Intraoperative blood loss during living donor liver transplantation: an analysis of 635 recipients at a single center

Predictors of intraoperative massive transfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although transfusion management has improved during the last decade, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with considerable blood transfusion requirements which poses some challenges in securing blood bank inventories. Defining the predictors of massive blood transfusion before surgery will allow the blood bank to better manage patients' needs without delays. We evaluated the predictors of intraoperative massive transfusion in OLT.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected on patients who underwent OLT between 2007 and 2017. Repeat OLTs were excluded. Analyzed variables included recipients' demographic and pretransplant laboratory variables, donors' data, and intraoperative variables. Massive transfusion was defined as intraoperative transfusion of ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (RBCs). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0.

RESULTS

The study included 970 OLT patients. The median age of patients was 57 (range: 16-74) years; 609 (62.7%) were male. RBCs, thawed plasma, and platelets were transfused intraoperatively to 782 (80.6%) patients, 831 (85.7%) patients, and 422 (43.5%) patients, respectively. Massive transfusion was documented in 119 (12.3%) patients. In multivariate analysis, previous right abdominal surgery, the recipient's hemoglobin, Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and operation time were predictive of massive transfusion. There was a direct significant correlation between the number of RBC units transfused and plasma (Pearson correlation coefficient r = .794) and platelets (r = .65).

DISCUSSION

Previous abdominal surgery, the recipient's hemoglobin, MELD score, cold ischemia time, warm ischemia time, and operation time were predictive of intraoperative massive transfusion in OLT.

Liver transplantation with interposition saphenous vein conduits for arterial reconstruction: Impact of morbidity and arterial ischemia time

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of liver transplantation with hepatic arterial reconstruction using interposition saphenous vein conduits are not widely reported. Here, we share our experience using great saphenous vein conduits for hepatic arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (n = 950). The saphenous vein conduits were used in 39 patients. We compared hepatic artery thrombosis, graft dysfunction, and 30-day and 1-year survival in the early (2012-2017) and late (2017-2020) transplant periods.

RESULTS

Among 39 patients (of whom 30 [76.9%] were males, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease was 24 [interquartile range, 17-27], median age was 50 [interquartile range, 43-54]), saphenous vein conduits were placed on supra celiac aorta in 7 (17.9%), infrarenal aorta in 25 (64.1%), and other arteries in 7 (17.9%) patients. The number of biliary and hepatic vein anastomoses, total arterial ischemia time, portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time, and duration of surgery was different in the 2 groups (P < .05). The 30-day mortality was 5/21 (23.8%) and 0 in the early and late periods (P = .05). The 30-day survival was >90% in patients with portal vein-hepatic artery reperfusion time <240 minutes, ≤2 grade 3 complications, no graft dysfunction, and later period of transplantation (P < .05). The 1-year survival with standard transplantation, transplantation with saphenous vein conduits in the early and late period was 87%, 62%, and 89% (P = .022).

CONCLUSION

Liver transplantation with saphenous vein conduits is associated with acceptable outcomes. Major complications and arterial ischemia times are major determinants of outcomes.

Perioperative management of adult living donor liver transplantation: Part 1 - recipients

Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation option has become an established and widely practiced transplantation method for adult patients suffering from end-stage liver disease. It has successfully addressed the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplant Anesthesia jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of live donor liver transplant recipients. The review aims to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live liver transplantation recipients. We feature the status, outcomes, surgical procedure, portal venous decompression, anesthetic management, prevention of acute kidney injury, avoidance of blood transfusion, monitoring and therapeutic strategies of hemodynamic derangements, and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for liver transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

High-dose ulinastatin to prevent late-onset acute renal failure after orthotopic liver transplantation

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of two distinct doses of ulinastatin on late-onset acute renal failure (LARF) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Methods

The high-risk recipients that underwent OLT were divided into two groups according to ulinastatin dose: low-dose (LD) ulinastatin group, 0.8 million U/d; high-dose (HD) ulinastatin group, 1.6 million U/d. The primary outcome was the incidence of LARF, which was defined the newly onset acute kidney injury (AKI) stage III (KDIGO, 2012) within 7–28 post-transplant days. The second outcomes were early multiple organ retrieval assessments, length of hospital stay and safety events.

Results

A total of 174 recipients were included (LD ulinastatin group, n = 55; HD ulinastatin group, n = 119). There was no significant difference in the incidence of LARF between LD (8/55, 14.50%) and HD (9/119, 7.56%) ulinastatin groups (HD vs. LD, HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.17–1.37; p = .1295). Multivariate Cox proportion risk regression model revealed HD ulinastatin (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.38–0.98; p = .0464) was an independent protective factor for LARF. Early lactate level, oxygenation, AKI stage, graft function, and sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score were significantly improved in HD ulinastatin group versus LD ulinastatin group. No significant adverse events were observed in either group.

Conclusions

Higher dose of ulinastatin (1.6 million U/d) might be preferable to prevent LARF after OLT, and it may contribute to the enhancement of early multiple organ recovery and thus attenuate the incidence of LARF.

Association between viscoelastic tests-guided therapy with synthetic factor concentrates and allogenic blood transfusion in liver transplantation: a before-after study

Background

Perioperative bleeding and transfusion are important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation. The aim of this study is to assess whether viscoelastic tests-guided therapy with the use of synthetic factor concentrates impact transfusion rates of hemocomponents in adult patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Methods

This is an interventional before-after comparative study. Patients undergoing liver transplantation before the implementation of a protocol using thromboelastometry and synthetic factor concentrates were compared to patients after the implementation. Primary outcome was transfusion of any hemocomponents. Secondary outcomes included: transfusion of red blood cells (RBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate or platelets, clinical complications, length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 183 patients were included in the control and 54 in the intervention phase. After propensity score matching, the proportion of patients receiving any transfusion of hemocomponents was lower in the intervention phase (37.0 vs 58.4%; OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20–0.87; p = 0.019). Patients in the intervention phase received less RBC (30.2 vs 52.5%; OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.08–0.56; p = 0.002) and FFP (5.7 vs 27.3%; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03–0.43; p = 0.002). There was no difference regarding transfusion of cryoprecipitate and platelets, complications related to the procedure, hospital length of stay and mortality.

Conclusions

Use of a viscoelastic test-guided transfusion algorithm with the use of synthetic factor concentrates reduces the transfusion rates of allogenic blood in patients submitted to liver transplantation.

Trial registration

This trial was registered retrospectively on November 15th, 2018 – clinicaltrials.gov – Identifier: NCT03756948.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-018-0664-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A data-driven patient blood management strategy in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Blood utilization during liver transplant has decreased, but remains highly variable due to many complex surgical and physiologic factors. Previous models attempted to predict utilization using preoperative variables to stratify cases into two usage groups, usually using entire blood units for measurement. We sought to develop a practical predictive model using specific transfusion volumes (in ml) to develop a data-driven patient blood management strategy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective evaluation of primary liver transplants at a single institution from 2013 to 2015. Multivariable analysis of preoperative recipient and donor factors was used to develop a model predictive of intraoperative red-blood-cell (pRBC) use.

RESULTS

Of 256 adult liver transplants, 207 patients had complete transfusion volume data for analysis. The median intraoperative allogeneic pRBC transfusion volume was 1250 ml, and the average was 1563 ± 1543 ml. Preoperative haemoglobin, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, preoperative haemodialysis and preoperative international normalized ratio together yielded the strongest model predicting pRBC usage. When it predicted <1250 ml of pRBCs, all cases with 0 ml transfused were captured and only 8·6% of the time >1250 ml were used. This prediction had a sensitivity of 0·91 and a specificity of 0·89. If predicted usage was >2000 ml, 75% of the time blood loss exceeded 2000 ml.

CONCLUSION

Patients likely to require low or high pRBC transfusion volumes were identified with excellent accuracy using this predictive model at our institution. This model may help predict bleeding risk for each patient and facilitate optimized blood ordering.

Intensive Care of Pulmonary Complications Following Liver Transplantation

Chronic liver disease has been associated with pulmonary dysfunction both before and after liver transplantation. Post-liver transplantation pulmonary complications can affect both morbidity and mortality often necessitating intensive care during the immediate postoperative period. The major pulmonary complications include pneumonia, pleural effusions, pulmonary edema, and atelectasis. Poor clinical outcomes have been known to be associated with age, severity of liver dysfunction, and preexisting lung disease as well as perioperative events related to fluid balance, particularly transfusion and fluid volumes. Delineating each and every one of these pulmonary complications and their associated risk factors becomes paramount in guiding specific therapeutic strategies.

Clinical Beneficial Effects of Using Crystalloid only in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Objective: Liver transplantation (LT) is a major surgery associated with intraoperative massive fluid shift, which is usually replaced by crystalloid, 5% albumin (colloid) and blood products. We studied 15 patients from 477 consecutive recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation. Each patient received crystalloid only during LT. Whether LT provides any clinical benefit is not clear and must be determined. Methods and Patients: The anesthesia records of 477 adult LDLT were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the fluids received. Group I (GI) had received blood products, 5% albumin and crystalloid, group II (GII) received 5% albumin and crystalloid, and group III (GIII) received crystalloid only. The characteristic intraoperative variable and postoperative acute rejection and survival rate were compared amongst groups by using One Way ANOVA post hoc with Bonferroni and by Ficher’s Exact test and Chi-square χ² test. Results and Conclusions: GIII had less intraoperative ascites and blood loss; they also had more stable hemodynamics. Furthermore, they could be extubated significantly earlier than GI, and the one- and three-year survival rates were excellent, with 100% in GIII, while that of GI and GII were 94.1%, 90.5% and 98.6%, 94.5%, respectively.

Massive haemorrhage in liver transplantation: Consequences, prediction and management

From its inception the success of liver transplantation has been associated with massive blood loss. Massive transfusion is classically defined as > 10 units of red blood cells within 24 h, but describing transfusion rates over a shorter period of time may reduce the potential for survival bias. Both massive haemorrhage and transfusion are associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity (need for dialysis/surgical site infection) following liver transplantation although causality is difficult to prove due to the observational design of most trials. The blood loss associated with liver transplantation is multifactorial. Portal hypertension secondary to cirrhosis results in extensive collateral circulation, which can bleed during hepatectomy particular if portal pressures are increased. Avoiding volume loading and maintenance of a low central venous pressure together with the use of vasopressors have been shown to reduce blood loss and transfusion during liver transplantation, but may increase the risk of renal impairment post-operatively. Coagulation defects may be present pre-transplant, but haemostasis is often re-balanced due to a deficit in both pro- and anti-coagulation factors. Further derangement of haemostasis may develop in the anhepatic and neohepatic phases due to absent hepatic metabolic function, hyperfibrinolysis and platelet sequestration in the donor liver. Point-of-care tests of coagulation such as the viscoelastic tests rotation thromboelastometry/thromboelastometry allow and more accurate and rapid assessment of these derangements in coagulation and guide the use of factor replacement and antifibrinolytics. Transfusion protocols guided by these tests have been shown to reduce transfusion rates compared with conventional coagulation tests, but have not shown improvements in mortality or morbidity. Pre-operative factors associated with massive transfusion include previous surgery, re-do transplantation, the aetiology and severity of liver disease. Intra-operatively the use of piggy-back technique and avoiding veno-veno bypass has been shown to reduced blood loss.

Peri-hepatic gauze packing for the control of haemorrhage during liver transplantation: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Albeit accepted in the trauma setting, use of peri-hepatic gauze packing has been rarely reported during liver transplantation.

AIMS

To assess the results of packing in liver transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical characteristics, intraoperative events and postoperative outcome of consecutive adult liver transplantation recipients between 2003 and 2013. Patients treated with packing were compared to no-packing patients and to matched controls selected using a propensity score.

RESULTS

Of 1396 recipients, 107 were treated with packing for peri-hepatic bleeding (76.6%), allograft damage (12.1%) or partial outflow obstruction (11.2%). Urgent reoperation for ongoing haemorrhage was required in 6 (5.6%). Correction of haemodynamic and coagulation parameters was constantly achieved. Overall, patient (90% vs. 98%, p<0.001) and graft (83.2% vs. 94.7%, p<0.001) 3-month survival was significantly reduced in packing patients. However, after matching, no significant difference was observed in patient (89.3% vs. 95.2%, p=0.12) and graft (83.5% vs. 92.2%, p=0.06) 3-month survival. Patient survival was associated with recipient age (HR 2.59; p=0.04) and donor age × recipient MELD (HR 2.04; p=0.02), but not with packing (HR 1.81; p=0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, packing was a valuable adjunct to conventional means of haemostasis during liver transplantation and, after accounting for confounding covariates, was not associated with inferior outcomes.

Coagulopathy and transfusion therapy in pediatric liver transplantation

Bleeding and coagulopathy are critical issues complicating pediatric liver transplantation and contributing to morbidity and mortality in the cirrhotic child. The complexity of coagulopathy in the pediatric patient is illustrated by the interaction between three basic models. The first model, "developmental hemostasis", demonstrates how a different balance between pro- and anticoagulation factors leads to a normal hemostatic capacity in the pediatric patient at various ages. The second, the "cell based model of coagulation", takes into account the interaction between plasma proteins and cells. In the last, the concept of "rebalanced coagulation" highlights how the reduction of both pro- and anticoagulation factors leads to a normal, although unstable, coagulation profile. This new concept has led to the development of novel techniques used to analyze the coagulation capacity of whole blood for all patients. For example, viscoelastic methodologies are increasingly used on adult patients to test hemostatic capacity and to guide transfusion protocols. However, results are often confounding or have limited impact on morbidity and mortality. Moreover, data from pediatric patients remain inadequate. In addition, several interventions have been proposed to limit blood loss during transplantation, including the use of antifibrinolytic drugs and surgical techniques, such as the piggyback and lowering the central venous pressure during the hepatic dissection phase. The rationale for the use of these interventions is quite solid and has led to their incorporation into clinical practice; yet few of them have been rigorously tested in adults, let alone in children. Finally, the postoperative period in pediatric cohorts of patients has been characterized by an enhanced risk of hepatic vessel thrombosis. Thrombosis in fact remains the primary cause of early graft failure and re-transplantation within the first 30 d following surgery, and it occurs despite prolongation of standard coagulation assays. Data, however, are currently lacking regarding the use of anti-aggregation/anticoagulation therapies and how to best monitor for thrombosis in the early postoperative period in pediatric patients. Therefore, further studies are necessary to elucidate the interaction between the development of the coagulation system and cirrhosis in children. Moreover, strategies to optimize blood transfusion and anticoagulation must be tested specifically in pediatric patients. In conclusion, data from the adult world can be translated with difficulty into the pediatric field as indication for transplantation, baseline pathologies and levels of pro- and anticoagulation factors are not comparable between the two populations.

Excessive intraoperative blood loss independently predicts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Background

Several studies have investigated the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) on recurrence of tumors. However, the independent effect of IBL on oncological outcome after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear.

Methods

A total of 479 patients who underwent LT for HCC from January 2001 to December 2012 at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective study. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to assess the recurrence rate, as well as its risk factors. Stratified analysis was performed to further examine the effect of IBL on HCC recurrence according to different characteristics of tumors. We also investigated the independent risk factors for excessive IBL using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The median follow-up was 28 months (range, 1–131 months). Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test according to IBL at per liter intervals showed that IBL > 4 L was significantly associated with a higher recurrence rate (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified that IBL > 4 L (P < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.32, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.60–3.36) was an independent risk factor for post-LT HCC recurrence, as well as age < 60 years, exceeding Milan criteria, α-fetoprotein levels > 400 ng/mL, and micro- and macrovascular invasion. IBL > 4 L (P < 0.001; HR = 2.45, 95 % CI = 1.64–3.66) was also independently associated with early (within 1 year) recurrence after LT. Furthermore, a significant correlation between IBL > 4 L and vascular invasion (P = 0.019) was found. IBL > 4 L was independently associated with HCC recurrence for patients with vascular invasion, but not for patients without vascular invasion. Finally, we found that the presence of ascites, model for end-stage liver disease score, and operation time were independent risk factors for IBL > 4 L.

Conclusions

Excessive IBL is an independent predictor of HCC recurrence after LT, especially in patients with vascular invasion.

Renal function status in liver transplant patients in the first month post-transplant is associated with progressive chronic kidney disease

AIM

Renal dysfunction is a common complication of liver transplantation (LT), related to hepatorenal syndrome with end-stage liver disease or calcineurin-inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also a common problem in long-term survivors post-LT. This study was done to investigate the association between renal functional status soon after LT and the development of CKD.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 63 patients who were aged 18 years or older, and underwent LT at Tohoku University Hospital. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation for Japan.

RESULTS

Before transplantation, 25 patients (39.7%) were diagnosed with CKD (eGFR, <60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) ). The incidence of CKD was 22.4% (13/58) at 2 years, 23.2% (13/56) at 3 years and 22.7% (12/54) at 5 years. The patients with CKD at 2 years post-transplant were more likely to have a history of glomerulonephritis, and were significantly older at the time of LT, compared to those without CKD. Levels of eGFR of less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) in the first month post-transplant and a volume of intraoperative blood loss of more than 300 mL/kg were predictive factors for the development of CKD at 2 years post-transplant and thereafter.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that there is an improvement of renal function in the majority of patients after LT. Regardless of the presence of pre-existing CKD, both renal function status at the first month post-transplant and a volume of intraoperative blood loss were predictive factors for the development of CKD at 2 years post-transplant and thereafter.

Review of anesthesia in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-accepted treatment modality of many end-stage liver diseases. The main issue in LT is the shortage of deceased donors to accommodate the needs of patients waiting for such transplants. Live donors have tremendously increased the pool of available liver grafts, especially in countries where deceased donors are not common. The main ethical concern of this procedure is the safety of healthy donors, who undergo a major abdominal surgery not for their own health, but to help cure others. The first part of the review concentrates on live donor selection, preanesthetic evaluation, and intraoperative anesthetic care for living liver donors. The second part reviews patient evaluation, intraoperative anesthesia monitoring, and fluid management of the recipient. This review provides up-to-date information to help improve the quality of anesthesia, and contribute to the success of LT and increase the long-term survival of the recipients.

Perioperative use of allogenic blood components in live-related donor orthotopic liver transplantation: A cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

In spite of many improvements that have reduced the blood component requirements, substantial numbers of transfusions are still needed in liver transplantation.

AIMS

The objective of the present study was to analyze the perioperative usage of allogenic blood components and predict the preoperative factors as predictors of red cell transfusion in live-related donor liver transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective data on utilization of allogenic blood components were analyzed for a total of 150 liver transplant procedures. The data on utilization of blood components during surgery and till 48 hours of ICU stay was collected from the blood bank record and hospital information system (HIS).

RESULTS

Red cell concentrate was commonest blood component used in liver transplant recipient and most of the transfusion took place during surgery. During intraoperative period 92.7% (N = 139) of the cases utilized red cell components with the median number of five whereas in postoperative period only 38% (N = 57) of patients received blood with the median number of one. This study demonstrates that the preoperative hemoglobin and platelet count are the predictors of utilization of red cell concentrates during surgery. There were a total of 11 (7.3%) recipients who didn't receive allogeneic blood transfusion in any form. Utilization of blood components was negligible among organ donors.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the pattern and predictors of usage of allogeneic blood components in liver transplant recipients at a tertiary healthcare center in India.

Blood transfusion requirement during liver transplantation is an important risk factor for mortality

BACKGROUND

Blood loss during liver transplantation is not incorporated into the dominant models for post-transplant survival. Our objective was to investigate blood transfusion requirement as a risk factor for mortality after liver transplantation, and to further analyze risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion requirement and hepatectomy time.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 233 consecutive liver transplant recipients over a span of 3 years by a single experienced surgeon. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years. Independent risk factors for patient survival after liver transplantation were identified using Cox proportion hazard regression. Independent risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion requirement and hepatectomy time were identified using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two factors were identified as significant predictors in multivariate analysis for survival after liver transplantation: hepatocellular carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.2) and intraoperative blood transfusion requirement per unit (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.02). Threshold analysis revealed that intraoperative blood transfusion volume ≥28 units or 85(th) percentile (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 4.7) was a significant risk factor for patient survival. Four covariates were identified as significant risk factors for intraoperative blood requirement: warm ischemia time (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.18), bilirubin (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.08), previous surgery (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.9), and hepatectomy time (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02). The only risk factor for prolonged hepatectomy time was previous major abdominal surgery (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.7 to 9.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative blood transfusion requirement is an important risk factor for mortality after liver transplantation. The strongest risk factors for intraoperative blood transfusion requirement are warm ischemia time and bilirubin levels. Intraoperative blood loss and its risk factors should be incorporated into models to predict survival after liver transplantation.

Blood loss, predictors of bleeding, transfusion practice and strategies of blood cell salvaging during liver transplantation

Blood loss during liver transplantation (OLTx) is a common consequence of pre-existing abnormalities of the hemostatic system, portal hypertension with multiple collateral vessels, portal vein thrombosis, previous abdominal surgery, splenomegaly, and poor “functional” recovery of the new liver. The intrinsic coagulopathic features of end stage cirrhosis along with surgical technical difficulties make transfusion-free liver transplantation a major challenge, and, despite the improvements in understanding of intraoperative coagulation profiles and strategies to control blood loss, the requirements for blood or blood products remains high. The impact of blood transfusion has been shown to be significant and independent of other well-known predictors of posttransplant-outcome. Negative effects on immunomodulation and an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality have been repeatedly demonstrated. Isovolemic hemodilution, the extensive utilization of thromboelastogram and the use of autotransfusion devices are among the commonly adopted procedures to limit the amount of blood transfusion. The use of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous blood transfusion should still be considered an important method to reduce the need for allogenic blood and the associated complications. In this article we report on the common preoperative and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss, intraoperative transfusion practices, anesthesiologic and surgical strategies to prevent blood loss, and on intraoperative blood salvaging techniques and autologous blood transfusion. Even though the advances in surgical technique and anesthetic management, as well as a better understanding of the risk factors, have resulted in a steady decrease in intraoperative bleeding, most patients still bleed extensively. Blood transfusion therapy is still a critical feature during OLTx and various studies have shown a large variability in the use of blood products among different centers and even among individual anesthesiologists within the same center. Unfortunately, despite the large number of OLTx performed each year, there is still paucity of large randomized, multicentre, and controlled studies which indicate how to prevent bleeding, the transfusion needs and thresholds, and the “evidence based” perioperative strategies to reduce the amount of transfusion.

Perioperative monitoring in liver transplant patients

Liver transplant (LT) is a major surgical undertaking involving major fluid shifts, hemodynamic instability and metabolic derangements in a patient with preexisting liver failure and multisystemic derangements. Monitoring and organ support initiated in the preoperative phase is continued intraoperatively and into the postoperative phase to ensure an optimal outcome. As cardiovascular events are the leading cause of non-graft related death among LT recipients, major emphasis is placed on cardiovascular monitoring. The other essential monitoring are the continuous assessment of coagulapathy, extent of metabolic derangements, dyselectrolytemis and intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. The type and extent of monitoring differs with need according to preexisting child status of the patient and the extent of systemic derangements. It also varies among transplant centers and is mainly determined by individual or institutional practices.

Effects of Liver Function on Ionized Hypocalcaemia following Rapid Blood Transfusion

OBJECTIVE: Hypocalcaemia detrimentally affects the cardiovascular system and massive transfusion-related hypocalcaemia is particularly severe in end-stage liver disease patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). This study, therefore, compared the severity and duration of ionized hypocalcaemia between patients with normal and impaired liver function. METHODS: Patients ( n = 26 per group) were transfused at a rate of 10 ml/kg within 10 min with packed red blood cells (PRBCs) during LT (group LP) or spinal surgery (group SP), or were infused with 0.9% normal saline during spinal surgery (group SN). Serum levels of ionized calcium were assessed before (T0), just after (T1), and at 20 (T2) and 60 min (T3) after transfusion. RESULTS: Transfusion with PRBCs caused more severe ionized hypocalcaemia than 0.9% normal saline at T1. In contrast to the faster (20 min) normalization in group SP, ionized hypocalcaemia in group LP persisted at T3. Serum ionized calcium levels at T3 showed correlations with vital signs, blood glucose, serum potassium, base deficit and lactate. CONCLUSION: Rapid blood transfusion caused more severe and prolonged ionized hypocalcaemia in patients with liver dysfunction than in those with normal liver function.

Risk factors and outcomes of massive red blood cell transfusion following living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors influencing blood loss and secondary blood transfusion and to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent a massive blood transfusion (MBT) following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary adult-to-adult right hepatic lobe LDLT were included in the study, and were divided into the MBT group [≥6 red blood cell (RBC) units in 24 h] and the non-massive blood transfusion (NMBT) group (<6 RBC units in 24 h). All potential risk factors, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and long-term survival rate of the patients in the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The data of 181 eligible patients were retrospectively analyzed. A decreased long-term survival rate, a higher incidence of postoperative infection and prolonged ICU stay were observed in the MBT group. No significant difference was observed in survival rate between patients having platelet transfusion>2 units and ≤2 units. Hemoglobin<100 g/L, platelet counts<70×10(9)/L, fibrinogen level<1.5 g/L and history of upper abdominal surgery were found to be independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood transfusion during LDLT can be predicted using preoperative variables. Massive RBC transfusion may lead to poor long-term survival, higher postoperative infection rate and prolonged ICU stay. Platelet transfusion may not be a risk factor for long-term survival.

Usefulness of the Pinch-Burn-Cut (PBC) technique for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Surgical bleeding during recipient hepatectomy is a major concern in liver transplantation (LT). Effective intraoperative control of bleeding is necessary. In the Pinch-Burn-Cut (PBC) technique, a small amount of tissue around the dissection plane is pinched with forceps, electocauterized and gently cut. The present study sought to estimate the usefulness of the PBC technique in LT.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and December 2010, 123 adult cases underwent LT in our center. Of these, 72 involved a recipient hepatectomy using the PBC technique (PBC group). and 51 involved the conventional technique (non-PBC group). Clinical parameters were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

The amount of blood loss and related transfusions were significantly reduced, and the operating time was shorter in the PBC group than in the non-PBC group (p=0.006, p<0.05 and p=0.002, respectively). There was also shorter duration of mechanical ventilation after LT in the PBC group (p=0.017). The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage was lower in the PBC group than in the non-PBC group, but had no statistical significance between two group (19.6% vs. 8.3%, p=0.101).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the PBC technique is effective for bleeding control during recipient hepatectomy in LT.

Effect of antifibrinolytic drugs on transfusion requirement and blood loss during orthotopic liver transplantation: Results from a single center

BACKGROUND

During orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), activation of the fibrinolytic system can contribute significantly to perioperative bleeding. Prophylactic administration of antifibrinolytic agents has been shown to reduce blood loss and the need for allogenic transfusion.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of antifibrinolytics on requirement of blood components, blood loss and operative time during OLT in patients with end stage liver disease, reporting to a single centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent OLT at this centre during the period February 2003-October 2007 were the subjects of this study. Based on the individual anesthesiologist's preference, patients were assigned to receive either two million units of aprotinin (AP) as a bolus followed by 5,00,000 units/hour or 10 mg/kg tranexamic acid (TA) as a bolus followed by 10 mg/kg every six to eight hours, administered from the induction till the end of the surgery. Transfusion policy was standardized in all patients. Intraoperative red cell salvage was done wherever possible. The effect of these two antifibrinolytic drugs on transfusion requirement was evaluated as a whole and in a sub group of patients from each treatment group and compared with a concurrent control group that did not receive antifibrinolytic drugs.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (40 M / 10 F, 44 adults, 6 pediatric patients) underwent OLT in the study period. Fourteen patients were given AP, 25 patients were given TA and 11 patients did not receive any of the agents(control group). The median volume of total blood components transfused in antifibrinolytic group (n = 39) was 4540 ml(0-19,200ml), blood loss 5 l(0.7-35l) and operative time 9h (4.5-17h) and that of control group(n = 11) was 5700 ml(0-15,500ml), 10 l(0.6-25 l) and 9h (6.4-15.8h) respectively. The median volume of blood transfusions, blood loss and operative time was lesser in AP group(n = 14) than that of TA group(n = 25).

CONCLUSION

There is definite decrease in transfusion requirement, blood loss and operative time in the patients who received antifibrinolytic drugs than that of patients who did not receive. Because of the small sample size, comparisons carried between different groups did not show statistical significance. Prophylactic use of antifibrinolytics during OLT, possibly helps in blood conservation.

Predictors of high intraoperative blood loss derived by simple and objective method in adult living donor liver transplantation

We conducted a risk factor analysis for high intraoperative blood loss (IBL) in 555 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) cases with a simple and objective method of IBL estimation based on the concept of red cell mass (RCM): Lost RCM (mL) = patient's estimated blood volume (mL) × (preoperative hematocrit in % - postoperative hematocrit in %) + (transfused leukocyte-depleted red blood cell in units × 213 × 70%) + (transfused Cell Saver blood in mL × 55%). Analysis of 33 preoperative variables revealed that Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, albumin, the presence of ascites, and previous abdominal surgery were correlated with high IBL (lost RCM > 1000 mL) in multivariate logistical regression analysis. In conclusion, we found that MELD score, albumin, the presence of ascites, and previous abdominal surgery were significantly correlated with high IBL during adult LDLT.

Effects of low central venous pressure during preanhepatic phase on blood loss and liver and renal function in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although the low central venous pressure (LCVP) technique is used to decrease blood loss during liver resection, its efficacy and safety during transplant procedures are still debatable. Our study aimed to assess the effects of this technique and its clinical safety for recipients undergoing liver transplantation.

METHODS

Eighty-six adult patients were randomly divided into a LCVP group and a control group. In the LCVP group, CVP was maintained below 5 mmHg or 40% lower than baseline during the preanhepatic phase by limiting infusion volume, manipulating the patient's posture, and administration of somatostatin and nitroglycerine. Recipients in the control group received standard care. Hemodynamics, blood loss, liver function, and renal function of the two groups were compared perioperatively.

RESULTS

A lower CVP was maintained in the LCVP group during the preanhepatic phase, resulting in a significant decrease in blood loss (1922 +/- 1429 vs. 3111 +/- 1833 ml, P < 0.05) and transfusion volume (1200 +/- 800 vs. 2400 +/- 1200 ml, P < 0.05) intraoperatively. Compared with the control group, the LCVP group had a significantly lower mean arterial pressure at 2 h after the start of the operation (74 +/- 11 vs. 84 +/- 14 mmHg, P < 0.05), a lower lactate value at the end of the operation (5.9 +/- 3.0 vs. 7.2 +/- 3.0 mmol/l, P < 0.05), and a better preservation of liver function after the declamping of the portal vein. There were no significant differences in perioperative renal function and postoperative complications between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The LCVP technique during the preanhepatic phase reduced intraoperative blood loss, protected liver function, and had no detrimental effects on renal function in LT.

Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the collagen-binding region of RspB from Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae

Liver transplant procedures require the most blood components, despite the fact that blood use in liver transplantation has declined dramatically over the last decade. Liver transplant recipients present unique challenges, not only in terms of blood supply, but also requirements for specialized blood components, serologic problems, and immunologic effects of transfusion on both the allograft and the recipient. The cause of intraoperative blood loss in liver transplantation is multifactorial, due to both technical factors and poor coagulation control. This procedure carries the risk of massive blood loss, which requires massive transfusions and is associated with postoperative infections, reduced graft survival, multi-organ dysfunction, and higher risk of mortality. Efforts to reduce intraoperative bleeding leading to limitation of blood transfusions are desirable to improve results and also to control costs.

Method of literature search:

The name of topic is typed and searched in Google search.

The name of topic is typed and searched in PubMed search. Related articles were also searched.

Some standard books in Transfusion Medicine were also referred.

Intraoperative massive transfusion decreases survival after liver transplantation

Patients undergoing liver transplantation often experience coagulopathy and massive intraoperative blood loss that can lead to morbidity and reduced survival. The aim of this study was to verify the survival rate and discover predictive factors for death among liver transplant patients who received massive intraoperative blood transfusions. This cohort study was based on prospective data collected retrospectively from January 2004 to July 2006. The 232 patients were distributed according to their blood requirements, (namely, more or less than 6 units), including red blood cell saver. The statistical analyses were performed using Student t test, Cox hazard regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). The massively transfused cohort displayed higher Child-Pugh classifications (10.2 vs 9.6; P = .03); model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores (19 vs 17; P = .02); recipient weights (75.4 vs 71 kg; P = .03); as well as warm ischemia times (70.7 vs 56.4 minutes; P < .001) and surgery times (584.6 vs 503.4 minutes; P < .05). The proportional hazard (Cox) regression analysis showed that the risk of death increased 2.1% for each unit of donor sodium and 1.6% for each additional year of donors age over 50. The survival rates at 6, 12, 60, and 120 months for > or = 6 vs <6 U of blood transfusion of 63.8% vs 83.3%; 53.9% vs 76.3%; 40% vs 60%; 34.5% vs 49.2%. In conclusion, we observed that patients receiving over 6 red blood cell units intraoperatively displayed reduced survival. Predictive factors for this risk factor were high donor level of sodium and of age.

Predictors of blood product use in orthotopic liver transplantation using the piggyback hepatectomy technique

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has historically been associated with massive blood loss and hemodynamic instability related to the coexistence of varices, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and portal hypertension. Piggyback hepatectomy (PGB) is a technique increasingly utilized in OLT to avoid veno-venous bypass and vena cava clamping. This study evaluated the factors associated with blood loss and blood product requirement in PGB.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of the anesthesia preoperative and operative notes and computerized lab values for all adult cadaveric liver transplants over a 42-month period. These data were combined with the liver transplant database for analysis. Approximately 98% of the transplants were performed using a standard piggyback approach with no use of veno-venous bypass.

RESULTS

Data were included for all 526 transplants performed during this time period. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 1000 cc. Median transfusion requirement was 3 units packed red blood cells, 7 units fresh frozen plasma, and 6 units platelets. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that predictors of EBL were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, initial central venous pressure, and total anesthesia time. Predictors of PRBC useage were age, MELD score, preoperative hemoglobin, initial fibrinogen, and anesthesia time. Postoperatively increased transfusion requirement was associated with increased length of hospital stay and lower 90-day and 1-year graft and patient survivals.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that PGB can be safely accomplished in nearly all liver transplant patients without venovenous bypass or vena cava clamping and with less warm ischemia, which may ultimately be associated with less perioperative morbidity and improved outcomes.

Early postoperative hemorrhage requiring urgent surgical reintervention after orthotopic liver transplantation

Hemorrhage is a common complication in the early postoperative period after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and surgical reintervention may be necessary. We sought to assess the incidence as well as to identify potential risk factors for bleeding requiring surgical reintervention in the early postoperative period. From January 2003 to December 2005, we retrospectively reviewed the courses of 261 patients who underwent OLT. We analyzed the pretransplantation parameters, transplantation features, and clinical data for surgical reintervention due to early postoperative hemorrhage. Twenty-two of 261 patients (8.4%) had early postoperative hemorrhage requiring urgent surgical reintervention during the initial hospital stay. In-hospital mortality of the patients with hemorrhage (9/22; 41%) was significantly higher than that of other patients (29/239; 12.1%; P < .001). The surgical problem was the main cause of hemorrhage (18/22; 81.8%). More intraoperative blood transfusions were necessary for patients with hemorrhage than for other patients. Furthermore, a greater number of blood transfusions, including red blood cells, plasma, and platelet concentrates, during the transplantation procedure correlated with a greater mortality. In conclusion, early postoperative hemorrhage requiring urgent surgical reintervention is a severe complication with a high mortality. It is mainly caused by errors in surgical technique. Blood transfusion during transplantation was correlated with a higher mortality.

K(ICG) value, a reliable real-time estimator of graft function, accurately predicts outcomes in adult living-donor liver transplantation

Reliable monitoring enabling evaluation of graft function is crucial after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A method to identify poor graft function at an early postoperative period would allow opportune intensive clinical management to bring about further improvements in LDLT outcomes. This study assessed the reliability of the indocyanine green (ICG) elimination rate constant (K(ICG)) value as an estimator of graft function and determined the actual temporal changes of K(ICG) after LDLT. K(ICG) values were measured using a noninvasive method in 30 adult recipients up to 28 days after LDLT. The receptor index (LHL15) based on liver scintigraphy, and graft parenchymal damage score based on histopathological findings were evaluated after LDLT and correlated well with simultaneous K(ICG). Thus, K(ICG) measured by noninvasive method was confirmed as accurately evaluating graft function. Changes of K(ICG) after LDLT in recipients with good graft function were maintained, after some falls in the early periods, and had a significant difference compared with those for recipients without good graft function; moreover, there were already significant differences in K(ICG) 24 hours after LDLT. Mean transit time reflecting systemic hemodynamics revealed that recipients without good outcomes fell into an unstable systemic hemodynamic state, and effective hepatic blood flow has a large influence on liver regeneration after LDLT. In conclusion, we suggested that K(ICG) values can predict clinical outcomes at the early postoperative period after LDLT by sharply reflecting the influence of systemic dynamics on splanchnic circulation.

Refined Suture Techniques to Prevent Bleeding From Accidental Slippage of Vascular Clamps During Living Donor Hepatectomy

Accidental slippage of vascular clamps during living donor hepatectomy can induce brisk bleeding and even imperil the donor. After practicing more than 1000 cases of living donor hepatectomy, the investigators realized that specialized suture techniques were important to secure the vascular closure to prevent unnecessary bleeding. For secure division of intrahepatic vein branches, we devised a continuous penetration suture method in which the orders of procedures were changed to clamping-closure-cut sequence. For secure division of the main and accessory hepatic vein branches from the inferior vena cava, we applied stay sutures at each corner and midpoint of the hepatic vein stump so as not to permit its slippage. After application of these methods, we did not experience any episode of accidental clamp slippage. We are sure that these suture techniques are beneficial to prevent unnecessary bleeding during living donor hepatectomy and to make surgeons feel at ease during the living donor operation.