Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among blood donors in Beijing and implications for improving the pretesting donor screening process

Epidemiological features of chronic hepatitis C infection caused by remunerated blood donors: A nearly 27-year period survey

AIM

To understand the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in blood donors over a nearly 27-year interval and to explore the factors that affect the outcome of HCV infection.

METHODS

A retrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants, mostly plasma donors, were selected from three administrative villages in the Jiangsu province in Eastern China. A questionnaire was administered among the villagers who had a history of blood donation from the late 1980s to the early 1990s. All participants underwent physical examination, liver B-ultrasonography, and liver stiffness measurement. In addition, 10 mL of blood was collected from each participant to measure simple liver function parameters (albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspirate aminotransferase), blood factors (platelet), and for hepatitis B surface antigen, antiHCV, and antihuman immunodeficiency virus detection. HCV RNA detection, HCV genotyping, and other tests were carried out in antiHCV-positive patients.

RESULTS

After a median of 27 years (25-31 years) from the last blood donation to the time of survey, a total of 1694 participants were investigated, and the antiHCV-positive individuals were categorized into three groups: blood donors (n = 12, 3.3%), plasma donors (n = 534, 68.5%), and mixed donors (n = 324, 58.8%). A total of 592 (68.05%) patients had detectable HCV RNA, and 91.9% had genotype 1b. A total of 161 (27.2%, 161/592) patients with chronic HCV were considered to have cirrhosis with a liver stiffness measurement level higher than 12 kPa. Multiple logistic (binary) regression analysis results showed that platelet and IgG levels were associated with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

The nearly 27-year interval investigation revealed that chronic hepatitis C infection is a very serious public health problem in Eastern China. Plasma donation and subsequent return of blood cells to the donor are the main causes of hepatitis C infection. The main HCV genotype is 1b. Nearly 28% of cases progressed to cirrhosis. Age, especially over 60 years, and regular drinking habits were risk factors associated with cirrhosis.

Risk factors for hepatitis B and C infection among blood donors in five Chinese blood centers

BACKGROUND

Few studies were conducted on hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV, respectively) risk factors among Chinese blood donors in recent years since voluntary donors replaced commercial donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A case-control survey was conducted in HBV- or HCV-positive and -negative donors from five blood centers in China between September 2009 and April 2011. Case status was defined by having a reactive result on Monolisa HBsAg Ultra (Bio-Rad) for HBV and Ortho anti-HCV EIA 3.0 (Johnson & Johnson) for HCV. Controls were randomly selected qualified blood donors matched to cases by donation month and blood center. Specific test-seeking, medical-related, and behavioral risk factors were compared by HBV and HCV status using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

A total of 364 HBV cases, 174 HCV cases, and 689 controls completed the survey; response rates were 66.2, 47.3, and 82%, respectively. HCV-positive donors were significantly more likely to report having a blood transfusion history (23.4% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.0001) and ever living with a person with illegal drug injection (6.0% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.0001) than controls. Having intravenous and intramuscular injections in the past 12 months and ever having a tattoo are marginal risk factors for HCV (p values < 0.01). No specific risk factor for HBV was identified.

CONCLUSION

History of previous transfusion and living with illegal drug users are risk factors for HCV infection among Chinese blood donors from five regions. Test-seeking behavior is not associated with HBV or HCV infections.

A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Asia, Australia and Egypt

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis C pandemic has been systematically studied and characterized in North America and Europe, but this important public health problem has not received equivalent attention in other regions.

AIM

The objective of this systematic review was to characterize hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemiology in selected countries of Asia, Australia and Egypt, i.e. in a geographical area inhabited by over 40% of the global population.

METHODOLOGY

Data references were identified through indexed journals and non-indexed sources. In this work, 7770 articles were reviewed and 690 were selected based on their relevance.

RESULTS

We estimated that 49.3-64.0 million adults in Asia, Australia and Egypt are anti-HCV positive. China alone has more HCV infections than all of Europe or the Americas. While most countries had prevalence rates from 1 to 2% we documented several with relatively high prevalence rates, including Egypt (15%), Pakistan (4.7%) and Taiwan (4.4%). Nosocomial infection, blood transfusion (before screening) and injection drug use were identified as common risk factors in the region. Genotype 1 was common in Australia, China, Taiwan and other countries in North Asia, while genotype 6 was found in Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries. In India and Pakistan genotype 3 was predominant, while genotype 4 was found in Middle Eastern countries such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria.

CONCLUSION

We recommend implementation of surveillance systems to guide effective public health policy that may lead to the eventual curtailment of the spread of this pandemic infection.

Serial follow-up of repeat voluntary blood donors reactive for anti-HCV ELISA

BACKGROUND

Voluntary non-remunerated repeat blood donors are perceived to be safer than the first time blood donors. This study was planned for follow-up of previous hepatitis C virus (HCV) test results of anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reactive repeat blood donors. The aim was to suggest a protocol for re-entry of the blood donors who are confirmed HCV negative by nucleic acid test (NAT) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). A group of repeat voluntary donors were followed retrospectively who became reactive on a cross sectional study and showed HCV reactivity while donating blood regularly.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 51,023 voluntary non remunerated blood donors were screened for anti-HCV ELISA routinely. If anybody showed positivity, they were tested by two ELISA kits (screening and confirmatory) and then confirmed infection status by NAT and or RIBA. The previous HCV test results of repeat donors reactive by anti-HCV ELISA were looked back from the records. Data of donors who were repeat reactive with single ELISA kit (in the present study) were analyzed separately from those reactive with two ELISA kits (in the present study).

RESULTS

In this study, 140 (0.27%) donors who were reactive by anti HCV ELISA were included. Out of them, 35 were repeat voluntary donors and 16 (11.43%) were reactive with single ELISA kit. All 16 donors were reactive by single ELISA kit occasionally in previous donations. Their present ELISA positive donations were negative for HCV NAT and RIBA. A total of 19 (13.57%) donors were reactive with two ELISA kits. In their previous donations, the donors who were reactive even once with two ELISA kits were consistently reactive by the same two ELISA kits in their next donations also.

CONCLUSION

Donor sample reactive by only single ELISA kit may not be considered as infectious for disposal as they were negative by NAT and or RIBA. One time ELISA positivity was found probably due to ELISA kit specificity and sensitivity. Donors reactive with two ELISA kit should be discarded as there is a high positivity with NAT/ RIBA. However, donors reactive by two ELISA kits and negative by NAT and RIBA should be followed up and may not be deferred permanently.