The relationship between average daily dose, medication adherence, and health-care costs among diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain patients initiated on duloxetine therapy

Identification of patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy who have a favorable cost profile with pregabalin treatment

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patient populations with favorable costs after the initiation of pregabalin for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) relative to duloxetine, gabapentin, and amitriptyline.

METHODS

Patients were identified from MarketScan having ≥ 1 claim for pDPN (ICD-9-CM codes 250.6 or 357.2) within 60 days of first prescription (index) for pregabalin, duloxetine, gabapentin, or amitriptyline in 2008 and continuous enrollment 12 months pre- and postindex. Pregabalin patients were propensity-score-matched to each comparator. Using cutoff values ≥ 80% proportion of days covered (PDC) and ≥ 65 years for age, pre- to postindex changes in healthcare costs were estimated for pregabalin vs. comparators.

RESULTS

Of 987 patients initiated on pregabalin, 349 matched to duloxetine; 987 to gabapentin; 276 to amitriptyline. The pre- to postindex changes in total healthcare costs were similar between cohorts: $3272 with pregabalin vs. $2290 with duloxetine (P = 0.5280); $3687 with pregabalin vs. $5498 with amitriptyline (P = 0.5863); $3869 with pregabalin vs. $4106 with gabapentin (P = 0.8303). For the high-age/high-PDC population, the pre- to postindex differences in mean total costs were significantly lower with pregabalin (P < 0.001) relative to comparators ($3573 vs. $8288 for duloxetine; $1423 vs. $3167 for gabapentin; $2285 vs. $6160 for amitriptyline).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of lower total costs among older individuals with pDPN who maintain high adherence to pregabalin therapy relative to key comparators suggests a pharmacoeconomic advantage of pregabalin in this population combined with a need for strategies promoting adherence.

Use of select medications prior to duloxetine initiation among commercially-insured patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess select medication utilization prior to duloxetine initiation among patients with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, and musculoskeletal pain associated with osteoarthritis or low back pain.

METHODS

Commercially insured duloxetine initiators between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2010 were identified from a large US administrative claims database. Disease subgroups were constructed based on diagnosis from medical claims during the 12 months prior to duloxetine initiation. Prior use of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and muscle relaxants was assessed during the 12-month preinitiation period.

RESULTS

This study identified 56,845 (2007), 44,838 (2008), and 65,840 (January 2009 to March 2010) duloxetine initiators. Among the 2009 initiators, utilization patterns were similar for patients with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, with antidepressants being the most used (84% and 80%, respectively), followed by opioids (58% and 55%, respectively). Patients across pain-related conditions also had similar utilization patterns, with opioid use being the highest (76%-82%), followed by antidepressants (65%-72%). Use of other medication classes was common (29%-63%) but less frequent, and over 50% of the patients used any antidepressants, 70% used any antidepressants or anticonvulsants, and 90% used any antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or opioids. Trends in the use of these select medications were similar between 2007 and 2009.

CONCLUSION

Patients used several types of medications over the 12 months prior to initiating duloxetine across disease states, with antidepressants and opioids being the most frequently used medications. Trends of select medication use were similar over time.

Dosing pattern comparison between duloxetine and pregabalin among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare medication dosing patterns of duloxetine and pregabalin among patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

METHODS

Applying a retrospective cohort study design on a large U.S. healthcare claims database, we examined the dosing patterns of duloxetine and pregabalin among commercially insured patients with DPNP aged 18 to 64 who initiated (a 90-day medication gap) duloxetine or pregabalin therapy in 2006. Selected patients had continuous enrollment during the 12-month pre- and post-index periods. The index mediation was used to classified individuals into the duloxetine or pregabalin cohorts. Initial daily dose, average daily dose over the first post-index year, and average daily dose of the first several prescriptions were estimated and compared across the cohorts.

RESULTS

The study sample included 828 duloxetine and 1934 pregabalin-treated patients with a mean age of 50 years. Cardiovascular diseases, neuropathic pain other than DPNP, osteoarthritis, and diabetic retinopathy were the most common comorbid conditions. The average initial daily doses were 54.3 and 171.8 mg for duloxetine and pregabalin, respectively. The average daily dose over the first post-index year was 55.2 mg for duloxetine and 173.8 mg for pregabalin. The average daily dose for the first 10 duloxetine prescriptions ranged between 54.3 and 61.9 mg, but increased from 171.8 to 264.3 mg for pregabalin.

CONCLUSIONS

The commercially insured patients with DPNP who initiated duloxetine or pregabalin therapy had different dosing patterns. The average daily dose for duloxetine was relatively stable over time, while pregabalin-treated patients had significant dose increase over the 12-month post-index period.

Duloxetine in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

Diabetic neuropathy affects up to 70% of diabetics, and diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is the most common and debilitating of the diabetic neuropathies. DPNP significantly reduces quality of life and increases management costs in affected patients. Despite the impact of DPNP, management is poor with one-quarter of patients receiving no treatment and many treated with medications having little or no efficacy in managing DPNP. Duloxetine is one of two drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for DPNP management. Duloxetine is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) proven safe, effective, and cost-saving in reducing DPNP symptoms at a dose of 60 mg/day. Duloxetine doses greater than 60 mg/day for DPNP management are not recommended since they are no more efficacious and associated with more side effects; addition of pregabalin or gabapentin for these patients may be beneficial. Side effects of duloxetine are generally mild and typical for the SNRI class including nausea, dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, sweating, dry mouth, constipation, and diarrhea. Given its other indications, duloxetine is a particularly good choice for DPNP treatment in patients with coexisting depression, anxiety, fibromyalgia, or chronic musculoskeletal pain. Duloxetine treatment had no clinically significant effect on glycemic control and did not increase the risk of cardiovascular events in diabetes patients. However, duloxetine use should be avoided in patients with hepatic disease or severe renal impairment. Given its safety, efficacy, and tolerability, duloxetine is an excellent choice for DPNP treatment in many patients.

Factors associated with pain medication selection among patients diagnosed with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with initiation of duloxetine therapy compared with other pharmacologic therapies for treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

METHODS

This study used administrative claims databases for commercially-insured individuals aged 18-64 years to examine factors associated with treatment among DPNP patients who initiated duloxetine versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), venlafaxine, gabapentin, pregabalin, or opioids between 7/1/2005 and 12/31/2007. Treatment initiation was defined as no pill coverage of the same medication over the previous 90 days. Multiple logistic regression models were estimated to assess factors associated with initiating duloxetine versus each of the other DPNP therapies.

RESULTS

The study included 11,060 DPNP patients with average age of 55 years old. Cardiovascular disease (63-70%), cerebrovascular/peripheral vascular disease (26-33%), low back pain (24-39%), and osteoarthritis (17-26%) were the most common diabetes- and pain-related comorbidities. Controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients who received duloxetine or pregabalin in the prior 12-month period were more likely to initiate duloxetine. Patients from other DPNP treatment cohorts, except for those in the pregabalin cohort, were more likely to re-initiate the same prior therapy than begin treatment with duloxetine (all p<0.05). A history of anxiety disorder was significantly associated with initiation of all DPNP treatments other than duloxetine (all p<0.05), except for TCAs. Patients with low back pain were more likely to initiate duloxetine than TCAs or venlafaxine, but less likely to initiate duloxetine than pregabalin or opioids. Patients with infections related to diabetes were less likely to initiate duloxetine than venlafaxine, gabapentin, or opioids.

LIMITATIONS

Because a retrospective administrative claims database was used, this study is subject to selection bias due to unobservable confounders, inability to measure prescriber preferences or characteristics or disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Among commercially-insured DPNP patients, those with prior use of duloxetine or pregabalin were more likely to initiate duloxetine than other treatments. The presence of select comorbidities was also associated with specific medication initiation.