Historical antecedents of normative vs pathologic perspectives in aging

Malignant struma ovarii: next-generation sequencing of six cases revealed Nras, Braf, and Jak3 mutations

PURPOSE

Struma ovarii (SO) is a highly specialized ovarian teratoma, consisting of thyroid tissue. Rarely, carcinomas histologically identical to their thyroid counterparts may occur, and are comprehensively defined as malignant struma ovarii (MSO). Their optimal management is controversial, and the molecular profile of the malignant counterpart in the ovary is incompletely known. In this study, the clinicopathological and molecular features of six MSO from different Italian Institutions were analysed, to explore genetic profiles of potential therapeutic interest.

METHODS

The histopathological features and immunoprofile (according to the known markers Galectin-3, HBME1, cytokeratin 19 and CD56) were reviewed. In addition, all cases underwent genetic analysis with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) hot spot cancer panel detecting mutations in 50 genes involved in cancerogenesis. RET/PTC rearrangements and TERT promoter alterations were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Papillary carcinoma in all similar to its thyroid counterpart was found in five of six cases, including classical (two tumors) and follicular variant (three tumors) types. The last case was a poorly differentiated carcinoma. An activating gene mutation, was detected in five of six cases, including two NRAS, two BRAF, and one JAK3 oncogene mutations. No alterations were found in the other panel genes, nor in TERT promoter, or in RET chromosomal regions.

CONCLUSIONS

MSO is a rare condition. Papillary carcinoma is the predominant malignant type, sharing both histomorphological and molecular features of its thyroid counterpart. Interestingly, the single case of poorly differentiated carcinoma displayed a JAK3 mutation. The presence of such driving mutation could be of potential interest in guiding postoperative treatment.

Four Principles Regarding an Effective Treatment of Aging

The question whether aging is a disease or not, has been asked by many professionals who are involved in the study of age-related degeneration. However, not only an agreement on this remains elusive, but also effective clinical treatments against human aging have not been forthcoming. In this Opinion paper I suggest that the complexity involved in aging is such that we need to remodel our thinking to involve a much more 'systems-oriented' approach. I explore four main principles which should be employed by those who are working on finding treatments against agerelated degeneration. First, I discuss the problems encountered in translating laboratory research into effective therapies for humans. Second, I propose that a 'systems-thinking' method needs to be more extensively employed, instead of relying exclusively on the current reductionist one. Third, it is submitted that we must learn from the history of life-extension research, and not blindly follow contemporary paradigms, which may lead us into yet more 'dead ends' with regards to therapies. Finally, I suggest that, we may need to employ certain universal notions and use these in order to gain insights into the mechanics of a possible therapy against age-related degeneration. Examples may be the principle of hormesis, those of degeneracy, exaptation, and others from cybernetic or systems science domains. By using this four-pronged approach we liberate our thinking from the shackles of existing common mistakes and fallacies, and we open the way for a fresh approach that may lead us towards entirely new paradigms for providing clinically effective therapies against agerelated degeneration.

Geriatric Medicine and the Categorisation of Old Age; The Historical Linkage

Geriatric medicine became a part of medical science in the middle of the nineteenth century, more than haifa century before ‘geriatrics’ was named, and a century before it was established in British health care. It was born in Germany along with ancient theories that ageing was in itself a disease, but was increasingly influenced by new pathological and physiological knowledge on ageing and disease, and further developed during the great French clinical era of the latter part of that century. As part of the development of this particular branch of medical science, a gradual categorisation of old age took place, with much credit to the Belgian statistician Quetelet, who may be regarded as the inventor of the category ‘the elderly’ defined by age. The developing biomedical images of old age were given much space in encyclopaedias, dictionaries and popular health literature after 1870. Therefore, the defined existence of old-age limits must also have influenced the legislators responsible for the first national Acts on old- age pension, which now celebrate their centenary.