Comparison of epicardial and endocardial programmed stimulation in patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Role of abnormal repolarization in the mechanism of cardiac arrhythmia

In cardiac patients, life-threatening tachyarrhythmia is often precipitated by abnormal changes in ventricular repolarization and refractoriness. Repolarization abnormalities typically evolve as a consequence of impaired function of outward K⁺ currents in cardiac myocytes, which may be caused by genetic defects or result from various acquired pathophysiological conditions, including electrical remodelling in cardiac disease, ion channel modulation by clinically used pharmacological agents, and systemic electrolyte disorders seen in heart failure, such as hypokalaemia. Cardiac electrical instability attributed to abnormal repolarization relies on the complex interplay between a provocative arrhythmic trigger and vulnerable arrhythmic substrate, with a central role played by the excessive prolongation of ventricular action potential duration, impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ handling, and slowed impulse conduction. This review outlines the electrical activity of ventricular myocytes in normal conditions and cardiac disease, describes classical electrophysiological mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia, and provides an update on repolarization-related surrogates currently used to assess arrhythmic propensity, including spatial dispersion of repolarization, activation-repolarization coupling, electrical restitution, TRIaD (triangulation, reverse use dependence, instability, and dispersion), and the electromechanical window. This is followed by a discussion of the mechanisms that account for the dependence of arrhythmic vulnerability on the location of the ventricular pacing site. Finally, the review clarifies the electrophysiological basis for cardiac arrhythmia produced by hypokalaemia, and gives insight into the clinical importance and pathophysiology of drug-induced arrhythmia, with particular focus on class Ia (quinidine, procainamide) and Ic (flecainide) Na⁺ channel blockers, and class III antiarrhythmic agents that block the delayed rectifier K⁺ channel (dofetilide).

Electrophysiological determinants of arrhythmic susceptibility upon endocardial and epicardial pacing in guinea-pig heart

AIM

Endocardial pacing instituted to treat symptomatic bradycardia may nevertheless promote tachyarrhythmia in some pacemaker-implanted patients. We sought to determine the contributing electrophysiological mechanisms.

METHODS

Left ventricular (LV) monophasic action potential duration (APD(90)) and effective refractory periods were determined in perfused guinea-pig hearts along with volume-conducted ECG recordings during epicardial and endocardial stimulations.

RESULTS

Consistent with electrotonic modulation of repolarization, APD(90) at a given (either epicardial or endocardial) recording site tended to be longer while pacing from the ipsilateral LV site as compared to stimulations applied at the opposite side of ventricular wall. As a result, the intrinsic transmural repolarization gradient was amplified during endocardial pacing while being significantly reduced upon epicardial stimulations. The maximum slope of APD(90) restitution was greater upon endocardial than epicardial pacing. The excitability was found to recur at earlier repolarization time point at endocardium than epicardium, thereby contributing to increased endocardial critical intervals for re-excitation. Premature extrasystolic beats could have been elicited at shorter coupling stimulation intervals and propagated with greater transmural conduction delay upon endocardial than epicardial stimulations. Endocardial site exhibited lower ventricular fibrillation thresholds and greater inducibility of tachyarrhythmia upon extrasystolic stimulations as compared to epicardium.

CONCLUSION

Arrhythmic susceptibility in guinea-pig heart is greater during endocardial than epicardial pacing because of greater transmural APD(90) dispersion, steeper electrical restitution slopes, greater critical intervals for LV re-excitation and slower transmural conduction of the earliest premature ectopic beats. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these effects may contribute to proarrhythmia in paced human patients.

Na+ channel distribution and electrophysiological heterogeneities in guinea pig ventricular wall

We sought to explore the distribution pattern of Na+ channels across ventricular wall, and to determine its functional correlates, in the guinea pig heart. Voltage-dependent Na+ channel (Nav) protein expression levels were measured in transmural samples of ventricular tissue by Western blotting. Isolated, perfused heart preparations were used to record monophasic action potentials and volume-conducted ECG, and to measure effective refractory periods (ERPs) and pacing thresholds, in order to assess excitability, electrical restitution kinetics, and susceptibility to stimulation-evoked tachyarrhythmias at epicardial and endocardial stimulation sites. In both ventricular chambers, Nav protein expression was higher at endocardium than epicardium, with midmyocardial layers showing intermediate expression levels. Endocardial stimulation sites showed higher excitability, as evidenced by lower pacing thresholds during regular stimulation and downward displacement of the strength-interval curve reconstructed after extrasystolic stimulation compared with epicardium. ERP restitution assessed over a wide range of pacing rates showed greater maximal slope and faster kinetics at endocardial than epicardial stimulation sites. Flecainide, a Na+ channel blocker, reduced the maximal ERP restitution slope, slowed restitution kinetics, and eliminated epicardial-to-endocardial difference in dynamics of electrical restitution. Greater excitability and steeper electrical restitution have been associated with greater arrhythmic susceptibility of endocardium than epicardium, as assessed by measuring ventricular fibrillation threshold, inducibility of tachyarrhythmias by rapid cardiac pacing, and the magnitude of stimulation-evoked repolarization alternans. In conclusion, higher Na+ channel expression levels may contribute to greater excitability, steeper electrical restitution slopes and faster restitution kinetics, and greater susceptibility to stimulation-evoked tachyarrhythmias at endocardium than epicardium in the guinea pig heart.