Single pass lead VDD pacing in children and adolescents

Upgrading of VVIR pacemakers with nonfunctional endocardial ventricular leads to VDD pacemakers in adolescents

BACKGROUND

In some children with ventricular rate responsive demand (VVIR) pacemakers (PM), transvenous leads fail for technical reasons or patient's growth.

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe our experience in adolescents with a nonfunctional ventricular lead in whom the lead was abandoned and an additional VDD lead was implanted. Of the 136 children who received a VVIR PM with an endocardial lead in our center, seven patients aged 7 (0.3-12) years [median (range)] at initial implantation, after 10 (5-15) years showed lead malfunction and underwent atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing (VDD) PM upgrading at 16 (10-20) years.

RESULTS

The VDD lead was inserted through the ipsilateral subclavian vein in five patients, the contralateral in two (venous occlusion in one and for operator choice in the first patient). The tip was positioned into the right ventricular apex, the atrial dipole along the lateral atrial wall. Fluoroscopy times were not significantly different from those measured in SSI PM implantation and in VVIR dual-chamber demand pacing (VVIR-DDD) upgrading. There were no intraprocedural complications. Follow-up duration is 12 (6-62) months. The VDD PM showed good function, no undersensing or oversensing. Tricuspid damage, new venous occlusion, and "twisting" of the two leads at x-ray were not documented. The first patient showed an infection of the old PM pocket after 1 year, local pain after 3 years, and endocarditis of the leads after 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The upgrading of VVIR PM to VDD PM with the abandonment of the nonfunctional lead is feasible, with no intraprocedural complications and good PM function. Lead endocarditis occurred in one patient.

Indications and techniques of pediatric cardiac pacing

There are special challenges associated with the use of transvenous pacemakers in children. For example, a child's chest cavity or vascular dimensions could be too small to host the generator and leads available or required. If leads are implanted, they may stretch as the child grows. This increases the risk that the leads will later dislodge or fracture. Moreover, children requiring pacemakers often have coexisting congenital heart defects and the structural abnormalities of those could hinder easy placement of the pacing system. This article will first review the indications for permanent pacing in children and will then describe the unique challenges associated with such use.

Three-year follow-up of atrial sensing efficacy in children and adults with a single lead VDD pacing system

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of atrial sensing in children with a single pass lead VDD pacing system and to compare it with the efficacy of atrial sensing in adult patients with the same pacing system. Although the feasibility of single pass lead VDD pacing system implantation in children was recently demonstrated, the efficacy of atrial sensing remains unclear. In addition, the effect of accelerated growth of children on the systems' efficacy has not been addressed. Atrial sensing followed by ventricular sensing and atrial sensing followed by ventricular pacing was prospectively evaluated in 13 children (age 0.5-15 years) and 24 adult patients (age 19-74 years). All had the same endocardial pacing system using a single pass lead. The children and adults had effective atrial sensing at a success rate of 94.00 +/- 9.687% and 96.04 +/- 4.64%, respectively, during mean follow-up of 3.5 years. The atrial electrogram amplitude was similar in both groups, 1.8 +/- 1.5 mV in children and 1.8 +/- 1.1 mV in adults. The adult patients more frequently exhibited ventricular sensing following atrial sensing. The ventricular pacing threshold and impedance were stable in both groups. When necessary, in children, the atrial sensing was corrected by adjusting the pacemaker's lower rate programming. Highly effective atrial sensing was demonstrated in children and adult patients with a single pass lead VDD pacing system. During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, not only was the atrial electrogram amplitude stable, but the clinically relevant atrial sensing was highly effective, justifying endocardial pacing with single pass lead VDD pacing in children and adults with preserved sinus node function.

Two-year follow-up in pediatric and adult patients with single-pass lead VDD pacing system

VDD pacing follow-up is similar in pediatric and adult patients. Atrial and ventricular pacing parameters are stable during 2-year follow-up in children, and single-pass lead VDD pacing is recommended when the sinus node function is normal.