Spatial vectorcardiography in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: correlation with epicardial mapping findings

Localization of cardiac arrhythmias: conventional noninvasive methods

Noninvasive localization of the accessory pathway (AP) in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and of the site of origin of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is reviewed. 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) is the most readily available method for localization of both the AP and the site of VT origin. Many published ECG criteria are introduced. The application of body surface potential mapping, vectorcardiography, nuclear phase imaging, echocardiography, computed tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance, and signal-averaged ECG in the localization of these arrhythmogenic substrates is also described. We believe that ECG is the most sensitive noninvasive method for AP localization as well as being convenient and simple; it may be used as the only noninvasive method for the initial evaluation. The left lateral AP, which occurs with an incidence of more than 40%, could be localized preoperatively by noninvasive methods only. For localization of the site of VT origin, none of the noninvasive methods is accurate enough for guiding the surgical and catheter-mediated ablative therapies so far.

Spatial vectorcardiogram in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction: its utility in identification of patients prone to complete heart block

Spatial vectorcardiography was performed in 28 (22 males, 6 females; age 36-78 years) consecutive cases of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction during sinus rhythm within 24 hours of admission. Orthogonal leads using the corrected Frank lead system were recorded at a paper speed of 100 mm/sec. Qualitative analysis consisted of study of QRS loop inscription in all 3 orthogonal planes. Additional quantitative analysis using the spherical coordinate system was undertaken to measure the magnitude and angular direction (azimuth and elevation angle) of spatial R maximum cardiac vector. During the hospital course, 15 patients developed transient complete heart block and 13 patients did not. The direction of the QRS loop inscription in the 3 planes did not differ between the two groups. The spatial R maximum magnitude and azimuth angle did not differ between the patients who developed complete heart block and those who did not. Values for elevation angle were markedly different between the two groups. The spatial R maximum elevation angle ranged from 0 to -35 degrees and was negative (superiorly directed) in 14 of the 15 patients with complete heart block, whereas it ranged from -10 degrees to +/- 75 degrees and was negative (superiorly directed) in only 2 of the 13 patients without this complication. Thus it appears that negative elevation angle of spatial R maximum cardiac vector in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction may indicate proneness to complete heart block.

Spatial quantitative vectorcardiography in aortic stenosis: correlation with hemodynamic findings

Thirty-four patients with hemodynamically documented valvar aortic stenosis without congestive heart failure were studied by the corrected Frank lead system vectorcardiography, with special emphasis on the angular characteristics of spatial R max to define the severity of the lesion. Spatial QRS-T angle demonstrated a highly significant correlation with the peak left ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.72, P less than 0.001) and a significant correlation with peak transvalvar aortic gradient (r = 0.49, P less than 0.01). Furthermore, all patients with a QRS-T angle of more than 90 degrees had significant aortic stenosis (TVG greater than or equal to 50 mm Hg). The peak left ventricular systolic pressure and transvalvar aortic gradient also demonstrated a significant negative correlation with azimuth angle (r = -0.36 and -0.34, respectively; P less than 0.05) and a positive correlation with spatial R max magnitude (r = 0.38 and 0.41, respectively; P less than 0.05). There was no correlation between elevation angle of spatial R max and left ventricle systolic pressure or transvalvar aortic gradient. Our study indicates that spatial quantitative vectorcardiographic angular characteristics, particularly spatial QRS-T angle, may be a useful adjunct to other noninvasive techniques to assess the severity of valvar aortic stenosis.

Value of the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram for locating the accessory pathway in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The resting 12 lead electrocardiogram and vectocardiogram were reviewed in 47 patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (a) who had pre-excitation on the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram, (b) who had a single anterograde conducting accessory pathway assessed and located during preoperative electrophysiological study and during epicardial mapping at operation, and (c) in whom surgical division of the accessory pathway resulted in loss of pre-excitation. The site of the accessory pathway established during operation was compared with that established by evaluating the polarity of the delta wave and QRS complex on the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram. The electrocardiogram was assessed by the Rosenbaum criteria (Wolff-Parkinson-White type A, left-sided pathway; or type B, right-sided pathway), the Gallagher criteria (atrial pacing resulting in maximal pre-excitation), and the World Health Organisation criteria (a composite of previous studies). The Gallagher and World Health Organisation criteria were derived from patients demonstrating maximal pre-excitation that often required atrial pacing. The present study was designed to determine whether these criteria could be accurately applied to the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram on which the degree of pre-excitation was variable. The Rosenbaum criteria correctly identified a left sided accessory pathway in 26 of 34 patients and a right-sided accessory pathway in nine of 13 patients. The Gallagher and World Health Organisation criteria correctly identified the location in only 15 (32%) of the 47 patients. The resting vectorcardiogram was inaccurate for locating the accessory pathway. Although published criteria are useful for identifying the site of the accessory pathway from an electrocardiogram obtained when rapid atrial pacing is being used to achieve maximal pre-excitation, they are not suitable for identifying the exact site of an accessory pathway from the resting 12 lead electrocardiogram.

When is the vectorcardiogram superior to the scalar electrocardiogram?

The clinical usefulness of the vectorcardiogram is well documented by the numerous reports published in the last 3 decades. It has been found more reliable than the electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of atrial enlargement and right ventricular hypertrophy. It is more sensitive than the electrocardiogram in the recognition of myocardial infarction, especially if the infarction is inferior or if it occurs in the presence of left bundle branch block or left anterior hemiblock. It is helpful in the diagnosis of ventricular pre-excitation and in the localization of the bypass tract. Some repolarization abnormalities are more clearly demonstrated by the vector display. However, some information, such as that on cardiac chamber size and myocardial damage, can also be obtained by other noninvasive tests that are often performed on the same patients. With the increasing awareness of cost-effectiveness of various laboratory procedures in medicine, the vectorcardiogram should no longer be considered a routine cardiac test and should be requested only for a specific clinical purpose. When properly utilized, vectorcardiography should remain a valuable diagnostic as well as teaching tool.