Therapeutic hotline: Re-induction may be useful to manage psoriasis relapse during long-term maintenance treatment with infliximab: a retrospective analysis

Infliximab and biosimilar infliximab in psoriasis: efficacy, loss of efficacy, and adverse events

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disease affecting multiple systems, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) plays a significant role in the initiation and progression of the disease process. Psoriasis has a high prevalence rate in the Western world, especially in the USA and Australia; in China, although the prevalence rate is much lower, there is still a large number of patients suffering from psoriasis and its comorbidities. As TNF-α is thought to be crucial in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, specific therapy blocking TNF-α may be beneficial in the treatment of this disease. Infliximab, a murine-human monoclonal antibody, is highly efficacious in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with better skin clearance and faster onset of action than topical medications such as methotrexate, narrow-band ultraviolet B, and calcipotriol. Lack of adherence to infliximab therapy is mainly due to loss of response (LOR) over time and adverse events, particularly because infusion reactions are usually encountered. Anti-infliximab antibody is thought to be responsible for the LOR and infusion reactions. However, the mechanism underlying the formation of anti-infliximab antibody and its side effects remains unclear. Further studies identifying patients at risk for LOR will probably help clinicians to select the right patients for anti-TNF-α therapy and to increase the durability of the treatment. This review discusses the efficacy of infliximab as demonstrated by various clinical trials, LOR to infliximab, combatting LOR, as well as the adverse events usually faced during the use of infliximab therapy and the infliximab biosimilar Remsima^®. We hope that we can discover a better way to use infliximab in the therapy of psoriasis from the current research data.

Systematic review of anti-drug antibodies of IL-17 inhibitors for psoriasis

Three main biologics target the IL-17 pathway; these include secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, all of which are approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine if IL-17 inhibitors are prone to develop anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and how efficacy of treatment is influenced. A total of 14 papers were reviewed. Only one secukinumab trial detected treatment-emergent ADA in 4 out of 996 (0.41%) patients during the 52-week treatment period. Two of these patients (1 on 150-mg retreatment as needed and 1 on 150-mg fixed interval) were found to have neutralizing antibodies; however, they were not associated with decreased efficacy. One paper reported ADAs against ixekizumab. One out of 1150 (9%) developed titers to ixekizumab after receiving 160-mg-loading dose followed by 80 mg every 2 weeks. Nineteen out of 1150 (1.7%) developed high titer (>1:1280) which impacted clinical outcomes. Three studies did detect ADA against brodalumab; however, none were neutralizing. It is difficult to draw a conclusion from our findings given the variability in ADA development. Most trials did not develop ADA, and if they did, the majority of the time they were not neutralizing. Only ixekizumab showed decreased efficacy, but no increased adverse events in cases with neutralizing ADA.

Long-term durability and dose escalation patterns in infliximab therapy for psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab often requires dose escalation to maintain response. Studies regarding long-term durability and dose escalation patterns for psoriasis are few.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate dose escalation patterns in psoriatic patients to identify factors of lack of optimal response to infliximab.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included 93 patients (216.3 patient-years) treated with infliximab for psoriasis. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed drug durability.

RESULTS

A median infliximab dose of 5.42 mg/kg/mo (range: 2.71-10.83) for a mean of 28 months was administered. Two thirds of patients received a dose escalation. Concurrent methotrexate extended duration of therapy (by a mean ± SD of 19.5 ± 8.1 months, P = .034), including time until first dose escalation (by a mean ± SD of 12.0 ± 6.1 months, P = .037), and failure (by a mean ± SD of 20.7 ± 6.7 months, P = .034). Patients who increased the infusion frequency before increasing the dose remained on infliximab 8.4 months longer than those who first increased the dose (P = .045). Four patients experienced adverse events; 2 required discontinuation.

LIMITATIONS

Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, infliximab levels, and antibody titers were not measured.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation optimizes durability of infliximab. The probability of maintaining response is enhanced by concomitant methotrexate and increasing the infusion frequency before increasing the dose.

A consensus report on appropriate treatment optimization and transitioning in the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND

There is limited information on systemic and biological treatment optimization and transitioning in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To provide practical guidance on treatment optimization and transitioning for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

Dermatologists from 33 countries contributed to the Transitioning Therapies programme. Fourteen questions were identified. Answers were drafted based on systematic literature reviews (7/14 questions) and expert opinion (7/14 questions). Using a modified Delphi procedure, dermatologists from 30 countries voted on their level of agreement with each draft answer (scale: 1-9, strong disagreement to strong agreement). Consensus was defined as ≥75% of participants scoring within the 7-9 range.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved on the answers to all questions. Recommendations for the use of cyclosporine and methotrexate were agreed. Transitioning from a conventional systemic therapy to a biological agent may be done directly or with an overlap (if transitioning is required because of lack of efficacy) or potentially with a treatment-free interval (if transitioning is required for safety reasons). Combination therapy may be beneficial. Continuous therapy for patients on biologicals is strongly recommended. However, during successful maintenance with biological monotherapy, a dosage reduction may be considered to limit drug exposure, although this may carry the risk of decreased efficacy. Switching biologicals for reasons of efficacy should be done without a washout period, but switching for reasons of safety may require a treatment-free interval.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides practical guidance on treatment optimization and transitioning for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, based on literature reviews and the expert opinion of dermatologists from across the globe.