The relative effects of different systemic immunosuppressives on skin cancer development in organ transplant patients

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and skin cancer risk in nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of malignancy compared with the general population. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been used as immunosuppressants in transplant recipients. There remains a lack of evidence of this treatment in nonrenal solid organ transplantation. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of mTOR inhibitors on secondary nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) malignancies in nonrenal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies for the present systematic review and meta-analysis included those in which patient cohorts underwent heart, liver, lung, and pancreas (i.e. nonrenal solid organ) transplantation, with treatment group being those treated with an mTOR inhibitor such as sirolimus or everolimus, and control group being placebo, or alternative non-mTOR inhibitor treatment such as calcineurin inhibitors or as per standard treatment protocol.

RESULTS

From the six included studies, we found no significant difference in the odds of either primary or secondary NMSC (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.29, P = 0.28). Pooled analysis of patients with secondary NMSC demonstrated a trend toward significant benefit with mTOR inhibitor treatment (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.02, P = 0.06) but no protective effect for primary NMSC (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.03-9.96, P = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in nonrenal transplant recipients, mTOR inhibitors may have a protective effect against secondary NMSC but not primary NMSC posttransplantation. Extrapolating the findings of reduced NMSC in renal transplant populations to nonrenal transplant cases should be cautioned.

Risk of infectious diseases and cutaneous tumours in solid organ recipients: A meta-analysis of literature

AIM: To compare the risk of cutaneous infections and tumours in kidney transplant recipients with data recently published about this topic.

METHODS: In the present work, we evaluated the incidence of bacterial, fungal and viral cutaneous infectious diseases and the development of skin cancers in a cohort of 436 patients who underwent a renal transplantation. The median age at transplantation of our patients was 50 years and the median duration of the immunosuppression was of 7.2 years. Data obtained from our cohort were compared with those obtained by a systematic review of the literature of the last 20 years about the same topic.

RESULTS: Infectious diseases were the most frequent dermatological disorders that were diagnosed after transplantation, affecting about the 16.5% of patients. Herpes virus reactivation occurs in about the 35% of patients and is more common within 6 mo from transplantation, whereas when the immunosuppression is reduced, skin infections are mainly represented by Human Papilloma Virus infections and localized mycosis, such as pityriasis versicolor and superficial candidiasis. Bacterial infections were relatively rare and occur mainly in the first months after transplantation. The cumulative risk to develop skin cancer enhance significantly over the time, as consequence of long-term immunosuppressive regiments. Endogenous and exogenous risk factors, as well as the schedule of immunosuppression can play a role and justify the different incidence of skin cancer in the various series.

CONCLUSION: Skin infections and cancer, commonly diagnosed in transplanted patients, impact on survival and life-quality, justifying the realization of follow-up programs for the early diagnosis and treatment.

Therapeutic options to decrease actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma incidence and progression in solid organ transplant recipients: a practical approach

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have a 50 to 250 times greater risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) than the general population and experience higher rates of invasive and metastatic disease. These greater risks are a product of the tumorigenic effects of their immunosuppressive medications. As the number of transplantations and the life expectancy of SOTRs increase, SCCs are becoming a major source of morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To present a practical approach for busy practicing clinicians to the care of SOTRs who are developing SCCs. Topics include assessment and treatment of new and neglected SOTRs; the dermatologist's role with the transplantation team; and practical considerations in the choice of topical agents, systemic agents, and immunosuppressive therapy manipulation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An extensive literature search of the understanding of SCC pathophysiology and treatment in SOTRs was conducted.

RESULTS

Presented here is a logical, concise guide to the care of SOTRs who are developing actinic keratoses and SCCs.

CONCLUSION

Proper assessment of patients, understanding therapeutic alternatives and their application, and early institution of preventative and adjuvant therapies can help to decrease skin cancer-related morbidity and mortality in SOTRs.

Immunosuppression and squamous cell carcinoma: a focus on solid organ transplant recipients

As transplant medicine advances, new immunosuppressive regimens are increasing the long-term survival of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). This growing population is at significantly increased risk for developing cutaneous malignancies, particularly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), as a result of chronic immunosuppression. Conventional risk factors for the development of skin cancer, including fair skin type, advanced age, sun exposure, and genetic predisposition, also play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of SCC in SOTRs. Immunosuppressed patients develop more aggressive and more numerous SCCs than immunocompetent individuals, however. It is important to understand the mechanisms underlying immunosuppression-mediated SCC development to identify prognostic markers and to develop effective prevention and treatment strategies. This article addresses the fundamental differences between SCC in SOTRs and those in the general population, focusing on the role that immunosuppression plays in the pathogenesis of this malignancy.

Skin Cancer After Transplantation: A Guide for the General Surgeon

The success of organ transplantation has been accompanied by serious concerns regarding the incidence and management of potentially catastrophic cutaneous carcinogenesis in transplant recipients. Delivery of the highest quality of care requires a concerted effort toward collaboration between multiple surgical and medical specialties. The purpose of this review is to provide the general surgeon with a practical, user-friendly guide to the important components of comprehensive dermatologic care for organ transplant recipients (OTRs) with references to more detailed sources of information.

Malignant melanoma in a patient with polyomavirus-BK-associated nephropathy

A possible relationship between malignant melanoma and polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in a renal transplant patient is presented. It is possible that BK polyomavirus (BKV) nephropathy and malignant melanoma developed independently. The coincidence may be related to over-immunosuppression. The presented case suggests careful oncological surveillance in patients with BKV nephropathy.

Potential clinical applications using stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood

There is an abundance of clinical applications using human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) as a source for stem cell populations. Other than haematopoietic progenitors, there are mesenchymal, endothelial stem cells and neuronal precursors, in varying quantities, that are found in human umbilical cord blood. These may be useful in diseases such as immune deficiency and autoimmune disorders. Considering issues of safety, availability, transplant methodology, rejection and side effects, it is contended that a therapeutic stem cell transplant, utilizing stem cells from HUCB, provides a reliable repository of early precursor cells that can be useful in a great number of diverse conditions. Drawbacks of relatively smaller quantities of mononucleated cells in one unit of cord blood can be mitigated by in-vitro expansion procedures, improved in-vivo signalling, and augmentation of the cellular milieu, while simultaneously choosing the appropriate transplantation site and technique for introduction of the stem cell graft.