Evaluation of transesophageal atrial pacing stethoscope in adult surgical patients under general anesthesia

Use of transesophageal atrial pacing to provide temporary chronotropic support in a dog undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation

A 14.5-kg, 13-year-old female spayed Cocker spaniel was evaluated because of episodic hind limb weakness. Results of examination were consistent with sick sinus syndrome with intermittent second-degree atrioventricular block. Transesophageal atrial pacing was successful in providing chronotropic support during permanent pacemaker implantation. Transesophageal atrial pacing appears to be a viable option for temporary atrial pacing in dogs with hemodynamically marked bradycardia without significant atrioventricular blockade.

Systematic overview and clinical applications of pacing atrial stress echocardiography

Pacing atrial stress echocardiography (PASE) has been studied over the past 3 decades for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Published studies suggest that PASE may be used as an alternative to exercise or pharmacologic stress imaging. The recent introduction of improved pacing electrodes, together with use of accelerated and shortened pacing protocols and improvements in transthoracic echocardiographic imaging techniques, makes PASE an appealing stress imaging method. A critical analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of PASE shows equivalence with other imaging stress modalities. PASE has been found to be highly feasible and accurate technique that may expedite the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. This review addresses the history, hemodynamics, protocols, accuracy, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of PASE as well as elucidating its place among other stress modalities.

Evaluation of transesophageal atrial pacing in the prone and lateral positions

OBJECTIVE

To develop recommendations for positioning the second-generation pacing esophageal stethoscope for transesophageal atrial pacing in patients positioned prone (P), right lateral decubitus (RLD), and left lateral decubitus (LLD).

DESIGN

Prospective; patients assigned consecutively.

SETTING

Tertiary and university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty (10 in each position group) adult patients undergoing surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

The optimal depths of insertions (DOI) where pacing current threshold was minimal (THmin) were determined first when supine, then after positioning.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Transesophageal atrial pacing was successful in all patients supine and after positioning. The optimal DOI varied from 2 cm less deep to 4 cm deeper in positioned patients compared with supine patients. Patients positioned P required equal or up to 8 mA greater current outputs to achieve transesophageal atrial pacing; LLD and RLD patients may require up to 8 mA greater or lesser current compared with supine patients.

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal atrial pacing can be used safely and effectively in patients positioned P, RLD, and LLD. Recommendations are presented for positioning the pacing esophageal stethoscope. Emphasis is given to using the lowest DOIs and smallest currents to reduce the chance of transesophageal ventricular pacing.

Interaction of an implanted pacemaker with a transesophageal atrial pacemaker: report of a case

We report an interaction of a transesophageal atrial pacemaker (TAP) with a permanently implanted pacemaker in a cardiac patient who had undergone ablative therapy for atrial tachyarrhythmia 5 years earlier. The patient's permanent A-V pacemaker was completely inhibited by the TAP, and there was loss of ventricular contractions and blood pressure. The patient required epicardial A-V pacing to overcome the programmed heart rate of 76 bpm. We describe alternative methods to epicardial pacing. We also recommend close inspection of the chest radiograph, which often can reveal the serial numbers of the implanted pacemaker, as a means of identifying the device's functions and programming.

The feasibility of gastrothoracic ventricular pacing during transesophageal echocardiography

We evaluated whether ventricular pacing is possible using pacing electrodes attached to a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe in 20 patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery. A bipolar pacing lead was fixed with silicone adhesive anteriorly to the TEE probe with the distal electrode 25 mm from the TEE probe tip. The TEE probe was positioned to obtain a transgastric short-axis view of the left ventricle. The distal or proximal electrode on the TEE probe was the cathode; the chest electrode placed at the V5 lead position was the anode. Gastrothoracic ventricular pacing (GVP) was performed at 100 bpm at 30- or 50-ms pulse duration. Transgastric ventricular pacing (TVP) was also attempted using both TEE probe electrodes alternately as cathode/anode. Maximal generator output was 32 mA. GVP with the distal electrode as cathode was successful in 75% and 80% of patients at 30- and 50-ms pulse durations and 23.3+/-5.8 mA and 22.6+/-5.8 mA threshold currents, respectively. However, success rates (20% and 25%, respectively) were significantly lower with the proximal electrode as cathode using the same pulse durations and 14.4+/-5.3 mA and 16.7+/-6.8 mA threshold currents. The TVP success rate was significantly lower than that for GVP. With optimization, this system could become an available technique for intraoperative emergency ventricular pacing.

IMPLICATIONS

Using an endocardial pacing lead attached to a transesophageal echocardiography probe, gastrothoracic ventricular pacing can be performed successfully without complications in 75%-80% of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Simultaneous transesophageal atrial pacing and transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients

OBJECTIVES

To measure the effect of inserting a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe on the pacing threshold of a previously inserted transesophageal pacing stethoscope, and to examine whether an indwelling pacing stethoscope influences the feasibility and image quality of a TEE examination.

DESIGN

Prospective, open study using each patient as his/her own control.

SETTING

Cardiac operating room of an academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty adult patients in sinus rhythm and anesthetized for cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

After induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, a pacing stethoscope was inserted into the esophagus. A 5-MHz TEE probe was inserted to the four-chamber-view position. A full echocardiographic examination was performed, noting image quality, ease of probe manipulation, and loss of pacing. The pacing stethoscope was removed, and image quality assessed again.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The initial mean pacing threshold +/- 1 standard deviation (SD) was 19 +/- 8 mA (range, 10 to 37 mA). After placement of the echocardiography probe, the mean threshold had increased to 24 +/- 8 mA (range, 11 to 40 mA; p < 0.01). Loss of pacing with probe manipulation was noted in 15 of 20 patients (transient in 10 patients, permanent in 5 patients). Problems manipulating the probe because of sticking to the pacing stethoscope were noted in 10 of 20 patients. Poor image quality, resolving after stethoscope removal, was seen in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Placement of a TEE probe results in a modest increase of the transesophageal pacing threshold. An indwelling pacing stethoscope frequently interferes with the ability to perform a full echocardiographic examination, and probe manipulation commonly causes loss of pacing.

Wave recognition and use of the intraoperative unipolar esophageal electrocardiogram

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the automated determination of onset and offset times and amplitudes of all the PQRST waves from simultaneously recorded surface electrocardiogram (SECG) and unipolar esophageal ECG (EsECG). The occurrence of ST segment deviation is also examined.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

30 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

SECG and two-lead unipolar EsECG were recorded after induction of anesthesia and before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The amplitudes of the P and T waves and the ST segment deviation were measured. EsECG had more noise than SECG. Slight movement of the esophageal electrodes occasionally caused substantial changes in the wave amplitudes and ST segment deviation in the unipolar EsECG. The maximum P wave amplitude in EsECG was, on average, 97% greater than the maximum P wave amplitude in SECG, ST segment deviation in EsECG was observed in the absence of ST segment deviation in SECG and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition and measurement of all the PQRST waves can be improved and automated by simultaneous use of EsECG and SECG. The P wave amplitude is greater in EsECG than in SECG, which may faciliate the identification of supraventricular versus ventricular arrhythmias. ST segment deviation in the unipolar EsECG may not be suitable for the routine detection of ischemia.

Positioning the pacing esophageal stethoscope for transesophageal atrial pacing without P-wave recording: implications for transesophageal ventricular pacing

This study determined guidelines for positioning a new pacing esophageal stethoscope (PES) used for transesophageal atrial pacing (TEAP) without having to record esophageal P waves. In 44 patients with heights ranging from 142 cm (4'8") to 193 cm (6'4"), the PES was inserted to a depth of insertion (DOI) of 43 cm. As the PES was withdrawn, TEAP thresholds were determined at every DOI in 1-cm intervals between 43 and 25 cm DOI inclusive. TEAP was accomplished in all 44 patients. The minimum TEAP threshold (mean +/- SD 10.8 +/- 4.0 mA) was < or = 17 mA in 43 of 44 patients (98%). Except for one patient, TEAP could be accomplished over a 9- to 19-cm (mean +/- SD, 13.7 +/- 2.8 cm) wide range of DOI. Unintentional transesophageal ventricular pacing (TEVP) occurred in 15 of 44 (34%) of patients. TEVP occurred over a 1- to 7-cm (mean +/- SD, 3.7 +/- 1.7 cm) wide range of DOI; the minimum TEVP threshold averaged 30.4 +/- 6.4 mA. TEAP was consistently accomplished at DOIs more proximal than where TEVP could occur and with lower currents than that required for TEVP. An insertion depth, in centimeters, equal to half of the patient's height, in inches, produced successful TEAP in all 44 patients; the minimum TEAP threshold occurred on average at a DOI 2.6 cm more proximal. Asynchronous TEVP can be avoided by using lower currents at shallow DOIs.

The effect of nasal or oral gastric tubes on transesophageal atrial pacing thresholds

This study was performed to evaluate whether the presence of either nasal or oral gastric tubes (GTs) would affect the ability to accomplish transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP). After endotracheal intubation, pacing esophageal stethoscopes were placed and the TAP thresholds were measured in 20 patients. With the PES fixed in position, GTs were inserted and pacing thresholds were remeasured. TAP was accomplished in all patients pre- and postinsertion. The mean +/- SD, range, and median TAP thresholds (mA) were 13.7 +/- 5.8, 7-25, and 12 preinsertion and 13.9 +/- 5.2, 5.5-25, and 13 postinsertion. The preinsertion-postinsertion differences ranged from -6 to 5 mA with a mean of the difference of -0.2 mA (95% confidence interval, -1.61-1.21 mA). No significant difference between the pre- and postinsertion groups was detected by the paired t-test, P = 0.77. In summary, the presence of GTs does not significantly affect TAP thresholds. Attempts to achieve TAP are expected to be successful in patients with either a nasal or oral GT in place.

Transesophageal atrial pacing for intraoperative sinus bradycardia or AV junctional rhythm: feasibility as prophylaxis in 200 anesthetized adults and hemodynamic effects of treatment

Sinus bradycardia (SB) or atrioventricular junctional rhythm (AVJR) may produce circulatory insufficiency in anesthetized surgical patients, especially those with cardiovascular disease. Chronotropic drugs have been the preferred initial treatment, except when epicardial pacing is available. Alternative methods include transvenous or transcutaneous pacing. Drugs may be ineffective or have undesirable effects. Transvenous pacing is time consuming and risky, and transcutaneous pacing is not universally applicable or effective. Transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) lacks these disadvantages, but unavailability of equipment and unfamiliarity with the method has discouraged widespread use. Feasibility of TAP as prophylaxis for intraoperative SB or AVJR was tested with approved or investigational devices in 200 anesthetized surgical patients, not necessarily with cardiovascular disease or having cardiac surgery. Of these, 84 later had incidental SB < or = 60 beats/min, and 23 of these 84 had SB < or = 50 beats/min. Thirteen patients had AVJR (72 +/- 4 beats/min; mean +/- SEM). TAP at 80 beats/min for SB, or at a rate sufficient to overdrive AVJR, was effective initial treatment in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)