A technique utilizing a steerable hydrophilic guidewire for permanent pacemaker implantation

Simplified cardiac resynchronization implantation technique involving right access and a triple-guide/single introducer approach

BACKGROUND

Biventricular pacing is useful for patients with congestive heart failure but has the disadvantage of being a long, user-dependent, highly technical procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to simplify the procedure. The simplified technique consists of sinus (CS) venography prior to implantation, direct coronary access for the left ventricular (LV) lead without use of a left-heart delivery system, and triple-guide/one introducer cephalic vein access as the first approach in patients presenting in sinus rhythm.

METHODS

A cephalic cutdown was performed, and a steerable hydrophilic guidewire was introduced in the cephalic vein. A 9Fr introducer was advanced over the guidewire, and two other guides were inserted through the introducer. This technique allowed for insertion of a right ventricular lead, an LV lead, and an atrial lead.

RESULTS

One hundred three patients were evaluated from January 2002 to September 2004. Four implants failed (3.9%). The 7Fr LV lead was successfully placed in 99 of 103 patients (96.1%) directly via the 9Fr introducer, without use of a dedicated left-heart delivery system. The final position was lateral in 59 patients, posterolateral in 33, posterior in 4, and anterolateral in 3. Sixty patients were in sinus rhythm, 13 were in atrial fibrillation, and 26 had a previous pacemaker (n = 21) or defibrillator (n = 5). Triple cephalic vein access was possible in 48 of the patients in sinus rhythm (80%). Procedure parameters were as follows: LV threshold 0.9 +/- 0.7 V, LV wave amplitude 15 +/- 8 mV, LV impedance 790 +/- 232 Omega, skin-to-skin procedure time 76 +/- 33 minutes, and fluoroscopy time 23 +/- 19 minutes. Ten complications (10.1%) occurred: 7 lead dislodgments (3 within 48 hours and 4 within 6 months) requiring repositioning (7.1%), 1 subacute local infection requiring explantation (1%), 1 phrenic nerve stimulation (1%), and 1 pneumothorax (1%). The long-term success of biventricular pacing was 93.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation can be simplified with the combined use of a steerable hydrophilic guidewire, three guides, and one introducer via a right cephalic vein, without use of a left-heart delivery system. The triple cephalic vein approach yields an 80% implant success rate for patients in sinus rhythm. The long-term success of biventricular pacing was 93.1%.

Permanent Pacing Lead Insertion Through the Cephalic Vein Using an Hydrophilic Guidewire

The cephalic vein (CV) should be preferred to the subclavian vein for the insertion of permanent pacing leads because of better results. Unfortunately, the direct lead introduction using the standard CV cutdown is often unsuccessful. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steerable hydrophilic guidewire (HGW) for lead insertion through the CV. An HGW was successfully introduced through the cephalic vein and into the subclavian vein. Over a 6-month period, 115 consecutive patients underwent pacemaker implantation. In nine (7.8%) patients, the cephalic vein did not allow lead or guidewire introduction. The direct introduction of the leads through the CV was successful in 55 (51.9%) of 106 patients. In 14 (12.2%) additional patients, a lead was inserted through the CV using a standard guidewire. The use of an HGW and of a split introducer allowed successful insertion of at least one lead in 35 (30.4%) additional patients. Overall, the HGW was successful in 35 (94.6%) of 37 of patients in which the technique was attempted. The CV approach was successful in 104 (90.4%) of 115 patients. In conclusion, the use of an HGW allows the insertion of a pacing lead through the CV in the great majority of patients in whom direct introduction and the use of a standard guidewire had failed. The technique significantly improves the success rate of the CV approach and may help to improve the acute and long-term results of permanent cardiac pacing.

Safe and effective placement of two bipolar silicone leads in the cephalic vein using a hydrophilic guidewire and a split introducer

The cephalic vein (CV) is preferable to the subclavian vein for implanting permanent pacing leads because of fewer complications. Unfortunately, this access is unusable in a substantial number of patients. This prospective study evaluates a technique to increase CV access for the placement of two silicone bipolar leads used in DDD pulse generator implants. A standard cephalic cutdown was performed under local anesthesia and a hydrophilic guidewire (HGW) threaded in the CV. The first (ventricular) bipolar lead was then introduced and positioned. When possible, introduction of the second (atrial) lead followed the same direct access. A failed introduction led to a modified procedure (MP) relying on a "split" introducer (8-9 Fr Plastimed) advanced with a circular motion over the HGW, then removal of the dilator, removal of the HGW, insertion of the pacing lead into the sheath with placement in the right atrium, followed by sheath withdrawal. Over an 18-month period, 90 consecutive patients had DDD pacemakers implanted. The CV was accessible in 76 (84.5%) of 90 patients and the direct introduction of the ventricular lead was obtained in 74 (97.4%) of these. Atrialization proceeded as follows: direct access CV in 14 (18%) of 76 patients, MP access in 54 (71%) of 76 patients, and MP failure in 8 (11%) of 76 patients. Overall, this approach allowed cephalic dual insertion in 68 (89%) of 76 patients. In conclusion, the modified procedure presented in this study allows a dual catheterization with bipolar leads in 89% of patients when a CV is available. This significantly improves the success rate for dual bipolar lead implants in this configuration.