Value of serial electropharmacological testing in managing patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest

Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review

While mexiletine has been used for over 40 years for prevention of (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias and for myotonia, patient access has recently been critically endangered. Here we aim to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in the treatment of patients with (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias, emphasizing the absolute necessity of its accessibility. Studies were included in this systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42020213434) if the efficacy or safety of mexiletine in any dose was evaluated in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias with or without comparison with alternative treatments (e.g. placebo). A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and in the clinical trial registry databases ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Risk of bias were assessed and tailored to the different study designs. Large heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures prompted a narrative synthesis approach. In total, 221 studies were included reporting on 8970 patients treated with mexiletine. Age ranged from 0 to 88 years. A decrease in ventricular arrhythmias of >50% was observed in 72% of the studies for pre-mature ventricular complexes, 64% for ventricular tachycardia, and 33% for ventricular fibrillation. Electrocardiographic effects of mexiletine were small; only in a subset of patients with primary arrhythmia syndromes, a relative (desired) QTc decrease was reproducibly observed. As for adverse events, gastrointestinal complaints were most frequently observed (33% of the patients). In this systematic review, we present all the currently available knowledge of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias and show that mexiletine is both effective and safe.

Parenteral antiarrhythmics for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

The acute management of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias often includes the use of parenteral antiarrhythmics. There are a number of agents currently available for this purpose. They are used to suppress inducible monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation, they terminate spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia, and prevent ventricular fibrillation in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction. Serious adverse reactions include proarrhythmia, hypotension, severe bradyarrhythmias, and precipitation of congestive heart failure. A comparative evaluation of intravenous antiarrhythmics is difficult due to inherent differences in the choice of agents for study, protocol design, patient population, defined endpoint, and serum drug levels. Likewise, the reported adverse reaction rates vary from 0.4% to 75%. To understand the difficulties in clinical decision-making in this problem area, particularly drug selection, we present here a review of pertinent clinical trials evaluating parenteral drug efficacy and adverse effects.

Determinants of prognosis in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as determined by programmed electrical stimulation

The incidence and prognostic significance of electrically induced ventricular arrhythmias were prospectively assessed in 42 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent 24-hour, long-term electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring and 30 were analyzed by a signal-averaging vectorcardiographic procedure at entry into the study. Their response to programmed electrical stimulation during basic right ventricular pacing was investigated using 1 and 2 ventricular extrastimuli. A monomorphic tachycardia was not induced in any patient. In 36 patients (86%) polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias were initiated. Three or more induced consecutive ventricular premature complexes occurred in 9 patients (21%), nonsustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 2 (4.8%) and ventricular fibrillation in 1 patient (2.4%). There was no association between electrically induced polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias and the degree of impairment of left ventricular function. Furthermore, the incidence of induced ventricular arrhythmias was not related to the Lown grade or to the total number of ventricular premature complexes during Holter monitoring. A late potential was detected by the averaged vectorcardiogram in only 1 of the 30 patients. During follow-up (mean 16 +/- 7 months) 7 patients died, 5 from chronic congestive heart failure and 2 from sudden cardiac death. No patient had an electrically induced arrhythmia of 3 or more ventricular premature complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)