Effects of respiration phase on ventricular defibrillation threshold in a hot can electrode system

Inspiration induced by phrenic nerve stimulation increases internal defibrillation energy requirements

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of active inspiration induced by phrenic nerve stimulation on the energy required for 50% successful defibrillation (E50).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Shocks (95-microF biphasic waveform) were delivered after 10 seconds of ventricular fibrillation between a right ventricular coil and left pectoral test can in ten anesthetized pigs (25 to 37 kg). Using a 1-J step size, the E50 was determined with an up/down, three-reversal method. Positive-pressure ventilation was halted just before fibrillation, and shocks were delivered during expiration or at the end of 2 seconds of bilateral phrenic stimulation (50 Hz, 0.3 msec, 5 to 6 V). Phrenic stimulation produced inspiratory volumes that were 15.3 +/- 1.7 mL/kg (mean +/- SD). The E50 was 9.8 +/- 1.9 J during expiration and increased to 13.0 +/- 1.7 during inspiration (P = 0.001). The leading-edge voltage at the E50 was 451 +/- 46 V during expiration and 519 +/- 33 V during inspiration (P = 0.001). The leading-edge current at the E50 was 9.7 +/- 1.0 A during expiration and increased to 11.3 +/- 1.4 A during inspiration (P = 0.002). The average impedance was 47.8 +/- 2.7 omega during expiration and 47.3 +/- 3.3 omega during inspiration (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Inspiration induced by phrenic stimulation results in a 31% increase in the E50 compared with expiration. The decrease in shock efficacy occurs in the absence of a change in impedance. Active inspiration may alter the distribution of the electrical field leading to a decrease in shock efficacy.