Characterization of a novel mutation in the F8 promoter region associated with mild hemophilia A and resistance to DDAVP therapy

Evidence of pathogenicity of a mutation in 3' untranslated region causing mild haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Despite the high mutation detection rate, in a small group of haemophilia A patients, using current screening methods, no causal mutation in F8 can be detected. In such cases, the causal mutation might be in the non-coding sequences of F8.

AIM

Rarely, mutations in non-coding sequences reveal a pivotal role. Here, we analysed a mild haemophilia A patient harbouring a mutation in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of F8 and elucidated the molecular mechanism leading to haemophilia phenotype.

METHODS

To find the causal mutation, the complete F8 genomic region was analysed by next generation sequencing. The effect of the identified alteration on F8 expression was evaluated in silico and analysed for the splicing effect at mRNA level. Moreover, in vitro studies using a luciferase reporter system were performed to functionally analyse the mutation.

RESULTS

We identified an alteration in the 3' UTR (c.*56G>T) as the only change in F8 gene. Pedigree analysis showed a segregation pattern for three affected members for the presumptive mutation. Moreover, the variant was predicted in silico to create a new donor splice site, which was also detected at mRNA level, resulting in a 159 bp deletion in 3' UTR of F8. Finally, the variant showed reduced expression of the gene reporter firefly luciferase in cell line expression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our results advocate the patient specific c.*56G>T base change in the 3' UTR to be a disease-associated mutation leading to alternative splicing explaining the mild haemophilia A phenotype.

Deep intronic variations may cause mild hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

In about 10% of patients with mild hemophilia A, no candidate gene mutations are apparent after complete gene sequencing.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To analyze factor VIII gene (F8) mRNA for mutations in five families with mild hemophilia A with no apparent genomic mutation and a reduced response to desmopressin.

RESULTS

In four cases, mRNA studies revealed the presence of an abnormal mRNA transcript in addition to normal F8 mRNA. Sequencing of the abnormal transcripts revealed complex abnormalities, which allowed the identification of three different intronic variations (c.2113+1152delA, c.5587-93C>T and c.5999-277G>A) at the DNA level, absent from 387 normal alleles. By in silico analysis, c.2113+1152delA and c.5587-93C>T were strongly predicted to result in the generation of new splice sites with the introduction of premature termination codons, while c.5999-277G>A was predicted to generate a new protein with 30 additional amino acids. However, these predictions were not homogeneous across the different mutations and programs used. The detrimental effect of two mutations was also confirmed by in vitro expression studies. These changes were also identified in related female carriers and in other mild HA patients not included in the original study. No mRNA abnormality was identified in the remaining patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, deep intronic variations may be responsible for mild hemophilia A where no other F8 mutations have been identified and may be associated with a reduced biologic response to desmopressin. F8 mRNA analysis is a useful tool for the identification of deep intronic variation not detectable by standard DNA sequencing.

Mild hemophilia A

Mild hemophilia A (HA), defined by clinical features and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) between 0.05 and 0.40 IU mL(-1), is characteristically distinct from severe HA. Indeed, although the molecular characterization of mild HA has permitted the identification of specific underlying mutations, its clinical phenotype is strikingly different from that of patients with a severe FVIII defect, where spontaneous hemorrhages or recurrent joint bleeding are usual manifestations. With aging, mild HA patients may develop complications (i.e. cancers and cardiovascular disorders), the management of which may prove challenging due to the concomitant bleeding tendency. Furthermore, the development of inhibitors provides an additional major complication in these patients, because it increases the severity of the bleeding phenotype and complicates their management. Standard management of mild HA includes the use of desmopressin and antifibrinolytic agents for minor bleeding episodes or surgical procedures, whilst major bleeding or surgery requires replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates. As regards treatment of patients with inhibitors, bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated FVII) have proven effective in the treatment of bleeding episodes, but as there are insufficient data to determine the optimal approach to immune tolerance induction in this group of patients, their optimal management remains controversial. Rituximab is a newer, promising therapeutic option for inhibitor eradication in such patients. Many aspects concerning mild HA remain to be clarified, including the molecular basis, the natural history and the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Only large prospective studies will shed light on this condition.