Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in elderly patients hospitalized in the 1990s: a favorable outcome

An audit of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Data reflecting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts in Saudi Arabia are limited. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics, and estimated the outcome, of in-hospital CPR in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia over 4 years.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted between January 2009 and December 2012 and included 4361 patients with sudden cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation forms were reviewed. Demographic data, resuscitation characteristics, and survival outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation age of arrested patient was 40 ± 31 years. The immediate survival rate was 64%, 43% at 24 h, and 30% at discharge. The death rate was 70%. Respiratory type of arrest, time and place of arrest, short duration of arrest, witnessed arrest, the use of epinephrine and atropine boluses, and shockable arrhythmias were associated with higher 24-h survival rates. A low survival rate was found among patients with cardiac types of arrest, and those with a longer duration of arrest, pulseless electrical activity, and asystole. Comorbidities were present in 3786 patients with cardiac arrest and contributed to a poor survival rate (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms the findings of previously published studies in highly developed countries and provides some reflection on the practice of resuscitation in Saudi Arabia.

Outcomes of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients with CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Advance care planning, including code/resuscitation status discussion, is an essential part of the medical care of patients with CKD. There is little information on the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in these patients. We aimed to measure cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in these patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Our study is observational in nature. We compared the following cardiopulmonary resuscitation-related outcomes in patients with CKD with those in the general population by using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2005-2011): (1) survival to hospital discharge, (2) discharge destination, and (3) length of hospital stay. All of the patients were 18 years old or older.

RESULTS

During the study period, 71,961 patients with CKD underwent in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with 323,620 patients from the general population. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were higher in patients with CKD (75% versus 72%; P<0.001) on univariate analysis. After adjusting for age, sex, and potential confounders, patients with CKD had higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.11 to 1.34; P≤0.001) and length of stay (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.15; P=0.001). Hospitalization charges were also greater in patients with CKD. There was no overall difference in postcardiopulmonary resuscitation nursing home placement between the two groups. In a separate subanalysis of patients ≥75 years old with CKD, higher odds of in-hospital mortality were also seen in the patients with CKD (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.17; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we observed slightly higher in-hospital mortality in patients with CKD undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Position paper for management of elderly patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: Groupe de Rythmologie et Stimulation Cardiaque de la Société Française de Cardiologie and Société Française de Gériatrie et Gérontologie

Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We reviewed the data regarding the applicability, safety and effectiveness of conventional pacing, ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in elderly patients. Although periprocedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, the implantation procedure for PMs and ICDs is still relatively safe in this age group. In older patients with sinus node disease, the general consensus is that DDD pacing with the programming of an algorithm to minimize ventricular pacing is preferred. In very old patients presenting with intermittent or suspected atrioventricular block, VVI pacing may be appropriate. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is similar in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantageous effect of the device on arrhythmic death may be attenuated by higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD implantation among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live more than 5-7years after implantation. Elderly patients usually experience significant functional improvement after CRT, similar to that observed in middle-aged patients. Management of CRT non-responders remains globally the same, while considering a less aggressive approach in terms of reinterventions (revision of left ventricular [LV] lead placement, addition of a right ventricular or LV lead, LV endocardial pacing configuration). Overall, physiological age, general status and comorbidities rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factors in making a decision about device implantation selection for survival and well-being benefit in elderly patients.

Long-term survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest: A matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Each year, 200,000 patients undergo an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), with approximately 15-20% surviving to discharge. Little is known, however, about the long-term prognosis of these patients after discharge. Previous efforts to describe out-of-hospital survival of IHCA patients have been limited by small sample sizes and narrow patient populations

METHODS

A single institution matched cohort study was undertaken to describe mortality following IHCA. Patients surviving to discharge following an IHCA between 2008 and 2010 were matched on age, sex, race and hospital admission criteria with non-IHCA hospital controls and follow-up between 9 and 45 months. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox PH models assessed differences in survival.

RESULTS

Of the 1262 IHCAs, 20% survived to hospital discharge. Of those discharged, survival at 1 year post-discharge was 59% for IHCA patients and 82% for controls (p<0.0001). Hazard ratios (IHCA vs. controls) for mortality were greatest within the 90 days following discharge (HR=2.90, p<0.0001) and decreased linearly thereafter, with those surviving to one year post-discharge having an HR for mortality below 1.0. Survival after discharge varied amongst IHCA survivors. When grouped by discharge destination, out of hospital survival varied; in fact, IHCA patients discharged home without services demonstrated no survival difference compared to their non-IHCA controls (HR 1.10, p=0.72). IHCA patients discharged to long-term hospital care or hospice, however, had a significantly higher mortality compared to matched controls (HR 3.91 and 20.3, respectively; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Among IHCA patients who survive to hospital discharge, the highest risk of death is within the first 90 days after discharge. Additionally, IHCA survivors overall have increased long-term mortality vs.

CONTROLS

Survival rates were varied widely with different discharge destinations, and those discharged to home, skilled nursing facilities or to rehabilitation services had survival rates no different than controls. Thus, increased mortality was primarily driven by patients discharged to long-term care or hospice.

The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

AIM

To determine the association between age and outcome in a large multicenter cohort of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational, cohort study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the CARES registry between 2006 and 2013. Age was categorized into 5-year intervals and the association between age group and outcomes (return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and good neurological outcome) was assessed in univariable and multivariable analysis. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients who had return of spontaneous circulation.

RESULTS

A total of 101,968 people were included. The median age was 66 years (quartiles: 54, 78) and 39% were female. 31,236 (30.6%) of the included patients had sustained ROSC, 9761 (9.6%) survived to hospital discharge and 8058 (7.9%) survived with a good neurological outcome. The proportion of patients with ROSC was highest in those with age <20 years (34.1%) and lowest in those with age 95-99 years (23.5%). Patients with age <20 years had the highest proportion of survival (16.7%) and good neurological outcome (14.8%) whereas those with age 95-99 years had the lowest proportion of survival (1.7%) and good neurological outcome (1.2%). In the full cohort and in the patients with ROSC there appeared to be a progressive decline in survival and good neurological outcome after the age of approximately 45-64 years. Age alone was not a good predictor of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age is associated with outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We did not identify a specific age threshold beyond which the chance of a meaningful recovery was excluded.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospitalized patient: impact of system-based variables on outcomes in cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

A better understanding of the factors affecting the outcome of inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial in making key clinical decisions. We aim to study the impact of various patient-related and hospital-related variables in a community-based teaching setup that could affect the prognosis of in-hospital cardiac arrests.

METHODS

We analyzed the data on all patients who experienced cardiac arrest while hospitalized at a community teaching hospital in Youngstown, Ohio. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify patient- and system-based variables associated with mortality in inpatient cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

A total of 417 in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests were recorded during the study period. We analyzed 299 events in our final sample. One hundred sixty-four patients (54.8%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 137 (48.5%) survived the cardiopulmonary arrest for at least 24 hours. The duration of CPR, age, initial rhythm, witnessed events and sex were strongly associated with mortality in our univariate analysis. After adjustment for age, location and whether the code was witnessed, the timing of the week, initial rhythm, the duration of CPR and the sex of the patient retained prognostic significance in predicting the mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we report a 17.4% survival to hospital discharge after an in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest and subsequent CPR, similar to rates reported in larger multicenter studies. Prolonged duration of CPR (>10 minutes) and male sex were found to be associated with worse outcomes. We report the impact of system-based variables such as physician and nursing staffing during different days of the week, on survival in these patients.

The chance of survival and the functional outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

physicians are frequently confronted with the question whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a medically appropriate treatment for older people. For physicians, patients and relatives, it is important to know the chance of survival and the functional outcome after CPR in order to make an informed decision.

METHODS

a systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane up to November 2012. Studies that were included described the chance of survival, the social status and functional outcome after in-hospital CPR in older people aged 70 years and above.

RESULTS

we identified 11,377 publications of which 29 were included in this review; 38.6% of the patients who were 70 years and older had a return of spontaneous circulation. More than half of the patients who initially survived resuscitation died in the hospital before hospital discharge. The pooled survival to discharge after in-hospital CPR was 18.7% for patients between 70 and 79 years old, 15.4% for patients between 80 and 89 years old and 11.6% for patients of 90 years and older. Data on social and functional outcome after surviving CPR were scarce and contradictory.

CONCLUSIONS

the chance of survival to hospital discharge for in-hospital CPR in older people is low to moderate (11.6-18.7%) and decreases with age. However, evidence about functional or social outcomes after surviving CPR is scarce. Prospective studies are needed to address this issue and to identify pre-arrest factors that can predict survival in the older people in order to define subgroups that could benefit from CPR.

Multiple in-hospital resuscitation efforts in the elderly

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics and survival rates of patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once during a single hospitalization.

DESIGN

We analyzed inpatient Medicare data from 1992 to 2005 identifying beneficiaries 65 years old and older who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once during the same hospitalization.

MEASUREMENTS

We examined patient and hospital characteristics, survival to hospital discharge, factors associated with survival to discharge, median survival, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 421,394 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the study period. Four lakh thirteen thousand four hundred three patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation once during a hospitalization and survival was 17.7% with median survival after discharge being 20.6 months. There were 7,991 patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once during the same hospitalization; 8.8% survived the efforts, and median survival after leaving the hospital was 10.5 months. Patients who received more than one episode of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during a hospitalization were significantly less likely to go home after discharge. Greater age, black race, higher burden of chronic illness, and receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a larger or metropolitan hospital were associated with lower survival among patients receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation more than once.

CONCLUSIONS

Undergoing multiple cardiopulmonary resuscitation events during a hospitalization is associated with substantially reduced short- and long-term survival compared with patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation once. This information may be useful to clinicians when discussing end-of-life care with patients and families of patients who have experienced return of spontaneous circulation following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation but remain at risk for recurrent cardiac arrest.

Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study

BACKGROUND

During in-hospital cardiac arrests, how long resuscitation attempts should be continued before termination of efforts is unknown. We investigated whether duration of resuscitation attempts varies between hospitals and whether patients at hospitals that attempt resuscitation for longer have higher survival rates than do those at hospitals with shorter durations of resuscitation efforts.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2008, we identified 64,339 patients with cardiac arrests at 435 US hospitals within the Get With The Guidelines—Resuscitation registry. For each hospital, we calculated the median duration of resuscitation before termination of efforts in non-survivors as a measure of the hospital's overall tendency for longer attempts. We used multilevel regression models to assess the association between the length of resuscitation attempts and risk-adjusted survival. Our primary endpoints were immediate survival with return of spontaneous circulation during cardiac arrest and survival to hospital discharge.

FINDINGS

31,198 of 64,339 (48·5%) patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 9912 (15·4%) survived to discharge. For patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation, the median duration of resuscitation was 12 min (IQR 6-21) compared with 20 min (14-30) for non-survivors. Compared with patients at hospitals in the quartile with the shortest median resuscitation attempts in non-survivors (16 min [IQR 15-17]), those at hospitals in the quartile with the longest attempts (25 min [25-28]) had a higher likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted risk ratio 1·12, 95% CI 1·06-1·18; p<0·0001) and survival to discharge (1·12, 1·02-1·23; 0·021).

INTERPRETATION

Duration of resuscitation attempts varies between hospitals. Although we cannot define an optimum duration for resuscitation attempts on the basis of these observational data, our findings suggest that efforts to systematically increase the duration of resuscitation could improve survival in this high-risk population.

FUNDING

American Heart Association, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, and the National Institutes of Health.

Survival after cardiac arrest and changing task profile of the cardiac arrest team in a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of in-hospital emergency response systems, survival rates, and variables associated with survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest vary significantly among medical centers worldwide. Aiming to optimize in-hospital emergency response, we performed an analysis of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the task profile of our cardiac arrest team.

METHODS

In-hospital emergencies handled by the cardiac arrest team in the years 2004 to 2006 were analyzed retrospectively, and patient and event characteristics were tested for their associations with survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The results were compared to a similar prior analysis for the years 1995 to 1997.

RESULTS

After cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the survival rate to discharge was 30.2% for the years 2004 to 2006 compared to 25.1% for the years 1995 to 1997 (difference not statistically significant). Survival after one year was 18.5 %. An increasing percentage of emergency calls not corresponding to medical emergencies other than cardiac arrest was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed survival rates are considerably high to published data. We suggest that for further improvement of in-hospital emergency response systems regular training of all hospital staff members in immediate life support is essential. Furthermore, future training of cardiac arrest team members must include basic emergency response to a variety of medical conditions besides cardiac arrest.

Reduction in hospital-wide mortality after implementation of a rapid response team: a long-term cohort study

Introduction

Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been shown to reduce cardiopulmonary arrests outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Yet the utility of RRTs remains in question, as most large studies have failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in hospital-wide mortality after RRT implementation.

Methods

A cohort design with historical controls was used to determine the effect on hospital-wide mortality of an RRT in which clinical judgment, in addition to vital-signs criteria, was widely promoted as a key trigger for activation. All nonprisoner patients admitted to a tertiary referral public teaching hospital from 2003 through 2008 were included. In total, 77, 021 admissions before RRT implementation (2003 through 2005) and 79, 013 admissions after RRT implementation (2006 through 2008) were evaluated. The a priori primary outcome was unadjusted hospital-wide mortality. A Poisson regression model was then used to adjust for hospital-wide mortality trends over time. Secondary outcomes defined a priori were unadjusted out-of-ICU mortality and out-of-ICU cardiopulmonary-arrest codes.

Results

In total, 855 inpatient RRTs (10.8 per 1, 000 hospital-wide discharges) were activated during the 3-year postintervention period. Forty-seven percent of RRTs were activated for reasons of clinical judgment. Hospital-wide mortality decreased from 15.50 to 13.74 deaths per 1, 000 discharges after RRT implementation (relative risk, 0.887; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.817 to 0.963; P = 0.004). After adjusting for inpatient mortality trends over time, the reduction in hospital-wide mortality remained statistically significant (relative risk, 0.825; 95% CI, 0.694 to 0.981; P = 0.029). Out-of-ICU mortality decreased from 7.08 to 4.61 deaths per 1, 000 discharges (relative risk, 0.651; 95% CI, 0.570 to 0.743; P < 0.001). Out-of-ICU cardiopulmonary-arrest codes decreased from 3.28 to 1.62 codes per 1, 000 discharges (relative risk, 0.493; 95% CI, 0.399 to 0.610; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Implementation of an RRT in which clinical judgment, in addition to vital-signs criteria, was widely cited as a rationale for activation, was associated with a significant reduction in hospital-wide mortality, out-of-ICU mortality, and out-of-ICU cardiopulmonary-arrest codes. The frequent use of clinical judgment as a criterion for RRT activation was associated with high RRT utilization.

Pre-arrest predictors of failure to survive after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our objective was to perform a systematic review of pre-arrest predictors of the outcome of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adults.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for studies published since 1985 and bibliographies of previous meta-analyses. We included studies with predominantly adult patients, limited to in-hospital arrest, using an explicit definition of cardiopulmonary arrest and CPR and reporting survival to discharge by at least one pre-arrest variable. A total of 35 studies were included in the final analysis. Inclusion criteria, design elements and results were abstracted in parallel by both investigators. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

The rate of survival to discharge was 17.5%; we found a trend towards increasing survival in more recent studies. Metastatic malignancy [odds ratio (OR) 3.9] or haematologic malignancy (OR 3.9), age over 70, 75 or 80 years (OR 1.5, 2.8 and 2.7, respectively), black race (OR 2.1), altered mental status (OR 2.2), dependency for activities of daily living (range OR 3.2-7.0 depending on specific activity), impaired renal function (OR 1.9), hypotension on admission (OR 1.8) and admission for pneumonia (OR 1.7), trauma (OR 1.7) or medical non-cardiac diagnosis (OR 2.2) were significantly associated with failure to survive to discharge; cardiovascular diagnoses and co-morbidities were associated with improved survival (range OR 0.23-0.53). Elevated CPR risk scores predicted failure to survive but have not been validated consistently in different populations.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several pre-arrest variables associated with failure to survive to discharge. This information should be shared with patients as part of a shared decision-making process regarding the use of do not resuscitate orders.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people – a review

Survival to discharge after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is about 20% in those aged 65–69 years, declining with advancing age to about 10% in those aged 90 years or more. There are conflicting reports on whether or not advanced age, independent of the severity of acute and chronic illness, is a determinant of outcome. Recognition that the outcome of CPR in hospital patients is often poor has prompted extensive debate regarding the appropriate use of this procedure. In particular, there has been concern about unnecessary CPR in extended-care and hospice settings. Conversely, there has also been evidence that doctors and families may be prone to underestimate the quality of life and likelihood of benefit from CPR in older people and to make resuscitation decisions without considering the preferences of older people themselves. Recent guidelines have attempted to strike a balance between ensuring patient participation whenever possible but without offering illusory choices where CPR is very unlikely to succeed.

Epidemiologic study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether the rate of survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is improving and which characteristics of patients and hospitals predict survival.

METHODS

We examined fee-for-service Medicare data from 1992 through 2005 to identify beneficiaries 65 years of age or older who underwent CPR in U.S. hospitals. We examined temporal trends in the incidence of CPR and the rate of survival after CPR, as well as patient- and hospital-level predictors of survival to discharge.

RESULTS

We identified 433,985 patients who underwent in-hospital CPR; 18.3% of these patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2 to 18.5) survived to discharge. The rate of survival did not change substantially during the period from 1992 through 2005. The overall incidence of CPR was 2.73 events per 1000 admissions; the incidence was higher among black and other nonwhite patients. The proportion of patients undergoing in-hospital CPR before death increased over time and was higher for nonwhite patients. The survival rate was lower among patients who were men, were older, had more coexisting illnesses, or were admitted from a skilled-nursing facility. The adjusted odds of survival for black patients were 23.6% lower than those for similar white patients (95% CI, 21.2 to 25.9). The association between race and survival was partially explained by hospital effects: black patients were more likely to undergo CPR in hospitals that have lower rates of post-CPR survival. Among patients surviving in-hospital CPR, the proportion of patients discharged home rather than to a health care facility decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after in-hospital CPR did not improve from 1992 through 2005. The proportion of in-hospital deaths preceded by CPR increased, whereas the proportion of survivors discharged home after undergoing CPR decreased. Black race was associated with higher rates of CPR but lower rates of survival after CPR.

Rethinking code blue in long-term care

Losing a loved one is often emotional and painful for families, and most aspects of death and dying are usually difficult for them to discuss. Our traditional view of death (as a failure) is being reassessed. Many residents' conditions place them at high risk for death, or they may have conditions considered terminal. Numerous facilities are rethinking their approach to Code Blue, and this is an ideal time to analyze the entire process, especially since death is a frequent occurrence in long-term care facilities. Approximately 10% of residents admitted under the Medicare benefit die, or are hospitalized and subsequently die, within 30 days of admission. In addition to simplifying rescue techniques, a movement is afoot to allow family members into scenes previously considered sacrosanct by medical care providers.

Changing attitudes to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a 15-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

while it is well established that individual patient preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may change with time, the stability of population preferences, especially during periods of social and economic change, has received little attention.

OBJECTIVE

to elicit the resuscitation preferences of older Irish inpatients and to compare the results with an identical study conducted 15 years earlier.

METHODS

one hundred and fifty older medical inpatients awaiting discharge in a university teaching hospital or a district general hospital subjects were asked about resuscitation preferences. Results were compared to those elicited from a hundred subjects in 1992.

RESULTS

most patients (94%) felt it was a good idea for doctors to discuss CPR routinely with patients, compared with 39% in 1992. In their current health, 6% in 2007 and 76% in 1992 would refuse CPR. The independent predictors of refusal of CPR in current health on logistic regression were age and year of assessment. In the final model, those aged 75-84 years [OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.25-6.13), P = 0.02] and 85 years or more [OR 15.19 (4.26-54.15), P < 0.0001] were more likely than those aged 65-74 years (reference group) to refuse CPR. Those questioned in 2007 [OR 0.04 (0.02-0.81), P < 0.0001] were less likely than those questioned in 1992 (reference group) to refuse CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

there has been a significant shift in the attitudes of older Irish inpatients over 15 years towards favouring greater patient participation in decision making and an increased desire for resuscitation.

Reliability testing and update of the Resuscitation Predictor Scoring (RPS) Scale

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the Resuscitation Predictor Scoring (RPS) Scale1 (Appendix A), a survival prediction nomogram designed to aid resuscitation termination decisions during a resuscitation attempt.

METHOD

Bivariate comparisons of predictors of survival and survival rates between the primary RPS Scale data set (1993-2000) and a secondary data set (2000-2003). A total of 2121 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

Comparisons of the two sets of data showed an increase in resuscitation attempts for patients > or =80 years (p<0.001); an increase in pulseless electrical activity (PEA) (p=0.01) and an increase in the duration of arrests (p=0.012). However, in relation to the RPS Scale there were no statistical differences in survival between any of the sub groups demonstrating the reliability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The final updated RPS Scale demonstrates predicted survival rates 15 min into a resuscitation attempt. These can be poor and suggest that it is an acceptable point at which to first consider termination (where there has been no ROSC). The RPS Scale has demonstrated reliability and validity, but can only be a guide for the cessation of resuscitation.

In-hospital resuscitation of the elderly: Characteristics and outcome

OBJECTIVES

To determine the characteristics of the geriatric patient population subjected to resuscitation attempts at a 1000-bed university hospital and to determine factors associated with mortality and outcome after in-hospital CPR.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review. The hospital records from all patients >75 years subjected to in-hospital resuscitation attempts during 2000-2001 were reviewed. Data regarding patient characteristics, mode of arrest and outcome details were extracted.

RESULTS

During the study period 151 resuscitation attempts were registered, and 53 (35%) of the patients were > or =75 years of age. The average age was 81 years; 29/53 (55%) patients were female. The admission diagnosis was "cardiac ischaemia" (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction) in 18/53 (34%) of the patients. PEA (pulseless electric activity) was the most common primary arrhythmia (17/53, 32%), and cardiac aetiology was the most common cause of arrest (41/53, 77%). The time of arrest was spread equally over the day. Most resuscitation attempts were performed at the general wards (28 patients, 53%). More then half-part of the patients died immediately (32/53, 60%); initially ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation) was established in 21/53 (40%) patients. A total of 9/53 (17%) patients were discharged home. 'Do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) orders or a statement that DNAR orders had been discussed with the patient was not documented in any of the patients resuscitated.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients among the geriatric hospitalised patients may benefit a from a short resuscitation attempt. This includes especially those admitted for cardiac ischemia suffering a cardiac arrest with VT or VF as a primary arrhythmia or patients suffering a primary respiratory/hypoxic arrest. Patients who are unlikely to benefit from CPR should be identified on or during hospital admission and the possibility of DNAR orders should be discussed to avoid inappropriate treatment and potential patient suffering. There is a need for implementing routines for discussing the existence of advance-directives or DNAR orders upon admission.

Resuscitation of the Elderly

The changing demographics of America's population over the past couple of decades have propelled geriatric medicine into the fore-front. Due to this, emergency medicine physicians will face numerous challenges managing an increasing number of critically ill elderly patients. This article will focus on success of resuscitation in this population, important pathophysiologic changes that occur with aging, as well as ethical considerations in end-of-life care.

A decade of in-hospital resuscitation: outcomes and prediction of survival?

OBJECTIVE

To provide survival rates and associated factors from a 10-year study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

DESIGN

Longitudinal prospective case register study of all adult in-hospital CPR attempts conducted from April 1993 to March 2003.

SETTING

1200-bed general hospital in Plymouth (UK).

PATIENTS

2121 adult in-hospital CPR attempts in Derriford Hospital, Plymouth during the period April 1993-March 2003.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Immediate, 24 h, hospital discharge and 12 month survival rates.

RESULTS

Following CPR the immediate survival rate (95% confidence interval (C.I.)) was 38.6% (36.5, 40.7), then 24.7% (22.8, 26.6) at 24 h, 15.9% (14.4, 17.6) at discharge and 11.3% (10.0, 12.7) at 12 months. The primary arrhythmia, age, duration of arrest and time of arrest were strongly related to survival at 24 h and discharge. There were very low survival rates for pulse-less electrical activity (PEA) and asystole compared to VT/VF arrests; survival rates were highest for those less than 60 years and decreased with increasing age. The longer the resuscitation the less the survival, and those who arrested at night were less likely to survive. The primary arrest, respiratory or cardiac, was also independently associated with survival at 24 h but not with hospital discharge. Sex and the commencement of basic life support (BLS) within 3 min was not an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show resuscitation survival rates from a 10-year study and indicate some of the key predictors of survival.

In-hospital cardiac arrest

To review the current management of in-hospital cardiac arrest and to identify variables that influence outcomes, OLDMEDLINE from 1950 to 1966 and MEDLINE from 1966 to March 2005 were searched using the keywords cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiac arrest, in hospital, and adult. Secondary sources were derived from review publications and personal communications by one of the authors. There is no secure evidence that the ultimate outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in settings of in-hospital cardiac arrest have improved in the >40 yrs that followed the landmark report by Kouwenhoven, Jude, and Knickerbocker, which launched the modern era of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A paucity of objective measurements preclude secure protocols for sequencing of interventions and, even more, when to initiate and discontinue cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The preparedness of both physicians and nursing professionals to implement the published guidelines has itself been questioned. Whereas early access defibrillation with automated external defibrillators may be of benefit in out-of-hospital settings, there has as yet been no secure evidence that automated external defibrillators have had a favorable impact on in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation when used on infrequent occasions by first responders. This contrasts with the much greater success of advanced life support providers and especially when electrical defibrillation is promptly performed by expertly trained personnel after onset of cardiac arrest. Outcomes are therefore improved in critical care settings and especially in coronary care units in which patients are continuously monitored.

Influence of perceived functional and employment status on cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives

BACKGROUND

Perceptions about functional and employment status before admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) may influence how patients and clinicians make decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives established within 24 hours of admission to the ICU and clinical perceptions of premorbid functional and employment status.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study in 15 university-affiliated centers in Canada, the United States, Australia, and Sweden.

PATIENTS

A total of 1,008 ICU patients aged 18 years or older expected to stay in the ICU at least 72 hours.

MEASUREMENTS

By using multinomial logistic regression, we examined the relationship between functional status and employment status perceived by the ICU team 1 month before ICU admission (the independent variables) and resuscitation status (the dependent variable). Each patient had either an explicit resuscitation directive (to resuscitate or not to resuscitate), or an implicit resuscitation directive to resuscitate.

RESULTS

On average, patients were 61.7 years (+/-17.4 y) old with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 21.5 (+/-8.7); 846 (83.9%) were ventilated mechanically within 48 hours and 345 (34.2%) died in the ICU. Most patients (793, 78.7%) had no explicit resuscitation directive; 98 (9.7%) had an explicit plan to resuscitate, whereas 117 (11.6%) had an explicit plan of do-not-resuscitate. Of 1,008 patients, 98 (9.7%) were severely functionally limited, 217 (21.5%) were somewhat limited, 628 (62.3%) were totally independent, and 65 (6.4%) had unknown functional status 1 month before ICU admission. Severe functional status impairment was associated moderately with an explicit plan to resuscitate (odds ratio, 2.2 relative to no explicit directive) and associated strongly with an explicit do-not-resuscitate plan (odds ratio, 6.2 relative to no explicit directive, P value on the difference =.011). This relationship was not influenced by age, sex, APACHE II score, medical or surgical status, admission diagnosis, employment status, or city. However, severe functional status was associated strongly and significantly with an explicit do-not-resuscitate directive among those who could not participate in decision making (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-15.0), and more weakly associated in those who could participate (odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.6). Being unemployed was associated with an increased odds of an explicit resuscitation directive versus no explicit directive (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-13.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Functional status impairment perceived by the ICU team is associated clearly with do-not-resuscitate directives in patients unable to participate in decision making. However, the association appears much weaker in patients able to participate in decision making. PATIENTS' perceived employment status also may influence resuscitation decisions. Our results emphasize the challenges of ensuring that crucial resuscitation decisions are not affected adversely by patients' inability to participate in decisions, and by their functional and employment status.

Controversial issues in critical care for the elderly: a perspective from Canada

Age alone does not at all preclude the possibility of warranted, effective, and successful intensive care. From a medical perspective, the key issue is the reversibility or otherwise of an acute illness and where this illness sits in the trajectory of that individual's life and possible death. It makes no more sense to admit a 19-year-old let alone a 91-year-old to an intensive care unit if intensive care cannot provide what is needed. Of paramount importance in our consideration of critical care for the elderly is a determination and an understanding of the many needs--medical, emotional, social, spiritual, psychologic--that elderly people have. By exploring them with compassion and sensitivity, we can establish whether the goals of care include critical care and the associated technology, or whether alternative and more conservative approaches more closely reflect the values and preferences of an increasingly elderly population.

An ethical analysis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for elders in acute care

Despite empirical evidence that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is of questionable effectiveness in elders with comorbidities, it continues to hold a unique place in the armamentarium of life-sustaining treatments in that consent for CPR is implied and, when needed, is administered emergently. These conditions of implied consent and emergency implementation often preclude an opportunity for patients/surrogates, in conjunction with their nurses and physicians, to determine the appropriateness of the intervention, given the patient's medical and functional status. Healthcare providers who perform CPR on elderly patients often find themselves in morally distressing circumstances because of their anecdotal knowledge of poor outcomes and realization that a multitude of barriers has precluded an anticipatory discussion regarding appropriateness of the treatment. Nurses and other healthcare providers must take the lead in helping patients/surrogates appreciate the meaning of CPR as a life-sustaining intervention and ensure that each patient's situation receives the ethical reflection deserved for each individual as a matter of human dignity.

Avoiding the futility of resuscitation

PURPOSE

To identify patients who should not have resuscitation started or continued.

DESIGN

Multi-disciplinary prospective study.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred forty-one consecutive patients with cardiopulmonary arrests from January 1995 to February 1997 were evaluated, of which 200 were studied.

METHODS

Subjects were studied for age, sex, arrest location, CPR duration, recovery from arrest, hospital discharge, 6 weeks' survival, sepsis and co-morbid conditions.

RESULTS

Overall 69 (34.5%) recovered from the arrest, 24 (12.0%) left the hospital, and 17 (8.5%) survived 6 weeks. Of inpatients, 13.7% (16/117) were alive at 6 weeks in contrast to 1.2% (1/83) of field/emergency room (ER) arrests. Sepsis did not lessen the immediate recovery rate; however, none of 25 septic patients survived hospitalization. Outcomes were not different between men and women or regular floor and ICU/CCU arrests. Age of survivors was the same as non-survivors. Survivors were resuscitated for 18.7+/-16.5 min and non-survivors 33.1+/-18.4 min (P=0.15). The initial rhythm of asystole or the presence of three or more co-morbid conditions had a negative prognosis.

CONCLUSION

CPR survival is problematic, and it is especially poor in field/BR arrests. Emergency squads should terminate CPR for pulseless patients after communicating with the ER physician. Age is not a determinant of recovery or survival. Arrest outside of the hospital, sepsis, three or more co-morbid conditions, previous CPR, asystole or resuscitation for >25 min all decrease the chance of hospital discharge and survival. Instituting or continuing CPR in a great majority of these patients is futile. Families should be so advised.

Decision making by emergency physicians when assessing cardiac arrest patients on arrival at hospital

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors which influence decision making by experienced emergency physicians when they decide whether to (a) pronounce 'life extinct' in adult patients with non traumatic cardiac arrest while in the ambulance, or (b) bring them into the resuscitation room in the Emergency Department for further assessment/management.

DESIGN

Qualitative study involving semi structured interviews and a focus group.

SETTING

Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments in the Yorkshire region.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen emergency physicians (two clinical fellows, nine specialist registrars and four consultants) working in the Yorkshire region.

RESULTS

Six main themes were identified that impacted upon the decision making process: the doctor's past experience, ambulance service issues, prehospital care, patient characteristics, presence and views of relatives, and organisational issues.

CONCLUSION

The reasoning behind decisions made when a patient arrives at the Emergency Department in cardiac arrest is multifactorial. Strict guidelines would be difficult to construct since individuals vary in the importance they attach to different factors.

Eliciting patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND

in helping patients decide about treatments, such as whether to authorize cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), physicians typically present information about the possible outcomes and their likelihoods. The aim of this study was to elicit patient disutilities for the adverse outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using the methodology of NH Anderson's functional theory of cognition and to determine how patients integrate the disutility and the likelihood of an outcome.

METHODS

77 French adults rated scenarios of possible outcomes of CPR on a linear scale with anchors "what would be the best (or worst) for me." In 25 of the 27 scenarios, the result would be either total recovery or one of five adverse outcomes (chest injury, mild reversible brain damage, severe irreversible brain damage, death after intensive care, immediate death) with one of five likelihoods (one to five chances out of ten). In the other two, the only possible result was either total recovery or immediate death.

RESULTS

the mean disutilities relative to 0 for chest injury and 100 for severe brain damage were 13 for mild brain injury, 68 for death after intensive care, and 69 for immediate death. The graphs of the ratings of each adverse outcome in relation to its frequency were fan-shaped, showing that participants integrated this information multiplicatively.

CONCLUSIONS

the functional theory of cognition provides an alternate method of eliciting patient utilities for the outcomes of CPR and supports clinicians' assumption that people combine utility and likelihood multiplicatively.

Resuscitation in the hospital: relationship of year and rhythm to outcome

OBJECTIVE

determine the frequency of initial rhythms in in-hospital resuscitation and examine its relationship to survival. Assess changes in outcome over time.

METHODS

retrospective cohort (registry) including all admissions to the Medical Center of Central Georgia in which a resuscitation was attempted between 1 January, 1987 and 31 December, 1996.

RESULTS

the registry includes 3327 admissions in which 3926 resuscitations were attempted. Only the first event is reported. There were 961 hospital survivors. Survival increased from 24.2% in 1987 to 33.4% in 1996 (chi(2)=39.0, df=1, P<0.0001). Survival was affected strongly by initial rhythm (chi(2)=420.0, df=1, P<0.0001) and decreased from 63.2% for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) to 55.3% for ventricular tachycardia (VT), 51.0% for perfusing rhythms (PER), 34.8% for ventricular fibrillation (VF), 14.3% for pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and 10.0% for asystole (ASYS). PEA was the most frequent rhythm (1180 cases) followed by perfusing (963), asystole (580), VF (459), VT (94) and SVT (38).

DISCUSSION

the powerful effect of initial rhythm on survival has been reported in pre-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation. VF is considered the dominant rhythm and generally accounts for the most survivors. We report good outcome for each; however, VF represents only 13.8% of events and 16.7% of survivors. PEA accounts for more survivors (169) than does VF (160). Our improved outcome is partially explained by changes in rhythms, but other institutional variables need to be identified to fully explain the results. Further studies are needed to see if our findings can be sustained or replicated.

Outcome after cardiac arrest in adults in UK hospitals: effect of the 1997 guidelines

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of the ILCOR Advisory Statements on Advanced Life Support adopted by the Resuscitation Council (UK), as the standard for resuscitation following cardiac arrest.

METHOD

Over the period May to November 1997, data on the process and outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation following in-hospital cardiac arrest were collected from 49 hospitals throughout the UK.

RESULTS

Of 2074 audit forms submitted, 1368 were included in the final analysis. The initial rhythm monitored was ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 429 patients, of whom 181 (42.2%) were discharged alive, compared to 6. 2% when the initial rhythm was non-VF/VT. Overall, 240 (17.6%) patients were discharged alive. At 6 months after discharge 195 (82. 3%) of 237 patients were still alive. Successful initial resuscitation, defined as return of spontaneous circulation lasting longer than 20 min (ROSC>20 min), was significantly associated with VF/VT as the initial arrest rhythm, return of circulation in less than 3 min, age less than 70 years and the use of an advanced airway (P<0.01). There was a significant increased likelihood of survival to discharge when the circulation was restored in less than 3 min and age was less than 70 years (P<0.05). The administration of any adrenaline (epinephrine) was significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of ROSC>20 min or alive discharge (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the last major multiple hospital study published in 1992, the results of this study suggest that there appears to have been an improvement in survival of in-hospital patients in the UK who have a VF/VT cardiac arrest. How much of this is directly attributable to the adoption of the latest guidelines is uncertain.

End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals

OBJECTIVE

To identify the desired features of end-of-life medical decision making from the perspective of elderly individuals.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using in-depth interviews and analysis from a phenomenologic perspective.

SETTING

A senior center and a multilevel retirement community in Los Angeles.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one elderly informants (mean age 83 years) representing a spectrum of functional status and prior experiences with end-of-life decision making.

MAIN RESULTS

Informants were concerned primarily with the outcomes of serious illness rather than the medical interventions that might be used, and defined treatments as desirable to the extent they could return the patient to his or her valued life activities. Advanced age was a relevant consideration in decision making, guided by concerns about personal losses and the meaning of having lived a "full life." Decision-making authority was granted both to physicians (for their technical expertise) and family members (for their concern for the patient's interests), and shifted from physician to family as the patient's prognosis for functional recovery became grim. Expressions of care, both by patients and family members, were often important contributors to end-of-life treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that advance directives and physician-patient discussions that focus on acceptable health states and valued life activities may be better suited to patients' end-of-life care goals than those that focus on specific medical interventions, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We propose a model of collaborative surrogate decision making by families and physicians that encourages physicians to assume responsibility for recommending treatment plans, including the provision or withholding of specific life-sustaining treatments, when such recommendations are consistent with patients' and families' goals for care.

Does advanced age matter in outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in community-dwelling adults?

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether advanced age is an independent predictor of survival to hospital discharge in community-dwelling adult patients who sustained an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a suburban county.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a suburban county emergency medical services system of community-dwelling adults who had an arrest from a presumed cardiac cause and who received out-of-hospital resuscitative efforts from July 1989 to December 1993. The cohorts were defined by grouping ages by decade: 19-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and 80 or more. The variables measured included age, gender, witnessed arrest, response intervals, location of arrest, documented bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and initial rhythms. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Results are reported using analysis of variance, chi square, and adjusted odds ratios from a logistic regression model. Age group 50-59 served as the reference group for the regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 2,608 total presumed cardiac arrests, the overall survival rate to hospital discharge was 7.25%. Patients in age groups 40-49 and 50-59 experienced the best rate of successful resuscitation (10%). Each subsequent decade had a steady decline in successful outcome: 8.1% for ages 60-69; 7.1% for ages 70-79; and 3.3% for age 80+. In a post-hoc analysis, further separation of the older age group revealed a successful outcome in 3.9% of patients ages 80-89 and 1% in patients 90 and older. Patients aged 80 years or more were more likely to arrest at home, were more likely to have an initial bradyasystolic rhythm, yet had a similar rate of resuscitation to hospital admission. In the regression model, age 80 or older was associated with a significantly worse survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a twofold decrease in survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to discharge in patients aged 80 or more when compared with the reference group in this suburban county setting. However, resuscitation for community-dwelling elders aged 65-89 is not futile. These data support that out-of-hospital resuscitation of elders up to age 90 years is not associated with a universal dismal outcome.

Management of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Since cardiopulmonary resuscitation was first described in 1960, it has become a standardized medical intervention. Separate guidelines have been developed for the neonatal and pediatric population, but none exist for the elderly population. This review will discuss recent available outcome data on resuscitation of the elderly and the known physiologic changes with aging that may affect decisions made during resuscitation.

Predicting unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of three morbidity scores

The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of three different morbidity scores in predicting unsuccessful resuscitation. We reviewed the records of adult patients who underwent CPR between September 1994 and June 1996 in The Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester. Demographic data and enough clinical data to calculate the Pre-Arrest Morbidity score (PAM), the Prognosis After Resuscitation score (PAR) and the Modified PAM Index (MPI) were collected. During the study period 264 consecutive adult patients underwent inpatient CPR. Twenty-eight (11%) of the patients survived to discharge from hospital. Patients who died had significantly higher morbidity scores than those who survived. No patient with a PAM score greater than 6/25, PAR greater than 7/28 or MPI greater than 6/24 survived. There were 47/264 patients who scored above this threshold for the PAM score giving a sensitivity for predicting unsuccessful CPR of 20%. The sensitivity of the PAR was 29% and MPI was 22%. Each score identified a different group of patients for whom CPR was unsuccessful. Using all three scores in combination identified 42% of the unsuccessful CPR attempts. Morbidity scores are likely to need further refinement in order to be a useful bedside tool for predicting success for individual patient resuscitation attempts.

Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of immediate survival and survival to discharge for adult patients undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and to identify demographic and clinical variables associated with these outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The MEDLARS database of the National Library of Medicine was searched. In addition, the authors' extensive personal files and the bibliography of each identified study were searched for further studies. Two sets of inclusion criteria were used, minimal (any study of adults undergoing in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and strict (included only patients from general ward and intensive care units, and adequately defined cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation). Each study was independently reviewed and abstracted in a nonblinded fashion by two reviewers. The data abstracted were compared, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus discussion. For the subset of studies meeting the strict criteria, the overall rate of immediate survival was 40.7% and the rate of survival to discharge was 13.4%. The following variables were associated with failure to survive to discharge: sepsis on the day prior to resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] 31.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9, 515), metastatic cancer (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.2, 12. 6), dementia (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1, 8.8), African-American race (OR 2. 8; 95% CI 1.4, 5.6), serum creatinine level at a cutpoint of 1.5 mg/dL (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2, 3.8), cancer (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2, 3.0), coronary artery disease (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.4, 0.8), and location of resuscitation in the intensive care unit (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.4, 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

When talking with patients, physicians can describe the overall likelihood of surviving discharge as 1 in 8 for patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 1 in 3 for patients who survive cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac surgery: a two-year study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after cardiac surgery and to find predictors of survival.

DESIGN

A retrospective study with data obtained by chart review.

SETTING

A university hospital 24-bed cardiac surgical intensive care unit (ICU).

PARTICIPANTS

Between 1993 and 1994, 4,968 consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the authors' hospital were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred thirteen of these patients (2.3%) were resuscitated. Seventy-nine patients (70%) survived to be discharged from the hospital. Significant predictors of survival were the time between admission to the ICU and initiation of CPR, CPR time, and creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB values.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of CPR after cardiac surgery was 2.3% with no difference between valve surgery and CABG. Best results were achieved when arrhythmias or bleeding were the predisposing causes. Further studies have to be undertaken concerning long-term results and quality of life of the discharged patients.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly. Beneficial or an exercise in futility?

Sudden cardiac death is one of the leading causes of death and a major public health problem that particularly affects the elderly. Sudden cardiac death may be a terminal event after a prolonged debilitating and painful illness, or it may occur following many years of symptoms related to a cardiac disorder; however, in many elderly persons, the cardiac arrest may be the first manifestation of cardiac disease in a supposedly healthy and physically active person. Whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be performed in elderly patients who sustain cardiac arrest is a significant issue confronting the medical profession and the general public. Several questions must be answered when evaluating the decision of whether or not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on an elderly patient.

Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Respecting and encouraging autonomy in the elderly is basic to the practice of geriatrics. In this paper, we examine the practice of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and "artificial" feeding in a geriatric unit in a general hospital subscribing to jewish orthodox religious principles, in which the sanctity of life is a fundamental ethical guideline. The literature on the administration of food and water in terminal stages of illness, including dementia, still shows division of opinion on the morality of withdrawing nutrition. We uphold the principle that as long as feeding by naso-gastric (N-G) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) does not constitute undue danger or arouse serious opposition it should be given, without causing suffering to the patient. This is part of basic care, and the doctor has no mandate to withdraw this. The question of CPR still shows much discrepancy regarding elderly patients' wishes, and doctors' opinions about its worthwhileness, although up to 10 percent survive. Our geriatric patients rarely discuss the subject, but it is openly ventilated with families who ask about it, who are then involved in the decision-making, and the decision about CPR or "do-not-resuscitate" (DNR) is based on clinical and prognostic considerations.

Determinants of reluctance to perform CPR among residents and applicants: the impact of experience on helping behavior

BACKGROUND

Though mouth-to-mouth resuscitation (MMR) is widely endorsed as a useful lifesaving technique, studies have shown that health care professionals are reluctant to perform it. To characterize the circumstances which facilitate this reluctance among physicians, we have surveyed current and future residency trainees regarding attitudes toward providing ventilation by this method to strangers experiencing arrest in the community.

METHODS

A total of 280 categorical emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) house officers and respective program applicants at a 655 bed Brooklyn, New York teaching hospital were anonymously surveyed regarding their willingness to attempt resuscitation in five hypothetical scenarios of cardiopulmonary arrest.

RESULTS

A direct relationship was observed between residency training level and reluctance to perform MMR in each scenario. Applicants expressed greater overall willingness to perform MMR than all residents (56 versus 34%, P < 0.00001). Willingness among experienced residents was lower than for junior-level residents (29 versus 40%, P = 0.01). EM and IM physicians were statistically indifferent in their responses. There were no differences in willingness to perform MMR by age in MD applicant or resident groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Many physicians and future doctors are reluctant to perform MMR on arrest victims in the community, a trend that increases in prevalence among those with more residency training. These data support the hypothesis that diminished helping behavior occurs gradually over the training period and may occur as a direct consequence of the training experience. A model for characterizing the elements that make up a rescuer's decision process is proposed.

Attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment of older persons in Hong Kong

OBJECTIVES

There have been few studies of the attitudes of older Asians toward life-sustaining therapy. This paper presents the knowledge of and attitudes toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and life support in a group of subjects in Hong Kong.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, descriptive study.

PARTICIPANTS

Of the 543 subjects, 382 were old-age home residents and 161 were in-patients of geriatric wards.

MEASUREMENTS

Sociodemographic data, functional ability (using the Barthel Index), self-perceived health scale, knowledge of life-sustaining procedures, and subjects' preferences for such treatments were studied. They were also asked to give the most important reason for wanting or declining CPR, and to indicate who they believe should be the decision-maker(s) regarding whether they should receive life-sustaining treatment.

RESULTS

Approximately 80% of old-age home residents and 60% of hospitalized patients had no knowledge of life-sustaining therapy. The success rate of CPR was overestimated by older subjects, and most wished to be resuscitated. However, up to 20% changed their minds and declined CPR after they knew the true outcome of the procedure. Half of the subjects wanted life support. Univariate analysis found that advanced age and not having a spouse were associated significantly with CPR preference, whereas subjects' knowledge was associated with preference for life support. Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age, not having a spouse, and female sex were independently associated with a tendency to decline CPR. A considerable proportion of older people wished to be involved in decision-making regarding life-sustaining treatment.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of life-sustaining procedures was poor among older people in Hong Kong compared with their counterparts in western countries. Although most older subjects wanted CPR, a number of them changed their minds after they knew the poor outcome. Therefore, older patients should be given more information about life-sustaining therapy and encouraged to take part in their treatment plans.