Relation between intracarotid amobarbital memory asymmetry scores and hippocampal sclerosis in patients undergoing anterior temporal lobe resections

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure: when is it worth repeating?

PURPOSE

Despite the reported diagnostic value of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) or "Wada test" for determining hemispheric lateralization and memory functioning, it has never undergone formal reliability testing because a prospective test-retest study design is neither feasible nor ethical. However, some patients require repeat testing for clinical purposes, a circumstance that allows for exploration of issues related to reliability. The current investigation sought to: (1) evaluate the frequency of and reasons for repeated IAPs and (2) describe the test-retest reliability of repeated IAPs in a large tertiary epilepsy center.

METHODS

A 10-year review (2001-2011) of the New York University Langone Medical Center Comprehensive Epilepsy Center patient registry revealed 630 IAPs. Review of medical records identified 20 individuals who underwent two or more IAPs on separate days. Because IAPs repeated due to technical problems should be considered separate from IAPs repeated for other reasons because these IAPs likely included a change in the procedure (e.g., lower medication dose) in an attempt to ameliorate the complication, patients were grouped accordingly. Six patients underwent repeated IAPs due to technical complication and 14 patients underwent a repeated IAP due to other reasons (e.g., unexpected memory outcome, reconsideration of surgery years after a previous surgical work-up in which no surgery was performed, and/or consideration of a second surgery). Given that data obtained from injections ipsilateral to a seizure focus are sometimes considered in a manner clinically different from data obtained from injections contralateral to the seizure focus, memory outcome was classified relative to the side of identified seizure focus. The degree to which language and memory data were consistent across repeated IAPs was examined.

KEY FINDINGS

Language functioning was consistently lateralized across IAPs in all but one case. Among the six patients who experienced technical problems in the first IAP, three were fully participatory in the second procedure such that valid data were obtained. For the other three, the technical problem recurred with no change in outcome across procedures. Among the 14 patients with repeated IAPs due to other reasons, 79% of the available ipsilateral and 73% of the contralateral pass/fail outcomes were consistent across procedures. No difference between ipsilateral or contralateral injections was observed for the likelihood of a change in results (p = 0.57).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data identified overall high reliability for both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides with repeated IAP testing. Results indicated that although patients for whom a correctable technical problem was identified during the IAP may benefit from a repeat study, there is little benefit to repeating the IAP in patients with discordant or unexpected results (i.e., results are not likely to change). These data support the overall reliability of both the language and memory data obtained from the IAP.

Intracarotid amobarbital procedure for epilepsy surgery

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) has been used for more than half a century to determine language dominance and to assess risk for amnesia after anterior temporal lobectomy. However, because of the risk associated with angiography and the development of noninvasive techniques, the need for the IAP when evaluating patients for epilepsy surgery can now be questioned. The purpose of this review is to examine the clinical indications and efficacy of the Wada test in the preoperative evaluation of epilepsy surgery candidates. This article summarizes a debate that took place during the 2009 American Epilepsy Society (AES) annual course.

Hemisphere-specific Episodic Memory Networks in the Human Brain: A Correlation Study between Intracarotid Amobarbital Test and [18F]FDG-PET

The purpose of the present study was to explore the brain regions involved in human episodic memory by correlating unilateral memory performance estimated by the intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT) and interictal cerebral metabolism measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET). Using this method, regional alterations of cerebral metabolism associated with epilepsy pathophysiology are used to predict hemisphere-specific episodic memory function, hence, investigate the differential distribution of memory in each hemisphere. Sixty-two patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (35 left and 27 right) were studied using [18F]FDG-PET with complementary voxel-based statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and region-of-interest (ROI) methods of analysis. Positive regression was analyzed in SPM with a series of different thresholds (p = .001, .01 or .05) with a correction to 100 voxels. IAT memory performance in which left hemisphere was tested by right-sided injection of amobarbital correlated with [18F]FDG uptake in left lateral and medial temporal regions, and in the left ventrolateral frontal cortex. Right IAT memory performance correlated with [18F]FDG uptake in the right inferior parietal lobule, right dorsolateral frontal cortex, right precentral gyrus, and caudal portion of the right anterior cingulate cortex. ROI analysis corroborated these results. Analyses carried out separately in patients with left (n = 50) and nonleft (n = 12) dominance for language showed that in the nonleft dominant group, right IAT scores correlated with right fronto-temporal regions, whereas left total memory scores correlated with left lateral and medial temporal regions. The findings indicate that (i) episodic memory is subserved by more widespread cortical regions beyond the core mesiotemporal lobe memory structures; (ii) there are different networks functional in the two hemispheres; and (iii) areas involved in memory may be different between patients with left and nonleft dominance for language, particularly in the right hemisphere.

Presurgical assessment of memory-related brain structures: the Wada test and functional neuroimaging

Medial temporal lobe structures are known to play a major role in memory processing. Recent work has revealed that extratemporal structures (e.g. the frontal lobe and thalamus) may also be important in memory function. In candidates for epilepsy surgery, particularly in those with temporal lobe seizures, presurgical evaluation of memory function is essential, since seizures may originate in the neural substrate that is critical for memory. In this article, we review the tools used for presurgical evaluation and their contribution to the understanding of memory function, focusing on the Wada test, [18F]fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We also explore perspectives on future studies that may elucidate the role of the temporal and extratemporal structures in memory function and the mechanisms of cerebral plasticity.

Effect of Wada methodology in predicting lateralized memory impairment in pediatric epilepsy surgery candidates

Because Wada evaluations are not standardized, it is impossible to know to what degree method variance accounts for reported differences in results. To examine this problem, three comprehensive epilepsy surgery centers compared the efficacy of two Wada memory methods to predict seizure onset laterality in 152 children being considered for epilepsy surgery. Wada memory asymmetries were evaluated using either real objects with no verbal response required or more mixed stimuli requiring a verbal response. When using real objects, Wada memory performance was significantly worse when relying on the side of seizure onset in both left and right seizure onset children. In contrast, Wada memory performance using mixed stimuli was worse on the side of seizure onset only among patients with seizures originating in the left-hemisphere. The superiority of real objects was most apparent in younger children with left side seizure onset. Results suggest the use of mixed stimuli is less sensitive to the effects of unilateral seizure onset, and thus, diminishes the capacity of the Wada test to predict lateralized seizure onset in children.

Prediction of seizure-onset laterality by using Wada memory asymmetries in pediatric epilepsy surgery candidates

PURPOSE

Because the capacity of intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) memory assessment to predict seizure-onset laterality in children has not been thoroughly investigated, three comprehensive epilepsy surgery centers pooled their data and examined Wada memory asymmetries to predict side of seizure onset in children being considered for epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-two children with intractable epilepsy underwent Wada testing. Although the type and number of memory stimuli and methods varied at each institution, all children were presented with six to 10 items soon after amobarbital injection. After return to neurologic baseline, recognition memory for the stimuli was assessed. Seizure onset was determined by simultaneous video-EEG recordings of multiple seizures.

RESULTS

In children with unilateral temporal lobe seizures (n = 87), Wada memory asymmetries accurately predicted seizure laterality to a statistically significant degree. Wada memory asymmetries also correctly predicted side of seizure onset in children with extra-temporal lobe seizures (n = 65). Although individual patient prediction accuracy was statistically significant in temporal lobe cases, onset laterality was incorrectly predicted in < or =52% of children with left temporal lobe seizure onset, depending on the methods and asymmetry criterion used. There also were significant differences between Wada prediction accuracy across the three epilepsy centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that Wada memory assessment is useful in predicting side of seizure onset in many children. However, Wada memory asymmetries should be interpreted more cautiously in children than in adults.

Bilateral Memory Dysfunction in Epilepsy Surgery Candidates Detected by the Intracarotid Amobarbital Procedure (Wada Memory Test)

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) is widely used in the evaluation of candidates for resective epilepsy surgery, in part to identify patients at risk for postoperative amnesia. Yet there is no widely accepted standardized protocol, and there is a paucity of quantitative data to assess the factors associated with poor IAP performance. This report summarizes our findings on 110 patients with intractable focal epilepsy who underwent IAP testing at our center. Ipsilateral IAP scores for patients with left-sided seizure foci were significantly lower than those for patients with right-sided seizure foci. Falsely and poorly lateralizing scores were also significantly more common in subjects with left-sided seizure onsets. Twenty-four percent of subjects failed the IAP bilaterally, and patients who failed the IAP bilaterally had significantly lower scores on neuropsychologic measures. There was no difference between patients who passed and failed in the location, etiology, duration, or age of onset of epilepsy. We conclude that bilateral memory dysfunction is common in patients with intractable partial epilepsy. Whether memory dysfunction detected by IAP testing as performed at our center is predictive of functionally limiting postoperative amnesia remains to be determined.

Memory outcome after left anterior temporal lobectomy in patients with expected and reversed Wada memory asymmetry scores

PURPOSE

The ideal candidate for anterior temporal lobectomy surgery shows a Wada memory asymmetry (WMA) score characterized by better memory performance in the hemisphere contralateral to the seizure focus relative to the ipsilateral (surgical) hemisphere. However, some surgical candidates show a reversed WMA or better Wada memory performance in the hemisphere of surgical interest relative to the hemisphere contralateral to the seizure focus. To date, no data are available contrasting memory and seizure outcome for these two Wada groups. The present study compared memory and seizure outcome after left anterior temporal lobectomy (L-ATL) in patients showing expected and reversed WMA scores, and also examined the relationship of the individual hemisphere Wada memory scores for predicting verbal memory outcome after L-ATL.

METHODS

We compared 6-month postoperative verbal memory change scores and seizure outcome in L-ATL patients with either an expected (n=12) or reversed WMA (n=9) pattern on Wada memory testing.

RESULTS

L-ATL patients showing a reversed WMA score had a poorer verbal memory outcome and poorer seizure control after surgery compared with patients showing a WMA score in the expected direction.

CONCLUSIONS

L-ATL patients with a reversed WMA score have a greater risk for memory morbidity and poorer seizure outcome than do patients with a WMA score in the expected direction. The WMA score was the best predictor of memory outcome after L-ATL. When the WMA score is not considered, both individual Wada hemisphere scores (contralateral and ipsilateral) provided significant and independent contribution to predicting postoperative verbal memory functioning. These findings are discussed in the context of the functional reserve and hippocampal adequacy models of memory change after temporal lobectomy.

Intracarotid amobarbital procedure and prediction of postoperative memory in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis

PURPOSE

Although temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with dominant hemisphere hippocampal sclerosis generally have good cognitive outcome after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), a minority of patients experience at least mild post-ATL decline on one or more standardized measures of episodic and semantic memory. The goal of this investigation was to determine whether memory outcome in this group could be predicted from preoperative intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) recognition memory scores.

METHODS

Data from 22 left TLE patients were studied retrospectively. All were left hemisphere language dominant and had IAP scores for each hemisphere, a significant degree of pathology-confirmed left hippocampal sclerosis (HS+), and no positive MRI findings other than atrophy. Cognitive outcome status was represented by the number of pre- to post-ATL declines across three tests, as defined by 90th percentile Reliable Change Index (RCI) criteria.

RESULTS

Only 14% of the sample exhibited decline on more than one memory test. Low right IAP (left hemisphere injection) scores and relatively high preoperative cognitive ability and age at surgery predicted a greater risk of post-ATL memory decline.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of left TLE HS+ patients experience at least a mild degree of RCI-defined decline in episodic or semantic memory after ATL. The right hemisphere IAP memory score, which reflects the functional reserve of the contralateral hemisphere, can help predict the risk of postoperative memory decline for TLE patients in whom HS+ is likely based on the presence of hippocampal atrophy on MRI or early age of seizure onset.

The wada test: prediction of focus lateralization by asymmetric and symmetric recall

PURPOSE

The intracarotid amytal test is commonly used as a predictor of memory dysfunctioning after anterior temporal lobe resection (ATL) for intractable epilepsy. Asymmetry in memory scores can provide focus lateralizing information. In this study the predictive value of a set of Wada test parameters was analyzed, including patients with symmetrical memory scores.

METHODS

The Wada test was carried out in 226 patients undergoing ATL (94 L, 132 R). Data were collected on item recognition (five items), story recall, amytal dose, presentation time, EEG and arterial filling of amytal. A logistic regression analysis was performed on these data in order to find a set of variables which could best predict the side of seizure onset.

RESULTS

The analysis yielded four variables, i.e. both memory scores, story recall after right-sided injection and presentation time of stimuli after left-sided injection which could correctly predict seizure lateralization in 85% of the cases. Misclassification was lower for right foci than for left foci. Seizure outcome was four times more favourable in the correctly classified patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that prediction of focus lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy can be fairly exact even if left/right memory scores are equal. Performing the Wada test with only five memory items keeps the time window of active amytal short enough and gives accurate information about contralateral temporal lobe functioning. The classification scheme can be useful in predicting a lowered chance of seizure freedom.

Neuropsychological assessment for temporal lobe epilepsy surgery

Neuropsychological assessment consists of a comprehensive evaluation of cognitive functioning and most often some evaluation of motor skills and sensory status also. Cognitive functions sampled typically include "intelligence" (IQ tests), attention, language skills, visuospatial abilities, "executive skills" and other abilities associated with frontal-lobe function, and learning and memory. Thus, the assessment samples vary widely among a variety of functions, providing a comprehensive picture of an individual's strengths and weaknesses. The resulting pattern points to the probable site of epileptic focus. Neuropsychological findings also serve to predict the risk for postsurgical cognitive decline and, when performance before and after operation is compared, they provide data on the impact of surgery upon cognitive functioning. Comprehensive evaluation of learning and memory is particularly important in this context, because of the frequency of temporal lobe epilepsy and the prominence of memory dysfunction associated with it. In addition, patients slated for elective surgery may also undergo an intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), which is performed to determine the side of cerebral dominance for language and to test the memory capabilities of each hemisphere alone. All of these specialized neuropsychological tools are discussed in this paper.

The role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in evaluation of patients for epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE

To examine the role of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) in the presurgical evaluation of patients with medically refractory localization-related epilepsy.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 111 patients who underwent cortical resective surgery at our center between 1991 and 1996. In patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE), a presurgical determination of the epileptogenic zone was compared with localization based on IAP memory asymmetry scores, and with ultimate localization after resective surgery. In patients with neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP was evaluated for evidence of unilateral or bilateral poor memory performance.

RESULTS

Of 68 patients with mTLE localized by noninvasive tests, 60 had concordant lateralized memory deficits on IAP. Eight patients had lateralized memory deficits on IAP that were discordant with noninvasive tests and with localization as determined by surgical outcome. All 11 mTLE patients requiring invasive EEG monitoring were correctly lateralized by IAP, including one patient in whom the noninvasive evaluation otherwise provided false lateralization. Of 32 patients with neocortical or mesial frontal lobe epilepsy, 21 displayed memory deficits on IAP. Of 10 patients with bilateral deficits, five had mesial frontal lobe epilepsy. In 13 patients with lateralized memory deficits, seven underwent electrode implantation in the mesial temporal lobe, and four ultimately underwent resection of an epileptogenic mesial temporal lobe in addition to a neocortical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mTLE, lateralized memory deficits on IAP usually confirm localization provided by noninvasive tests. However, in mTLE not well lateralized by the noninvasive evaluation, and in neocortical or mesial frontal epilepsy, the IAP may provide information regarding localization that ultimately alters surgical management.

Beyond speech lateralization: a review of the variability, reliability, and validity of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure and its nonlanguage uses in epilepsy surgery candidates

While the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) was originally utilized to lateralize speech functions as an aid in the surgical treatment of epilepsy, additional uses for the IAP have emerged including: (1) the use of the IAP to predict post-surgical memory changes, including both global amnesia and smaller, yet significant, material-specific memory deficits; (2) the use of the IAP to provide confirmatory evidence of lateralization of seizure focus; and (3) the use of the IAP to predict post-surgical relief from seizures. While the literature on the IAP is extensive and growing, its utility is marred by the wide variability associated with the procedure itself from epilepsy center to center. This variability renders comparisons among IAP studies problematic and conclusions about IAP efficacy difficult. The variability associated with the amobarbital procedures, as well as the reliability and the validity of the IAP in its nonlanguage uses is reviewed here. A special emphasis is devoted to research conducted in the last decade. Also discussed is the future of the IAP including anticipated research directions.

[Epilepsy due to mesiotemporal sclerosis in children: 10 cases]

BACKGROUND

Mesio-temporal sclerosis is a frequent and probably underestimated cause of resistant temporal epilepsy in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients originating from West and North-East France are reported in this retrospective study. They were referred for partial temporal epilepsy which had begun between the ages of 3.5 and 15 years. Mesio-temporal sclerosis was diagnosed on MRI (ten cases) and on neuropathological examination (three cases).

RESULTS

Complex partial seizures were noted in all patients, with most frequently fear, abnormal epigastric perception and oro-alimentary automatisms. Social and educational issues were altered due to frequent seizures and amnesic disturbances. An initial event, always a complex febrile seizure, was found in six patients. MRI study showed in all patients unilateral hippocampal atrophy and/or an increase in hippocampal T2 signal intensity on coronal sections. Ictal EEG showed homolateral temporal seizures six times. Hippocampo-amygdalectomy was performed in three patients with a good outcome.

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy associated with mesio-temporal sclerosis belongs to intractable epilepsy in childhood. Early recognition of its symptoms would allow early pre-operative assessment in order to minimize developmental defects due to continuing epilepsy, and adverse cognitive effects of anti-epileptics.

Lateralizing value of the Wada memory test in non-Western patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

The Wada memory test measures a psychological construct (i.e. memory), which is widely acknowledged to be under the influence of a vast array of moderating variables including culture. Thus, the lateralizing value of the Wada memory test for epileptogenic foci may potentially differ for Western versus non-Western patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In the present study, the lateralizing value of the Wada memory test was investigated in 17 Korean patients with medically intractable TLE who were post-operatively seizure-free. The Wada memory stimuli were composed of eight drawings of common objects, animals, and fruits. A clinical criterion of at least 2 points difference between left and right injections correctly classified 14 patients (82%) into left and right TLE groups, with only one patient (6%) falsely classified. This diagnostic accuracy is at least as high as that reported for Western TLE patients. These results indicate that whatever culture-specific factors Korean TLE patients may bring to the Wada memory test, they do not significantly reduce the lateralizing value of the test.

Prediction of presence of hippocampal sclerosis from intracarotid amobarbital procedure memory asymmetry scores and epilepsy on set age

Identification of the pathological status of the hippocampus prior to surgery is important since the absence of hippocampal sclerosis (HS) carries risks to memory function following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). We studied 62 patients undergoing ATL (31 L, 31 R) for intractable epilepsy of temporal lobe origin in whom no pathology was identified apart from HS. An intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) was performed as part of the preoperative evaluation. All patients were left hemisphere dominant for language. IAP memory testing was according to the protocol of Loring. We examined IAP memory asymmetry scores at four levels of difference (<2, > or =2, > or =4, > or =6) as a function of the presence (HS+) or absence (HS-) of HS. A logistic regression analysis was performed with HS+ as the dependent variable, and age at onset of epilepsy, age at time of surgery, gender, side of surgery and significant IAP memory asymmetry as independent variables. At each level of memory asymmetry, onset age and memory asymmetry were the only predictors of HS+. Younger age at onset was associated with HS+. Curves were constructed showing probability of HS+ for age at onset for each level of asymmetry. These can be used to predict the likelihood of presence of HS based on age at onset of epilepsy and the IAP memory asymmetry score. It is concluded that IAP memory asymmetry scores reflect the functional and pathological status of the hippocampus, and greater asymmetry increases the probability of finding HS in the resected hippocampus.

Prediction of verbal memory loss in individuals after anterior temporal lobectomy

PURPOSE

Decreased memory function represents the area of greatest neuropsychological morbidity after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), particularly for left ATL candidates. We wished to identify easily derived demographic and neuropsychological predictors of risk of pre- to postoperative memory decline using only information available preoperatively.

METHODS

We assessed decline in memory as measured by the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) by deriving multiple regression equations using the following measures as independent variables: age at onset, chronological age at time of surgery, sex, Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), level of education, and preoperative memory scores. In all, 203 patients (93 males, 110 females), undergoing ATL (107 left, 96 right) with preoperative and 6-month postoperative testing, were examined.

RESULTS

The combination of age, FSIQ, sex, side of surgery and preoperative score was highly predictive (p-values < 0.0001) of postoperative memory scores. Higher postoperative scores were associated with higher preoperative score, younger chronological age, higher FSIQ, female sex, and right side of resection. Reliable change index (RCI) values were used to estimate meaningful decline on the total score across five trials. Logistic regression analysis showed preoperative score and age to be predictors of RCI decline for left-sided resections. Sensitivity of decline (> or =90th centile RCI) prediction was 56%, and specificity was 95%. Validation in 30 patients from a separate population of patients undergoing left ATL produced similar figures.

CONCLUSIONS

The derived regression equations can accurately predict verbal memory decline on a list-learning task in approximately 50% of individual patients undergoing ATL, and false-positive prediction errors are very rare.

Naming decline after left anterior temporal lobectomy correlates with pathological status of resected hippocampus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the determinants of postoperative change in visual confrontation naming ability and the differential sensitivity of two common tests of confrontation naming.

METHODS

In a group of 99 patients undergoing lobectomy of the left, language-dominant anterior temporal lobe, we examined naming ability using two measures: the 60 item Boston Naming Test (BNT), and the Visual Naming (VN) subtest of the Multilingual Aphasia Examination (MAE). ATL entailed resection of lateral temporal lobe followed by microsurgical complete removal of hippocampus. Language mapping was not performed. The status of the resected hippocampus was graded on a scale 0-4 of hippocampal sclerosis (HS). A dichotomous grouping HS- (grades 0 and 1, n = 34) and HS+ (grades 3 and 4, n = 61) was effected. Age at surgery, age of epilepsy onset, sex, extent of lateral temporal resection, Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ), and preoperative naming scores were also examined as potential predictors of pre- versus postoperative naming change.

RESULTS

Preoperative BNT and VN scores were significantly worse for HS+ than for HS- (BNT, p < 0.05; VN, p = 0.001). Postoperatively, BNT and VN scores significantly declined for HS- as compared with HS+ patients (p < 0.001). For individual risk, the 90th centile of reliable change index (RCI) was used. By this criterion, of the total sample, 39% evidenced decline on the BNT and 17% evidenced decline on the VN. Logistic regression analysis with backward elimination showed HS to be the only predictor of decline in BNT and HS and sex to be the only predictors of VN decline. Males were more at risk than females. Age, age at onset, extent of lateral resection, preoperative scores, and FSIQ were not predictors. Using age at onset as a proxy for HS+/HS- we calculated probabilities for naming decline for given onset age.

CONCLUSIONS

Both preoperative and postoperative change in naming ability are associated with the pathological status of the hippocampus. The potential interpretations and implications of these findings are discussed.

Use of the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in the evaluation of memory

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) involves the temporary inactivation of one cerebral hemisphere by the injection of sodium amobarbital, which allows independent testing of the contralateral hemisphere. Initially used for lateralization of language, IAP later found a role in the evaluation of memory function in patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy being considered for resective surgery. IAP technique varies widely across centers, but, in general, memory is assessed by presenting the patient with a number of items during the period of hemispheric inactivation and testing recall or recognition of these items after the effect of the drug has worn off. Because the medial temporal lobe is not directly perfused by the internal carotid artery, concerns have been raised about the ability of the IAP to test hippocampal memory function. Consequently, a variety of selective procedures have been devised. Findings on both intracranial EEG recordings and pathologic and neuroimaging studies support the association of IAP memory results with hippocampal function. The IAP memory test was originally designed to predict the risk for development of global amnesia following unilateral temporal lobectomy. More recently, it also has been used as an adjunct in lateralizing the seizure focus and for predicting postoperative selective memory deficits and seizure outcome.

Neuropsychological evaluation in epilepsy surgery

Neuropsychology has played a prominent role throughout the modern era of epilepsy surgery. Neuropsychology, including the Wada test, has been of benefit in documenting dysfunction associated with a lateralized temporal lobe seizure onset. In addition, neuropsychological results have some predicative power regarding seizure outcome following anterior temporal lobectomy. The current status of neuropsychology in patient evaluation and outcome prediction will be presented. Differences between the Wada test, an inactivation procedure, and functional magnetic resonance imaging, which is an activation procedure, will be discussed. This paper will also present preliminary information about the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III, the recent revision of the most commonly used test of intellectual function, and its effects on neuropsychological performance results.