Oral Health Considerations in Older Women Receiving Oral Bisphosphonate Therapy

A systematic review assessing occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw following dental procedures

Aim: This study aimed to systematically review existing literature regarding the association between dental procedures—such as tooth extractions and periodontal therapy—and occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in individuals using bone-modifying drugs. Methods: Search strategies were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for a timeframe ending in December 2021. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias were analyzed independently by two researchers. Three meta-analyses were performed, estimating the crude risk ratio (RR), the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the association between tooth extraction and MRONJ. Results: Of the 1,654 studies initially retrieved, 17 were ultimately included. The majority of patients with MRONJ in these studies were female, with a mean age of 64 years. Zoledronic acid was the most commonly used drug among patients with MRONJ, and cancer was the most frequent underlying health condition. Regarding the performed meta-analyses, crude and adjusted analyses demonstrated that tooth extraction increased the risk for MRONJ by 4.28 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.73–10.58), the OR for MRONJ by 26.94 (95%CI: 4.17–174.17), and the HR for MRONJ by 9.96 (95%CI: 4.04–24.55). Conclusion: It was concluded that performing dental procedures, especially tooth extraction, in patients using bone-modifying drugs increased the risk of MRONJ occurrence and, therefore, should be avoided. Further studies, using adjusted data, are warranted.

Clinical considerations for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a comprehensive literature review

Background

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), which was first reported as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) in bisphosphonate users, is a rare but severe soft and hard tissue disease induced by several types of medications. There has been a deluge of information about MRONJ, such as epidemiology, risk factors, clinical recommendations for dental treatment to prevent it, and treatment strategies in medication-prescribed users. The aim of this study was to comprehensively review recent articles and provide the current scientific information about MRONJ, especially clinical considerations or recommendations for dental treatment to prevent its occurrence.

Materials and methods

The current literature review was mainly based on 14 systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis, 4 position papers, 1 consensus statement, 1 clinical guideline, and 2 clinical reviews regarding MRONJ after a PubMed database and manual searches according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Moreover, 53 articles were selected by manual search in regard to all references from selected articles and other articles identified on the PubMed search, irrespective of publication date, and inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

The incidence and prevalence of MRONJ are relatively low, although they are clearly higher in cancer patients receiving high-dose antiresorptive agents or angiogenesis inhibitors rather than osteoporosis patients receiving oral bisphosphonates or denosumab. There are many types of local, systemic, and other risk factors for the development of MRONJ. Clinical recommendations are provided for each clinical situation of patients to prevent MRONJ. There are also treatment strategies for MRONJ in each stage.

Conclusions

General dentists should perform appropriate dental treatment to prevent MRONJ in the patients prior to or when receiving medications that could induce MRONJ. Moreover, there are treatment strategies for MRONJ in each stage that oral surgeons could follow. Adequate and updated clinical information regarding MRONJ based on scientific data is required whenever possible.

Images in medicine: torus palatinus

A 56 year old African-American female with history of well-controlled hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented to the office for an annual physical examination. She did not have any complaints. She reported being compliant with her medications, exercised daily at her local gym, and maintained a low salt diet. She visits her dentist every 6 months and has had a few fillings in her premolars in the past. On physical examination, her vital signs were normal and the entirety of her physical examination was normal with the exception of her oropharynx. Throat examination revealed a 2 × 1 cm midline hard palate swelling that was bony hard in consistency and covered by normally appearing oral mucosa. It was diagnosed as a torus palatinus. The patient was unaware of its presence and denied being informed about it by her dentist on any visit. She was also educated about the diagnosis and safety-netted by being informed about red-flags that would prompt investigation such as change in size or shape.

The influence of alendronate and tooth extraction on the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw among osteoporotic subjects

BACKGROUND

Although bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) develops mainly after tooth extractions (TEs), the strength of the association between them and how the existence of the disease among bisphosphonate (BP)-treated osteoporotic patients exposed to TE remain uncertain.

METHODS

A nationwide retrospective cohort study investigated the influence of alendronate and TE on the development of ONJ.

RESULTS

Incidence of ONJ following long-term alendronate therapy was 262/100,000 person-years, while no event developed in the control group on raloxifene. Overall prevalence of ONJ in osteoporotic subjects receiving alendronate was estimated at 0.34% which rose to 2.16% after TE. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusted for the potential confounders, showed TE (adjusted odds ratio, 9.60 [4.33-21.29]), drug duration exceeding 3 years (3.00 [1.33-6.76]), and concomitant rheumatoid arthritis (4.94 [1.64-14.90]) were independent predictors of ONJ.

CONCLUSIONS

This article strengthens the relationship between ONJ and BPs. Among osteoporotic patients exposed to alendronate, TE confers a 9.6-fold increased risk for ONJ and it should be performed with caution irrespective of drug duration.

Influence of obesity on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Obesity and periodontitis are important chronic health problems. Obesity is associated with an increased prevalence of periodontitis. Whether obesity also affects the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy is to date still unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies referenced in SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Biosis and Web of Science was performed. Titles, abstracts and finally full texts were scrutinized for possible inclusion by two independent investigators. Quality and heterogeneity of the studies were assessed and the study designs were examined. Probing pocket depth reduction was analyzed as primary surrogate parameter for therapeutic success after non-surgical periodontal therapy.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-fifty-nine potentially qualifying studies were screened. Eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Three of eight studies failed to show an influence of obesity on pocket depth reduction after non-surgical therapy. The remaining five studies documented a clear negative effect on the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy. The finally included studies did not correspond to the highest level of quality (RCTs). Due to the heterogeneity of the data a meta-analysis was not possible.

CONCLUSION

The literature on the effect of obesity on the treatment outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy remains controversial. The data, however, support that obesity is not only a factor associated with poorer periodontal health but might also result in inferior response to non-surgical treatment of periodontitis.

Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: 2015 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Bisphosphonates are the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis, and are also used in malignant bone metastases, multiple myeloma, and Paget's disease, and provide therapeutic efficacy on those diseases. However, it was reported that occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) could be related with bisphosphonate exposures, and there have been many cases regarding this issue. Therefore, a clearer definition and treatment guidelines were needed for this disease. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) reported statements on bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ), and a revised version was recently presented. In the revised edition, the diagnosis BRONJ was changed to medication-related ONJ (MRONJ), which reflects a consideration of the fact that ONJ also occurs for denosumab, a bone resorption inhibitor of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) antibody family, and bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenesis inhibitor. In 2009, a statement on ONJ was also reported locally by a relevant organization, which has served as basis for clinical treatment in Korea. In addition to the new official stance of the AAOMS and ASBMR, with an increasing pool of ONJ clinical experience, a revised version of the 2009 local statement is needed. As such, the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research (KSBMR) and the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (KAOMS) have collectively formed a committee for the preparation of an official statement on MRONJ, and have reviewed recent local and international data to propose guidelines customized for the local Korean situation.

The risk of osteonecrosis of the jaws in Taiwanese osteoporotic patients treated with oral alendronate or raloxifene

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the possible association between osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) and oral alendronate or raloxifene used for osteoporosis and to estimate its absolute and attributable risks in the Taiwanese population.

METHODS

Using an electronic medical records system and manual confirmation of ONJ, we identified patients who began taking alendronate or raloxifene for osteoporosis and developed ONJ between January 2000 and April 2012.

RESULTS

The incidence of ONJ associated with oral alendronate for the management of osteoporosis began after 1 year of drug exposure and progressively increased with longer durations of therapy, specifically from 0.23% to 0.92% as the duration of treatment went from 2 years to 10 years. The overall frequency of ONJ related to oral alendronate over a 12-year period was 0.55%. The incidence rate of ONJ attributed to alendronate exposure was 283 per 100 000 persons per year. On multivariate Cox proportional analysis, adjusting for the potential confounders, alendronate remains an independent predictor for ONJ occurrence [hazard ratio 7.42 (1.02-54.09)] compared with raloxifene. Advanced age, drug duration, and coexisting diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis are contributing factors to the development of oral alendronate-related ONJ.

CONCLUSION

We provided the evidence to support the association of ONJ with oral alendronate used in the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis.

Alendronate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws: a review of the main topics

Bisphosphonates is a group of inorganic pyrophosphates analogues that suppress bone resorption by inducing osteoclast inactivation, being frequently used for management of diseases affecting bone metabolism, bone metastases and bone tumors. However, since 2003 many cases describing the presence of necrotic bone exposures in the jaws have been described in patients receiving these drugs, what represent a significant complication of bisphosphonates treatment. The overall incidence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws is low, ranging from 0.7% to 12%, mainly observed in those patients receiving intravenously treatment. Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated to oral bisphosphonate, particularly alendronate, has also been reported by a number of authors. Considering that alendronate is one of the most used drugs worldwide, specially for treatment of osteoporosis, a better understanding of osteonecrosis of the jaws related to its use and how to manage these patients is extremely important. Therefore, in the current manuscript the authors aim to review the most important topics related to this pathological presentation.

Key words:Bisphosphonates, alendronate, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, osteonecrosis.

Risk of osteomyelitis of the jaw induced by oral bisphosphonates in patients taking medications for osteoporosis: a hospital-based cohort study in Japan

Oral bisphosphonates (BPs) represent the first line of prevention and treatment for osteoporosis. However, several studies have reported osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), also known as osteomyelitis of the jaw (OMJ), as a side effect of these drugs. Although absolute risk is suggested to be low, information to date on the relative risk or attributable risk has in fact been limited. Here, we estimated risk of oral BPs for OMJ in osteoporosis patients taking oral BPs compared with other osteoporosis drugs. Using an electronic medical records retrieval system and manual confirmation of OMJ, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients taking medications for osteoporosis at Kyoto University Hospital between November 2000 and October 2010. To evaluate relative risks of oral BPs for OMJ, logistic regression analysis was performed and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were estimated. In addition, sensitivity analyses were performed according to hierarchical diagnosis. A total of 4129 patients (59.6%) were prescribed BPs while 2794 (40.3%) received other osteoporosis drugs. Absolute risk for OMJ was estimated to range from 0.46% to 0.99% (95% CIs: 0.25-0.66 to 0.69-1.2) among patients receiving oral BPs and 0.071% to 0.17% (95% CIs: 0-0.17 to 0.022-0.33) among patients receiving other osteoporosis drugs. The attributable risks of oral BPs for OMJ were estimated to range from 0.38% to 0.81% (95% CIs: 0.38-0.39 to 0.80-0.81). ORs (95% CIs) adjusted for confounding factors were 5.0 (1.9-12.9) to 6.0 (1.3-26.1) for confirmed cases only. In terms of absolute and attributable risks, the risk of oral BPs for OMJ is considered to be less than 1% in patients with osteoporosis. However, oral BPs may increase the risk of OMJ compared with patients treated with other osteoporosis medications and the risk of side effects should be kept in mind.

Severe ulceration over mandibular torus in an ovarian cancer patient receiving bevacizumab therapy

► Bevacizumab may increase the risk of mucosal ulceration and subsequent bone necrosis. ► Patients receiving bevacizumab should be closely monitored for dental symptoms.