Limitations in the medical treatment of cryptogenic or symptomatic localization-related epilepsies of childhood onset

Seizure outcome after AED failure in pediatric focal epilepsy: impact of underlying etiology

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify long-term seizure outcome in pediatric nonsyndromic focal epilepsy after failure of serial antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) due to lack of efficacy.

METHODS

Children (1 month-17 years) with new-onset focal epilepsy not meeting the criteria for a defined electroclinical syndrome diagnosed between 1980 and 2009 while residing in Olmsted County, MN, were retrospectively identified. Medical records of those followed for ≥2 years were reviewed to assess etiology, the number of AEDs that failed due to lack of efficacy, and seizure outcome at final follow-up. Etiology was classified into structural/metabolic, genetic, or unknown. Favorable outcome was defined as seizure freedom ≥1 year, on or off AEDs, without prior epilepsy surgery. Poor outcome was defined as ongoing seizures in the preceding year or having undergone prior epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

Nonsyndromic focal epilepsy accounted for 275/468 (59%) of all patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy--of these, 256 (93%) were followed for a minimum of two years and were included in the study. Median duration of follow-up was 10.0 years. At least one AED had failed due to lack of efficacy in 100 (39.1%) children. Favorable outcomes occurred in 149/156 (95.5%) children with no AED failure, 16/30 (53.3%) with one AED failure, 8/25 (32%) with two AED failures, and only 2/45 (4.4%) with three AED failures. After two AED failures, the seizures of nearly one-quarter of children who had epilepsy with an unknown cause responded favorably to the third AED compared with only 7.8% of the cohort that had epilepsy with a structural/metabolic cause. Children with a remote brain insult had a significantly higher likelihood of favorable outcome with serial AEDs than those with other structural abnormalities.

SIGNIFICANCE

Etiology is an important determinant of pharmacoresistance in nonsyndromic focal epilepsy. Surgical evaluation should be considered after failure of 1-2 AEDs in those who have epilepsy with structural causes, excluding remote brain insults. Conversely, as surgical success is lower with normal MRI or more diffuse brain insults, it appears reasonable to hold off surgical evaluation until 2-3 AEDs have failed in such children.

Predicting pharmacoresistance in pediatric epilepsy

Approximately 20% of children with epilepsy will be pharmacoresistant. The impact of intractable epilepsy extends far beyond just the seizures to result in intellectual disability, psychiatric comorbidity, physical injury, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), and poor quality of life. Various predictors of pharmacoresistance have been identified; however, accurate prediction is still challenging. Population-based epidemiologic studies show that the majority of children who develop pharmacoresistance do so relatively early in the course of their epilepsy. However, approximately one third of children who initially appear pharmacoresistant in the first few years after epilepsy onset will ultimately achieve seizure freedom without surgery. The most significant predictor that early pharmacoresistance will not remit is the presence of a neuroimaging abnormality. Such children should be strongly considered for surgical evaluation.

The "natural" history of medically treated temporal lobe epilepsy: what can an evidence-based approach tell us?

We systematically reviewed the literature to describe the “natural” history of medically treated temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). No population-based studies recruiting incident cases of TLE irrespective of age exist. Prospective, population-based studies were limited to those recruiting only childhood-onset TLE or those reporting TLE as a subgroup of cohorts of focal epilepsies. Few studies have been performed in the “MRI era” limiting information on natural history secondary to specific pathologies. Available data suggests that TLE is highly variable, with unpredictable transient remissions and low rates of seizure freedom (30 to 50%). Etiology and failure of first and second drug seem to be the most important predictors for treatment prognosis. The role of initial precipitating injuries remains speculative, as imaging information of related events is either missing or conflicting. Prospective cohorts of new-onset TLE with long-term followup using advanced MRI techniques, timely EEG recordings, and assessments of psychiatric comorbidities are needed.

EEG and neuroimaging studies in young children having epilepsy surgery

The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of electroencephalography and structural and functional neuroimaging in children having resective epilepsy surgery before 5 years of age. Charts of all 28 children (54% male) having resective surgery before 60 months of age at the Mayo Clinic between January 2002 and June 2009 were reviewed. Mean age at seizure onset was 9.6 months (S.D. 12.7); mean age at surgery was 28.8 months (S.D. 17.7). Sixteen children (57%) had partial-onset seizures, 8 (29%) had partial-onset seizures and spasms, and 4 (14%) had spasms alone. Initial surgery type was hemispherectomy in 6 cases, multilobar resection in 8, temporal in 7, and extratemporal in 7. Only 10 of the 25 children (40%) with recorded seizures preoperatively had a well-localized, single ictal focus. Ictal discharge was generalized in 8/25 cases (32%), both generalized and focal in 1 case (4%), hemispheric in 4 cases (16%), and absent in 1 case (4%). Findings from magnetic resonance imaging were abnormal in 27 cases, and revealed focal pathology in 20. Surgical outcome was favorable, with 18 of the 27 survivors (67%) being free, or nearly free, of disabling seizures. In summary, electroencephalography frequently failed to indicate a single ictal focus in young children having epilepsy surgery. In contrast, magnetic resonance imaging was more helpful, revealing focal abnormalities in 74% of patients.

Pharmacologically intractable epilepsy in children: diagnosis and preoperative evaluation

It is important to correctly diagnose medically intractable epilepsy in children and to identify those children whose medically refractory, localization-related seizures may be surgically remediable as soon as possible to optimize the surgical outcome. In this paper the authors review the definition of medically intractable seizures and discuss the various causes and risk factors for this disorder in children. They also outline the presurgical diagnostic evaluation process for pharmacologically intractable epilepsy in children who may be candidates for surgical treatment of localization-related seizures. The treatment of children with medically intractable epilepsy is both challenging and rewarding. Surgery has the potential of altering the natural history of epilepsy by improving or eliminating seizures in carefully selected patients.

Reinvestigation and reduction of polytherapy in children with chronic seizures

From October 2001 to October 2003, the authors reviewed all patients with chronic seizures taking antiepileptic drugs for more than 2 years with follow-up at the pediatric neurological clinic. They identified 31 patients who were using 3 or more drugs. Twenty-nine patients agreed to undergo a drug reduction and readjustment. The authors spent a mean period of 14.1 months to either purely reduce the numbers of drugs or introduce a new drug (rational polytherapy) plus removal of some drugs to achieve the end goal of a maximum of 2 or 3 drugs (if necessary). Seizure control in 96.6% of patients (28 of 29 patients) did not worsen after the readjustment and reduction of the antiepileptic drugs. Instead, 65.5% (19 of 29 patients) got better, and 37.9% (11 of 29) were seizure free. The number of antiepileptic drugs before and after adjusting was 3.6 (range, 3-6) to 1.9 (4 monotherapy, 22 duotheray, and 2 triple drugs). The most common combined therapies were sodium valproate/lamotrigine (n = 10) and carbamazepine/ topiramate (n = 5). Although the results could be possibly attributed to the spontaneous remission of the seizures, it was still shown that those patients were overtreated. Serial addition to 3 or more antiepileptic drugs is less likely to lead to seizure freedom for patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. On the contrary, polytherapy and some antiepileptic drugs could aggravate seizures. Certain combinations of antiepileptic drugs (rational polytherapy) offer better efficacy to control seizures.

Topiramate in long-term treatment of epilepsy in the intellectually disabled

BACKGROUND

To study the effectiveness of topiramate (TPM) in refractory epilepsy in patients who have intellectual disability (ID).

METHODS

A representative population sample of 57 patients with ID (age range 2-61, mean 32.8) was administered add-on TPM for drug-refractory epilepsy.

RESULTS

Seizure freedom for at least for 6 months was attained by 10 (17%), and seizure reduction of > or = 50% by further 26 (46%). Less than 50% decrease in seizure frequency was found in 16 (29%). TPM was more efficacious in localisation-related than in generalised epilepsies (81% vs. 50%, P=0.019). An at least 50% decrease in seizure frequency was achieved by patients with temporal lobe epilepsy in 100%, continuous spike-waves during sleep syndrome in 75%, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in 52%, and those with infantile spasms in 25% of cases. As great decrease in seizure frequency was found in most patients with cortical dysplasia (83%), acquired encephalopathy with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) (75%), and genetic disease associated with MTS (66%). Adverse effects occurred in 10% including two (3%) with seizure aggravation and three (5%) necessitating discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

TPM is an effective antiepileptic drug which is of value in treating people with seizures that are resistant to other antiepileptic medication. As a broad-spectrum drug it may substitute for polypharmacy and, at the same time decrease adverse effects and costs of therapy.

Treatment of partial seizures in childhood : an overview

The treatment of partial seizures in children is based on the use of first generation and recently introduced antiepileptic drugs as well as nonpharmacological treatments such as the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation and surgical therapy. The present review discusses the efficacy and tolerability of different treatment options for partial seizures in childhood. Few adjunctive or monotherapy, placebo-controlled or comparative trials of the first-generation antiepileptic drugs and some of the more recently introduced antiepileptic drugs have been performed in children. This can be explained by the fact that it is only relatively recently (1989) that the International League against Epilepsy proposed that randomised, controlled trials be included among the required criteria for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of an antiepileptic agent. This led to controlled, comparative trials among older antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid), both in adults and in paediatric patients, being performed relatively 'late', based on when these drugs were first introduced. Carbamazepine and valproic acid may still be considered as first-line antiepileptic therapies for children with partial seizures. Phenobarbital and phenytoin are mostly considered as last choice drugs because of their adverse event profiles. The new generation of antiepileptic agents has added to the first- and second-line treatment options for paediatric partial seizures. To date, there are sufficient data to support the clinical use of some of the recently introduced antiepileptic drugs (e.g. oxcarbazepine, topiramate, gabapentin and lamotrigine) as adjunctive or first-line monotherapy. Because of the risk of visual field constriction with vigabatrin, the use of this drug is currently limited to patients refractory to other medications. Tiagabine, felbamate, levetiracetam and zonisamide have been shown to be effective in adults with partial seizures; however, at present there are not yet enough data on the efficacy of these drugs in children to support consideration of their use as either first-line or add-on therapy in this patient population, although controlled studies are expected shortly. Furthermore, the use of felbamate is considerably limited by rare, but severe, hepatic and haematological toxicity. Controlled trials for paediatric partial seizures are still lacking for the ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation, though they may represent, in given patients, useful adjunctive alternative treatments for refractory partial seizures. In conclusion, further trials are needed to determine an optimal sequence of first- and second-line therapies and to establish whether other newer antiepileptic drugs merit consideration as initial therapy in children with partial seizures.

Differential roles for mGluR1 and mGluR5 in the persistent prolongation of epileptiform bursts

Transient activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) with the selective agonist (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG) produces persistent prolongation of epileptiform bursts in guinea pig hippocampal slices, the maintenance of which can be reversibly suppressed with group I mGluR antagonists. To determine the relative roles of mGluR1 and mGluR5 in these group I mGluR-dependent induction and maintenance processes, subtype-selective antagonists were utilized. In the presence of picrotoxin, DHPG (50 microM, 20-45 min) converted interictal bursts into 1- to 3-s discharges that persisted for hours following washout of the mGluR agonist. 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP, an mGluR5 antagonist; 25 microM) and (+)-2-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (LY367385, an mGluR1 antagonist; 20-25 microM) each significantly suppressed the ongoing expression of the mGluR-induced prolonged bursts. However, LY367385 was more effective, reducing the burst prolongation by nearly 90%; MPEP only produced a 64% reduction in burst prolongation. Nevertheless, MPEP was more effective at preventing the induction of the burst prolongation; all 10 slices tested failed to express prolonged bursts both during and after co-application of DHPG with MPEP. Co-application of DHPG with LY367385, in contrast, resulted in significant burst prolongation (in 68% of slices tested) that was revealed on washout of the two agents. These results suggest that while both receptor subtypes participate in both the induction and maintenance of mGluR-mediated burst prolongation, mGluR1 activation plays a greater role in sustaining the expression of prolonged bursts, whereas mGluR5 activation may be a more critical contributor to the induction process underlying this type of epileptogenesis.