Nonepileptic psychogenic seizures: quagmires of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Differentiation between seizure and hysteria in a tenth-century persian text: Hidāyat of al-Akhawayni (d. 983 AD)

Although hysteria is associated largely with the nineteenth century, we find the subject treated in a tenth-century Persian medical text, the Hidayat al-Muta`allemin Fi al-Tibb [A Guide to Medical Learners] by al-Akhawayni Bukhari (d. 983 AD), a prominent physician in the Persian history of medicine. In this article, we discuss al-Akhawayni's views on seizure and hysteria and his differentiation between the two conditions, and we place it in a historical context.

Psychologic treatment of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures are relatively common, often disabling and costly to patients and society. Most authorities consider psychologic treatment as the therapeutic intervention of choice. This review is intended primarily for psychologists and therapists who treat patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, and for neurologists who make the diagnosis and wish to find out more about psychologic treatment options. The first section describes the nature and etiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. General questions regarding the psychologic treatment of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures are addressed, before discussing specific therapeutic approaches. The final part summarizes the authors' views on optimal treatment and the direction of future research.

Psychiatric disorders in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and drug-resistant epilepsy: a study of an Argentine population

Epidemiological data show that up to 20-30% of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs), resembling drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), are referred to tertiary epilepsy centers. Furthermore, both disorders present high psychiatric comorbidity, and video-EEG is the gold standard to make differential diagnoses. In this study, we described and compared the clinical presentation and the frequency of psychiatric disorders codified in DSM IV in two groups of patients, one with PNESs and the other with DRE, admitted in a tertiary care epilepsy center of Buenos Aires, Argentina. We included 35 patients with PNESs and 49 with DRE; all were admitted in the video-EEG unit in order to confirm an epilepsy diagnosis and determine surgical treatment possibilities. All patients underwent a neurological and psychiatric assessment, according to standardized protocol (SCID I and II; DSM IV criteria). Student's t test was performed to compare continuous variables and Chi square test to compare qualitative variables. In this study, 33 (67%) patients with DRE and 35 (100%) patients with PNESs met criteria for at least one disorder codified in Axis I of DSM IV (p=0.003). Differences in the frequency of psychiatric disorder presentation were found between groups. Anxiety disorders (16.32% vs 40%; p=0.015), trauma history (24.5% vs 48.57%; p=0.02), posttraumatic stress disorder (4.08% vs 22.85%; p=0.009), and personality cluster B disorders (18.37% vs 42.86%; p=0.02) were more frequent in the group with PNESs. Psychotic disorders were more frequent in the group with DRE (20.4% vs 2.85%; p=0.019). Depression was equally prevalent in both groups. Standardized psychiatric assessment provides information that could be used by the mental health professional who receives the referral in order to improve quality of care and smooth transitions to proper PNES treatment, which should include a multidisciplinary approach including neurology and psychiatry.

Clinical events in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures based on semiological seizure classification

OBJECTIVES

None of the classifications of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) have been widely accepted and used by physicians so far. In this study we aimed at classifying PNES on the basis of a modified version of semiological seizure classification (SSC). We also sought to assess the interrater reliability (IRR) of the PNES diagnosis based on SSC.

METHODS

We classified PNES into four types on the basis of our modification of SSC: pseudoaura, dialeptic, motor, and special (atonic, astatic, hypotonic) spells. Pseudoauras were not included in the statistical analysis. Ninety-one PNES attacks were observed during the 55 video-EEG sessions recorded for all patients. The interrater agreement was assessed by the kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine women (78·3%) and eight men (21·6%) were surveyed, with a mean age of 28·4 ± 9·6 (range 16-54). The final diagnosis of PNES was established after a mean of 4·5 ± 2·3 years following the onset of PNES attacks in the patients. The mean seizure duration in the PNES was 241 seconds and 40·5% of our patients had PNES longer than 300 seconds. Motor and special PNES were the most common types observed by all the raters. The kappa values for each pair were as follows: Observers I-II 0·51 (p = 0·000), Observers I-III 0·47 (p = 0·000), and Observers II-III 0·73 (p = 0·000).

CONCLUSIONS

Interobserver agreement was moderate and substantial for three observers who classified PNES according to our modified SSC. The modified version of SSC could be used without difficulty in classifying PNES. Using SSC for PNES both shortens the period before diagnosis and eliminates the need to learn another new and acceptable classification for PNES.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Treatment for PNES must be individualized. A combination of approaches is probably the most beneficial for improvement. Treatment should not simply emphasize removing maladaptive PNES behaviour, but should also focus on learning new coping skills and removing secondary gains. If PNES persist, therapy should be re-evaluated.

Seizure in a nonpredisposed individual induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation

Seizure induction is a rare, but serious adverse effect of the otherwise very safe method of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). There are only very few single case reports concerning seizure in single-pulse TMS. All of these reports describe individuals with neurological disorders or epileptogenic medication. To our knowledge, we are the first to describe a healthy subject who developed symptoms of a seizure after single-pulse TMS during motor threshold estimation. This case report provides evidence that single-pulse TMS may provoke a seizure even in the absence of neurological risk factors. Differential diagnoses of a classic neurological seizure, that is, convulsive syncope and psychogenic seizure, are discussed. Neurogenic seizure after TMS and convulsive syncope are the most probable hypotheses, although clear specification of this singular incident remains impossible. Therefore, to minimize the risk for such rare adverse effects, existing and new suggestions are combined to provide reasonable precautions to be taken before and during TMS application.

Patients diagnosed with nonepileptic seizures: their perspectives and experiences

The objective of this qualitative study was to examine how patients with nonepileptic seizures (NES) make sense of their illness experience in light of the many obstacles they may face when seeking treatment. We conducted semistructured interviews with five patients with NES to explore their illness perspectives and different modes of reasoning in regard to their illness and treatment experiences. The data were examined using thematic content analysis. The participants who implicitly incorporated epilepsy as an illness prototype demonstrated less effective treatment expectations and imposed greater life constraints on themselves than the participant who used anxiety attacks. The participants who defined an explanatory model with a psychosocial basis for illness onset were receptive and demanding of psychotherapeutic intervention. Emergent themes included accounts of adverse and positively perceived life events coinciding with illness onset, head injury, presence of caregivers during events, comorbid illness, and previously witnessing epilepsy in others.

[Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: history and critique of a concept]

This discussion of the evolution of psychiatric knowledge concerning psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) sheds light on the epistemological assumptions underlying the concept and on its practical implications as well. PNES are defined as repeated seizures or attacks which can be mistaken for epilepsy because of the similar behavioral changes displayed, but which differ in that they are not the result of abnormal electrical activity in the brain and may be psychogenic in origin. The article investigates the historical development of the concept of PNES over the past forty years. The concepts of psychiatric comorbidity, abuse, and dissociation enter the discussion owing to their roles in the checkered development of the concept of PNES.

Should patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures be allowed to drive? Recommendations of German experts

In the absence of evidence-based regulations on the driving ability of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), we asked 41 German epileptologists via e-mail for their recommendations on driving with PNES. This survey was modeled on an earlier study by Benbadis et al. in the United States and was compared with it. Thirty-four (82.9%) epileptologists responded. Three responses were possible: (A) same restrictions as stipulated for patients with epilepsy, answered by 11 epileptologists (32.4%); (B) no restrictions at all, which no German expert gave as an answer (0%); (C) decision on an individual basis, answered by 23 experts (67.6%). The divergent approaches reflect the poor data on motor vehicle accidents of patients with PNES and the great variability of PNES with respect to semiology, psychiatric morbidity, and prognosis. In the study by Benbadis et al., 49% chose A, 32% B, and 19% C. The considerable national differences may be explained by differences between the two countries with respect to driving regulations and cultural aspects.

Nondrug treatments for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: what's the evidence?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this Cochrane Review was to establish the evidence base for treatment of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

METHODS

Six hundred eight references were identified using a search strategy designed with the support of the Cochrane Review Epilepsy Group library. The search employed Medline and PsychInfo, and included hand searches of relevant journals (Seizure, Epilepsia, Epilepsy &Behavior, Epilepsy Research).

RESULTS

Three studies were found that met the inclusion criteria; two used hypnosis and one used paradoxical therapy. None included detailed reports of improved seizure frequency or quality of life, although reduction in seizure frequency was mentioned. All three studies concluded that the intervention used was beneficial in the treatment of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited number of studies and poor methodology preclude these results from being generalizable. There is a need for well-designed clinical trials to identify the most suitable treatments for this population.

Nonepileptic disorders imitating generalized idiopathic epilepsies

Differential diagnosis between epileptic and nonepileptic paroxysmal disorders is fundamental not only to allow correct management of patients but also to avoid the burden of unnecessary antiepileptic medication. The focus of this chapter is limited to imitators of idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) which are expressed through myoclonic, tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, and absence seizures. Apparent losses of consciousness and drop attacks also have to be considered. Benign myoclonus of early infancy is the main nonepileptic disorder in the differential diagnosis of infantile spasms, but is not dealt with here because West syndrome is not an IGE. Hyperekplexia, metabolic disorders, hypnagogic myoclonus, and disturbed responsiveness caused by the use of drugs are listed in Table 1. Other conditions that may imitate more focal epileptic seizures are omitted. Benign neonatal sleep myoclonus, apnea and apparent life-threatening events in infants, cyanotic and pallid breath-holding spells, syncope, staring spells, psychogenic seizures, hyperventilation syndrome, and narcolepsy have been selected based on frequency or difficulties in differential diagnosis with the intention to cover the most conspicuous imitators of IGE in different ages.

An integrated neuropsychiatric approach to diagnosis and management of patients with epileptic seizures

In patients who present to neurology settings with history of epileptic seizures, psychiatric disorders may be the sole manifestation of apparent neurologic symptoms, or they may coexist. Current challenges for clinicians include distinguishing between two disorders and making the correct diagnoses, interpreting test results, and (co-) managing the disorder(s). Our goal is to provide the clinician with an integrated neuropsychiatric approach for the triage, assessment (history, screening tools, examination, diagnostic tests), and treatment (neurologic and/or psychiatric) of these challenging patients. In particular, use of schemata, tables, and algorithms will offer step-by-step approaches and guidelines for the clinician. Recommendations are made for the indications for psychiatric consultation, and co-management is recommended for patients with emergencies, those who fail routine psychiatric treatments, and those with complex presentations or multiple comorbid conditions.

Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a critical review

Although video-EEG monitoring has revolutionized the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizure (PNES), the etiology of this condition remains poorly understood. This article is a critical review of studies on the prevalence of traumatic events, abuse, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with PNES. Searches carried out on MEDLINE (1966-2004) and Web of Science (1945-2004) identified 17 relevant studies. PNES samples showed very high rates of trauma (44-100%) and abuse (23-77%), which were 15-40% higher than those found in control groups. This suggests that traumatic experiences may be a potential risk factor for PNES. PNES samples also showed a higher prevalence of PTSD than control groups, raising the possibility that PNES may arise as a clinical expression of a hypothetical PTSD subtype the core symptoms of which are dissociative. Methodological limitations do not permit the confirmation of these hypotheses. Stronger research designs are needed, such as prospective and case-control studies in both hospital and community settings.

The Treatment of Nonepileptic Seizures: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions

Nonepileptic seizures (NES) are neuropsychiatric disorders presenting with a combination of neurologic signs and underlying psychological conflicts. For more than a century, the medical community has accumulated data and insights about the phenomenology, epidemiology, risks, comorbidities, and prognosis of NES. However, we have not progressed much beyond anecdotal reports of treatments for NES, and no randomized, controlled trials of treatment for the disorder have been conducted. We review the diagnosis and treatment of NES and suggest directions for future research in these areas.

The perceived health status of people with psychologically derived non-epileptic attack disorder and epilepsy: a comparative study

While a wealth of literature describes the short and longer term impact of living with epilepsy, there is, in contrast, very little information about the impact of psychologically derived non-epileptic attack disorder (PNEAD). In the absence of any physical disease, some clinicians may assume that this group requires little help. However, evidence suggests that there maybe a significant impact. Therefore, this study has set out to document the effects on perceived health status of PNEAD. We compared 97 people with PNEAD with a sample, case matched for age and gender, of 97 people who had been previously diagnosed with epilepsy. A questionnaire was administered to both groups requesting information about their perceived overall health (SF-36) and their clinical and demographic status. PNEAD patients described a significantly poorer profile of perceived health compared with the epilepsy group. People with PNEAD have substantially impaired perceived health status, to the extent of feeling in poorer health than people with organically explained epilepsy. Clinical interventions are necessary that can improve their perceived health.

Phenomenology and psychiatric origin of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

INTRODUCTION Psychogenic nonepileptic seizure (PNES) is a sudden change in a person's behavior, perception, thinking, or feeling that is usually time limited and resembles, or is mistaken for, epilepsy but does not have the characteristic electroencephalographic (EEG) changes that accompanies a true epileptic seizure [1]. It is considered that PNES is a somatic manifestation of mental distress, in response to a psychological conflict or other Stressors [2]. A wide spectrum of clinical presentation includes syncope, generalized tonic-clonic seizure, simple and complex partial seizure, myoclonic seizure, frontal lobe seizures and status epilepticus [3]. Coexistence of epilepsy and PNES is seen in approximately 9% of cases [5]. Between 25-30% of patients referred to tertiary centers and initially diagnosed as refractory epilepsy were on further examination diagnosed as PNES [6,7]. In DSM-IV [12] PNES are usually categorized under conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions. However, psychiatric basis of PNES may be anxiousness (panic attack), somatization or factitious disorder, simulation, dissociative disorders and psychosis [1]. AIM The aim of the study was to establish clinical phenomenology and EEG characteristics as well as basic psychiatric disorder in patients with PNES. METHOD In a retrospective study covering the period from January 1st 1999 till April 31 st 2003, 24 patients (22 female, 2 male) treated at the Institute of Neurology in Belgrade were analyzed. PNES were defined as sudden change in behavior incoherent with epileptiform activity registered on EEG. Possible PNES were determined on the basis of history data and clinical examination during the attack but definitive confirmation was established only by the finding of no ictal EEG changes during typical seizure of each patient. Patients with coexisting epilepsy were included in the study, too. At least two standard EEG (range 2-6, median 4) were performed at the beginning of diagnostic evaluation. Demographic data, clinical presentation (apparent loss of consciousness, type of convulsion and associated clinical signs) and placebo-induced seizures (administration of saline near the cubital vein) with EEG or video-EEG monitoring were analyzed. Basic psychiatric disorder was classified according to DSM IV classification criteria. RESULTS Duration of PNES was 4.7 years (range from 2 months to 30 years). The time from onset to the diagnosis of PNES was 4.5 years. Epilepsy comorbidity was diagnosed in 9 patients (37.5%). The average time of use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in the group of isolated PNES was 2.4 years and 20% of patients were treated with two or more AED. The vast majority of patients presented with bilateral convulsions (54.16%) with apparent loss of consciousness found in 91.6% of cases. Ictal iwury (16.7%), tongue bite (4.2%) and premonition of the seizure (17.4%) were uncommon. Variability in clinical presentation of seizures was found in over half of patients (57%). Psychological trigger could be determined in over 60% of patients. EEG findings in a group with isolated PNES suggesting the existence of epileptiform activity was found in one case. EEG monitoring of placebo-induced seizure was performed in 20 patients, of whom 19 (95%) showed typical habitual attack with no electroclinical correlate. In 70% of cases conversion disorder DSM-IV criteria were fulfilled. Somatization disorder and undifferentiated somatoform disorder were found in 3 patients. The diagnosis of factitious disorder was made in one case and only two patients were undiagnosed according to DSM-IV. DISCUSSION Average delay from onset to diagnosis of PNES in larger studies was estimated to be approximately 7 years [8]. Even though diagnostic delay in our study was shorter, organizational reasons for this could not be found. Longer duration of a typical attack (compared to the epileptic seizure), apparent loss of consciousness, bilateral convulsion behavior and significant clinical variability in absence of typical epileptic elements such as tongue bite and ictal iwury could be the main clinical manifestation of PNES. We found rare interictal abnormalities (6.7%) in the group with isolated PNES and significant percentage (77.7%) in patients with coexisting epilepsy which is coherent with other reports [8]. The latest could lead to prolonged delay in appropriate diagnosis and suitable treatment. Clear psychological trigger wasn't noted in whole group of patients (61 %). This, however, is not unusual since PNES represents a chronic disorder with repeated triggering that could lead to less significant role of the same psychological trigger in developed PNES. Even insufficiently resolved in ethical terms, placebo-induced procedure was of huge sensitivity. In clinical practice conversion disorder is hard to differ from malingering or implementation of secondary gain. One could make the conclusion only on the basis of detailed and careful estimation of the symptoms developing context Conversion disorder is more prevalent among women (from 2:1 to 10:1) [4, 13] but modest percentage of affected men could be explained only by limited sample in this study. CONCLUSION PNES is often replaced with epilepsy and in number of cases clinical differentiation is not easy. One should be acquainted with clinical presentation of PNES as well as its psychiatric origin in order to adequately recognize and treat the disorder.

Posttraumatic stress disorder, dissociation, and sexual abuse history in epileptic and nonepileptic seizure patients

Rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dissociative symptoms, and childhood sexual abuse (CSA) are believed to be higher among patients with nonepileptic seizures (NES) than those with epileptic seizures (ES). However, women have higher rates of CSA and sexual assault than men. Comparisons of seizure type controlling for gender may produce different results. Data from an opportunity sample of 34 patients with ES and 17 with NES evaluated during or following phase 1 video-EEG monitoring demonstrated that patients with NES had statistically higher rates of PTSD and CSA and higher Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) scores than patients with ES. No differences were found between women with NES and ES for histories of PTSD or CSA. Mean between-group DES score differences remained. Results indicated that PTSD, dissociation, and CSA may be common among women presenting to a tertiary epilepsy referral center for both ES and NES. Neither a positive history of CSA nor a history of PTSD was evidence against epilepsy.

Somatization, dissociation and general psychopathology in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

The etiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) remains uncertain. Previous studies have shown that PNES patients are characterized by high levels of somatization, dissociation and general psychopathology but a correlation of measures of these features and PNES severity or outcome has never been demonstrated, although this would strengthen a possible etiological link. This study measured somatization (Screening Test for Somatoform Symptoms-2), dissociation (Dissociative Experience Scale, DES), and general psychopathology (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, SCL-90) in 98 patients with PNES and 63 patients with epilepsy. All mean scores were raised in the PNES compared to the epilepsy group. However, only measures of somatization and general psychopathology discriminated between patients with PNES and epilepsy in a logistic regression model (even when patient gender was controlled for). In PNES patients, high somatization scores correlated with poor outcome and greater seizure severity even after correction was made for dissociation and psychopathology. Dissociation and psychopathology scores were not independently associated with outcome or severity. The results suggest that, as a group, patients with PNES are best characterized by their tendency to express psychosocial distress by producing unexplained somatic symptoms which are brought to medical attention. Although dissociation may be relevant in some individuals it does not appear to be an independent factor across the whole PNES patient group.

Psychogenic seizures: clinical features and psychological analysis

Approximately 25-30% of patients referred to epilepsy centers for refractory epilepsy are found to have nonepileptic seizures (NES). In many cases psychological assessments are performed to evaluate for underlying psychiatric disorders. The authors analyzed the clinical features of 23 patients with NES and correlated the features with underlying psychological status. Thirteen of the twenty-three patients (56.5%) had motor manifestations and 10 presented with limpness and unresponsiveness. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, or malingering between patients with limpness and those with motor manifestations. However, only patients with motor manifestations had a history of sexual and physical abuse. Those with limp and unresponsive presentations were less likely to have a history of sexual and/or physical abuse. This finding may help treating physicians to choose optimum psychiatric treatment for patients with NES. Additional studies are needed to clarify the association.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update

The population incidence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) may be only 4% that of epilepsy, but many patients with PNES have a tendency to seek medical attention, and PNES make up a larger share of the workload of neurologists and emergency and general physicians. Although a great number of publications describe how PNES can be distinguished from epileptic seizures, it usually takes several years to arrive at this diagnosis, and three-quarters of patients (with no additional epilepsy) are treated with anticonvulsants initially. However, the management of PNES as epileptic seizures can lead to significant iatrogenic harm. Moreover, the failure to recognize the psychological cause of the disorder detracts from addressing associated psychopathology and enhances secondary somatization processes. This review provides an overview of studies of the diagnosis, etiology, treatment, and prognosis of PNES. Physicians should always consider PNES in the differential diagnosis of a seizure disorder. If a diagnosis of PNES is possible, or a diagnosis of epilepsy in doubt, a clear diagnostic categorization should be sought. This should involve the assessment of the patient by a physician versed in the diagnosis of seizure disorders and, in many cases, the documentation of a typical seizure by video-EEG. Outcome may be improved if the diagnosis is more actively sought, made earlier, and communicated more convincingly.

Somatisation indexes as differential factors in psychogenic pseudoepileptic and epileptic seizures

One of the postulated factors responsible for psychogenic epileptic seizures is somatisation. The purpose of this study was to analyse differences in the levels of somatisation manifested in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) somatisation scales. Subjects were divided into three groups on the basis of a neurological examination and long-term video-monitoring. Group One (N=66, 55F; 11M) had only psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. Group Two (N=42, 32F; 10M) had both epileptic and psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. Group Three (N=36, 28F; 8M) had only epileptic seizures and served as the control group. Patients in all three groups were given the MMPI. Somatisation indexes in the three groups were compared. Significant between-group differences were obtained for the following somatisation indexes (mean scores): Hypochondriasis (P<0.001), Somatic Complaints (P<0.001), Organic Symptoms (P<0.015) and Poor Health (P<0.05). No significant differences were found for Physical-Somatic Complaints. Psychological evaluation of the differences in the levels of somatisation in these groups may help us to gain a better understanding of, and discrimination between, patients with psychogenic epileptic seizures, mixed seizures and epileptic seizures only.

Anxiety as a differential factor in epileptic versus psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures

Anxiety may be a hypothetical factor responsible for psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. The purpose of this study was to analyse anxiety indexes manifested in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of a neurological examination and long-term video-monitoring. Group One (N=70; 58 F, 12 M) had only psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. Group Two (N=40; 31 F, 9 M) had both epileptic seizures and psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. Group Three (N=42; 30 F, 12 M) had only epileptic seizures and served as the control group. Patients with psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures, alone or in combination with epileptic seizures scored significantly higher than the epileptic group on the following anxiety measures: Anxiety Sign (Gough) - AxS - (P<0.001), Expressive-repressive Index (Sandford, Webster and Freedman) - ERI (P<0.001), and the Neurotic score (Ruesch and Bowman) - NS (P<0.001). Difference between all three groups were found for the Triad Elevation Index (Lovell)-TI (P<0.001) and the Frustration Tolerance Index (Beall and Panton) - FT (P<0.005). These findings suggest that the existence of psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures or the predisposition to such seizures is reflected in the anxiety dimensions of the personality profile. Psychological evaluation of anxiety may help us to gain a better understanding of, and discrimination between, patients with psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures, mixed seizures and epileptic seizures.

Clinical Manifestations and Management of Conversion Disorders

Conversion disorder, the acute onset of sensory or motor loss unexplained by physical findings, has long been reported in the neurologic and psychiatric literature. It was once thought to be largely covariate with the "hysterical" (now referred to as "histrionic") personality, but recent work finds that conversion disorder more often presents in the absence of this personality disorder. Conversion disorder may also be part of a chronic pattern of physical expression of psychologic distress known as somatization disorder. Other psychiatric illnesses (particularly mood and anxiety disorders) are frequently comorbid, and conversion disorder and their treatment may affect the prognosis of conversion disorder symptoms. The neurologist suspecting a case of conversion disorder is advised to complete a thorough neurologic evaluation, and to have a low threshold for psychiatric consultation, which facilitates prompt comanagement that may increase the likelihood of a return to premorbid function.

The tendency to have psychogenic non-epileptic attacks out of camera view during long-term video-EEG monitoring

The aim of this study was to compare out of camera view seizure occurrence rates between psychogenic non-epileptic and epileptic seizures during long-term video-EEG monitoring. From 1996 to 2001, 208 adult patients were monitored in 212 sessions, and 196 patients were included in the study. Depending on video-EEG recordings and witnessed accounts, 18 of the patients had no seizures recorded, 160 had epileptic seizures and 18 had psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, four of whom had psychogenic non-epileptic seizures plus true epileptic seizures. Six hundred and ninety two seizures were recorded; 634 of them were epileptic seizures and 58 of them, psychogenic non-epileptic ones. Out of camera attack occurrence was significantly higher in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic attacks compared with epileptic ones (chi-square with Yates correction = 19.75, df = 1, P< 0.001).

Interictal EEG abnormalities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

PURPOSE

To examine interictal EEG abnormalities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs).

METHODS

(a) Retrospective study of EEG reports of 187 consecutive patients with PNES seen at the Department of Epileptology, Bonn, Germany; (b) Blinded, multirater comparison of EEGs of all PNES patients with no other clinically recognizable cause of EEG disturbance (n = 50) and healthy controls (n = 50).

RESULTS

Of 187 consecutive patients with PNESs, 57 patients had PNESs and epilepsy (PNES+E), and 130 patients, PNESs alone. The diagnosis of additional epilepsy was based on ictal (video-) EEG or on the critical assessment of all clinical data by an experienced epileptologist. Retrospective review of all available EEG reports showed that 92.9% of patients in the PNES+E and 53.8% in the PNES-only group had one or more abnormal EEGs (median number of EEGs per patient, three; range, one to 42). In the PNES-only group, EEG changes were nonspecific in 42.3% of patients. Only 50 of 130 patients with PNESs alone had no other clinically recognizable cause of EEG disturbance and entered the controlled study. In this study, 18% of patients and 10% of controls had abnormal EEGs. The frequency of epileptiform EEG changes was similar to that in previous population studies in both groups (2.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

PNESs often occur in patients with organic brain disease. Even in patients with PNESs alone and no clinically recognizable cause of EEG disturbance, nonspecific abnormalities are found 1.8 times as often as in healthy controls. Interictal EEG changes are common in patients with PNESs and, in isolation, should not be interpreted as evidence of epilepsy.

The role of hypnosis in the detection of psychogenic seizures

In this preliminary clinical investigation, hypnosis was used in the differential diagnosis of epileptic versus psychogenic seizures (PS). Eight patients with a clinical profile suggesting the presence of PS were given a hypnotic suggestion in which they had to go back in time to the exact moment of their last seizure. They were then asked to concentrate their attention on any unusual feeling or bodily sensation. All 8 patients presented a PS during the age regression protocol. In 6 cases, independent testimony from family members corroborated the morphological similarity of the induced attack and the ones presented in their natural environment. Also, the seizures ended abruptly after a command was given to stop them. A control group of 5 epileptic subjects did not present any signs of discomfort or seizure behavior during the hypnotic protocol. It is argued that a simple procedure as the one described in this investigation can be useful as a diagnostic tool in the differentiation of epileptic from PS attacks.

Treating patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

While the diagnostic features of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures have been better characterized in recent years, comparatively little is written about management. This review provides guidance to clinicians involved in the treatment of patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and generates ideas for future research. It summarizes the recent literature specifically dealing with the treatment of such seizures and draws on the wider psychiatric literature on effective treatments for patients with other medically unexplained symptoms.

Patients with coexistent psychogenic pseudoepileptic and epileptic seizures: a psychological profile

Despite significant advances in epileptology, the differential diagnosis of epileptic and pseudoepileptic seizures continues to be a considerable challenge. The problem becomes even more complicated when epileptic and psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures coexist in the same patient. Appropriate psychological measures may be helpful in the diagnosis and may improve knowledge about aetiological factors which can provoke psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures. The purpose of this paper is to present the psychological profile of patients with mixed seizures (epileptic and psychogenic pseudoepileptic) developed on the basis of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and to discuss the personality differences between patients with psychogenic epileptic seizures and epileptic patients. In patients with diagnosed epilepsy and/or suspected psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures long-term video-monitoring was performed. On the basis of the gathered data the patients were divided into three groups: group I (N= 32 : 25 F and 7 M) had coexistent psychogenic pseudoepileptic and epileptic seizures, group II (N= 38 : 30 F and 8 M) had psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures only and group III (N= 36 : 18 F and 8 M) had epileptic seizures only and was treated as the control group. All three groups were given the MMPI. Comparison of the averaged personality profiles of the three groups revealed significant differences (P< 0.0001) in hypochondriasis (Hs) and hysteria (Hy), similarity of the profiles of groups I and II, and significantly higher Hs and Hy scores than D (Depression) scores (P< 0.001). Unlike groups I and II, group III (the epileptic group) had significantly higher D scores than Hs and Hy scores (P< 0.01). Our findings suggest that conversion, manifested in the typically elevated Hs and Hy scores as compared to D scores, is present in both groups of patients demonstrating pseudoepileptic seizures but absent in the patients with epilepsy where the Hs and Hy to D ratio is reversed. Patients with mixed seizures and patients with psychogenic pseudoepileptic seizures only have similarly shaped profiles.

Long-term EEG monitoring: a clinical approach to electrophysiology

Long-term electroencephalographic monitoring (LTM) is the capability of recording the EEG over long periods of time and not a specific duration. Prolonged EEG recording is used primarily for epilepsy monitoring, but LTM is also used in the intensive care unit, the operating room, and in the emergency department. The purpose of LTM is to expand the limited time sampling associated with shorter "routine" EEG recording. Audiovisual monitoring may also be used in conjunction with LTM to evaluate simultaneously a specific clinical behavior that may or may not be associated with EEG alteration. This is typically performed in a hospital setting for safety and ancillary testing purposes. LTM is used most frequently in the diagnosis and management of seizures and "spells," but has also gained wider application in the evaluation of sleep disorders, cerebrovascular disease, psychiatric conditions, and movement disorders. Computer-assisted LTM systems that process, analyze, compress, and store data digitally have become widely available in clinical practice both in the hospital as well as outside the hospital when the patient is ambulatory.

Psychological Treatment of Nonepileptic Events

Nonepileptic events (NEEs) occur with and without true seizure disorders and vary greatly in clinical presentation. They are often associated with significant psychopathology. This paper proposes six categories of NEE patients based on psychosocial history, NEE etiology, and mechanisms of and response to psychotherapy. A series of 26 adult NEE patients were grouped according to six symptom patterns: (a) acute anxiety/panic, (b) impaired affect regulation and interpersonal skills, (c) somatization/conversion, (d) depression, (e) posttraumatic stress disorder, and (f) reinforced behavior pattern. Classification was made on the basis of the specific psychotherapeutic interventions found most effective with each patient group.

Nonepileptic seizure outcome varies by type of spell and duration of illness

PURPOSE

To determine whether differences in clinical manifestations of psychogenic nonepileptic events are associated with differences in outcome and whether the length of illness before diagnosis correlates with outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed ictal videotapes and EEGs in 85 patients diagnosed with exclusively nonepileptic psychogenic seizures during inpatient CCTV-EEG monitoring at the University of Michigan between June 1994 and December 1996. They were classified into groups of similar ictal behaviors. Fifty-seven of these patients were available to respond to a follow-up telephone survey about their condition 2-4 years after discharge. We examined demographics, baseline EEG abnormalities, and outcome of treatment interventions. We also evaluated whether interventions were more likely to succeed if patients were diagnosed early in the course of the illness.

RESULTS

We found that the largest groups consisted of patients with motionless unresponsiveness ("catatonic," n = 19) and asynchronous motor movements with impaired responsiveness ("thrashing," n = 19). Infrequent signs included tremor, automatisms, subjective events with amnesia, and intermittent behaviors. There was a higher incidence of baseline EEG abnormalities in the thrashing group (31%) than in the catatonic group (0%). There was a higher incidence of complete remission of spells in the catatonic group (53%) than in the thrashing group (21%). Patients who had a more recent onset of seizures (most often within 1 year) were much more likely to have remission of spells after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification of nonepileptic seizures is useful in predicting outcome and may be valuable in further investigation of this complex set of disorders.

Dissociation, hypnotizability, coping styles and health locus of control: characteristics of pseudoseizure patients

Although literature in this area is relatively sparse, the occurrence of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (pseudoseizures) has been linked to stress, anxiety and possible dissociative tendencies. An association between dissociation and hypnotic susceptibility has also been proposed and dissociative tendencies have themselves been found to relate to the use of emotion-focused coping strategies. In order to investigate the hypothesis that pseudoseizure patients may exhibit higher levels of dissociation, a more emotion-focused coping style, and greater hypnotic susceptibility than the general population, the questionnaire responses of 20 patients with pseudoseizures were compared with those obtained from a non-clinical control group. As predicted, pseudoseizure patients demonstrated some evidence of higher levels of dissociation and escape-avoidance coping strategies. They also expressed a greater belief in external control over health and higher depression scores, compared to the control group, but the previously reported elevation in hypnotizability scores in the pseudoseizure patients was not found. Possible explanations for this pattern of results are discussed.

Cluster analysis of clinical seizure semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

PURPOSE

To develop an objective classification of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (NES) based on cluster analysis of clinical seizure semiology.

METHODS

We studied the clinical seizure semiology in 27 patients with psychogenic NES documented by prolonged video-EEG monitoring. We analyzed the following clinical symptoms: clonic and hypermotor movements as well as trembling of the upper and/or lower extremities, pelvic thrusting, head movements, tonic posturing backward of the head, and falling. We used cluster analysis to identify symptoms occurring together in a systematic way and thus tried to achieve a clinical classification of psychogenic NES.

RESULTS

We could identify three symptom clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by clonic and hypermotor movements of the extremities, pelvic thrusting, head movements, and tonic posturing of the head, and therefore was named "psychogenic motor seizures." Cluster 2 comprised trembling of the upper and lower extremities and was termed "psychogenic minor motor or trembling seizures." Cluster 3 consisted of falling to the floor as the only symptom and was referred to as "psychogenic atonic seizures."

CONCLUSIONS

Our study represents the first study to analyze the clinical semiology of psychogenic NES by cluster analysis, which should be useful for an objective classification of psychogenic NES. This classification should allow both a better characterization of psychogenic NES and an easier differential diagnosis against specific epileptic seizures.

A comparative study of trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence in epilepsy patients and psychogenic nonepileptic seizure patients

PURPOSE

This study tests the hypothesis that trauma histories, including histories of physical and sexual abuse, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are more prevalent in psychogenic non-epileptic seizure (NES) patients than in epilepsy patients.

METHODS

Thirty-five inpatients with intractable seizures were evaluated for trauma history and PTSD. After these assessments, patients were diagnosed as having either epileptic or nonepileptic seizures through EEG monitoring.

RESULTS

NES diagnosis correlated with PTSD and total number of lifetime traumas, adult traumas, and abuse traumas. Contrary to previous hypotheses, reported childhood sexual abuse (CSA) did not correlate significantly with NES diagnosis. However, CSA predicted PTSD in a discriminant analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence for the hypothesized relations between trauma, abuse, PTSD, and NES diagnosis. However, elevated levels in both seizure-disorder groups suggest that routine assessment for abuse, trauma, and PTSD might facilitate medical care and treatment for all intractable seizure patients.

Psychogenic seizures--why women?

The only consistent finding in studies of psychogenic seizures is the approximately threefold higher incidence in women. Therefore, why women? Charcot and Freud emphasized the sexual aspects of the seizure as has the current interest in childhood sexual abuse. From case studies and review of the literature the author believes that psychogenic seizures in women express rage, fear, and helplessness against the dominant and abusive male rather than sexual conflicts. Emphasizing the aggressive component of seizures does not minimize the traumatic effects of sexual abuse but rather includes it as leading to rage and helplessness.

The role of quantitative ictal SPECT analysis in the evaluation of nonepileptic seizures

Nonepileptic seizures may represent difficult diagnostic problems. Identifying their presence and frequency is critical for determining appropriate treatment. The authors investigated the value of quantitative perfusion changes as measured by ictal single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) difference images in differentiating nonepileptic from epileptic seizures. Eleven patients with a clinical suspicion of nonepileptic events had ictal and interictal technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine SPECT scans during continuous audiovisual surface electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. The authors analyzed perfusion difference images based on registration, normalization, and subtraction of ictal and interictal SPECT images. The difference images were registered to each patient's magnetic resonance imaging scan to anatomically localize ictal perfusion changes. Three of 11 patients also carried the diagnosis of epilepsy and were taking antiepileptic medication. Five patients were taking antiepileptic drugs, but the diagnosis of epilepsy was not confirmed. In all patients, continuous video EEG monitoring revealed no ictal EEG findings. In nine of these patients, visual interpretation of ictal SPECT was suggestive of localized increased (n = 6) or decreased perfusion (n = 3). In all patients, however, no blood flow changes were noted on quantitative SPECT analysis with injections performed during the seizure-like event, suggesting the diagnosis of pseudoseizures. The authors' results suggest that quantitative ictal SPECT analysis is a useful tool in the diagnosis of nonepileptic seizures.

Are we overusing the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic events?

In order to determine how often results of video/EEG (V-EEG) studies may change the clinical diagnosis of paroxysmal events, we prospectively studied 100 consecutive patients (75 females, 25 males) admitted for diagnosis of recurrent paroxysmal spells. The presumed diagnosis of the referring physician was obtained. Episodes were classified as epileptic seizures (ES), psychogenic non-epileptic events (PNEE), or physiologic non-epileptic events (PhysNEE). Eighty-seven patients had diagnostic events. A final diagnosis of ES was made in 21 patients, PNEE in 39, PNEE + ES in 20, and PhysNEE in seven. All PhysNEE were unsuspected. ES were misdiagnosed as PNEE more frequently than the reverse (57% vs. 12%, P < 0.001). Among the 64 patients with recorded events who had been suspected of having PNEE, 14 (21.9%) were misdiagnosed: two had PhysNEE and 12 (18.75%) had ES. Among the 23 patients with recorded events who were thought to have ES, 12 (39.1%) were misdiagnosed: seven had PNEE, five PhysNEE. V-EEG changed the clinical diagnosis in 29.8% of the patients with recorded events. Our data suggests that clinicians have become more aware of PNEE since the advent of V-EEG and have little problem recognizing them. However, they may be more prone to make a false-positive diagnosis of PNEE in ES with some atypical features. At this point, efforts should be channeled to better training in the proper recognition of ES that mimic PNEE.