Relation between cycle length, volume, and pressure in type I atrial flutter

Cardiorespiratory interactions in patients with atrial flutter

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is generally known as the autonomically mediated modulation of the sinus node pacemaker frequency in synchrony with respiration. Cardiorespiratory interactions have been largely investigated during sinus rhythm, whereas little is known about interactions during reentrant arrhythmias. In this study, cardiorespiratory interactions at the atrial and ventricular level were investigated during atrial flutter (AFL), a supraventricular arrhythmia based on a reentry, by using cross-spectral analysis and computer modeling. The coherence and phase between respiration and atrial (γ[Formula: see text], φAA) and ventricular (γ[Formula: see text], φRR) interval series were estimated in 20 patients with typical AFL (68.0 ± 8.8 yr) and some degree of atrioventricular (AV) conduction block. In all patients, atrial intervals displayed oscillations strongly coupled and in phase with respiration (γ[Formula: see text]= 0.97 ± 0.05, φAA = 0.71 ± 0.31 rad), corresponding to a paradoxical lengthening of intervals during inspiration. The modulation pattern was frequency independent, with in-phase oscillations and short time delays (0.40 ± 0.15 s) for respiratory frequencies in the range 0.1–0.4 Hz. Ventricular patterns were affected by AV conduction type. In patients with fixed AV conduction, ventricular intervals displayed oscillations strongly coupled (γ[Formula: see text]= 0.97 ± 0.03) and in phase with respiration (φRR = 1.08 ± 0.80 rad). Differently, in patients with variable AV conduction, respiratory oscillations were secondary to Wencheback rhythmicity, resulting in a decreased level of coupling (γ[Formula: see text]= 0.50 ± 0.21). Simulations with a simplified model of AV conduction showed ventricular patterns to originate from the combination of a respiratory modulated atrial input with the functional properties of the AV node. The paradoxical frequency-independent modulation pattern of atrial interval, the short time delays, and the complexity of ventricular rhythm characterize respiratory arrhythmia during AFL and distinguish it from normal RSA. These peculiar features can be explained by assuming a direct mechanical action of respiration on AFL reentrant circuit.

A model for mechano-electrical feedback effects on atrial flutter interval variability

Atrial flutter is a supraventricular arrhythmia, based on a reentrant mechanism mainly confined to the right atrium. Although atrial flutter is considered a regular rhythm, the atrial flutter interval (i.e., the time interval between consecutive atrial activation times) presents a spontaneous beat-to-beat variability, which has been suggested to be related to ventricular contraction and respiration by mechano-electrical feedback. This paper introduces a model to predict atrial activity during atrial flutter, based on the assumption that atrial flutter variability is related to the phase of the reentrant activity in the ventricular and respiratory cycles. Thus, atrial intervals are given as a superimposition of phase-dependent ventricular and respiratory modulations. The model includes a simplified atrioventricular (AV) branch with constant refractoriness and conduction times, which allows the prediction of ventricular activations in a closed-loop with atrial activations. Model predictions are quantitatively compared with real activation series recorded in 12 patients with atrial flutter. The model predicts the time course of both atrial and ventricular time series with a high beat-to-beat agreement, reproducing 96+/-8% and 86+/-21% of atrial and ventricular variability, respectively. The model also predicts the existence of phase-locking of atrial flutter intervals during periodic ventricular pacing and such results are observed in patients. These results constitute evidence in favor of mechano-electrical feedback as a major source of cycle length variability during atrial flutter.

The Superior Transseptal Surgical Approach to Mitral Valve Creates Slow Conduction

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachycardia is very frequent after mitral valve surgery using the superior transseptal approach.

METHODS

Sixteen patients operated on for mitral valve disease (superior transseptal approach = Group A, n = 9, and left atrial approach = Group B, n = 7) underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia guided by electroanatomic mapping. Twenty-six consecutive patients without previous cardiac surgery with typical atrial flutter served as controls (Group C).

RESULTS

Atrial tachycardia occurred earlier after the operation in Group A than in Group B (median 97 vs 2,159 days, P = 0.003). Typical atrial flutter was the most frequent circuit in all groups (Group A-7 patients, Group B-5 patients, Group C-26 patients). Three patients in Group A developed right atrial incisional tachycardia. Ten of 14 tachycardia circuits (typical atrial flutter, n = 7, incisional tachycardia, n = 3) in Group A depended on the corridor between the right atrial part of the atriotomy and the tricuspid annulus. Slow conduction during typical atrial flutter was detected in this corridor in Group A, but not in the corresponding region in Groups B and C (P < 0.001). The cycle length of typical atrial flutter was longer in Groups A and B than in Group C (mean 283 ms and 282 ms vs 233 ms, P = 0.003). Patients in Group B with typical atrial flutter had larger right atria than patients in Group A or Group C (mean 156 mL vs 96 mL and 113 mL, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The superior transseptal incision may predispose to atrial tachycardia by creating slow conduction between the atriotomy and the tricuspid annulus.