Epistaxis in the older hypertensive patient

Computed tomography findings in patients with primarily unknown causes of severe or recurrent epistaxis

Objective

In addition to rhinoscopy, computed tomography of paranasal sinuses (CT) may be performed on patients with primary unknown cause of severe epistaxis (SE) or recurrent epistaxis (RE) to further assess the potential cause of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate CT findings during the work-up of intractable epistaxis patients.

Methods

6937 patients were treated in our emergency department with acute epistaxis between 2009–2018. 304/6937 patients underwent CT and rhinoscopy due to intractable SE or RE. 33 patients presented with head trauma prior to epistaxis and were excluded from the final analysis. In 271 cases the primary causes of SE (n = 252) or RE (n = 19) remained unknown. Two observers retrospectively evaluated CT scans for potential sources of epistaxis. Disagreement was settled by consensus. CT and rhinoscopy findings were compared.

Results

In 247/271 (91.1%) SE patients no related pathology was found on CT. A possible cause for epistaxis was found in all RE patients, but only in 5/252 (1.9%) patients with SE.

Most tumours (10/11) and inflammatory conditions (9/10) were found in patients with RE.

In three SE cases, a tumour was suspected on CT, from which two suspicions were refuted during rhinoscopy. CT revealed 10 cases of inflammatory conditions of the sinus and anatomical variant as potential cause of bleeding.

Conclusion

For patients with unknown causes of epistaxis, supplementary CT imaging may be a useful diagnostic add-on to rhinoscopy in the event of RE, tumour suspicion or inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. However, in most cases of first-time SE, CT does not necessarily add to the diagnosis. In these cases, the marginal benefit of CT needs to be weighed carefully against its risks.

[Current aspects in epistaxis]

A survey of current literature on the topic of epistaxis revealed only a circumscript number of publications with a high methodologic value. The analysis of these publications showed that there is a controversy on the necessity of routine coagulation tests in epistaxis patients. These tests should only be performed in cases with clinical evidence of a coagulation disorder. Also, there is an ongoing controversy on the value of local cooling with ice or cold packs. Nasal creams and decongestive nose drops have been found to be effective in uncomplicated epistaxis. Rhinoscopically and endoscopically targeted coagulation of bleeding vessels and nasal packing are recommended treatment options. There is a debate on discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, if INR is within normal limits in Cumadin patients. Intractable epistaxis requires a broad armamentarium of different diagnostic and therapeutic options. Recurrent epistaxis in hereditary syndromes remains to be a challenge, although some advances have been made in diagnosis and symptomatic treatment. Some new medical drugs, as Viagra or Cialis may have nosebleeds as side-effects.