Sinus node dysfunction

Predictors of Clinical Success of Cardioneuroablation in Patients With Syncope: Results of a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising treatment for syncope.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to analyze the success and risk of CNA ,and to describe predictive factors of CNA success in patients with syncope.

METHODS

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with syncope treated with CNA in 22 hospitals and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Patients with reflex cardioinhibitory, mixed syncope, functional sinus node dysfunction (SND), or functional atrioventricular block were included. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of syncope after the CNA.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49.3 ± 13.4 years and 54.5% were women. Five (6.5%) patients presented complications. Three patients presented SND, 1 required a pacemaker. During a median follow-up of 12 months (Q1-Q3: 8-20 months), 26 (33.8%) patients had recurrence of syncope. Women had a significantly higher risk of recurrence compared with men (HR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.2-8.8; P = 0.016). Patients >50 years of age had a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared with younger patients (HR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9; P = 0.032). The risk of recurrence in mixed syncope was significantly higher than in cardioinhibitory syncope (HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 1.1-17.5; P = 0.033). Syncope recurrence was significantly less frequent in patients treated with general anesthesia or deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (HR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6; P = 0.002). Finally, the number of radiofrequency applications (≤30 or >30) had a significant association with CNA success (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9; P = 0.042). These results were adjusted for confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this multicenter study, the effectiveness of CNA was less than previously reported. We found a 3.9% risk of SND. Male sex, age >50 years, cardioinhibitory syncope, general anesthesia or deep sedation, and >30 radiofrequency applications could predict success of CNA for syncope.

Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management

Syncope is a concerning symptom that affects a large proportion of patients. It can be related to a heterogeneous group of pathologies ranging from trivial causes to diseases with a high risk of sudden death. However, benign causes are the most frequent, and identifying high-risk patients with potentially severe etiologies is crucial to establish an accurate diagnosis, initiate effective therapy, and alter the prognosis. The term cardiac syncope refers to those episodes where the cause of the cerebral hypoperfusion is directly related to a cardiac disorder, while arrhythmic syncope is cardiac syncope specifically due to rhythm disorders. Indeed, arrhythmias are the most common cause of cardiac syncope. Both bradyarrhythmia and tachyarrhythmia can cause a sudden decrease in cardiac output and produce syncope. In this review, we summarized the main guidelines in the management of patients with syncope of presumed arrhythmic origin. Therefore, we presented a thorough approach to syncope work-up through different tests depending on the clinical characteristics of the patients, risk stratification, and the management of syncope in different scenarios such as structural heart disease and channelopathies.

Recommendations for the use of electrophysiological study: Update 2018

The field of cardiac electrophysiology has greatly developed during the past decades. Consequently, the use of electrophysiological studies (EPSs) in clinical practice has also significantly augmented, with a progressively increasing number of certified electrophysiology centers and specialists. Since Zipes et al published the Guidelines for Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiology and Catheter Ablation Procedures in 1995, no official document summarizing current EPS indications has been published. The current paper focuses on summarizing all relevant data of the role of EPS in patients with different types of cardiac pathologies and provides up-to-date recommendations on this topic. For this purpose, the PubMed database was screened for relevant articles in English up to December 2018 and ESC and ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines, and EHRA/HRS/APHRS position statements related to the current topic were analyzed. Current recommendations for the use of EPS in clinical practice are discussed and presented in 17 distinct cardiac pathologies. A short rationale, evidence, and indications are provided for each cardiac disease/group of diseases. In conclusion, because of its capability to establish a diagnosis in patients with a variety of cardiac pathologies, the EPS remains a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disorders and is capable of establishing indications for cardiac device implantation and guide catheter ablation procedures.

Consecutive administration of atropine and isoproterenol for the evaluation of asymptomatic sinus bradycardia

AIMS

Sinus node function is commonly evaluated by the atropine test. The isoproterenol test is less used. The aim of this study was to evaluate chronotropic reserve in patients with asymptomatic sinus bradycardia using the combined administration of atropine and isoproterenol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were studied, 18-70 years old, with permanent, asymptomatic, sinus bradycardia and no detectable cardiac disease. The standard administration protocols for atropine and isoproterenol were used and successive heart rate recorded. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (control), showing normal response to atropine and isoproterenol; Group B, demonstrating abnormal response to atropine; Group C, with abnormal response to atropine and isoproterenol. No statistically significant difference was observed between Groups A and B (P = 0.11), whereas Group C differed statistically from both Groups A (P < 0.000001) and B (P = 0.000003) to a significant extent. By the end of the 3-year follow-up period, 47% of the Group C patients had undergone permanent pacemaker implantation (DDDR)--Kaplan-Maier survival curves predict only 35% survival without pacing--whereas none did so in Groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with deficient chronotropic response to atropine administration, isoproterenol tests could differentiate those with inadequate chronotropic reserves, possibly requiring preventive pacemaker implantations.

Usefulness of echocardiography to predict inappropriate atrial sensing in single-lead VDD pacing

Reliable atrial sensing is the prerequisite for restoration of atrioventricular synchrony in patients with single-lead VDD pacing systems. To determine echocardiographic variables associated with inappropriate atrial sensing, 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic second- or third-degree AV block and normal sinus node function were studied. Prior to implantation echocardiographic measurements of end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions and volumes of the right atrium and right ventricle were performed. All patients underwent implantation of a Medtronic Thera VDD(d) pacemaker with a bipolar Medtronic Capsure electrode. A minimal amplitude of the unfiltered atrial electrocardiogram of > or =0.5 mV was required for permanent lead position and the atrial sensitivity was programmed below the lowest recorded value. Appropriate atrial sensing (atrial triggered ventricular paced complexes/total number of ventricular paced complexes) was assessed during 24-hour Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise testing 3 to 6 weeks after implantation. Inappropriate atrial sensing (<95% correct atrial synchronization during Holter registration and/or <97.5% during exercise testing) was present in nine patients. Right atrial volumes and the right ventricular end-diastolic volume was significantly higher, as compared to patients without inappropriate sensing (12 patients). The right atrial and diastolic volumes had the highest correlation with correct atrial sensing r = 0.83, P<0.0001). Using a postdefined cut-off value of > or =80 mL for the end-diastolic right atrial volume, sensitivity and specificity for inappropriate sensing was 100% and 92%, respectively. These findings show that preimplant echocardiography can identify patients with inappropriate sensing during VDD pacing, in whom DDD pacing should be considered.

Dual chamber pacing with a single-lead DDD pacing system

The successful application of single-lead VDD pacing during the last few years has generated the idea of single-lead DDD pacing. Preliminary data from several single-lead VDD studies attempting to pace the atrium by a floating atrial dipole are unsatisfactory, causing an unacceptably high current drain of the device. We studied the feasibility as well as the short- and long-term stability of atrioventricular sequential pacing, using a new single-pass, tined DDD lead. In eight consecutive patients (age 73+/-16 years) with symptomatic higher degree AV block and intact sinus node function, this new single-pass DDD lead was implanted in combination with a DDDR pacemaker. Correct VDD and DDD function was studied at implantation; at discharge; and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. At implant, the atrial stimulation threshold was 0.6+/-0.1 V/0.5 ms. During follow-up, the atrial pacing thresholds in different every day positions averaged 2.1+/-0.5 V at discharge, 2.9+/-0.5 V at 1 month, 3.8+/-0.4 V at 3 months, and 3.4+/-0.4 V at 6 months (pulse width always 0.5 ms). The measured P wave amplitude at implantation was 4.5+/-2.2 mV; during follow-up the telemetered atrial sensitivity thresholds averaged 2.1+/-0.3 mV. Phrenic nerve stimulation at high output pacing (5.0 V/0.5 ms) was observed in three (38%) patients at discharge and in one (13%) patient during follow-up; an intermittent unmeasurable atrial lead impedance at 3 and 6 months follow-up was documented in one (13%) patient. This study confirms the possibility of short- and long-term DDD pacing using a single-pass DDD lead. Since atrial stimulation thresholds are still relatively high compared to conventional dual-lead DDD pacing, further improvements of the atrial electrodes are desirable, enabling lower pacing thresholds and optimizing energy requirements as well as minimizing the potential disadvantage of phrenic nerve stimulation.

VDD(R) pacing: short- and long-term stability of atrial sensing with a single lead system

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that the atrial signal can reliably be sensed for VDD(R) pacing via atrial floating electrodes incorporated in a single-pass lead. However, there remains concern about the long-term stability of atrial sensing and proper VDD function under real-life conditions. This study investigated the long-term reliability of atrial sensing and atrioventricular synchronous pacing using a new single lead VDD(R) pacing system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 20 consecutive patients (ages 71 +/- 14 years) with normal sinus node function and high-degree heart block, a single lead VDD(R) pacemaker (Unity, Intermedics) was implanted. Atrial sensing was studied at implantation, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of follow-up. At implant, the measured P wave amplitude was 2.3 +/- 1.2 mV. By telemetry, the atrial sensing threshold was 0.79 +/- 0.41 mV at discharge, 0.75 +/- 0.43 mV at 1 month, 0.73 +/- 0.43 mV at 3 months, 0.76 +/- 0.41 mV at 6 months, 0.79 +/- 0.41 mV at 12 months, and 0.77 +/- 0.35 mV at 18 months of follow-up (P = NS). Appropriate VDD pacing was assessed by the percentage of correct atrial synchronization (PAS = atrial triggered ventricular paced complexes divided by total number of ventricular paced complexes) during repeated Holters. PAS was 99.99% +/- 0.01% at 1 month, 99.99% +/- 0.02% at 3 months, and 99.98% +/- 0.05% at 12 months of follow-up (P = NS). No atrial oversensing with inappropriate ventricular pacing was observed, neither during isometric arm exercise testing nor spontaneously during Holter monitoring.

CONCLUSION

The long-term stability of atrial sensing with almost 100% correct atrial synchronous tracking and the lack of inappropriate pacing due to atrial oversensing make the new Unity VDD(R) system a highly reliable single lead pacing system. In view of the lower costs and the ease of single lead implantation, this system may offer an interesting alternative to DDD pacemakers in patients with normal sinus node function.

A multicenter evaluation of a single-pass lead VDD pacing system. The Multicenter Study Group

Since June 1985 until April 1989, 237 patients (130 males, 107 females, aged 22 to 95 years, mean 71) with symptomatic AV conduction disturbances and competent sinus node, were implanted with a single-pass lead VDD pacing system in 30 centers and followed-up for at least 6 months. The ventricular pacing lead incorporated two atrial ring 3-cm apart electrodes, positioned within the right atrial cavity without contact with the heart wall, in order to detect the atrial activity, which is differentially processed by the pacemaker. At implant, mean atrial electrogram amplitude, derived from a custom pacemaker system analyzer (PSA) with the same input filter of the pacemaker was 1.7 +/- 0.8 mV (n = 93). In all cases, atrial sensitivity at implant was the default value +/- 0.15 mV. The atrial tracking capability of the pacing systems was assessed within the month and every 6 months after implantation by means of clinical evaluation, resting ECG, 24-hour Holter monitoring and the following tests: exercise stress testing, mental stress, isometric exercise, and nifedipine test. These tests evoke an increase of atrial rate in consequence of metabolic needs or as a reflex response. The criterion used to evaluate the correct operation of the system was the percentage of atrial synchronization. This was defined as the ratio between atrial triggered ventricular paced complexes and all ventricular paced complexes. All monitorings showed a ratio higher than or equal to 98% in a percentage of patients not lower than 95%. Mean follow-up was 385 days (range 183-1,370 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Emotion profiles and quality-of-life of paced patients

More than any other organ of human anatomy, the heart is symbolically charged with emotions. Introducing a foreign body into the heart, even a pacemaker, would be expected to alter, if not damage the most intimate of personal attributes, an individual's personality. Nevertheless, standard measures of emotions, administered before and after pacemaker implantation, revealed an improvement in psychological well-being in an unselected sample of 80 patients, aged 36 to 80 years. Furthermore, these results occurred whether or not patients returned to work.

Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous xamoterol in patients with sinus node dysfunction

The electrophysiologic effects of xamoterol were studied in ten patients with electrophysiologic evidence of sinus node dysfunction. A significant shortening of mean sinus cycle length, maximal corrected sinus-node recovery time, and the mean of the three longest corrected sinus-node recovery times was observed after intravenous administration of 0.1 mg/kg of xamoterol. The atrioventricular (AV) conduction time and the effective and functional refractory periods of the AV node were shortened as the effective refractory period of the atrium. These effects suggest that xamoterol could be tried safely for the treatment of patients with moderate symptoms due to sinus-node disease.

The value of intracardiac electrophysiologic techniques in recurrent syncope of "unknown cause"

We prospectively evaluated and followed-up 45 patients with syncope in whom conventional cardiovascular and neurological investigations did not reveal the cause. All patients underwent electrophysiologic studies to assess the function of the sinus node and the integrity of atrioventricular conduction. These included the ajmaline test and the inducibility of supraventricular or ventricular tachycardia. Seven patients (15.5%) had evidence of sinus node dysfunction, 8 patients (17.7%) had evidence of infra-His atrioventricular block after ajmaline administration and 5 patients (11.1%) had inducible ventricular tachycardia. The remaining 25 patients (55.5%) had non-diagnostic studies. All patients with sinus node dysfunction and inducible infra-His atrioventricular block were asymptomatic during a mean follow-up period of 14.3 +/- 9.5 months after implantation of a permanent pacemaker. Patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (except 1 with poor left ventricular function who died) were likewise asymptomatic while receiving laboratory guided anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. Twenty-five patients with non-diagnostic studies who were treated empirically are alive but the symptoms persist in 14 (56%). Provocative electrophysiological studies are of diagnostic and therapeutic utility in a significant number of patients with recurrent syncope of "unknown cause".

Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope

The effectiveness of an open referral electrocardiographic monitoring service in identifying an arrhythmogenic cause for syncope was evaluated. Over 5 years, 7,364 patients of all ages underwent ambulatory 24-hour electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring using a 2-channel recorder. Of these, 1,512 (20.5%) were referred because of syncope. During monitoring, 15 patients had syncope and 7 of the episodes were related to an arrhythmia, usually ventricular tachycardia. Presyncope was reported in 241 patients, with a related arrhythmia in 24. Thus, an arrhythmia-related symptom that could be diagnostic was present in only 2% of the patients monitored. However, syncope or presyncope without an associated arrhythmia might be considered a negative diagnostic clue and occurred in 225 (15%). High-grade atrioventricular block was present in 15 and ventricular tachycardia in 116; only 6 (5%) reported associated symptoms. An age-related incremental increase in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias was found. In 415 of the 1,004 patients (41%) aged 60 years or more, arrhythmias that are conventionally associated with sinoatrial disease were recorded. Using stringent diagnostic criteria, the sick sinus or tachybradycardia syndrome was present in 33 (3%). Many older patients (70%) were taking drugs that could be arrhythmogenic, hypotensive or both. It is concluded that an open referral 24-hour ambulatory monitoring service rarely results in identifying relevant symptom-related arrhythmias in patients with syncope. It records many asymptomatic arrhythmias that can compound rather than resolve the diagnostic problem in older patients, because the data obtained could lead to unnecessary therapy. An iatrogenic cause for syncope should always be considered.