Atrial vulnerability in patients with paroxysmal "lone" atrial fibrillation

Obstructive sleep apnea in the patient with atrial fibrillation: current knowledge and remaining uncertainties

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in patients with atrial fibrillation and plays a causal role for OSA in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation. The presence of OSA in atrial fibrillation is associated with increased symptom burden and increased risk of hospitalizations. Furthermore, untreated OSA is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence post ablation or cardioversion, and observational studies suggest that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy can attenuate this risk. This review describes our current understanding of the relationship between OSA and atrial fibrillation with an emphasis on emerging evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have identified novel screening questionnaires, which may be superior to traditional questionnaires in identifying OSA in atrial fibrillation populations. Significant night-to-night variability in OSA severity has been shown in atrial fibrillation patients, which has implications for diagnostic testing. While several small, randomized control trials (RCTs) have not shown CPAP therapy to be effective in reducing atrial fibrillation burden, one RCT did show CPAP can attenuate the atrial substrate with implications for long-term outcomes.

SUMMARY

Further RCTs, appropriately powered, and focused on well defined cohorts, are required to guide management decisions regarding screening and treatment of OSA in atrial fibrillation populations.

Electrophysiological abnormalities in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the absence of overt structural heart disease

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to define the atrial electrical substrate in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring in the absence of overt structural heart disease and to assess if electrophysiological parameters could predict AF recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in this population.

Methods and results

45 consecutive patients (39 male, age 59 ± 10 years) with paroxysmal AF and without overt structural heart disease, referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation, were prospectively enrolled. A cohort of 12 age-matched patients without a history of AF, served as a control group. Atrial electrical substrate was assessed by P-wave signal-averaging, intracardiac conduction delays and refractory periods. Total P wave duration during signal-averaging was longer in patients with paroxysmal AF than in controls (140 ± 19 ms vs 123 ± 13 ms, p = 0.004). Patients with paroxysmal AF showed an increase in right intra-atrial (40.2 ± 11.3 ms vs 31.7 ± 11.8 ms, p = 0.02) and inter-atrial conduction delays (87.93 ± 22.0 ms vs 65.3 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.001) in sinus rhythm. Refractory periods in the right atrium were longer in patients with paroxysmal AF (265 ± 44 ms vs 222 ± 32 ms, p = 0.002). After ablation, 22 patients had AF recurrence but showed no differences in electrophysiological parameters compared to patients without recurrence.

Conclusion

Electrophysiological abnormalities are present in patients with paroxysmal AF without overt structural heart disease. Neither signal-averaged P-wave duration nor intracardiac atrial electrophysiology could predict arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.

Noninvasive evidence of shortened atrial refractoriness during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Shortening of the atrial refractory period is the key feature of atrial electrical remodeling during atrial fibrillation (AF). During sinus rhythm (SR), assessment of the atrial refractoriness is hampered by the fact that the atrial repolarization wave (Ta wave) is largely obscured by the following QRST complex. The purpose of this study was to study the Ta wave in subjects with paroxysmal AF during SR with third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, and in matched controls.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (mean age 70 +/- 10 years, five males) with paroxysmal AF undergoing AV-nodal ablation were studied. Fifteen age- and gender-matched subjects (mean age 71 +/- 9 years, five males) with third-degree AV block, without a history of heart disease, were used as controls. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded and transformed to orthogonal leads and studied using P-wave signal averaging technique.

RESULTS

The P to Ta interval was shorter (408 +/- 47 ms vs 451 +/- 53 ms, P = 0.017) and in Lead Y the Ta peak location was earlier (156 +/- 31 ms vs 187 +/- 34 ms, P = 0.002) in subjects with paroxysmal AF than in the controls. The P-wave duration (126 +/- 15 ms vs 129 +/- 17 ms, P = 0.59) and morphology was similar in AF patients and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the ECG signs of shorter atrial refractoriness associated with a history of AF are visualized for the first time during SR. The finding of the earlier location of the PTa peak in AF subjects implies that a possible indicator of increased arrhythmia susceptibility may be visible already in the unprocessed ECG.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of atria in patients without heart disease

BACKGROUND

The significance of atrial fibrillation or tachycardia (AF) induction remains debatable. Some believe that the presence of heart disease (HD) increases the sensitivity and decreases the specificity of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS). There are few data in patients without HD. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of PAS in asymptomatic patients without HD and in those with documented spontaneous AF, but without HD, to know the diagnosis value of the technique.

METHODS

A total of 4,900 PAS were consecutively performed. The control group (I, N=67) was defined by the absence of preexcitation syndrome, dizziness/syncope, hypertension, history of tachycardia, or other documented HD together with a normal 2D echocardiogram and 24-hour Holter monitoring. They were compared to a group (II) of 54 patients with documented paroxysmal AF and without HD. PAS used one and two extrastimuli, delivered during sinus rhythm and two drive rates (600, 400 ms). Atrial-effective refractory periods (ARP), their adaptation to cycle length, and conduction times were noted. AF induction was defined as the induction of AF lasting more than 1 minute.

RESULTS

Group I patients (1.4% of 4,900) were younger than group II (51 +/- 17 vs 65 +/- 11 years, P < 0.001). A single extrastimulus never induced sustained AF in group I, but did so in 11 group II patients (20%); sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 15 group I patients (22%) and in 31 group II patients (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no ARP and conduction time differences in group I patients with and without inducible AF, but there was a longer sinus cycle length in patients with inducible AF (977 +/- 164 vs 838 +/- 141 ms, P < 0.02). There were no electrophysiological differences in group II patients with and without inducible AF. No group I patient developed spontaneous AF (follow-up 4 +/- 2 years). The sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was 20% and the specificity 100%; the sensitivity of PAS with two extrastimuli was 57% and the specificity 78%.

CONCLUSION

Sustained AF was not induced by one extrastimulus in control patients without symptoms, nor heart disease, but sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 22% of these patients. The induction of a sustained AF by two extrastimuli should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in patients with a relative sinus bradycardia. However, the sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was very low and two extrastimuli were required in patients with spontaneous AF to induce the tachycardia. Other electrophysiological parameters were not useful to differentiate patients with and without inducible AF.

Clinical Assessment of Antiarrhythmic Agents for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Modification of Electrophysiologic Arrhythmogenicity

INTRODUCTION

Rapid atrial pacing alters atrial electrophysiology, promoting initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to assess differences in the electrophysiologic properties of atrial tissue between patients with and without AF episodes and to determine whether electrophysiologic properties can predict the clinical efficacy of antiarrhythmic agents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty patients were studied, 33 with documented episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and 27 control patients. Atrial effective refractory period (AERP), atrial vulnerability, and intra-atrial conduction time were measured at baseline and after rapid constant atrial pacing for 5 minutes at rates of 130, 150, 170, and 190 beats/min. The clinical efficacy of antiarrhythmic agents for PAF prophylaxis was assessed over 14 months with an antiarrhythmic agent identical to that administered intravenously, and the antiarrhythmic agent effects on AERP, atrial vulnerability, and intra-atrial conduction time were assessed. AERP shortening and atrial vulnerability increase were significantly larger in the PAF group. Antiarrhythmic agents that were clinically effective in suppressing PAF significantly attenuated AERP shortening, but antiarrhythmic agents that were clinically ineffective did not.

CONCLUSION

Changes in AERP and atrial vulnerability observed after rapid atrial pacing are considered indicative of the electrophysiologic substrate of PAF. Attenuation of AERP and atrial vulnerability by antiarrhythmic agents might be useful in predicting their clinical efficacy.

Comparative study of atrial vulnerability in patients with unexplained ischemic stroke or lone atrial paroxysmal fibrillation

Strokes have a high prevalence, with a high rate of recurrence, and about 30-40% remain of unknown cause. Some patients might have asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) which remains the main cause of embolic events. A latent atrial arrhythmogenic substrate may induce recurrent arrhythmias, including functional abnormalities such as nonuniform refractoriness and/or anatomic abnormalities such as atrial septum aneurysm (ASA) and patent foramen ovale (PFO). In 175 patients divided into three groups (Group I: 103 patients with unexplained ischemic stroke, Group II: 48 patients with paroxysmal AF and Group III or control group: 24 patients explored for another cause), such an atrial arrhythmogenic substrate was assessed by electrophysiological study. Groups I and II had a similar high rate of inducible atrial arrhythmias compared to control group III where no arrhythmia was induced. An induced atrial arrhythmia was observed in more than 50% of patients of Group I and in more than 70% of patients of Group II without any significant difference according to age. However, in 26 young patients of Group I who had a transesophageal echocardiography, both a high rate (46%) of ASA and/or PFO and a frequent latent atrial vulnerability (LAV) were observed, compared to older patients where an atrial septum abnormality was observed in only 21% of cases. Thus, among patients with stroke of unknown cause, a high percentage of them might have asymptomatic atrial paroxysmal arrhythmia. The predictive value of the electrophysiological study for spontaneous arrhythmias and recurrence of stroke remains to be demonstrated.

Occurrence of atrial fibrillation after flutter ablation: the significance of intra-atrial conduction and atrial vulnerability

Atrial vulnerability and intra-atrial conduction delay are important substrates for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AFib); however, their significance is unknown in patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation. Antegrade (high right atrium to coronary sinus: HRA-CS) and retrograde (CS-HRA) intra-atrial conduction times and AFib inducibility were assessed in 61 patients undergoing ablation for type I atrial flutter. Twenty-three patients had structural heart disease and 18 AFib before the procedure. After 16 +/- 12 months of follow-up 17 patients experienced AFib, 5 of which progressed into chronic AFib. During the study, AFib was easily inducible in 14 patients, 7 of which developed AFib (P =.03). Patients with post- ablation AFib were older (59 +/- 11 vs. 44 +/- 15 years, P =.001), had longer intra-atrial conduction times before (98 +/- 17 ms vs. 68 +/- 20 ms, P <.001) and after ablation (91 +/- 19 ms vs. 73 +/- 21 ms, P =.01) than those without AFib. Discriminant analysis revealed that only age, previous AFib and inta-atrial conduction delay (>90 ms) were independent predictors of postablation AFib. Patients without a history of AFib and with normal intra-atrial conduction had a 3% risk of AFib, while patients with both factors had a 90% risk of AFib after ablation. Intra-atrial conduction delay is an important electrophysiological factor predicting atrial fibrillation after successful flutter ablation.

Signal-averaged P-wave abnormalities and atrial size in patients with and without idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The relation between abnormalities in the signal-averaged P wave and atrial size has not been determined in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) without structural heart disease.

METHODS

Signal-averaged electrocardiograms of P waves were recorded in 38 patients with idiopathic PAF and 34 control subjects. Filtered P-wave duration (FPD) and root-mean-square voltages for the last 20 ms of the vector magnitude were measured. Atrial volume was calculated by cine magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

FPD was longer (131.7 +/- 10.9 ms vs 120.8 +/- 8.6 ms, P <.0001) and root-mean-square voltage was lower (2.89 +/- 1.29 microV vs 3.62 +/- 1.48 microV, P <.05) in the PAF group than in control subjects. However, the various atrial volumes were similar in the 2 groups. In controls, FPD was significantly correlated with left (r = 0.593, P <.0001) and total (r = 0.492, P <.005) atrial volume but not with right atrial volume. In patients with PAF, no significant correlations were found between FPD and any of the atrial volumes. Elderly patients with PAF (age > or =60 years) showed longer FPD than younger patients with PAF (139.2 +/- 9.4 ms vs 125.6 +/- 8.0 ms, P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

FPD is influenced by the left and total atrial volumes in the normal heart without PAF. Prolonged FPD seems to be a useful predictor of idiopathic PAF among patients without atrial enlargement, especially in the elderly.