortality, and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death

PURPOSE

This report concerns the 2-year extension of the study of mortality and sudden, unexpected, unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in the cohort of patients receiving vagal nerve stimulation by the NCP System for the treatment of epilepsy.

METHODS

A cohort of 1,819 individuals was followed 3,176.3 person-years from implantation. The 25 deaths that occurred during NCP System activation were reviewed for SUDEP by a panel.

RESULTS

The mortality rates were lower [standardized mortality ratio (SMR = 3.6)] with the extended follow-up compared to the previous finding (SMR = 5.3). The SUDEP rates (4.1 vs. 4.5 per 1,000 person-years) were similar to those in the previous study of this cohort. When the vagal nerve stimulation experience is stratified by duration of use, the rate of SUDEP was 5.5 per 1,000 over the first 2 years, but only 1.7 per 1,000 thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality and SUDEP rates are similar to those reported from clinical trials of new drugs and cohorts of severe epilepsy. The lower SUDEP rates after 2 years of follow-up are intriguing, but require further investigation.

Tiagabine: absence of kinetic or dynamic interactions with ethanol

Tiagabine is a new antiepileptic drug that inhibits the uptake of gamma-aminobutyric acid into neurons and glia. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the effect of multiple doses of tiagabine on the adverse cognitive effects produced by a single dose of ethanol in 20 healthy volunteers. The effects of each drug on the pharmaco-kinetics of the other were also determined. Compared with placebo, tiagabine produced no statistically significant effects on digit vigilance speed (primary assessment variable) or accuracy, choice reaction time, immediate or delayed word recall, delayed word recognition speed or sensitivity, visual tracking, body sway, or subjective measures of alertness, calmness, and contentment. There was no evidence of a pharmacodynamic interaction between tiagabine and ethanol with respect to these variables. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tiagabine and ethanol (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], time to Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve) were unchanged during concomitant administration. Adverse events, which mainly affected the central nervous system, occurred with a similar incidence during tiagabine and placebo administration and were more common after the administration of ethanol. There appears to be no need for additional caution regarding driving or operating machinery when ethanol is administered to patients taking tiagabine.

Depression in epilepsy: etiology, phenomenology, and treatment

A history of depression or depressive symptomatology has been reported in up to two-thirds of patients with medically intractable epilepsy, whereas community studies have demonstrated affective disorder only in a quarter of these patients. Depression has been reported peri- and interictally. However, differentiation may be difficult in patients with frequent seizures. Most authors have found no correlation between depression and epilepsy variables. However, complex partial seizures, especially of temporal lobe origin, appear to be etiologic factors, particularly in men with left-sided foci. Depression is also more common in patients treated with polytherapy especially with barbiturates, phenytoin, and vigabatrin. Depression has also been described de novo after temporal lobectomy. Psychosocial factors also play a part, but underlying risk factors (e.g., genetic, endocrine and metabolic) may explain the increased rates of depression in people with epilepsy compared to those with other neurologic and chronic medical conditions. The depression appears to be endogenous. Patients tend to exhibit fewer neurotic traits and more psychotic symptoms such as paranoia, delusions, and persecutory auditory hallucinations. Treatment approaches include psychotherapy, rationalization of antiepileptic drug medication, antidepressant treatment, and ECT. The tricyclic and related antidepressants appear to be epileptogenic, especially in people at high risk (personal or family history of seizures, abnormal pretreatment EEG, brain damage, alcohol or substance abuse/withdrawal and concurrent use of CNS-active medication). Seizures tend to occur early in treatment or after dose increments, especially if rapidly titrated. There is little evidence that the newer antidepressants, e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, moclobemide, venlafaxine, or nefazodone are more epileptogenic than placebo.

Psychiatric syndromes related to antiepileptic drugs

All antiepileptic drugs may provoke positive or negative psychiatric reactions in individual patients. These psychotropic effects are not simply idiosyncratic but depend on the drug's anticonvulsive strength and the person's genetic and biographic psychiatric predisposition. Mechanisms related to psychiatric adverse events are polytherapy and folate deficiency, forced normalization, drug toxicity, and withdrawal. Our knowledge on dose independent, idiosyncratic psychotropic side effects is still limited. With respect to the older antiepileptic drugs there are almost no systematic data, and knowledge is largely empirical and based on anecdotal reports. With respect to the new generation of anticonvulsants there are data on psychiatric side effects from drug trials. However, these data are not always entirely transparent to the interested epileptologist. Moreover, drug trials are designed to test anticonvulsive efficacy and psychiatric adverse events are not systematically reported, thus severity psychopathologic nature of behavioral problems remain obscure. Differences in patients included in trials do not allow comparisons of psychiatric risks of specific drugs, particularly since following the vigabatrin experience, patients with a psychiatric history were often excluded from trials. In this chapter, methodological issues related to data on psychiatric adverse events of AED are discussed followed by an overview on the current knowledge on psychiatric side effect profiles of old and new antiepileptic drugs.

Review of controlled trials of gabitril (tiagabine): a clinician's viewpoint

A recent problem for doctors has been the choice of which new antiepileptic drug (AED) to select for treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. This article summarizes the clinical experience to date regarding the efficacy and safety of tiagabine (TGB; Gabitril) as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures. In its early Phase II development, TGB was evaluated in two multicenter pilot studies. Each had an open-label enrichment phase followed by a treatment phase with randomized, double-blind, two-period, cross-over phases. Between 24 and 50% of patients experienced reductions in seizure rates of > or =50%, depending on the type of partial seizure. In Phase III, three double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled adjunctive studies determined the efficacy of TGB in patients with refractory partial seizures. The first was a dose-response study employing doses of TGB-HCl of 16, 32 or 56 mg/day. Significant reductions in seizure rates were found with 32 and 56 mg/day. The second and third studies evaluated the efficacy of dosing TGB twice, three times, and four times daily, all of which showed similar efficacy. TGB efficacy in partial seizures was supported in several open trials, and no tolerance to efficacy was noted in long-term continuation studies. Tolerability was documented in all trials. Most adverse events were mild or moderate and transient, occurring during dose titration. They were clearly dose-related. No relevant changes in hematologic and biochemical tests, vital signs, or body weight were attributable to TGB. TGB appears to be an effective new drug for partial seizures with an acceptable safety profile.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

The majority of persons with epilepsy develop lasting remission from seizures, although mortality is significantly greater than that of the age-matched general population. Of the deaths that are thought to be directly related to seizures, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy is probably the commonest category; more so than status epilepticus or seizure-related accidents. Annual incidence rates vary from 1 in 200 patients with chronic epilepsy to about 1 in 1000 in more population-based studies. Young adults with severe, intractable epilepsy appear to be the most frequently affected group and may have even higher incidence rates. Other risk factors may also be important. An area of great research interest, several pathogenetic mechanisms have been postulated, centering mainly around cardiac rhythm and central hypoventilation. Given the frequent devastation caused by sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, the importance of seizure control is emphasised.

Tiagabine

Tiagabine (TGB) is a recently approved antiepileptic drug (AED) that inhibits y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) reuptake into neurons and glia, a mechanism of action that is specific and unique among the AEDs. TGB is potent and has linear and predictable pharmacokinetics. It has no clinically relevant effects on hepatic metabolism or serum concentrations of other AEDs, effects on laboratory values, or interactions with common non-AEDs. TGB is effective as add-on therapy for partial seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy in doses ranging from 30 to 56 mg daily. Conversion to TGB monotherapy can be achieved in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, although additional controlled studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of TGB as monotherapy and to establish the effective dosage range. In controlled studies, the most common adverse events of TGB are dizziness, asthenia, somnolence, accidental injury, infection, headache, nausea, and nervousness. These are usually mild to moderate in severity and almost always resolve without medical intervention.