The Dotter retriever and pigtail catheter: efficacy in extraction of chronic transvenous pacemaker leads

Percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads

Background. Widespread use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has inevitably increased the need for lead revision/replacement. We report our experience in percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Methods. Thirty-six patients admitted to our centre from September 2005 through October 2012 for percutaneous lead extraction were included. Lead removal was attempted using Spectranetics traction-type system (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado, CO, USA) and VascoExtor countertraction-type system (Vascomed GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany). Results. Lead extraction was attempted in 59 leads from 36 patients (27 men), mean ± SD age 61 ± 5 years, with permanent pacemaker (n = 25), defibrillator (n = 8), or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n = 3) with a mean ± SD implant duration of 50 ± 23 months. The indications for lead removal included pocket infection (n = 23), endocarditis (n = 2), and ventricular (n = 10) and atrial lead dysfunction (n = 1). Traction device was used for 33 leads and countertraction device for 26 leads. Mean ± SD fluoroscopy time was 4 ± 2 minutes/lead for leads implanted <48 months (n = 38) and 7 ± 3 minutes/lead for leads implanted >48 months (n = 21), P = 0.03. Complete procedural success rate was 91.7% and clinical procedural success rate was 100%, while lead procedural success rate was 95%. Conclusions. In conclusion, percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads using dedicated removal tools is both feasible and safe.

Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram

OBJECTIVES

We describe the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of percutaneous lead extraction in patients at a tertiary care center who had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram.

BACKGROUND

Infection in the presence of intracardiac devices is a problem of considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with intracardiac vegetations are at high risk for complications related to extraction and protracted clinical courses. Historically, lead extraction in this cohort has been managed by surgical thoracotomy.

METHODS

We analyzed percutaneous lead extractions performed from January 1991 to September 2007 in infected patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac vegetations, followed by a descriptive and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 984 patients underwent extraction of 1,838 leads; local or systemic infection occurred in 480 patients. One hundred patients had intracardiac vegetations identified by transesophageal echocardiogram, and all underwent percutaneous lead extraction (215 leads). Mean age was 67 years. Median extraction time was 3 min per lead; median implant duration was 34 months. During the index hospitalization, a new device was implanted in 54 patients at a median of 7 days after extraction. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 10%; no deaths were related directly to the extraction procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with intracardiac vegetations identified on transesophageal echocardiogram can safely undergo complete device extraction using standard percutaneous lead extraction techniques. Permanent devices can safely be reimplanted provided blood cultures remain sterile. The presence of intracardiac vegetations identifies a subset of patients at increased risk for complications and early mortality from systemic infection despite device extraction and appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Recommendations for extraction of chronically implanted transvenous pacing and defibrillator leads: indications, facilities, training. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology Lead Extraction Conference Faculty

The procedure of lead removal has recently matured into a definable, teachable art with its own specific tools and techniques. It is now time to recognize and formalize the practice of lead removal according to the current methods of medicine and the health care industry. In addition, since at this time the only prospective scientific study of lead extraction is the PLEXES trial, we suggest that studies relating to the techniques of and indications for lead extraction be designed. Recommendations for a common set of definitions, for a framework of training and reviewing physicians in the art, for general methods of reimbursement, and for consistency among clinical trials have been made. Implementation of these recommendations will require additional effort and cooperation from practicing physicians, medical societies, hospital administrations, and industry.

Feasibility, safety, and determinants of extraction time of percutaneous extraction of endocardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads by intravascular countertraction method

Previous studies of the removal of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads have been restricted to case reports or small series. In this report, we describe our experience in ICD lead extraction by intravascular countertraction method using Cook's extraction kit. A total of 47 high-voltage (HV) leads, 3 rate sensing (S) leads, and 2 subcutaneous arrays were removed from 42 patients (33 men, 9 women; mean age 59 years [range 14 to 81]). One HV superior vena cava (SVC) lead and 11 HV right ventricular (RV) leads were explanted by manual traction only and defined in the "lead removal" category. One S lead was removed using a femoral venous approach. The remaining 37 leads were explanted by SVC approach using extraction sheaths and defined in the "lead extraction" category. Twenty leads were extracted for "infectious" (group A) and 17 leads for "noninfectious" (group B) etiologies for which extraction times of 27.0+/-18.0 and 27.0+/-15.0 minutes (mean+/-SD), respectively, were not different. Although extraction time, 34.0+/-11.0 minutes, for leads implanted for >48 months was longer than 23.0+/-16.0, 28.0+/-18.0, and 24.0+/-14.0 minutes, for leads with implant durations of 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively, such differences were not statistically significant. The extraction time, however, was directly related to the degree of fibrosis around the lead, 39.0+/-15.0 minutes for leads with severe fibrosis compared with 13.0+/-6.0 minutes for the leads with mild fibrosis (p<0.001). Patient's age, sex, or history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery did not significantly affect extraction time. All except the initial 2 lead extractions were performed in the electrophysiology laboratory. No mortality or serious complications associated with the procedure using these methods were observed.

Current concepts in extraction of transvenous pacing and ICD leads

Extraction of chronically implanted pacing leads involves a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of lead maturation and the problems that may occur. It also requires specific knowledge of lead construction and the idiosyncrasies of individual lead models. Though we have evolved to use a standardized approach to lead extraction, each patient and lead removal is unique. The operator must be ready to adapt the technique and tools used to the situation at hand. The more experience and the more tools available to the operator, the more likely that there will be a safe and successful outcome to the procedure. Preparation for disaster is mandatory, such that when a complication does occur, one may respond quickly and therefore salvage the patient.

Percutaneous transcatheter repositioning of displaced permanent pacemaker lead

In three patients, two with a pacemaker and one with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, hospitalized for dislodgement of a passive fixation J-shaped atrial lead, a percutaneous transcatheter repositioning was successfully attempted thus avoiding surgical revision. This procedure, performed through the femoral vein, is easy and safe. The stability of the lead position and of the pacing and sensing parameters was confirmed 1 and 6 months after the transcatheter repositioning.

Percutaneous extraction of transvenous defibrillator leads using the VascoExtor pacing lead removal system

In the implantable cardioverter defibrillator era the necessity for lead removal is not negligible. A specially designed extraction lead system for percutaneous removal of such leads is lacking, in contrast to the existing pacing lead extraction systems. We report the successful percutaneous extraction of four implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads in three patients because of lead malfunction using a novel pacemaker lead extraction system, the VascoExtor (VascoMed) system. Three leads were successfully removed in two patients using traction with special locking stylets from the superior approach. One lead was removed using the system's additional extraction tools through the femoral approach. There were no complications. This preliminary experience shows that the VascoExtor (VascoMed) pacemaker lead extraction system can also be used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction safely and effectively. In addition to the locking stylets, adjunct percutaneous extraction tools may be needed in some cases.

Single center experience with femoral extraction of permanent endocardial pacing leads

Between March 1995 and June 1997, 128 leads were extracted from the hearts of 28 women and 50 men, 69 +/- 15 years of age (mean +/- SD, range 22-92 years). The indications for the procedure were: Accufix leads in 18 patients (14%), dysfunction or incompatibility with ICD in 16 (12%), endocarditis on the lead in 41 (32%), pulse generator pocket infection in 28 (22%), and pulse generator and/or lead erosion in 25 patients (19%). The extraction was performed with a snare (lasso), via a femoral vein as a first approach in 116 leads, and as an alternate approach, after extraction from the original site of implantation had failed, in 12 leads. The leads had been implanted for 62 +/- 48 months (range 1-205 months). A Cook sheath was used in 7, and a femoral approach traction in 20 instances. Of the 128 leads, 122 (95%) were completely extracted, and 2 (2%) were partially extracted (the distal electrode remaining attached to the myocardium), and 4 (3%) could not be removed. Four complications occurred: 2 tears of the tricuspid valve without clinical consequences, one separation of the lead's distal electrode which migrated into the hypogastric vein, and one hemorrhage at the femoral puncture site. There was no death or serious complication caused by lead extraction in this series.

Undertreatment and overtreatment of patients with infected antiarrhythmic implantable devices

BACKGROUND

Infection of implantable defibrillators or pacemakers is a serious complication, reported with increasing frequency probably because of an increase in the total number of devices implanted due to a change in trends in the treatment of arrhythmias. This review is aimed to provide guidelines on how to deal with these infections and which method is most likely to be successful.

METHODS

This is a review of 38 patients with infected antiarrhythmic implantable devices under three different plans of therapy. There were 17 implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 21 pacemakers. In 27, infection occurred after primary implantation (15 pacers, 12 implantable cardioverter defibrillators), and in 11 after replacement (six pacers, five implantable cardioverter defibrillators). Three therapeutic plans were identified. Group I (n = 12) received intravenous antibiotics without removal of the antiarrhythmic implantable device, but with relocation to a different area or plane, and with or without the use of a topical irrigating-suction system. Group II (n = 19) had complete removal of the system, 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, and implantation of a new unit followed by 10 more days of antibiotics. Group III (n = 7) underwent complete removal, 6 weeks of antibiotics, implantation of a new unit, and another 6 or more weeks of antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Failure occurred in 100% of cases in group I. Groups II and III had complete clearing of infection and successful reimplantation of new systems with no recurring infections. Follow-up was 8 months to 5 years. Two deaths occurred, both in group I. Hospitalization for groups I and III was 104 days and 65 days, respectively, versus 22 days for group II. No deaths occurred in group II or III.

CONCLUSIONS

With an infected antiarrhythmic implantable device, immediate removal of the entire unit is recommended, followed by 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics, implantation of a new system, and 10 more days of postoperative antibiotics. This regimen is sufficient to cure the problem. No attempts should be made to save an infected system from removal because it endangers the patient's life, prolongs hospitalization, increases costs, and most likely will fail.

Extraction of permanent pacing leads: there are still controversies

Images

Evaluation and extraction of the Accufix atrial J lead

The Accufix (Telectronics Pacing Systems, Englewood, Colo.) atrial active fixation pacemaker lead has a preformed J stiff retention wire that can fracture and erode through the atrium. We screened 85 patients with digital fluoroscopy and detected 18 (21%) lead fractures. Fourteen (16%) leads were successfully extracted by percutaneous techniques. The mean time for extraction and placement of a new atrial lead was 109 +/- 53 min, and a lead > 1 year old but not in the presence of a fracture was associated with a significantly longer extraction time. There were two extraction complications. One patient had a fever following the extraction, and one patient had a focal sensory deficit 1 week after the extraction probably caused by a paradoxical embolus. Standard percutaneous extraction tools can be used for successful and safe removal of a fractured Accufix lead.

Three-year experience with a stylet for lead extraction: a multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The extraction of chronically implanted and infected pacemaker and defibrillator leads is an important issue. This article describes the experience gathered between 1990 and 1994 by seven European centers regarding a locking stylet that is uniformly applicable for a wide variety of internal pacing coil diameters. This interventional locking stylet for lead extraction has an outer diameter of 0.4 mm (0.016 inches). The stylet consists of a hollow shaft in which an inner traction wire is embedded. At the tip of the inner traction wire an anchoring mechanism, which can be opened by retraction, is applied. Removal attempts were made for 150 leads, 110 in ventricular and 40 in atrial positions.

RESULTS

Complete removal was possible in 122 cases (81%). Partial removal was possible in 18 cases (12%). Failure to remove the lead with the extraction stylet was experienced in 10 cases (7%). In seven patients, the leads were removed by cardiothoracic surgery; 3 defective leads were left in place. There were no serious complications associated with the procedure. None of the patients died.

CONCLUSION

The experience with this extraction stylet for lead removal has shown good results. Despite a low complication rate thus far, each case for lead removal should be judged on the individual basis of benefit-to-risk ratio.

Removal of endocardial defibrillation leads

Two patients, each with an endocardial defibrillation lead system (Endotak O62), required lead removal; one because of chronic lead infection and the second because of spurious shocks caused by lead insulation damage. Neither lead could be removed by simple traction. The defective lead was removed by a combination of catheterization techniques including a steerable ablation catheter and traction, both under general anesthesia. The lead with the insulation defect was rapidly removed with a locking stylet, suggesting that endocardial lead defibrillating leads can be removed similarly to pacemaker leads, thus avoid thoracotomy.

Catheter aided repositioning of a displaced permanent pacemaker lead

A 91-year-old woman, who had a pacemaker implanted in 1977, underwent replacement of a pulse generator and lead in 1995 because of recurrent syncope. The new lead dislodged the next day and migrated to the pulmonary artery. Because of her dependence on continued pacing, repeated resuscitation was required. Considering her advanced age and the impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on her general condition, we attempted catheter aided repositioning of the pacemaker lead. The procedure was technically successful; lead position was stable and optimal pacing parameters were attained. She was discharged in good condition.