Precision and Reliability of 5 Platelet Function Tests in Healthy Volunteers and Donors on Daily Antiplatelet Agent Therapy

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation protocols used during mechanical circulatory support call for titration of antiplatelet agents. We compared the precision and reliability of 5 platelet function tests in healthy volunteers and donors on daily antiplatelet therapy to distinguish their efficacy for titrating antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

We assessed arachidonic acid–induced platelet function by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), Multiplate impedance aggregometry, VerifyNow, and platelet mapping by thromboelastography (TEG PM). We assessed ADP-induced platelet function by the same methods and flow cytometry. Forty healthy volunteers and 10–13 volunteers on daily aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy were evaluated. We compared tests for intraassay precision, interassay precision (samples from 2 separate blood draws), and reliability coefficient.

RESULTS

For arachidonic acid–induced platelet aggregation in healthy volunteers, intra- and interassay CVs were ≤10% for all methods. Intra- and interassay precision among donors on daily aspirin was ≤30% for all methods except LTA (38% interassay CV) and TEG PM (95% intraassay and 104% interassay CV). For ADP-induced platelet function, intra- and interassay precision was ≤10% and ≤30% for all methods. Only Multiplate demonstrated moderate or greater (R > 0.40) reliability coefficients for arachidonic acid–induced platelet function among all subjects. All methods of ADP-induced platelet function, except TEG PM, demonstrated substantial or greater (R > 0.60) reliability among all subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

TEG PM is least suited to monitor effects of antiplatelet agents. Multiplate impedance aggregometry was the only method to demonstrate an acceptable reliability coefficient among healthy volunteers and donors on both aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

Aspirin has little additional anti-platelet effect in healthy volunteers receiving prasugrel

BACKGROUND

Strong P2Y(12) blockade, as can be achieved with novel anti-platelet agents such as prasugrel, has been shown in vitro to inhibit both ADP and thromboxane A(2) -mediated pathways of platelet aggregation, calling into question the need for the concomitant use of aspirin.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the hypothesis that aspirin provides little additional anti-aggregatory effect in a group of healthy volunteers taking prasugrel. STUDY PARTICIPANTS/METHODS: In all, 9 males, aged 18 to 40 years, enrolled into the 21-day study. Prasugrel was loaded at 60 mg on day 1 and maintained at 10 mg until day 21. At day 8, aspirin 75 mg was introduced and the dose increased to 300 mg on day 15. On days 0, 7, 14 and 21, platelet function was assessed by aggregometry, response to treatments was determined by VerifyNow and urine samples were collected for quantification of prostanoid metabolites.

RESULTS

At day 7, aggregation responses to a range of platelet agonists were reduced and there was only a small further inhibition of aggregation to TRAP-6, collagen and epinephrine at days 14 and 21, when aspirin was included with prasugrel. Urinary prostanoid metabolites were unaffected by prasugrel, and were reduced by the addition of aspirin, independent of dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy volunteers, prasugrel produces a strong anti-aggregatory effect, which is little enhanced by the addition of aspirin. The addition of aspirin as a dual-therapy with potent P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors warrants further investigation.

Platelet response to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with peripheral atherosclerosis

Aspirin and clopidogrel are important drugs in the secondary prevention of ischemic events. A considerable individual variation in platelet response to these drugs has, however, been reported, and high residual platelet reactivity despite treatment may be an independent risk factor for ischemic events. Most studies have been undertaken in patients with coronary heart disease, but patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) may exhibit greater residual platelet reactivity, possibly because of platelet activation by a larger area of diseased endothelium. It is yet unsettled which method that best measures platelet reactivity and an eventual lack of response to aspirin. Several instruments are promoted to measure platelet response and low-response to platelet inhibitors, but it is questionable if they measure this in comparable ways. We studied the comparability of three tests of platelet reactivity for the assessment of low-response to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with PAD. In 263 patients, platelet function was assessed twice, 3 months apart, by the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA), light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and whole blood impedance aggregometry (IA). In a subgroup of 43 patients, we studied the effect of a single dose of 600 mg clopidogrel on platelet function. Low-response to aspirin assessed by analyses targeting cyclooxygenase-1 activity (LTA, IA) was rare (≤ 8.1%). With the PFA, we found 17% with low response at both visits, and 60% who were consistently responsive, whereas 23% were categorized differently at the two visits. Low response to clopidogrel, occurred in 0-23%, depending on the method and the criteria used. A low-response to aspirin, defined by lack of COX-1 inhibition, is a rare phenomenon whereas high residual platelet reactivity as determined by PFA may be a rather frequent finding but is not consistent over time in all patients. A low-response to clopidogrel depends very much on the method and definition used.

Comparison of laboratory detection methods of aspirin resistance in coronary artery disease patients

Aspirin reduces the prevalence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and death by 25.0% in high risk group of patients with cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have estimated that about 5.5-56.8% of the population are aspirin resistant. The mechanisms of aspirin resistance (AR) have not been fully understood. We compared the detection methods for AR using traditional platelet aggregometry and VerifyNow system. One hundred and seventy-two coronary artery disease patients who had taken aspirin only or combinations with aspirin and clopidogrel for over 7 days were included. Of the 55 patients with aspirin only, aggregometer detected six AR (10.9%) and VerifyNow identified 10 AR (18.2%) cases. Among 117 patients with combined therapy, none (0.0%) and 10 (8.5%) of AR were detected by aggregometer and VerifyNow, respectively. There were six (3.4%) patients of AR defined by both methods and they all received aspirin monotherapy. Although the correlation between the aggregometry and VerifyNow was low, with defined criteria both methods gave 91.9% agreement to find AR. VerifyNow showed a higher sensitivity to detect AR. Further studies are required to biologically define AR and to alter therapy based on platelet function tests.

Effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy men measured by platelet aggregation and PFA-100

There are no generally accepted definitions for low-response (frequently called resistance) to the platelet inhibitors, aspirin and clopidogrel. Low-response may increase the risk of cardiovascular events in atherosclerotic patients. We aimed to define the normal drug responses in healthy men. Platelet function was measured in 20 healthy men during 11 days of aspirin or clopidogrel intake, using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the Platelet Function Analyzer 100 (PFA-100). The lower limits for LTA at baseline were 64% and 61%, using arachidonic acid and ADP as agonists, respectively. During aspirin intake the LTA results were stable from day to day, and an upper limit of 9% arachidonic acid stimulated aggregation was found. Clopidogrel intake was best shown by ADP induced aggregation. However, two out of 20 individuals exhibited low-response to clopidogrel. In the remaining 18 volunteers an upper limit of 48% aggregation was found. We found an upper limit for collagen-epinephrine stimulated PFA-100 results of 166 s at baseline. During aspirin intake, these results varied considerably from day to day in nine out of 20 men, resulting in an overlap between the reference ranges at baseline and during therapy. In conclusion, platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel assessed by aggregometry was stable during 11 days of treatment and reference ranges were established. The PFA-100 results varied greatly and low-response was not precisely defined by this method.