Evolution of P wave characteristics after pacemaker implantation

The effect of VVI pacing on P-wave dispersion in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers

The incidence of atrial fibrillation is higher in patients with VVI pacing mode than DDD pacing mode, but the likely mechanism is not clearly understood. We aimed to evaluate whether short-term VVI pacing increases inhomogeneous atrial conduction by using P-wave dispersion. Forty-seven patients (32 men, 15 women, mean age 54 +/- 13 years) with DDD pacemakers were enrolled in this study. Twelve-lead surface ECGs were obtained in all patients during VDD pacing after an observation period of 1 week. The mode was then changed to VVI and 12 lead surface ECGs were obtained after another 1-week observation period. P-wave durations were calculated in all 12 leads in both VDD and VVI pacing modes. The difference between the maximum and the minimum P-wave duration was defined as the P-wave dispersion (PWD = P(max) - P(min)). P-wave maximum duration (P(max)) calculated in VVI pacing mode was significantly longer than in VDD pacing mode (128 +/- 19 vs 113 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the P-wave minimum durations (80 +/- 13 ms vs 79 +/- 12 ms, P = 0.7) between VVI pacing and VDD pacing. The P-wave dispersion value was higher in the VVI pacing mode than in the VDD pacing mode (48 +/- 8 ms vs 34 +/- 7 ms, P < 0.001). Short-term VVI pacing induces prolongation of P(max) and results in increased P-wave dispersion, which might be responsible for the development of atrial fibrillation more frequently in these patients than in those with the VDD pacing mode.

Sinus and Paced P Wave Duration and Dispersion as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Isolated Sick Sinus Syndrome

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the sinus and the paced P wave duration and dispersion as predictors of AF after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The study included 109 (69 women, mean age 72 +/- 11 years) patients with SSS, 59 with bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome (BTS). A 12-lead ECG was recorded before pacemaker implantation and during high right atrial and septal right atrial pacing at 70 and 100 beats/min. The ECGs were scanned into a computer and analyzed on screen. The patients were treated with AAIR (n = 52) or DDDR pacing. The P wave duration was measured in each lead and mean P wave duration and P wave dispersion were calculated for each ECG. AF during follow-up was defined as: AF in an ECG at or between follow-up visits; an atrial high rate episode with a rate of > or =220 beats/min for > or =5 minutes, atrial sensing with a rate of > or =170 beats/min in > or =5% of total counted beats, mode-switching in >/=5% of total time recorded, or a mode switching episode of > or =5 minutes recorded by the pacemaker telemetry. The ECG parameters were correlated to AF during follow-up. Mean follow-up was 1.5 +/- 0.9 years. None of the ECG parameters differed between patients with AF and patients without AF during follow-up, nor was there any difference between groups after correction for BTS and age. BTS was the strongest predictor of AF during follow-up (P < 0.001). P wave duration and dispersion measured before and during pacemaker implantation were not predictive of AF after pacemaker implantation in patients with isolated SSS.

Acute short-term effect of VVI pacing mode on P wave dispersion in patients with dual chamber pacemakers

The acute or chronic effect of VVI pacing on P wave duration in the same patient with dual chamber pacemaker has not been studied before. Hence, with the purpose of determining whether VVI pacing increases dispersion of atrial refractoriness, we undertook a comparative study with the aid of a simple noninvasive approach, namely P wave dispersion (PWD) determined from surface electrocardiogram in the same patients who were implanted with dual chamber pacemakers. Pmax duration calculated in VVI paced mode was significantly higher than in VDD paced mode (121+/-21 vs. 111+/-17 ms, P=0.021). PWD (33+/-15 vs. 40+/-23 ms, P=0.062) did not demonstrate any significant difference between VDD and VVI paced modes, respectively. In conclusion, the findings of our study suggest that short-term VVI pacing itself does not have any direct effect on PWD in patients with dual chamber pacemakers. Different pacing modes in the long term might be responsible for altering PWD and the occurrence of atrial fibrillation while affecting the autonomic nervous system.

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during atrioventricular pacing with varying intervals: role of atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system

INTRODUCTION

Patients receiving VVI pacemakers have a higher incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) than those receiving DDD pacemakers. However, the mechanism behind the difference is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether atrial electrophysiology and the autonomic nervous system play a role in the occurrence of AF during AV pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 28 patients who had (group I, n = 15) or did not have (group II, n = 13) AF induced by a single extrastimulus during pacing with different AV intervals. Atrial pressure, atrial size, atrial effective refractory periods, and atrial dispersion were evaluated during pacing with different AV intervals. Twenty-four-hour heart rate variability and baroreflex sensitivity also were examined. Atrial pressure, atrial size, effective refractory periods in the right posterolateral atrium and distal coronary sinus, and atrial dispersion increased as the AV interval shortened from 160 to 0 msec. During AV pacing, group I patients had greater minimal (52+/-17 vs 25+/-7 msec; P < 0.005) and maximal (76+/-16 vs 36+/-9 msec; P < 0.005) atrial dispersion than group II patients. The differences in atrial size and atrial dispersion among different AV intervals were greater in patients with AF than in those without AF. Baroreflex sensitivity (6.6+/-1.7 vs 3.9+/-1.0; P < 0.00005), but not heart rate variability, was higher in patients with AF than in those without AF.

CONCLUSION

Abnormal atrial electrophysiology and higher vagal reflex activity can play important roles in the genesis of AF in patients receiving pacemakers.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with permanent VVI pacemakers: risk factors for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Atrial fibrillation (AF) does not only deteriorate the cardiac function and increases the thromboembolic risk but also triggers rapid and irregular ventricular rhythm in patients with atrial synchronous pacing. However, the risk factors for the development of AF in patients with pacemakers are not clearly determined yet. The present study was designed to determine the risk factors for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers.

METHODS

This study included 80 patients (41 sick sinus syndrome, 39 AV block) who were followed for more than 6 months or developed AF regardless of the duration of follow-up after implantation of VVI pacemakers. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not AF developed during follow-up (mean: 25.7 +/- 2.5 months): group A developed AF and group B did not. The underlying arrhythmias, cardiovascular risk factors, left atrial size, characteristics of P wave were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 58.9 +/- 11.4 years and 28 (35%) were male. AF developed in 13 (16.3%) of 80 patients with VVI pacemakers. Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) as an underlying arrhythmia was significantly more frequent in group A than group B (84.6% vs. 44.8%, p < 0.01). P wave width was greater in group A (127.6 +/- 24.8 ms) than in group B (110.7 +/- 17 ms) (p < 0.05). There was, however, no significant difference in cardiovascular risk factors, left atrial size, P wave axis and amplitude between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that sinus node dysfunction and intra-atrial conduction delay may be the risk factors for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers. Further studies are needed to determine how sick sinus syndrome and intra-atrial conduction delay increase the risk for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers.

Predictive value of the P wave at implantation for atrial fibrillation after VVI pacemaker implantation

This study assesses the value of P wave measurements on the surface ECG at implantation, in the prediction of atrial fibrillation in VVI paced patients. From a consecutive series of 320 pacemaker implantations 172 VVI paced patients for symptomatic atrioventricular block (AVB) (n = 126; mean age 69 +/- 14) or sick sinus syndrome (SSS) (n = 56; mean age 68.6 +/- 12) and in sinus rhythm at implantation were used in this study. P wave duration in V1 is correlated with the incidence of atrial fibrillation during 5 years of follow-up. V1 at implantation was significantly longer (114.6 +/- 2.7 msec) in the patients who developed atrial fibrillation than in those who did not (91.9 +/- 2.7 msec) (P < 0.001). Although positive predictive accuracy increases progressively for higher V1 values for AVB and SSS, the negative predictive and diagnostic accuracy of V1 criteria were less in SSS. Application of the Bayes' theorem showed that in SSS the probability to develop atrial fibrillation is 33% for V1 < 110 msec and is for V1 < 90 msec still higher than that reported in DDD paced patients. In the AVB group the probability to develop atrial fibrillation is 8% for V1 < 110 msec and 6% for V1 < 100 msec. It seems, therefore, that atrial stimulation (AAI or DDD) is always indicated in SSS. In AVB with V1 < 100 msec, DDD pacing, if not needed for other indications, apparently does not offer much benefit in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation.

Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing

Nine hundred fifty patients who received three modes of primary pacemaker systems (581 dual-chamber universal [DDD], 84 atrioventricular-sequential ventricular-inhibited [DVI] and 285 ventricular-inhibited [VVI]) over 12 years were studied retrospectively to determine the effect of pacing mode on patient longevity and the subsequent development of chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter. All patients were followed up continuously for 7 to 8 years. Patients were classified according to indication for permanent pacing (sick sinus syndrome or other indication), age at pacemaker implantation (less than or equal to 70 or greater than 70 years) and history of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Fourteen percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation at some time during the study period. Of those, 4% had a DDD pacemaker, 8% had a DVI pacemaker and 19% had a VVI pacemaker. At 7 years, atrial fibrillation was significantly more frequent in the VVI group than in the DDD and DVI groups. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, the incidence rate was even higher in the VVI group but approximately the same in the DDD and DVI groups. Patients in the VVI and DVI groups who had had previous atrial tachyarrhythmia had a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation at 7 years than did those in the DDD group. During the entire period there were 130 deaths in the study group, including 22% of patients with a DDD pacemaker, 38% of those with a DVI pacemaker and 50% of those with a VVI pacemaker. Patient survival at 7 years was lower in the VVI group than in the DDD or DVI groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)