Initial Perspectives from Midwestern Neurologists: Epilepsy Patients' Barriers and Motivators for Seeking Treatment

Clinical correlates of negative health events and disparities among adults with epilepsy enrolled in a self-management clinical trial

AIMS

Despite advances in care, people with epilepsy experience negative health events (NHEs), such as seizures, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. This analysis using baseline data from an epilepsy self-management clinical trial targeting people from rural regions and other underserved populations assessed the relationship between demographic and clinical variables vs. NHEs.

METHODS

Data to evaluate disparities and clinical correlates was collected using patient surveys from a baseline sample of 94 participants in a larger prospective study of 160 individuals with epilepsy who experienced an NHE within the last six months. Demographic characteristics, mental and physical functional status assessed using 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire version 2 (SF-36v2), depression assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), quality of life assessed with the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-10), self-efficacy assessed the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES), social support assessed with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), self-management assessed with the Epilepsy Self-Management Scale (ESMS), and stigma assessed with the Epilepsy Stigma Scale (ESS) were all examined in association with past 6-month total NHE frequency as well as NHE sub-categories of past 30-day and 6-month seizure counts, self-harm attempts, ED visits and hospitalizations. An exploratory evaluation of NHE correlates in relation to the Rural Urban Continuum Code (RUCC) residence classification compared 3 subgroups of increasing rurality. Descriptive statistics were generated for demographic and clinical variables and NHEs, and exploratory analyses compared the distribution of demographic, clinical, and NHE variables by RUCC categorization.

RESULTS

The mean age was 38.5 years (SD 11.9), predominantly female (N= 62, 66.0%) and white (N=81, 86.2%). Just a little under half (N=43, 45.7%) of participants had annual incomes of less than $25,000, and 40% (N=38) were rural residents (RUCC >3). The past 6-month NHEs count was 20.4 (SD 32.0). Seizures were the most common NHE with a mean 30-day seizure frequency = 5.4 (SD 11.8) and 6-month seizure frequency of 18.7 (SD 31.6). Other NHE types were less common with a past 6-month self-harm frequency of 0.16 (SD 1.55), ED visit frequency of 0.72 (SD 1.10), and hospitalization frequency of 0.28 (SD 1.02). There were few significant demographic and clinical correlates for total and sub-categories of NHEs. Worse physical health status, as measured by the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36v2, was significantly associated with 6-month seizure counts (p=.04). There were no significant differences between the 3 RUCC subgroups on demographic variables. However, past 30-day seizure count, past 6-month seizure count and total past 6-month NHE counts were all higher among individuals from more rural settings (p-values <.01 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

Rural adults with epilepsy were more likely to have a greater number of seizures and more epilepsy complications in general. Worse physical health function was also associated with more epilepsy complications. However, this analysis found few other demographic and clinical correlates of cumulative NHEs among adults with epilepsy. Additional efforts are needed to investigate health disparities among people with epilepsy who live in rural regions or who have poor physical health function.

Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of parents/caregivers towards epilepsy in children - A cross- sectional observational study

Objectives

The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of parents/caregivers toward epilepsy in paediatric patients at a tertiary care centre of North India.

Methods

A cross sectional study was carried out among 418 parents or caregivers using convenience sampling technique with 16-item questionnaire in English language and also translated to local language that is Hindi. Children with epilepsy who visited the paediatric outpatient department within a year were included in the study (January 2021-22). A total of 450 children visited the clinic, 32 of whom were excluded for various reasons, and the final analysis was conducted among the 418 parents or caregivers who completed the questionnaire.

Results

The male and female patients were 56.7% (n = 237) and 43.3% (n = 181) respectively. The age distribution of patients with less than 5 years, 6-10 years and more than 10 years were 35.6% (n = 149), 54.5% (n = 228), 9.8% (n = 41) respectively. Only one third of parents and caregivers did not consider epilepsy as psychiatric illness. Most of the parents and caregivers think that epilepsy affects school performance (77.2%) and hinders family life (71.0%). More than half of the parents or caregivers believes that the society discriminates against person with epilepsy and around 46.6% consider that alternative medicine can cure epilepsy. The parents or caregivers felt financial burden due to epilepsy was in 72.5% and approximately 78.5% perceived that their work is affected because of their child's epilepsy. Perception of epilepsy as a psychiatric illness was found to be significantly higher in parents with primary and secondary level education, when compared to parents who were graduates. The practice of the parents or caregivers towards administration of drugs to their child was good, however around 36.6% (n = 153) missed the dose of anti-seizure medications.

Conclusion

The study highlights the substantial knowledge, attitude and practice gap amongst parents and caregivers for children with epilepsy which indirectly has huge impact on the management of epilepsy. Thus it becomes utmost important to educate the family as well as the community regarding epilepsy which will help in improving the therapeutic outcomes, overall quality of life and interpersonal and social relationships of these children.

Perceived stigma and self-esteem for children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The study was conducted to determine the sense of stigma and self-esteem in children with epilepsy.

METHODS

The study has a descriptive-correlational design.The research group included 150 children aged 9 to 15 who presented to a hospital in eastern Turkey, the Pediatric Neurology Clinic and Polyclinic, between January and June 2021, and were admitted to a pediatric clinic associated with the epilepsy polyclinic. A personal information form, a child perceptions scale (CPS), and the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (CSEI) were used to collect the data.

RESULTS

Children scored an average of 3.31 ± 1.10 on the CPS and an average of 37.33 ± 27.78 on the CSEI. A statistically significant, high-level, and negative relationship was found between CSEI and CPS scores (p < 0.05). As the CSEI score increases, the CPS score drops. A statistically significant model was obtained from the regression analysis (F = 246.816; p = 0.000; R2 = 0.791; SH = 17.07). The CSEI score significantly predicts the CPS score.

CONCLUSION

The research study revealed that children with epilepsy have a high perception of stigma and low self-esteem levels, and that children's perceptions of being stigmatized are influenced by their educational status, their parents' educational status, their income level, their family type variables, and their self-esteem. The study determined that children's self-esteem decreased as their perception of stigma increased.

Systematic review of frequency of felt and enacted stigma in epilepsy and determining factors and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy-Report from the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence of felt and enacted stigma and attitudes toward persons living with epilepsy, and their determining factors.

METHODS

Thirteen databases were searched (1985-2019). Abstracts were reviewed in duplicate and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. Studies were characterized using descriptive analysis by whether they addressed "felt" or "enacted" stigma and "attitudes" toward persons living with epilepsy.

RESULTS

Of 4234 abstracts, 132 met eligibility criteria and addressed either felt or enacted stigma and 210 attitudes toward epilepsy. Stigma frequency ranged broadly between regions. Factors associated with enacted stigma included low level of knowledge about epilepsy, lower educational level, lower socioeconomic status, rural areas living, and religious grouping. Negative stereotypes were often internalized by persons with epilepsy, who saw themselves as having an "undesirable difference" and so anticipated being treated differently. Felt stigma was associated with increased risk of psychological difficulties and impaired quality of life. Felt stigma was linked to higher seizure frequency, recency of seizures, younger age at epilepsy onset or longer duration, lower educational level, poorer knowledge about epilepsy, and younger age. An important finding was the potential contribution of epilepsy terminology to the production of stigma. Negative attitudes toward those with epilepsy were described in 100% of included studies, and originated in any population group (students, teachers, healthcare professionals, general public, and those living with epilepsy). Better attitudes were generally noted in those of younger age or higher educational status.

SIGNIFICANCE

Whatever the specific beliefs about epilepsy, implications for felt and enacted stigma show considerable commonality worldwide. Although some studies show improvement in attitudes toward those living with epilepsy over time, much work remains to be done to improve attitudes and understand the true occurrence of discrimination against persons with epilepsy.

A randomized controlled trial of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART) targeting rural and underserved people with epilepsy: a methodologic report

BACKGROUND

Many people living with epilepsy (PLWE) reside in rural communities, and epilepsy self-management may help address some of the gaps in epilepsy care for these communities. A prior randomized control trial of a remotely delivered, Web-based group format 12-week self-management program (SMART) conducted in Northeast Ohio, a primarily urban and suburban community, demonstrated improved outcomes in negative health events such as depression symptoms and quality of life. However, there is a paucity of research addressing the needs of PLWE in rural settings.

METHODS

The present study leverages collaboration between investigators from 2 mid-western US states (Ohio and Iowa) to replicate testing of the SMART intervention and prioritize delivery to PLWE in rural and semi-rural communities. In phase 1, investigators will refine the SMART program using input from community stakeholders. A Community Advisory Board will then be convened to help identify barriers to trial implementation and strategies to overcome barriers. In phase 2, the investigators will conduct a 6-month prospective randomized control trial of the SMART program compared to 6-month waitlist controls, with the primary outcome being changes in negative health events defined as seizure, self-harm attempt, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. Additional outcomes of interest include quality of life and physical and mental health functioning. The study will also assess process measures of program adopters and system end-users to inform future outreach, education, and self-management strategies for PLWE.

DISCUSSION

The method of this study employs lived experience of PLWE and those who provide care for PLWE in rural and underserved populations to refine a remotely delivered Web-based self-management program, to improve recruitment and retention, and to deliver the intervention. Pragmatic outcomes important to PLWE, payers, and policymakers will be assessed. This study will provide valuable insights on implementing future successful self-management programs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04705441 . Registered on January 12, 2021.

Healthcare provider perspectives regarding epilepsy care in Uganda

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is the most common chronic neurological disorder in the world and imposes a large economic burden on global healthcare systems, especially in low-income settings and rural areas as is found in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Despite the high epilepsy prevalence, there are no systematic descriptions of healthcare provider (HCP) perceptions and needs in managing people with epilepsy (PWE) in Uganda. Identifying these perceptions and needs is crucial for understanding community priorities, thereby enhancing the development of culturally sensitive communications, interventions, and research approaches.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we used semistructured interview guides to conduct focus group discussions that explored the perspectives of 32 providers of epilepsy care from health facilities around Mbarara, Uganda. Our sample included nonspecialized general physicians (n = 3), medical residents (n = 8), medical clinical officers (n = 3), psychiatric clinical nurses (n = 6), medical nurses and nursing assistants (n = 9), and other providers (n = 3), who were loosely grouped into discussion groups based on level or type of training. Self-assessed proficiency ratings were also administered to gain a better understanding of participants' confidence in their training, preparedness, and capabilities regarding epilepsy care. Thematic analysis of the focus group transcripts was conducted to ascertain commonly occurring themes about perceptions and challenges in epilepsy care.

RESULTS

Our analyses identified nine major themes that dominated the perspectives of the study participants: care management, medications, diagnostics, HCP training, human resources, location, patient education, social support, and community knowledge and beliefs. Proficiency ratings prioritized areas of confidence as knowledge related to referrals, psychosocial impacts, and seizure neurophysiology. Areas of need were revealed as knowledge of diagnostic tools and antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings delineate the perspectives of providers caring for PWE, with consistent recognition of challenges centering around resource augmentation, infrastructure strengthening, and education. Participants emphasized the urgent need to augment these resources to address limitations in medication types and access, trained human resources, and diagnostic tools. They overwhelmingly recognized the need for infrastructure strengthening to address human, diagnostic, medicinal, and capital resource limitations that place undue burden on patients with epilepsy and physicians. Providers indicated a clear desire to learn more about different diagnostic tools and medical management practices, potentially through continuing education, specialized training, or more intentional in-school diagnostic preparation. They also advocated for the powerful influence of patient and family education and clearly articulated the need for community sensitization and support. This article is part of the Special Issue "The Intersection of Culture, Resources, and Disease: Epilepsy Care in Uganda".

Knowledge, attitude and practice of parents regarding pediatric antiepileptic drug therapy

Objectives To evaluate the parental knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) regarding the antiepileptic medication therapy in childhood.

Methods This study was carried out over a period of 10 months in the division of Pediatric Neurology of Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences. The cohort of patients was selected randomly meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Parents' KAP regarding epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy was assessed using a questionnaire prepared by the authors and patient adherence towards antiepileptic drug therapy by using Pediatric Epilepsy Self-Management Questionnaire (PEMSQ).

Results A total of 123 patients were selected and enrolled in the study. Seventy eight percent of the respondents knew that epilepsy is a brain disorder, while only 6% of them were aware about all the treatment options. The scoring in the domain of “Disease and Treatment Knowledge & Expectations of parents” was found to be significantly low (69.07%) when compared to other domains in the PEMSQ. Although socioeconomic status did not correlate with knowledge score of the parents (p = 0.216), it was significantly related to adherence (p = 0.042).

Conclusion In this cohort, even though the parents had a fair knowledge about the nature of epilepsy, they were found to be less aware about its characteristics, causes and prognosis. The awareness about the nature and duration of treatment, its objectives, use of drugs, their side effects and importance of adherence to drug regimen was found to be significantly low with a potential for affecting the therapeutic outcome. Special awareness programs for parents of children with epilepsy may be needed to reduce the knowledge gaps in the management of epilepsy and to ensure compliance and optimal therapeutic outcomes.

First-aid management of tonic-clonic seizures among healthcare personnel: A survey by the Apulian section of the Italian League Against Epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the knowledge of healthcare workers about first-aid measures to be performed during and after a tonic-clonic seizure.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-four healthcare workers (86 physicians) working at 8 tertiary hospitals in the Apulia region, Italy, responded to a questionnaire comprising of 28 questions based on available Italian and international recommendations about what to do during a tonic-clonic seizure.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-four healthcare workers completed and returned surveys with a response rate of 96.25%. There were 55 nurses (35.7%), 86 physicians (55.8%), and 13 healthcare workers with different roles (Electroencephalograph technicians, psychologists, social workers). Among physicians, there were 7 cardiologists, 3 surgeons, 12 infectious-disease specialists, 11 internal medicine specialists, 2 psychiatrists, 2 gynecologists, 27 specialists working in the emergency department, and 22 physicians with different specializations. Nearly 90% of the respondents identified head protection as important first aid, while 100% responded to not keep the legs elevated. To avoid tongue bite, both physicians and other healthcare workers would put something in the mouth (54.0%), like a Guedel cannula (71.0%) fingers (29.5%). Grabbing arms and legs, trying to stop the seizure, would be potentially performed by 11.6% of our sample. Physicians would administer a benzodiazepine during the seizure (65.7%) and during the postictal phase (29.2%), even if the patient is known to have epilepsy (23.7%), and in this case, 11.3% of respondents would administer the usual antiepileptic medications. More than half of respondents would call the emergency telephone number, because of necessary hospitalization in case of tonic-clonic seizure, even if it is experienced by a patient known to have epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Our survey suggests the need for epilepsy educational programs on first-aid management of seizures among healthcare workers.

Systematic review of unmet healthcare needs in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Patients with epilepsy (PWE) are more likely to have unmet healthcare needs than the general population. This systematic review assessed the reasons for unmet needs in PWE.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched using keywords relating to unmet healthcare needs, treatment barriers, and access to care. The search included all countries, adult and pediatric populations, survey and qualitative studies, but excluded non-English articles and articles published before 2001. Reasons for unmet needs were extracted.

RESULTS

Nineteen survey and 22 qualitative studies were included. Three survey and five qualitative studies excluded patients with comorbidities. There were twice as many studies on unmet mental healthcare needs than unmet physical care needs in PWE. Poor availability of health services, accessibility issues, and lack of health information contributed to unmet needs in both Western and developing countries. Lack of health services, long wait lists, uncoordinated care, and difficulty getting needed health information were prevalent in the United States (US) as well as countries with a universal healthcare system. However, unmet needs due to costs of care were reported more commonly in studies from the US.

SIGNIFICANCE

This systematic review identified reasons for unmet needs in PWE across different countries, which will inform specific interventions required to address these unmet needs. Unmet needs may have been underestimated due to exclusion of PWE with comorbidities in some studies. Additional studies are needed to understand the contribution of comorbidities on unmet needs and their interaction with caregiver and family factors.

Pediatric Teleneurology: A Model of Epilepsy Care for Rural Populations

BACKGROUND

Approximately 2.7 million individuals in the United States are affected by epilepsy. It is the fourth most common neurological disorder and affects people of all ages, races, and economic backgrounds. In many rural states, the few pediatric neurologists commonly practice in the metropolitan areas. The inadequate resources present challenges for families residing in rural areas or with limited transportation resources. One remedy for this situation is to deliver pediatric neurology services to rural areas through videoconferencing.

METHODS

The University of Kansas Center for Telemedicine and Telehealth has been providing telemedicine consultations in various clinical specialties for 25 years, including mental health and teleneurology. On the basis of the telemedicine models provided at the University of Kansas Center for Telemedicine and Telehealth and other programs, we explain how to provide teleneurology services to rural communities while maintaining high quality care, including direction for assessing need, technology, privacy, administrative and clinical support, credentialing and legality, and sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a protocol for teleneurology development, outlining examples of needed staff, and measures to ensure a smooth implementation and execution, ending with an example of the current teleneurology clinic provided at the University of Kansas Center for Telemedicine and Telehealth.

Development of a Chronic Care Model for Neurological Conditions (CCM-NC)

Background

Persons with neurological conditions and their families face a number of challenges with the provision of health and community-based services. The purpose of this study was to understand the existing health and community service needs and gaps in care and to use this information to develop a model to specify factors and processes that may improve the quality of care and health and well-being for persons with neurological conditions.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with health care professionals, community-based non-health care professionals working with individuals with neurological conditions, and policy makers –from the Ministries of Health, Community and Social Services, Transportation and Education– across Canada. We used a purposive sampling and snowballing approach to obtain maximum variation across professions, sector and geography (provinces and territories, rural and urban). Data analysis was an iterative, constant comparative process involving descriptive and interpretive analyses and was initially guided by the components of the Expanded Chronic Care Model.

Results

A total of 180 individuals completed the interviews: 39% (n = 70) health care professionals, 47% (n = 85) community-based non-health care professionals, and 14% (n = 25) policy makers. Based on the data we developed the Chronic Care Model for Neurological Conditions (CCM-NC). The major needs/gaps are represented by the following themes: acceptance and openness to neurological conditions, evidence informed policy, investments and funding, supported transitions, caregiver support, and life enhancing resources (education, employment, housing and transportation), knowledge and awareness of neurological conditions and availability and access to health services. The model maintains that intersectoral collaboration across the health system, community and policy components is needed. It recognizes that attitudes, policies, enhanced community integration and health system changes are needed to develop activated patients and families, proactive service delivery teams, a person-centred health system and healthy public policy for persons with neurological conditions.

Conclusion

The CCM-NC will generate debate and discussion about the actions needed in each of the model components to enable people with neurological conditions to sustain healthier lives. Next steps include validating the model with persons with neurological conditions, in and outside of the Canadian context and developing and evaluating interventions to test the model.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-409) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Is insufficient knowledge of epilepsy the reason for low levels of healthcare in the Lao PDR?

Background

The treatment gap for epilepsy is considerable in low and middle-income countries. In the Lao PDR it is estimated at over 90%. Health workers play a significant role in bridging the gap between people with epilepsy (PWE) and access to epilepsy care. In a national survey we assessed: 1) the knowledge and practices of health workers in the Lao PDR towards the disease, and, 2) patient attendance at health facilities.

Methods

We conducted a random three-stage sampling of health workers at the provincial, district and health center levels in 2009.

Results

Overall, 284 health workers were enrolled in 50 health facilities of 11 provinces: health centers 24.7%; district hospitals 23.2%; and province hospitals 52.1%. Only a minority of these (2.5%) recalled ever having received training or seeking information on epilepsy. Our survey showed a lack of knowledge in diagnosing and prescribing drugs for epilepsy, including phenobarbital, the first-line of treatment. The majority of respondents (59.9%) was unaware of the availability of antiepileptic drugs in health facilities. Only 10 (20%) health facilities, and no health centres, received people with epilepsy. It was estimated that one PWE per month receives medical attention. Traditional beliefs about PWE were common; such as the idea that epilepsy could be transmitted through saliva (63.2%). A higher attendance of PWE was observed in province hospitals where the knowledge of epilepsy care was higher. Global acceptance of people with epilepsy was low.

Conclusions

The low level of knowledge of epilepsy on the part of health workers may be contributing to the wide treatment gap in the Lao PDR. Improving knowledge of this disease and increasing the availability of antiepileptic drugs will reduce misconceptions about epilepsy, thus encouraging more PWE to seek treatment. Community-based educational programs and extensive advocacy for people with epilepsy only began in 2009.

Comparing standard medical care for nonepileptic seizures in Chile and the United States

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the diagnostic and treatment practices for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) in the United States (US) to Chile.

METHODS

A survey on the diagnostic and treatment practices for PNES was administered to practicing clinicians in Chile. Results from 96 Chilean respondents were compared to results from 307 US clinicians. Type I error (alpha) was set to 0.005 for multiple comparisons.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of PNES is made by inpatient video-EEG/LTM in 89% of the US respondents compared to 25% of the Chilean respondents (p<0.0001). The diagnosis of PNES is made by history and exam alone at twice the rate in Chile (38%) than in the US (16%; p<0.0001).

TREATMENT

A higher proportion of the Chilean respondents (65%) endorsed psychopharmacotherapy as potentially beneficial compared to the US respondents (31%; p<0.0001).

DISCUSSION

This cross-cultural multi-site survey reveals some differences in PNES evaluation and management between neurologists and other clinicians in the US and in Chile. Access to video EEG may improve PNES diagnosis and treatment.

Fostering epilepsy self management: the perspectives of professionals

Epilepsy clinical, academic, and human service professionals (N = 101) were surveyed regarding the challenges people with epilepsy face managing their condition. 30% of the respondents had personal experience with epilepsy. Interviews were transcribed and coded into themes. Response differences by profession and personal experience were examined using chi-squared tests. The two greatest challenges reported most frequently for people with epilepsy were finding high quality health care and managing psychological and emotional effects. The two most important epilepsy outcomes were seizure control and quality of life. The two greatest challenges facing clinicians were too little time with patients and limited clinical focus. The two main weaknesses in the field were insufficient research and narrow approaches to addressing epilepsy. Significant differences in responses across professions were evident as were differences according to personal experience with epilepsy. Few clinicians cited quality of care as a major challenge (p<0.0001) compared to other professions. Few respondents with personal experience with epilepsy cited stigma as a challenge (p = 0.006).

Health behaviors and conditions of persons with epilepsy: a bivariate analysis of 2006 BRFSS data

Using amalgamated Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from nine states in 2006, this study examined the differences in demographics, health conditions, health behaviors, and quality of life among persons with active epilepsy (PWAE) and persons with a lifetime prevalence of epilepsy (PWLE), compared with persons without epilepsy (PWOE). Frequencies for PWAE, PWLE, and PWOE by selected health behaviors, health conditions, quality of life, and demographic variables were produced. Differences between persons with and without epilepsy were analyzed. Results indicated smoking and unemployment rates were significantly higher among PWLE/PWAE than among PWOE. PWLE/PWAE were also less likely than PWOE to report advanced educational attainment, and more likely to report suffering physical, mental, or emotional limitations that affected their activities in some way. Hispanics were less likely to report a lifetime or active prevalence of epilepsy than people without epilepsy. PWLE/PWAE report several differences in demographics, health conditions, health behaviors, and quality of life compared to people without epilepsy.

A health literacy assessment of the epilepsy.com website

Current healthcare guidelines identify low health literacy as a major barrier to optimal health communication. Health literacy is defined as the degree to which individuals can obtain, process and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions. An estimated 90 million people in the U.S. have marginal health literacy. The Institute of Medicine and the U.S. Department of Education recommend that health related information be written at the 6th-8th grade level to address low health literacy. Epidemiological studies demonstrate that persons with epilepsy have significantly lower educational attainment and lower incomes placing them at risk for low health literacy and limited Internet access. While Internet users tend to have higher educational attainment, previous research indicates even good readers prefer simpler rather than more complex medical information. Health educational content that could be printed and given to patients addresses an important need in clinical epilepsy care. Previous reviews of health websites found they exceed recommended readability levels. Two online programs were used to assess the reading level of 1327 web pages on the www.epilepsy.com website using established readability formulas. Based on the Flesch Reading Ease assessment, only 3% of epilepsy.com web pages are written for a 6th grade reading level or below. If 8th grade level or below is used as the standard, only 15% are adequate. Recommendations and examples are provided for improving the readability of epilepsy-specific health education content.

Do knowledge of, perception of, and attitudes toward epilepsy affect the quality of life of Turkish children with epilepsy and their parents?

The main goal of this study was to evaluate knowledge of, perceptions of, and attitudes toward epilepsy and then to correlate knowledge with quality of life and stigmatization of children with epilepsy and their families. Specific questionnaires were administered to children aged 8 to 17 with epilepsy (n=220) and their parents (n=313). Poor school performance, less social support, less self-esteem, higher anxiety, greater stigmatization, and more depressive symptoms were documented in children who were less knowledgeable (P<0.05). Parents were found to be more knowledgeable about the antiepileptic drugs used, understanding both the effects and the side effects of the medications (P<0.05). Family activities were less restricted if they were more knowledgeable and these parents reported worrying less about their children (P<0.05). Knowledge about epilepsy is associated with less perceived stigmatization and social isolation, as well as fewer depressive symptoms and misperceptions.

Patient, caregiver, and health care practitioner knowledge of, beliefs about, and attitudes toward epilepsy

The medical literature related to knowledge of, beliefs about, and attitudes toward epilepsy was reviewed from the perspective of patients, caregivers, and health care providers. The literature points to a desire for enhanced epilepsy education by patients and caregivers; however, these needs have not been met by primary or specialty care. Surveys of general practitioners (GPs) point to limitations in knowledge and negative attitudes. GPs view their role in epilepsy care as primarily educational and tend to acknowledge their limitations by referring difficult cases. Ongoing education for GPs is important, as is an improved partnership in defining roles for care and education. Health care professionals specialized in epilepsy care acknowledge their own set of barriers to optimal care. Epilepsy education programs have been able to improve knowledge; however, long-term improvements in behavioral outcomes or quality of life are less documented. Suggestions for improvements are provided.

What is "treatment as usual" for nonepileptic seizures?

OBJECTIVE

A recent NINDS/NIMH/AES-sponsored international NES Treatment Workshop identified a lack of knowledge in the field regarding standard of care in the management of patients with psychological nonepileptic seizures (NES).

METHODS

We administered a survey to AES clinicians to determine actual postdiagnostic instructions given to patients and referral practices, or NES treatment as usual.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents were epileptologists, followed by neurologists, neuropsychologists, and nurses, evenly dispersed across the United States. Almost all respondents reported discussing the diagnosis of NES with the patients. Sixty-nine percent of neurologists continued to follow the patient after NES diagnosis. Treatment referrals were most commonly made to psychiatrists and psychologists. Antiepileptic drugs were tapered by 83% of the respondents, and 47% prescribed psychotropic medications if comorbid diagnoses were made.

CONCLUSION

This is the first known national survey that summarizes national practices and the range of care, or treatment as usual, offered to patients with NES.