Left heart function during right heart pacing

Intra- and interatrial conduction delay: implications for cardiac pacing

Atrial conduction disorders are frequent in elderly subjects and/or those with structural heart diseases, mainly mitral valve disease, hyperthrophic cardiomyopathies, and hypertension. The resultant electrophysiological and electromechanical abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias, either atrial fibrillation, typical or atypical flutter or other forms of atrial tachycardias. Such an association is not fortuitous because intra- and interatrial conduction abnormalities delays disrupt (spatial and temporal dispersion) electrical activation, thus promoting the initiation and perpetuation of reentrant circuits. Preventive therapeutic interventions induce variable, sometimes paradoxical effects as with the proarrhythmic effect of class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Similarly, atrial pacing may promote proarrhythmias or an antiarrhythmic effect according to the pacing site(s) and mode. Multisite atrial pacing was conceived to correct, as much as possible, abnormal activation induced by spontaneous intra- or interatrial conduction disorders or by single site atrial pacing, which are situations responsible for commonly refractory arrhythmias. Atrial electrical resynchronization can also be used to correct mechanical abnormalities like left heart AV dyssynchrony resulting from intraatrial conduction delays.

Automatic Beat-to-Beat Left Heart AV Normalization:. Is It Possible?

Programming the right heart AV interval to a normal value may cause a nonphysiological left heart AV due to interatrial and interventricular conduction delays, thus affecting cardiac performance. Since AV normalization at rest and exercise may be invalidated by pacing or sensing (mode) changes, the aim of this study was to (1) study the feasibility of a mode independent pacemaker (PM) algorithm for automatic beat-to-beat left AV normalization, (2) establish normal values for the time between mitral flow A wave (Af) and ventricular activation (Va), the AfVa interval, the mechanical surrogate of left AV, and (C) determine the range of values of the interatrial electromechanical delays (IAEMDs) and the effect of RA pacing. To pace with the proper right AV, the previously reported RV-paced interventricular electromechanical delay and the interatrial electromechanical delay, either P-sensed (IAEMDs) or atrial-paced (IAEMDp) are required inputs. Data were collected during diagnostic echo Doppler studies in 84 subjects divided in three groups: (1) control with narrow QRS and no structural heart disease (n = 33, age 50 +/- 21 years, 42% men); (2) patients in sinus rhythm with diverse cardiac pathologies except LBBB (n = 39, age 69 +/- 14 years, 56% men), and (3) DDD-paced patients (n = 12, mean age 71 +/- 6 years). Normal values of AfVa were established from the control group, while IAEMDs and IAEMDp and active atrial flow time (A-peak), in all subjects. The algorithm was tested by computer simulation under all possible modes with the following calculation: RAV = N + IAEMD - IVD, where RAV is the right AV, N is the desired normal AfVa value, IAEMD is either P-sensed or A-paced, and IVD is close to zero for intrinsic narrow QRS and biventricular pacing, or 79 ms for RV pacing. The results demonstrated (1) Normal (controls) AfVa: 85 +/- 15 ms (range 52-110 ms); (2) IAEMDs (All): 84 +/- 16 ms; (3) atrial pacing prolonged IAEMDs by 57 +/- 18 ms (from 93 +/- 15 to 150 +/- 25 ms, P < 0.0001); and (4) Computer simulation of rate and mode changes validated the normalization algorithm. An automatic, beat-to-beat left AV normalization algorithm to preserve a normal AfVa without a hemodynamic sensor is feasible. The normal value of AfVa is 85 +/- 15 ms.

Cardiac pacing. A review

Pacing is a field of rapid clinical progress and technologic advances. Clinical progress in the 1990s included the refinement of indications for pacing as well as the use of pacemakers for new, nonbradycardiac indications, such as the treatment of cardiomyopathies and CHF and the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Important published data and studies in progress are shedding new light on issues of pacing mode selection, and they may influence future practice significantly. Important technologic advances include development of new rate-adaptive sensors and sensor combinations and the evolution of pacemakers into sophisticated diagnostic devices with the capability to store data and ECGs. Automatic algorithms monitor the patient for appropriate capture, sensing, battery status, and lead impedance, providing better patient safety and pacemaker longevity.

Multisite or alternate site pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation

The role of permanent pacing in preventing atrial fibrillation in patients at risk for this arrhythmia is a relatively new concept. Existing retrospective studies support the superiority of atrial-based pacing over ventricular stimulation with respect to lowering the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Constant rate overdrive pacing has been shown to reverse abnormalities in conduction or refractoriness that are dependent on bradycardia and suppress atrial ectopic complexes. Multisite (biatrial and dual right atrial) pacing is a promising concept. The antiarrhythmic mechanism is not well understood, but atrial resynchronization and reduction of site-dependent conduction delay of atrial premature complexes may be relevant. The cardiology community awaits additional data from prospective trials that are currently underway.

What range of programmable AV delays is necessary in antibradycardia DDD stimulation?

DDD pacemakers differ considerably in device specific extents of AV delay (AVD) programmability. To demonstrate the requirements of a mean DDD pacemaker patient population optimal AVDs in 200 DDD pacemaker patients (age 8 to 91 years) were estimated by left atrial electrography. The results should help to define an AVD programmability standard. Left atrial electrograms were recorded via a bipolar filtered esophageal lead. The method aims on adjusting the left atrial electrogram to 70 ms prior to the ventricular spike, both during VDD and DDD operation of the pacemaker. In atrial sensed stimulation the optimal AVD varied from 40 to 205 ms (100.5 +/- 24.5 ms) and in atrial paced stimulation from 85 to 245 ms (169.1 +/- 24.5 ms). The difference of the mean values is statistically significant (p < 0.001). The difference between both values in the individual patient, the individual AVD correction time, varied from 0 to 170 ms (68.7 +/- 26.6 ms). Thus, from our findings requirements on AV delay programmability standard can be derived: AVDs (1) should have a range from 40 to 250 ms, (2) should be independently programmable during atrial sensed and atrial paced operation, and (3) should provide as nominal settings 100 ms for atrial sensed and 170 ms for atrial paced stimulation.

The importance of the left atrioventricular interval during atrioventricular sequential pacing

During atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing from the right heart, the interval between the left atrium and ventricle may vary from the programmed AV interval depending on the position of the atrial and ventricular electrodes and interatrial and interventricular conduction. The aim of this study was to determine the hemodynamic effects of altering the left AV interval while keeping the programmed AV interval constant. Four male and 17 female patients, aged 49 +/- 15 years were studied. The left AV interval was measured by a catheter in the coronary sinus. Stroke volume and mitral flow were measured by simultaneous echo Doppler during AV sequential pacing from the right atrial appendage and right ventricular apex at programmed AV intervals of 100, 60, and 6 ms. The atrial catheter was then positioned on the atrial septum and the measurements repeated. With the atrial catheter in the right atrial appendage, interatrial activation time (118 +/- 20 ms) was similar to interventricular activation time (125 +/- 21 ms) and the left AV interval was almost identical to the programmed right AV interval. There was a significant correlation between interatrial and interventricular activation times (r = 0.8; P < 0.001). Positioning the atrial electrode on the septum decreased interatrial activation time by 39 +/- 12 ms and increased the left AV interval by a similar amount. At a programmed AV interval of 60 ms, the left AV interval increased from 67 +/- 15 ms to 105 +/- 17 ms after the atrial catheter was repositioned from the appendage to the septum (P < 0.001). Compared to pacing from the right atrial appendage, atrial septal pacing increased mitral A wave velocity integral (2.8 +/- 1.4 vs 4.4 +/- 1.7 cm at a programmed AV interval of 60 ms, P < 0.01), decreased E wave velocity integral (8.1 +/- 2.2 vs 6.1 +/- 2.4 cm, P < 0.001) but did not alter stroke volume (44.8 +/- 10.6 vs 44.9 +/- 10.1 mL). In contrast, a 40 ms decrease in the programmed right AV interval from 100 to 60 ms decreased stroke volume from 48.0 +/- 10.0 to 44.9 +/- 10.2 mL (P < 0.001). There was a strong relationship between interatrial and interventricular conduction so that patients with prolonged interatrial conduction still had equivalent left and right AV intervals during atrioventricular sequential pacing from the right atrial appendage and right ventricular apex. Positioning the atrial electrode on the septum decreases interatrial activation time and increases the left AV interval by about 40 ms but has minimal hemodynamic effect in patients without heart failure.

Pacing strategies to prevent atrial fibrillation

The role of cardiac pacing in preventing atrial fibrillation in patients at risk for this arrhythmia is a relatively new concept. This article discusses the influence of the pacing mode, rate, atrial pacing site, and novel pacing algorithms on the prevention of atrial fibrillation.

Exercise induced sympathetic influences do not change interatrial conduction times in VDD and DDD pacing

Using telemetry, right atrial electrogram (RA), and marker channel of atrial sense events (MA) in combination with the left atrial electrogram (LA), recorded by a filtered bipolar esophageal lead, interatrial conduction during submaximal exercise and at rest was examined in 46 DDD pacemaker patients. The RA-LA and MA-LA conduction times measured in the presence of atrial sensing (VDD) as well as the conduction time SA-LA from atrial stimulus (SA) to LA, determined during atrial pacing (DDD) were found to be individual constants independent of exercise induced sympathetic influences. Thus, having determined an optimal mechanical interval (LA-LV)mech/opt from left atrium to ventricle by other methods, the optimal AV delay for DDD as well as for VDD operation can be calculated by the sum of the appropriate interatrial conduction time (SA-LA, respectively MA-LA) and the (LA-LV)mech/opt interval. Due to the constant SA-LA and MA-LA, the difference between these two values (AV delay correction interval) is a constant as well, which remains unchanged during exercise. Therefore, in selecting the rate responsive AV delay, only hemodynamic and not electrophysiological measurements need to be considered.

Influence of exercise induced myocardial ischemia on right ventricular dP/dt: potential implications for rate responsive pacing

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) dP/dtmax has been used as a simple parameter for rate responsive pacing to simulate the normal sinus node function. However, the effect of acute myocardial ischemia on RV dP/dtmax has not yet been evaluated.

METHODS

RV high fidelity pressure was measured in 21 patients at rest and during supine bicycle exercise. Nine patients (Group 1 = controls) had no or only minimal alterations of the coronary arteries and 12 (Group 2 = CAD) had significant coronary artery disease with exercise induced left ventricular (LV) wall-motion abnormalities (n = 10) and/or angina pectoris (n = 6). RV pressure and its first derivative (RV dP/dt) were determined by an 8 French micromanometer catheter. The time constant of RV pressure decay (Tau) was calculated from the negative reciprocal of RV pressure versus negative dP/dt during isovolumic relaxation. RV volumes and ejection fraction were calculated from RV biplane angiograms (multiple slice method) at rest and during exercise.

RESULTS

Heart rate (HR), RV dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin increased significantly during exercise, whereas Tau decreased. There were no significant differences between the two groups, although RV ejection fraction increased from 67% to 72% in the control group but decreased from 63% to 51% in the CAD group (P < 0.05). An exponential relationship was found between HR and dP/dtmax with a correlation coefficient of 0.82 (P < 0.01; SEE = 7% of the mean value).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute exercise induced myocardial ischemia does not significantly influence RV dP/dtmax during sinus rhythm. Consequently, this index of RV contractility may be used in patients with coronary artery disease as a simple parameter for rate responsive pacing.