Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Interactions between Levetiracetam and Numerous Antiepileptic Drugs in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock Seizure Model: An Isobolographic Analysis

Presynaptic antiseizure medications - basic mechanisms and clues for their rational combinations

Among clinically highly efficient antiseizure medications (ASMs) there are modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery. Of them, levetiracetam and brivaracetam show a high affinity to the synaptic vesicle protein type 2 A (SV2A), whereas pregabalin and gabapentin are selective ligands for the α2δ1 subunits of the voltage-gated calcium channels. In this paper, we present recent progress in understanding the significance of presynaptic release machinery in the neurochemical mechanisms of epilepsy and ASMs. Furthermore, we discuss whether the knowledge of the basic mechanisms of the presynaptically acting ASMs might help establish a rational polytherapy for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Synergistic effects of the galanin analog 810-2 with the antiseizure medication levetiracetam in rodent seizure models

OBJECTIVE

The use of many antiseizure medications (ASMs) is limited due to pharmacoresistance and dose-limiting side effects, suggesting an unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches. The neuropeptide galanin reduces seizures in several preclinical seizure and epilepsy models, but its clinical utility is limited due to rapid metabolism and poor blood-brain barrier penetration. The lead galanin analog 810-2 is systemically bioavailable and reduces seizures when administered alone. Further development of this analog, with the potential for use as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy, requires a better understanding of the use of this analog in combination with approved ASMs. We sought to evaluate 810-2 in combination with commonly used ASMs in rodent models of seizures.

METHODS

The mouse 6-Hz seizure assay was used to test efficacy of 810-2 in combination with levetiracetam (LEV), valproic acid (VPA), or lacosamide (LCM) using a 1:1 dose ratio in isobolographic studies. Further characterization was performed for the combination of 810-2 and LEV in the mouse corneal kindling and rat 6-Hz assays.

RESULTS

Whereas the combination of 810-2 with VPA and LCM yielded additive interactions, the combination of 810-2 with LEV demonstrated a synergistic interaction in the mouse 6-Hz assay. Supra-additive effects were also observed in the mouse corneal kindling and rat 6-Hz assays for this combination.

SIGNIFICANCE

The combination of 810-2 with LEV suggests the potential for this galanin analog to be further developed as an add-on therapy for patients with epilepsy, particularly when coadministered with LEV.

Orally disintegrating tablet containing carbamazepine and levetiracetam: formulation and in vitro and in vivo characterization

This study aimed to prepare and characterize the orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) formulations containing the combination of levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) (CBZ + LEV combination) for the treatment of epilepsy. The ODT formulations were prepared using the lyophilization (L) and direct compression (DC) methods. The flowability of the mixed powders used for DC formulation was evaluated. The quality control tests for the ODTs were performed. Also, the antiepileptic effects of pure drugs, their combination, and the suspension of CBZ + LEV-DC-ODT formulation were evaluated in the rats with pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced epilepsy model. The obtained results for the mixed powders of the DC formulation (angle of repose: 26.18 ± 0.794°; compressibility index: 15.24 ± 0.764%) suggest that the flow properties of the powder blend were suitable for the preparation of CBZ + LEV-ODT using DC method. The mean values of diameter and hardness of L-ODTs and DC-ODTs were found to be 16.87 mm and 16.18 mm and 11.96 N and 30.11 N, respectively. The friability of both formulations was <1%. Both formulations were disintegrated in seconds. Drugs in L-ODT had faster dissolution than those in DC-ODT. Compared to the seizure scores obtained for the groups treated with LEV or CBZ, generally, there was a higher decrease in seizure scores in the groups treated with CBZ + LEV combination or the suspension of CBZ + LEV-DC-ODTs. Consequently, the ODT formulations containing the CBZ + LEV combination might be beneficial in the treatment of epilepsy.

Chronic limbic epilepsy models for therapy discovery: Protocols to improve efficiency

OBJECTIVE

There have been recommendations to improve therapy discovery for epilepsy by incorporating chronic epilepsy models into the preclinical process, but unpredictable seizures and difficulties in maintaining drug levels over prolonged periods have been obstacles to using these animals. We report new protocols in which drugs are administered through a new chronic gastric tube to rats with higher seizure frequencies to minimize these obstacles.

METHODS

Adult rats with spontaneous limbic seizures following an episode of limbic status epilepticus induced by electrical hippocampal stimulation were monitored with long-term video- electroencephalography (EEG). Animals with a predetermined baseline seizure frequency received an intragastric tube for drug administration. Carbamazepine, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, and phenytoin were tested with either an acute protocol (an increasing single dose every other day for a maximum of three doses) or with a chronic protocol (multiple administrations of one dose for a week). Drug levels were obtained to correlate the effect with the level.

RESULTS

With the acute protocol, all four drugs induced a clear dose-related response. Similar dose-related responses were seen following the week-long dosing protocol for carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin, and these responses were associated with drug levels that were in the human therapeutic range. The response to chronic levetiracetam was much less robust. The gastric tube route of administration was well tolerated over a number of months.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using rats with stable, higher seizure frequencies made it possible to identify the potential of a drug to suppress seizures in a realistic model of epilepsy with drug levels that are similar to those of human therapeutic levels. The acute protocol provided a full dose response in 1 week. The chronic administration protocol further differentiated drugs that may be effective long term. The gastric tube facilitates a less stressful, humane, and consistent administration of multiple doses.

Developing precision treatments for epilepsy using patient and animal models

Introduction: Phenytoin was the first antiepileptic drug (AED) discovered in an animal model of seizures whose clinical efficacy was subsequently confirmed. This clearly indicated that a search for other AEDs had to consider animal studies.Areas covered: Main seizure tests used for the evaluation of possible anticonvulsive activity of potential anticonvulsants and their predictive values have been reviewed. Procedures used for the estimation of antiepileptogenic effects have been also included.Expert opinion: First-line seizure models comprise maximal electroshock (MES)-, pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)- and kindling-induced convulsions in rodents. The MES test may be considered as a convenient and easy model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures, PTZ test - as a model of generalized myoclonic seizures and to a certain degree - absence seizures. Kindled seizures (for example, from amygdala) may be regarded as a model of focal seizures. Some tests have been suggested for the search of AEDs effective in drug-resistant seizures - for instance, 6 Hz (44 mA) test or intrahippocampal kainate model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. There are also recommendations from experimental epileptology on synergistic AED combinations for patients with drug-resistant seizures. The clinical evidence on this issue is scarce and favors a combined treatment with valproate + lamotrigine.

Advances in the design and discovery of novel small molecule drugs for the treatment of Dravet Syndrome

Introduction: Dravet syndrome (severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy) begins in the first year of life characterized by generalized or unilateral clonic seizures that are frequently triggered by high fever. A subsequent worsening stage occurs (in years 1-4 of life) and seizure activity is accompanied by disturbed psychomotor development. The third stage of the disease, known as the 'stabilization phase,' is associated with seizures and intellectual impairment. Of note, a mutation in the voltage-gated sodium-channel gene α 1 subunit (SCN1A) has been found in around 85% of patients with Dravet syndrome.Areas covered: The authors review the current treatment strategies as well as potential drugs in the initial stages of clinical evaluation. The authors also review drugs with protective activity in mice models of Dravet syndrome.Expert opinion: Experimental data and results from initial clinical studies have brought attention to several drugs with various mechanisms of action including: ataluren (a suppressant of premature stop codons; under clinical evaluation), EPX-100, EPX-200, fenfluramine (serotonin modulators), soticlestat (an 24-hydroxylase cholesterol enzyme inhibitor), SPN-817 (an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase), verapamil (a voltage-dependent calcium channel inhibitor) and STK-001 (an antisense oligonucleotide). The latter is scheduled for clinical evaluation.

Sub-additive (antagonistic) interaction of lacosamide with lamotrigine and valproate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice: an isobolographic analysis

BACKGROUND

Launching polytherapy with two or three antiseizure drugs (ASDs) in patients with epilepsy is still problematic. The choice of ASDs to combine them together is usually based on clinicians' experience and it requires knowledge about mechanisms of action of the studied ASDs and their drug-drug interactions, whose nature may be favorable, neutral or unfavorable. To characterize three-drug interaction among lacosamide (LCM), lamotrigine (LTG) and valproate (VPA), the type I isobolographic analysis was used. The antiseizure effects of three-drug combination were analyzed in a model of maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) in albino Swiss mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The seizure activity in mice was evoked by alternating current stimulation (25 mA, 500 V, 50 Hz, 0.2 s). Both, the type I isobolographic analysis and the test of parallelism of dose-response effects of the ASDs were used so as to properly classify interaction among three ASDs, administered in a fixed ratio combination of 1:1:1.

RESULTS

The three-drug mixture of LCM, LTG and VPA at the fixed ratio of 1:1:1 protected the experimental mice from MES-induced seizures; however, the reported interaction was sub-additive (antagonistic; p < 0.01) with isobolography.

CONCLUSION

The antagonistic pharmacodynamic interaction among LCM, LTG and VPA in the MES test in mice cannot be transferred to clinical settings and this unfavorable combination should not be recommended for patients with epilepsy.

Anti-Epileptogenic Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs

Generally, the prevalence of epilepsy does not exceed 0.9% of the population and approximately 70% of epilepsy patients may be adequately controlled with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Moreover, status epilepticus (SE) or even a single seizure may produce neurodegeneration within the brain and SE has been recognized as one of acute brain insults leading to acquired epilepsy via the process of epileptogenesis. Two questions thus arise: (1) Are AEDs able to inhibit SE-induced neurodegeneration? and (2) if so, can a probable neuroprotective potential of particular AEDs stop epileptogenesis? An affirmative answer to the second question would practically point to the preventive potential of a given neuroprotective AED following acute brain insults. The available experimental data indicate that diazepam (at low and high doses), gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate and valproate exhibited potent or moderate neuroprotective effects in diverse models of SE in rats. However, only diazepam (at high doses), gabapentin and pregabalin exerted some protective activity against acquired epilepsy (spontaneous seizures). As regards valproate, its effects on spontaneous seizures were equivocal. With isobolography, some supra-additive combinations of AEDs have been delineated against experimental seizures. One of such combinations, levetiracetam + topiramate proved highly synergistic in two models of seizures and this particular combination significantly inhibited epileptogenesis in rats following status SE. Importantly, no neuroprotection was evident. It may be strikingly concluded that there is no correlation between neuroprotection and antiepileptogenesis. Probably, preclinically verified combinations of AEDs may be considered for an anti-epileptogenic therapy.

Effect of newer anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) on the cognitive status in pentylenetetrazol induced seizures in a zebrafish model

Epilepsy is marked by seizures that are a manifestation of excessive brain activity and is symptomatically treatable by anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Unfortunately, the older AEDs have many side effects, with cognitive impairment being a major side effect that affects the daily lives of people with epilepsy. Thus, this study aimed to determine if newer AEDs (Zonisamide, Levetiracetam, Perampanel, Lamotrigine and Valproic Acid) also cause cognitive impairment, using a zebrafish model. Acute seizures were induced in zebrafish using pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) and cognitive function was assessed using the T-maze test of learning and memory. Neurotransmitter and gene expression levels related to epilepsy as well as learning and memory were also studied to provide a better understanding of the underlying processes. Ultimately, impaired cognitive function was seen in AED treated zebrafish, regardless of whether seizures were induced. A highly significant decrease in γ-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and glutamate levels was also discovered, although acetylcholine levels were more variable. The gene expression levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (CAMP) Responsive Element Binding Protein 1 (CREB-1) were not found to be significantly different in AED treated zebrafish. Based on the experimental results, a decrease in brain glutamate levels due to AED treatment appears to be at least one of the major factors behind the observed cognitive impairment in the treated zebrafish.

Levetiracetam combined with ACEA, highly selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist changes neurogenesis in mouse brain

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of second generation antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) with arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide (ACEA) on proliferating neural precursor cells in mouse brain. Additionally, we established the relationship between treatment with ACEA in combination with LEV and hippocampal neurogenesis in mouse brain. All experiments were performed on male CB57/BL mice injected i.p. with LEV (10 mg/kg), ACEA (10 mg/kg) and PMSF (30 mg/kg) for 10 days. Experiments were provided in two stages: stage 1- an acute response of proliferating neural precursor cells to ACEA and LEV administration (Ki-67 staining), stage 2 - a long term response to ACEA and LEV administration (BrDU, NeuN, GFAP staining). Results indicate that ACEA + PMSF and ACEA + PMSF + LEV significantly increased the total number of Ki-67 positive cells comparing to the control group. PMSF and LEV administered alone and in combination had no significant impact on cell proliferation compared to the control group. Results from neurogenesis study indicated that ACEA + PMSF administered alone and in combination with LEV increased the total number of BrDU cells compared to the control group, although LEV on its own decreased the number of BrDU cells. Moreover, the combination of ACEA + PMSF + LEV significantly increased the total number of newborn neurons compared to the control group. In turn, LEV significantly decreased the process of neurogenesis. Astrocytes were considerably reduced in all treated groups as compare to the control mice. These data provide substantial evidence that LEV administered chronically decreases the proliferation and differentiation of newly born cells while combination of LEV + ACEA significantly increases the level of newborn neurons in the dentate subgranular zone.

Inhibitory effects of cannabidiol on voltage-dependent sodium currents

Cannabis sativa contains many related compounds known as phytocannabinoids. The main psychoactive and nonpsychoactive compounds are Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), respectively. Much of the evidence for clinical efficacy of CBD-mediated antiepileptic effects has been from case reports or smaller surveys. The mechanisms for CBD's anticonvulsant effects are unclear and likely involve noncannabinoid receptor pathways. CBD is reported to modulate several ion channels, including sodium channels (Nav). Evaluating the therapeutic mechanisms and safety of CBD demands a richer understanding of its interactions with central nervous system targets. Here, we used voltage-clamp electrophysiology of HEK-293 cells and iPSC neurons to characterize the effects of CBD on Nav channels. Our results show that CBD inhibits hNav1.1-1.7 currents, with an IC50 of 1.9-3.8 μm, suggesting that this inhibition could occur at therapeutically relevant concentrations. A steep Hill slope of ∼3 suggested multiple interactions of CBD with Nav channels. CBD exhibited resting-state blockade, became more potent at depolarized potentials, and also slowed recovery from inactivation, supporting the idea that CBD binding preferentially stabilizes inactivated Nav channel states. We also found that CBD inhibits other voltage-dependent currents from diverse channels, including bacterial homomeric Nav channel (NaChBac) and voltage-gated potassium channel subunit Kv2.1. Lastly, the CBD block of Nav was temperature-dependent, with potency increasing at lower temperatures. We conclude that CBD's mode of action likely involves 1) compound partitioning in lipid membranes, which alters membrane fluidity affecting gating, and 2) undetermined direct interactions with sodium and potassium channels, whose combined effects are loss of channel excitability.

A viewpoint on rational and irrational fixed-drug combinations

INTRODUCTION

Considering that there are around 30% of patients with epilepsy resistant to monotherapy, the use of synergistic combinations of antiepileptic drugs is of particular importance. This review shows most beneficial as well as irrational combined treatments both from an experimental and clinical point of view. Areas covered: Preferably, experimental data derived from studies evaluating synergy, additivity, or antagonism by relevant methods, in terms of anticonvulsant or neurotoxic effects and pharmacokinetic data have been considered. Although there have been no randomized clinical trials on this issue, the clinical data have been analyzed from studies on considerable numbers of patients. Case-report studies have been not considered. Expert commentary: The experimental data provide a strong support that co-administration of lamotrigine with carbamazepine is negative, considering the anticonvulsant and neurotoxic effects. Clinical reports do not entirely support this conclusion. Other experimentally documented negative combinations comprise lamotrigine+ oxcarbazepine and oxcarbazepine+ phenytoin. From the experimental and clinical point of view, a combination of lamotrigine+ valproate may deserve recommendation. Other most positive experimental and clinical combinations include carbamazepine+valproate, phenytoin+phenobarbital, carbamazepine+gabapentin, carbamazepine+topiramate, levetiracetam+valproate, levetiracetam+carbamazepine. Certainly, experimental data have some limitations (non-epileptic animals, acute administration of antiepileptic drugs) so all experimental recommendations need a careful clinical evaluation.

Potent and selective pharmacodynamic synergy between the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 2-positive allosteric modulator JNJ-46356479 and levetiracetam in the mouse 6-Hz (44-mA) model

OBJECTIVE

We previously demonstrated that positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of metabotropic glutamate subtype 2 (mGlu₂ ) receptors have potential synergistic interactions with the antiseizure drug levetiracetam (LEV). The present study utilizes isobolographic analysis to evaluate the combined administration of JNJ-46356479, a selective and potent mGlu₂ PAM, with LEV as well as sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG).

METHODS

The anticonvulsant efficacy of JNJ-46356479 was evaluated in the 6-Hz model of psychomotor seizures in mice. JNJ-46356479 was administered in combination with LEV using 3 fixed dose-ratio treatment groups in the mouse 6-Hz (44-mA) seizure test. The combination of JNJ-46356479 with LEV was also evaluated in the mouse corneal kindling model. The potential interactions of JNJ-46356479 with the antiseizure drugs VPA and LTG were also evaluated using fixed dose-ratio combinations. Plasma levels were obtained for analysis of potential pharmacokinetic interactions for each combination studied in the mouse 6-Hz model.

RESULTS

JNJ-46356479 was active in the 6-Hz model at both 32-mA and 44-mA stimulus intensities (median effective dose = 2.8 and 10.2 mg/kg, respectively). Using 1:1, 1:3, and 3:1 fixed dose-ratio combinations (LEV:JNJ-46356479), coadministration was significantly more potent than predicted for additive effects, and plasma levels suggest this synergism was not due to pharmacokinetic interactions. Studies in kindled mice further demonstrate the positive pharmacodynamic interaction of LEV with JNJ-46356479. Using 1:1 dose-ratio combinations of JNJ-46356479 with either VPA or LTG, there were no significant differences observed for coadministration.

SIGNIFICANCE

These studies demonstrate a synergistic interaction of JNJ-46356479 with LEV, whereas no such effect occurred for JNJ-46356479 with either VPA or LTG. The synergy seems therefore to be specific to LEV, and the combination LEV/mGlu₂ PAM has the potential to result in a rational polypharmacy approach to treat patients with refractory epilepsy, once it has been confirmed in clinical studies.

Anti-Epileptic Drug Combination Efficacy in an In Vitro Seizure Model - Phenytoin and Valproate, Lamotrigine and Valproate

In this study, we investigated the relative efficacy of different classes of commonly used anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of action, individually and in combination, to suppress epileptiform discharges in an in vitro model. Extracellular field potential were recorded in 450 μm thick transverse hippocampal slices prepared from juvenile Wistar rats, in which “epileptiform discharges” (ED’s) were produced with a high-K⁺ (8.5 mM) bicarbonate-buffered saline solution. Single and dual recordings in stratum pyramidale of CA1 and CA3 regions were performed with 3–5 MΩ glass microelectrodes. All drugs—lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT) and valproate (VPA)—were applied to the slice by superfusion at a rate of 2 ml/min at 32°C. Effects upon frequency of ED’s were assessed for LTG, PHT and VPA applied at different concentrations, in isolation and in combination. We demonstrated that high-K⁺ induced ED frequency was reversibly reduced by LTG, PHT and VPA, at concentrations corresponding to human therapeutic blood plasma concentrations. With a protocol using several applications of drugs to the same slice, PHT and VPA in combination displayed additivity of effect with 50μM PHT and 350μM VPA reducing SLD frequency by 44% and 24% individually (n = 19), and together reducing SLD frequency by 66% (n = 19). 20μM LTG reduced SLD frequency by 32% and 350μM VPA by 16% (n = 18). However, in combination there was a supra-linear suppression of ED’s of 64% (n = 18). In another independent set of experiments, similar results of drug combination responses were also found. In conclusion, a combination of conventional AEDs with different mechanisms of action, PHT and VPA, displayed linear additivity of effect on epileptiform activity. More intriguingly, a combination of LTG and VPA considered particularly efficacious clinically showed a supra-additive suppression of ED’s. This approach may be useful as an in vitro platform for assessing drug combination efficacy.

Additive interactions between retigabine and oxcarbazepine in the chimney test and the model of generalized tonic-clonic seizures in mice

Introduction. Patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy are usually treated with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The search for therapeutically efficacious AED combinations is still a challenging issue for clinicians and epileptologists throughout the world.

Aim. To determine the interaction profile for the combination of retigabine (RTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) in both, the model of tonic-clonic seizures, the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model and chimney test (motor performance) in adult male albino Swiss mice.

Methods. Isobolographic analysis (type I) was applied to characterize interactions for the combination of RTG with OXC with respect to its anticonvulsant and acute side (neurotoxic) effects, as determined in the MES and chimney tests, respectively.

Results. The combination of RTG with OXC at the fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1 produced additive interactions in the MES test in mice. Similarly, the combination of RTG with OXC at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 produced additive interaction with a tendency towards sub-additivity in the chimney test in mice. Measurement of total brain concentrations of both AEDs revealed that RTG did not affect total brain concentrations of OXC and inversely, OXC had no impact on RTG’s total brain concentrations, confirming pharmacodynamic interaction between the drugs.

Conclusions. The additive pharmacodynamic interactions in both the MES and chimney tests in mice were observed for the combination of RTG with OXC.

Additive interaction of levetiracetam with lamotrigine in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model – an isobolographic analysis

The aim of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in combination with lamotrigine (LTG – a second-generation antiepileptic drug), in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model. Limbic (psychomotor) seizure activity was evoked in albino Swiss mice by a current (32 mA, 6 Hz, 3 s stimulus duration) delivered via ocular electrodes and isobolographic analysis for parallel dose-response relationship curves (DRRCs) was used to characterize the consequent anticonvulsant interactions between the drug combinations. Results indicated that LEV administered singly was associated with a DRRC that was parallel to that for LTG. With isobolography for parallel DRRCs, the combination of LEV with LTG at three fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1 exerted additive interaction. LEV combined with LTG exerted additive interaction in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.

Isobolographic analysis of the mechanisms of action of anticonvulsants from a combination effect

The nature of the pharmacodynamic interactions of drugs is influenced by the drugs׳ mechanisms of action. It has been hypothesized that drugs with different mechanisms are likely to interact synergistically, whereas those with similar mechanisms seem to produce additive interactions. In this review, we describe an extensive investigation of the published literature on drug combinations of anticonvulsants, the nature of the interaction of which has been evaluated by type I and II isobolographic analyses and the subthreshold method. The molecular targets of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) include Na(+) and Ca(2+) channels, GABA type-A receptor, and glutamate receptors such as NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptors. The results of this review indicate that the nature of interactions evaluated by type I isobolographic analyses but not by the two other methods seems to be consistent with the above hypothesis. Type I isobolographic analyses may be used not only for evaluating drug combinations but also for predicting the targets of new drugs.

Synergism of lacosamide with established antiepileptic drugs in the 6-Hz seizure model in mice

PURPOSE

Lacosamide (LCM, Vimpat) is an anticonvulsant with a unique mode of action. This provides lacosamide with the potential to act additively or even synergistically with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The objective of this study was to determine the presence of such interactions by isobolographic analysis.

METHODS

The anticonvulsant effect of LCM in combination with other AEDs including carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), gabapentin (GBP), and levetiracetam (LEV) at fixed dose ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1, was evaluated in the 6-Hz-induced seizure model in mice. In addition, the impact of the combinations of LCM with the other AEDs on motor coordination was assessed in the rotarod test. Finally, AED concentrations were measured in blood and brain to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

KEY FINDINGS

All studied AEDs produced dose-dependent anticonvulsant effects against 6-Hz-induced seizures. Combinations of LCM with CBZ, LTG, TPM, GBP, or LEV were synergistic. All other LCM/AED combinations displayed additive effects with a tendency toward synergism. Furthermore, no enhanced adverse effects were observed in the rotarod test by combining LCM with other AEDs. No pharmacokinetic interactions were seen on brain AED concentrations. Coadministration of LCM and TPM led to an increase in plasma levels of LCM, whereas the plasma concentration of PHT was increased by coadministration of LCM.

SIGNIFICANCE

The synergistic anticonvulsant interaction of LCM with various AEDs, without exacerbation of adverse motor effects, highlights promising properties of LCM as add-on therapy for drug refractory epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drug interactions - principles and clinical implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Rational Polytherapy with Antiepileptic Drugs

Approximately 30-40% of patients do not achieve seizure control with a single antiepileptic drug (AED). With the advent of multiple AEDs in the past 15 years, rational polytherapy, the goal of finding combinations of AEDs that have favorable characteristics, has become of greater importance. We review the theoretical considerations based on AED mechanism of action, animal models, human studies in this field, and the challenges in finding such optimal combinations. Several case scenarios are presented, illustrating examples of rational polytherapy.

Pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic drugs: preclinical data based on isobolography

BACKGROUND

At least 20 - 30% of epileptic patients do not sufficiently respond to monotherapy. Some of them can benefit from drug combinations; hence, animal data may provide some useful novel clues for rational polytherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review combinations of antiepileptic drugs, evaluated with the help of isobolographic analysis, in terms of their efficacy and adverse effects.

METHODS

A literature search, on the basis of experimental studies, with no time limit was carried out.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Preclinical data indicate that a synergy occurred for the combinations of valproate + phenytoin, valproate + ethosuximide, lamotrigine + valproate, gabapentin + valproate, gabapentin + carbamazepine, topiramate + carbamazepine, topiramate + valproate, topiramate + oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam + topiramate, levetiracetam + oxcarbazepine, oxcarbazepine + gabapentin, tiagabine + gabapentin and lamotrigine + topiramate. On the other hand, lamotrigine combined with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine resulted in a clear-cut antagonism. Interestingly, a combination of oxcarbazepine + clonazepam produced variable responses, including synergy, additivity or antagonism, depending on the dose ratio of these drugs. In no case did pharmacokinetic factors contribute to the final analysis of the effects of drug combinations. Pharmacokinetic factors can contribute to the final effect of drug combinations,such as when stiripentol is added to valproate, or clobazam is added to valproate. It may be concluded that the rational treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy needs to consider the results of preclinical studies.

Efficacy, safety, and potential of extended-release lamotrigine in the treatment of epileptic patients

Epilepsy is a frequent, chronic disease demanding long-term medication with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). When slow release formulations of AEDs are used the chance of compliance and control of seizures is increased. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a broad spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED), effective against both generalized and partial seizures. Its immediate-release formulation (LTG-IR) requires twice-daily dosing. In contrast, an extended-release formulation (LTG-XR) may be given once daily, providing a flatter dose-concentration curve with apparently lower maximum serum levels. Simplified dosing positively affects compliance and LTG-XR has a similar profile of efficacy and tolerability to LTG-IR. Rashes, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, are the most serious adverse effect impacting 0.8% of pediatric patients. Thus, LTG-XR should be discontinued upon the appearance of rash.

Rational polytherapy

Monotherapy has been considered the gold standard for drug treatment of epilepsy. However, there is renewed interest in polytherapy because of the advent of new drugs with fewer drug interactions and novel mechanisms of action, and the realization that most patients with refractory epilepsy are eventually treated with drug combinations. Careful consideration must be given to drug additions and conversions; it may be less risky to add a drug than to convert from one monotherapy to another in patients with frequent or severe seizures. Rational choice of drug combinations is, at present, based more on avoidance of pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic side effects than on evidence for supra-additive efficacy. There are indications that combinations of two sodium-channel blocking agents are less effective than combinations of drugs with different primary mechanisms of action, and some human studies suggest that lamotrigine and valproate may be synergistic for efficacy. However, more animal and human research is needed, with attention to the effects of various combinations on both toxicity and seizure control.

Isobolographic characterization of the anticonvulsant interaction profiles of levetiracetam in combination with clonazepam, ethosuximide, phenobarbital and valproate in the mouse pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure model

This study was designed so as to characterize the interactions between levetiracetam (LEV) and the conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ETS), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA) in suppressing pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced clonic seizures in mice by use of type II isobolographic analysis. Adverse-effect profiles of the drugs in combination were determined and brain AED concentrations were measured. The combinations of VPA and ETS with LEV at the fixed-ratio of 1:2, CZP with LEV (1:20,000), and PB with LEV (1:20) were supra-additive (synergistic) in suppressing seizures. In contrast, VPA and ETS with LEV (1:1, 2:1, and 4:1), CZP with LEV (1:1000, 1:5000, and 1:10,000), and PB with LEV (1:1, 1:5, and 1:10) were additive. No adverse effects were observed. ETS significantly reduced brain LEV concentrations but no other pharmacokinetic changes were observed. The combinations of CZP with LEV (1:20,000); VPA and ETS with LEV (1:2); and PB with LEV (1:20) appear to be favorable combinations exerting supra-additive interactions in suppressing PTZ-induced seizures.

Isobolographic characterization of interactions of levetiracetam with the various antiepileptic drugs in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model

The aim of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in combination with the various antiepileptic drugs (clonazepam [CZP], oxcarbazepine [OXC], phenobarbital [PB], tiagabine [TGB], and valproate [VPA]), in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model. Limbic (psychomotor) seizure activity was evoked in albino Swiss mice by a current (32 mA, 6 Hz, 3s stimulus duration) delivered via ocular electrodes and isobolographic analysis for parallel and non-parallel dose-response effects was used to characterize the consequent anticonvulsant interactions between the various drug combinations. Potential concurrent adverse-effect profiles of interactions between LEV and CZP, OXC, PB, TGB, and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were evaluated in the chimney (motor performance), passive avoidance (long-term memory), and grip-strength (muscular strength) tests. LEV administered singly was associated with a dose-response relationship curve (DRRC) that was parallel to that for CZP and non-parallel to that for OXC, PB, TGB and VPA. With isobolography for parallel DRRCs, the combination of LEV with CZP at three fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1 was additive in nature. With isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs the combinations of LEV with OXC, TGB and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were also additive. In contrast, the isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs revealed that the interaction for the combination of LEV with PB at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 was supra-additive (synergistic). None of the combinations were associated with any concurrent adverse effects with regards to motor coordination, long-term memory or muscular strength. LEV is associated with favorable anticonvulsant synergism with PB and is additive with regards to CZP, OXC, TGB and VPA in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction profiles of levetiracetam in combination with gabapentin, tiagabine and vigabatrin in the mouse pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure model: an isobolographic analysis

To characterize the interactions between levetiracetam and the antiepileptic drugs gabapentin, tiagabine, and vigabatrin in suppressing pentylenetetrazole-induced clonic seizures in mice, type II isobolographic analysis was used. Clonic seizures were evoked in Albino Swiss mice by subcutaneous injection of pentylenetetrazole at its CD(97)(98 mg/kg). Adverse-effect profiles with respect to motor performance, long-term memory and skeletal muscular strength were measured along with total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations. The combination of gabapentin with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 were supra-additive (synergistic) in terms of seizure suppression whilst the combination at the fixed-ratio of 4:1 was additive. Tiagabine with levetiracetam and vigabatrin with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 1:25, 1:50, 1:100, 1:200, and 1:400 and at 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, 6:1, 8:1, and 16:1 were additive, respectively. No acute adverse effects were observed. Measurement of total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations revealed that levetiracetam in combination with gabapentin at the fixed-ratio of 1:4 significantly elevated (21%) total brain gabapentin concentrations. In contrast, levetiracetam was without affect on tiagabine or vigabatrin concentrations and co-administration with gabapentin, tiagabine or vigabatrin had no effect on levetiracetam brain concentrations, indicating the pharmacodynamic nature of interaction between these antiepileptic drugs in the mouse pentylenetetrazole model. The combination of gabapentin with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 appears to be particularly favorable combination exerting supra-additive interaction in suppressing pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures, although there is a pharmacokinetic contribution to the interaction between levetiracetam and gabapentin at the fixed-ratio of 1:4. Levetiracetam in combination with tiagabine and vigabatrin appear to be neutral combinations producing only additivity in the mouse pentylenetetrazole model.

Conversion from carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine to topiramate in adolescents and adults with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To explore effectiveness, tolerability and changes in quality of life in patients with epilepsy converting to topiramate (TPM) from carbamazepine (CBZ) or oxcarbazepine (OXC) due to insufficient effectiveness and/or tolerability.

METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, non-interventional trial was used to examine patients (> or = 12 years) with epilepsy, changing to TPM monotherapy from baseline mono- or combination therapy with CBZ or OXC. TPM was added to the existing antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and started at a dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose was titrated up with 25 mg/day increments, once every 1-2 weeks, until a final dose between 50 and 200 mg/day was reached. On the basis of clinical judgment, the treating physician decided whether or not the existing AED treatment with CBZ or OXC could then be withdrawn. Type and number of seizures, preferred TPM dose, quality of life (QOLIE-10 questionnaire), subjective perception of improvement and adverse events (AE) were documented.

RESULTS

140 patients (53.5% women, mean age 47 years) decided to switch to TPM due to insufficient effectiveness (75% of patients) and/or poor tolerability (80%) of the CBZ/OXC treatment. Average duration of follow-up was 24 weeks with an overall discontinuation rate of 19.3%, mainly due to AEs (12.1%). At study endpoint, the intended shift to TPM monotherapy was achieved in 73% of patients at a median TPM dose of 100 mg/day. A seizure reduction of > or = 50% was achieved in 91% of patients in the last scheduled period (weeks 12-26); 62% of patients entering that period remained seizure free. Quality of life at endpoint improved significantly when compared with baseline for all domains of QOLIE-10 (P < 0.001). Most frequent AEs (reported by > or = 5% of patients) were paresthesia (9.3%), weight loss (7.9%), convulsions (5.7%) and memory disorders (5.0%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with epilepsy, previously not satisfactorily treated with CBZ or OXC, conversion to TPM may result in an improvement in seizure control as well as in quality of life.

Topiramate: a review of its use in the treatment of epilepsy

Topiramate (Topamax) is a structurally novel broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug (AED) with established efficacy as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of adult and paediatric patients with generalised tonic-clonic seizures, partial seizures with or without generalised seizures, and seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The incidence and severity of many adverse events, including CNS-related events, may be reduced through the use of slow titration to effective and well tolerated dosages. It is associated with few clinically significant interactions with other drugs, is effective when used with other AEDs, is not associated with drug-induced weight gain and, at lower dosages, does not interfere with the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. Therefore, topiramate is a valuable option as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in the treatment of epilepsy in adult and paediatric patients.

Nonlinear blending: a useful general concept for the assessment of combination drug synergy

Human diseases may involve cellular signaling networks that contain redundant pathways, so that blocking a single pathway in the system cannot achieve the desired effect. As such, the use of drugs in combination are particularly effective interventions in networked systems. However, common synergy measures are often inadequate to quantify the effect of two different drugs in complex cellular systems. This article proposes a general approach to quantifying the synergy of two drugs in combination. This approach is called strong nonlinear blending. Drugs with different relative potencies, different effect maxima, or situations of potentiation or coalism pose no problem for strong nonlinear blending as a way to assess the increased response benefit to be gained by combining two drugs. This is important as testing drug combinations in complex biological systems are likely to produce a wide variety of possible response surfaces. It is also shown that for monotone increasing (or decreasing) dose response surfaces that strong nonlinear blending is equivalent to improved potency along a ray of constant dose ratio. This is important because fixed dose ratios form the basis for many preclinical and clinical combination drug experiments. Two examples are given involving HIV and cancer chemotherapy combination drug experiments.

Levetiracetam: the profile of a novel anticonvulsant drug-part I: preclinical data

The objective of this article was to review and summarize the available reports on the preclinical profile of the novel anticonvulsant drug levetiracetam (LEV). Therefore, a careful search was conducted in the MEDLINE database and combined with guidelines from regulatory agencies, proceedings of professional scientific meetings, and information provided by the manufacturers. This article provides detailed information on the anticonvulsant effects of LEV in various animal models of epilepsy and on its pharmacology in laboratory animals. The mechanism of action of LEV is reviewed, with special regard to its recently discovered binding site, the synaptic vesicle protein 2A. In general, LEV is shown to be a safe, broad-spectrum anticonvulsant drug with highly beneficial pharmacokinetic properties and a distinct mechanism of action. The clinical studies with LEV will be discussed in the second part of this review article to be published subsequently.

Influence of levetiracetam on the anticonvulsant efficacy of conventional antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

Levetiracetam (LEV, [S]-alpha-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine acetamide) is a new antiepileptic that has been used as adjunctive therapy to treat patients with intractable epilepsy. Systemic administration of levetiracetam (2.5-30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) was able to produce a dose-dependent decrease in DBA/2 audiogenic seizure severity score. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, levetiracetam, 5mg/kg, i.p., which per se did not significantly affect the occurrence of audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of some antiepileptic drugs studied against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice. The degree of potentiation induced by levetiracetam was greater, approximately twice, for carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, topiramate, gabapentin, and valproate, less for lamotrigine, phenobarbital and phenytoin. This increase was associated with a comparable impairment in motor activity; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of antiepileptic drugs with levetiracetam was more favourable than the combination with saline with the exception of lamotrigine, phenytoin and phenobarbital. Since levetiracetam did not significantly influence the total and free plasma and the brain levels of antiepileptics studied. In addition, levetiracetam did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the anticonvulsants tested. In conclusion, levetiracetam showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when administered in combination with some classical anticonvulsants, most notably carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, topiramate and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.

Synergistic combinations of anticonvulsant agents: what is the evidence from animal experiments?

PURPOSE

Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use.

METHODS

Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p<0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.

Isobolographic analysis of interaction between drugs with nonparallel dose-response relationship curves: a practical application

The objective of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant and acute adverse-effect potentials of topiramate (TPM) and gabapentin (GBP)-two second-generation antiepileptic drugs administered alone and in combination in the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and chimney test in mice. The anticonvulsant and acute adverse effects of the combination of TPM with GBP at the fixed ratio of 1:1 were determined using the type I isobolographic analysis for nonparallel dose-response relationship curves (DRRCs). To ascertain any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed interaction between TPM and GBP, total brain concentrations of both drugs were determined. The isobolographic analysis of interaction for TPM and GBP, whose DRRCs were not parallel in both MES and chimney tests, was accompanied with a presentation of all required calculations allowing the determination of lower and upper lines of additivity. The isobolographic analysis revealed that TPM combined with GBP at the fixed-ratio combination of 1:1 interacted supraadditively (synergistically) in terms of suppression of MES-induced seizures, and simultaneously, the combination produced additive interaction with respect to motor coordination impairment (adverse effects) in the chimney test. The evaluation of pharmacokinetic characteristics of interaction for the combination of TPM with GBP revealed that neither TPM nor GBP affected their total brain concentrations in experimental animals, and thus, the observed interaction in the MES test was pharmacodynamic in nature. In conclusion, the combination of TPM with GBP, because of supraadditivity in the MES test and additivity in terms of motor coordination impairment in the chimney test as well as lack of pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs, fulfilled the criterion of a favorable combination, worthy of recommendation in further clinical practice.

Levetiracetam and felbamate interact both pharmacodynamically and pharmacokinetically: an isobolographic analysis in the mouse maximal electroshock model

PURPOSE

Polytherapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is generally required for approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy, who do not respond satisfactorily to monotherapy. The potential usefulness of AED combinations, producing synergistic anticonvulsant efficacy and minimal adverse effects, is therefore of significant importance. The present study sought to ascertain the potential usefulness of levetiracetam (LEV) and felbamate (FBM) in combination in the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model.

METHODS

The anticonvulsant interaction profile between LEV and FBM in the mouse MES-induced seizure model was determined using type II isobolographic analysis. Acute adverse effects (motor performance) were ascertained by use of the chimney test. LEV and FBM brain concentrations were measured by HPLC in order to determine any pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed antiseizure effect.

RESULTS

LEV in combination with FBM, at the fixed ratios of 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1, were supraadditive, whereas at the fixed ratio of 1:4, additivity was observed in the mouse MES model. Furthermore, none of the investigated combinations altered motor performance in the chimney test. Brain FBM concentrations were unaffected by concomitant LEV administration. In contrast, FBM significantly increased LEV brain concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

LEV in combination with FBM was associated with pharmacodynamic supraadditivity in the MES test. However, this anticonvulsant supraadditivity was associated with a concurrent increase in brain LEV concentrations indicating a pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed pharmacodynamic interaction between LEV and FBM.

2-phosphonomethyl-pentanedioic acid (glutamate carboxypeptidase II inhibitor) increases threshold for electroconvulsions and enhances the antiseizure action of valproate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

This study examined the effect of 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic acid (2-PMPA), a potent and selective inhibitor of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCP II), an enzyme releasing glutamate and N-acetyl-aspartate from synaptical terminals, on the electroconvulsive threshold in mice. Moreover, the influence of 2-PMPA on the anticonvulsant activities of four conventional antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) was evaluated in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. Results indicated that 2-PMPA (at a dose range of 50-200 mg/kg, i.p.) raised the electroconvulsive threshold in mice dose-dependently. Linear regression analysis of dose-response relationship between the doses of 2-PMPA and their corresponding threshold values allowed the calculation of threshold increasing dose by 20% (TID20), which was 109.2 mg/kg. Moreover, 2-PMPA administered i.p. at a constant dose of 150 mg/kg (the dose increasing the threshold for electroconvulsions) enhanced significantly the anticonvulsant action of valproate, by reducing its median effective dose (ED50) from 281.4 to 230.1 mg/kg (P<0.05). In contrast, 2-PMPA at the lower dose of 100 mg/kg (i.p.) had no impact on the antiseizure activity of valproate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test. Likewise, 2-PMPA at 100 and 150 mg/kg did not affect the antiseizure action of carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Additionally, none of the combinations investigated between 2-PMPA (150 mg/kg, i.p.) and carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate (at their ED50 values) produced motor coordination impairment in the chimney test. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of interaction between 2-PMPA and valproate revealed that 2-PMPA at 150 mg/kg selectively increased total brain concentrations of valproate, remaining simultaneously without any effect on free plasma concentrations of valproate, indicating a pharmacokinetic nature of observed interaction in the maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Based on our preclinical data, it may be concluded that 2-PMPA possesses a seizure modulating property by increasing the electroconvulsive threshold. The reduction of glutamate neurotransmission in the brain, as a consequence of inhibition of GCP II activity by 2-PMPA, was however insufficient to enhance the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs, except for valproate, whose antiseizure action against maximal electroconvulsions was potentiated by 2-PMPA. Unfortunately, the favourable interaction between 2-PMPA and valproate was associated with a pharmacokinetic increase in total brain valproate concentrations.