Familial aphasic episodes: another variant of partial epilepsy with simple inheritance?

Epileptic aphasia - A critical appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Aphasic and other language disturbances occur in patients with epilepsy during and after epileptic seizures. Moreover, the interictal language profile in these patients is heterogeneous, varying from normal language profile to impairment in different language functions. The aim of this paper was to critically review the terms and concepts of ictal language alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

For this review we performed an extensive literature search on the term "epileptic aphasia" and analyzed the semiology and terminology indicating language-associated seizure symptoms. In addition, we give an overview on EEG, etiology, and brain imaging findings and ictal language disorders.

RESULTS

In the literature, a plethora of terms indicates language-associated seizure symptoms. Simultaneous Video-EEG monitoring represents the gold standard to correctly classify ictal versus postictal language disturbances and to differentiate aphasic symptoms from speech automatisms. Different rhythmic and periodic EEG patterns associated with ictal language disturbances are recognized. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is essential in the diagnosis of seizures and epilepsy. Brain tumors and acute or remote cerebrovascular lesions are the most frequently reported structural etiologies underlying ictal language alterations. However, it has to be recognized that brain imaging may show alterations being the consequence of seizures itself rather than its cause. Functional brain imaging might be informative in patients with inconclusive EEG and MRI findings. Overall, seizure-associated aphasia is reported to have good lateralizing significance.

CONCLUSION

Various language disturbances are caused by different types of seizures, epilepsies and underlying etiologies. In the clinical context, simultaneous Video-EEG monitoring facilitates precise classification of ictal versus postictal language alterations and differentiation of aphasic symptoms from speech automatisms.

Altered language processing in autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features

BACKGROUND

Autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF) is an idiopathic focal epilepsy syndrome with auditory symptoms or receptive aphasia as major ictal manifestations, frequently associated with mutations in the leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) gene. Although affected subjects do not have structural abnormalities detected on routine MRI, a lateral temporal malformation was identified through high resolution MRI in one family. We attempted to replicate this finding and to assess auditory and language processing in ADPEAF using fMRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG).

METHODS

We studied 17 subjects (10 affected mutation carriers, 3 unaffected carriers, 4 noncarriers) in 7 ADPEAF families, each of which had a different LGI1 mutation. Subjects underwent high-resolution structural MRI, fMRI with an auditory description decision task (ADDT) and a tone discrimination task, and MEG. A control group comprising 26 volunteers was also included.

RESULTS

We found no evidence of structural abnormalities in any of the 17 subjects. On fMRI with ADDT, subjects with epilepsy had significantly less activation than controls. On MEG with auditory stimuli, peak 2 auditory evoked field latency was significantly delayed in affected individuals compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings do not support the previous report of a lateral temporal malformation in autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF). However, our fMRI and magnetoencephalography data suggest that individuals with ADPEAF have functional impairment in language processing.

Penetrance of LGI1 mutations in autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the penetrance of disease-causing mutations is extremely important for developing clinical applications of gene discovery, such as genetic testing and counseling. Mutations in the leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 gene (LGI1) have been identified in about 50% of families with autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF), but estimates of LGI1 mutation penetrance have ranged widely, from 50 to 85%. The current study aimed to provide a more precise estimate of LGI1 mutation penetrance.

METHODS

We analyzed data from all 24 previously published ADPEAF families with mutations in LGI1. To estimate penetrance, we used the information from the published pedigree figures to determine the proportion of obligate carriers who were affected. We assessed whether penetrance was associated with the total number of affected individuals in each family, or mutation type (truncating or missense) or location within the gene. We also compared penetrance in males and females, and among different generations within the families.

RESULTS

Overall penetrance was 67% (95% CI 55-77%), and did not vary according to mutation type or location within the gene. Penetrance was greater in families with more affected individuals, but this trend was not significant. Penetrance did not differ by gender but increased with advancing generation, probably because of limited information about early generations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that about two-thirds of individuals who inherit a mutation in LGI1 will develop epilepsy. This probably overestimates the true penetrance in the population because it is based on data from families containing multiple affected individuals.

Speech-induced Aphasic Seizures in Epilepsy Caused by LGI1 Mutation

PURPOSE

Patients with autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (ADTLE) may have seizures precipitated by sound or speech. We have examined a patient with speech-induced seizures caused by an LGI1 mutation (C46R).

METHODS

A clinical study and a video-EEG recording using interrogative speech as the activation procedure was performed in a 23-year-old man.

RESULTS

He had experienced short episodes of sensory aphasia in situations in which he was suddenly verbally addressed. Voices became distorted, and he could not comprehend despite hearing words. The day after a late party, his girlfriend unexpectedly spoke to him. Her speech became unintelligible to him. He did not reply and had a generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) seizure. During an EEG, he was suddenly asked for the names of his siblings. He answered, but lost understanding of the further conversation and described how syllables floated together with an echoing character. With a versive movement to the right, another GTC occurred. In the EEG, rhythmic 6-Hz activity built up in the frontotemporal areas starting on the left side with bilateral and posterior spreading. Postictal slowing was symmetrical, and no aphasia was noted on awakening.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first video-EEG recorded seizure in LGI1-caused ADTLE. This peculiar seizure semiology and precipitating effect of speech may serve as a marker for identifying further individuals with this particular phenotype and genotype and may indicate that the LGI1 gene may have a physiologic function connected to the human capacity for speech and language.

Abnormal Phonologic Processing in Familial Lateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Due to a New LGI1 Mutation

PURPOSE

Autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (ADLTLE) is a rare familial epilepsy with onset in adolescence or early adulthood, associated with mutations of LGI1 in most families. We describe the clinical, neuropsychological, and molecular genetic study of a new ADLTLE Italian family.

METHODS

A four-generation family from Sardinia was studied. Clinical, neuropsychological, and genetic analysis were performed in eight living affected family members.

RESULTS

Nine family members had seizures over four generations; four of them had auditory auras and aphasia followed by secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCs). One individual in addition had visual symptoms, and one family member had only vertigo followed by SGTCs. The side of seizure onset could not be determined in these five patients with focal seizures. The proband had febrile and afebrile tonic-clonic seizures. Two family members had only febrile seizures. Inheritance was autosomal dominant with 59% penetrance. Genetic molecular analysis showed a new LGI1 missense mutation causing a Leu154Pro substitution in six affected and one unaffected individuals. Dichotic listening performance was abnormal in four affected individuals compared with controls. Fluency and lexical abilities also were pathological in three patients. These findings showed that in patients, the left temporal lobe was less specialized in the auditory processing function than in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In this ADLTLE family, both seizure semiology and neuropsychological findings point to a lateral temporal lobe dysfunction. The newly identified LGI1 mutation might underlie both the seizure disorder and the neuropsychological deficits.

Idiopathic partial epilepsy with auditory features (IPEAF): a clinical and genetic study of 53 sporadic cases

The purpose of our study was to describe the clinical characteristics of sporadic (S) cases of partial epilepsy with auditory features (PEAF) and pinpoint clinical, prognostic and genetic differences with respect to previously reported familial (F) cases of autosomal dominant partial epilepsy with auditory features (ADPEAF). We analysed 53 patients (24 females and 29 males) with PEAF diagnosed according to the following criteria: partial epilepsy with auditory symptoms, negative family history for epilepsy and absence of cerebral lesions on NMR study. All patients underwent a full clinical, neuroradiological and neurophysiological examination. Forty patients were screened for mutations in LGI1/epitempin, which is involved in ADPEAF. Age at onset ranged from 6 to 39 years (average 19 years). Secondarily generalized seizures were the most common type of seizures at onset (79%). Auditory auras occurred either in isolation (53%) or associated with visual, psychic or aphasic symptoms. Low seizure frequency at onset and good drug responsiveness were common, with 51% of patients seizure-free. Seizures tended to recur after drug withdrawal. Clinically, no major differences were found between S and F patients with respect to age at onset, seizure frequency and response to therapy. Analysis of LGI1/epitempin exons failed to disclose mutations. Our data support the existence of a peculiar form of non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy closely related to ADPEAF but without a positive family history. This syndrome, here named IPEAF, has a benign course in the majority of patients and could be diagnosed by the presence of auditory aura. Although LGI1 mutations have been excluded, genetic factors may play an aetiopathogenetic role in at least some of these S cases.

Autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy: clinical spectrum, new epitempin mutations, and genetic heterogeneity in seven European families

PURPOSE

[corrected] To describe the clinical and genetic findings of seven additional pedigrees with autosomal dominant lateral temporal epilepsy (ADLTE).

METHODS

A personal and family history was obtained from each affected and unaffected member, along with a physical and neurologic examination. Routine and sleep EEGs, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed in almost all the patients. DNAs from family members were typed with several microsatellite markers localized on either side of LGI1 at 10q24 and screened for LGI1 mutations.

RESULTS

The seven families included a total of 34 affected individuals (10 deceased). The age at onset ranged between 8 and 50 years (average, 22 years). Twenty-six patients had clear-cut focal (elementary, complex, or secondarily generalized) seizures, characterized by prominent auditory auras in 68% of the cases. Less frequent ictal symptoms were visual, psychic, or aphasic seizures, the latter occurring in isolation in one family. The attacks were rare and well controlled by antiepileptic drug treatment but recurred after drug discontinuation. Interictal EEGs were usually unrevealing. MRI or CT scans were negative. Analysis of LGI1/Epitempin exons failed to show mutations in three pedigrees. Linkage analysis strongly suggested exclusion of linkage in one of these families. We found two novel missense mutations, a T-->C substitution in exon 6 at position 598, and a T-->A transition in exon 8 at position 1295, the latter being detected in a family with aphasic seizures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the inclusion of aphasic seizures within the ADLTE clinical spectrum, suggest the existence of locus heterogeneity in ADLTE, and provide new familial cases with LGI1 missense mutations associated with the disease.

LGI1 is mutated in familial temporal lobe epilepsy characterized by aphasic seizures

Autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy previously has been linked to chromosome 10q22-q24, and recently mutations in the LGI1 gene (Leucine-rich gene, Glioma Inactivated) have been found in some autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy families. We have now identified a missense mutation affecting a conserved cysteine residue in the extracellular region of the LGI1 protein. The C46R mutation is associated with autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy in a large Norwegian family showing unusual clinical features like short-lasting sensory aphasia and auditory symptoms.

Familial temporal lobe epilepsy with aphasic seizures and linkage to chromosome 10q22-q24

PURPOSE

To describe the phenotypic expression of a new family with familial lateral temporal lobe epilepsy with aphasic seizures, and to compare the findings with the clinical features of previously reported families linked to chromosome 10q22-q24.

METHODS

Medical records were collected from 12 living affected members. The patients underwent a personal interview and a clinical neurologic examination. Results from interictal scalp EEGs and neuroimaging examinations were obtained.

RESULTS

The cardinal ictal symptom was a brief sensory aphasia in eight of the patients. In four, this was accompanied by auditory symptoms, usually in the form of monotonous unformed sounds. Simple partial seizures with psychic or somatosensory seizures also were present. Visual ictal symptoms and complex partial seizures were absent. All patients had generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) did not reveal morphologic correlates. Improvement with age seemed to occur in many patients. Significant linkage to chromosome 10q22-q24 was established by testing 17 polymorphic microsatellite markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The epilepsy of this family appears to represent a variety of autosomal dominant lateral temporal lobe epilepsy. Aphasic seizures and a peculiar seizure-precipitating effect of the activation of speech (initiation or perception) may serve as markers for identifying further families with this phenotype.