Evaluation of a dual sensor rate responsive pacing system based on a new concept. French Talent DR Pacemaker Investigators

The future of telemedicine for the management of heart failure patients: a Consensus Document of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (A.N.M.C.O), the Italian Society of Cardiology (S.I.C.) and the Italian Society for Telemedicine and eHealth (Digital S.I.T.)

Telemedicine applied to heart failure patients is a tool for recording and providing remote transmission, storage and interpretation of cardiovascular parameters and/or useful diagnostic images to allow for intensive home monitoring of patients with advanced heart failure, or during the vulnerable post-acute phase, to improve patient's prognosis and quality of life. Recently, several meta-analyses have shown that telemedicine-supported care pathways are not only effective but also economically advantageous. Benefits seem to be substantial, with a 30-35% reduction in mortality and 15-20% decrease in hospitalizations. Patients implanted with cardiac devices can also benefit from an integrated remote clinical management since all modern devices can transmit technical and diagnostic data. However, telemedicine may provide benefits to heart failure patients only as part of a shared and integrated multi-disciplinary and multi-professional 'chronic care model'. Moreover, the future development of remote telemonitoring programs in Italy will require the primary use of products certified as medical devices, validated organizational solutions as well as legislative and administrative adoption of new care methods and the widespread growth of clinical care competence to remotely manage the complexity of chronicity. Through this consensus document, Italian Cardiology reaffirms its willingness to contribute promoting a new phase of qualitative assessment, standardization of processes and testing of telemedicine-based care models in heart failure. By recognizing the relevance of telemedicine for the care of non-hospitalized patients with heart failure, its strategic importance for the design of innovative models of care, and the many challenges and opportunities it raises, ANMCO and SIC through this document report a consensus on the main directions for its widespread and sustainable clinical implementation.

Assessment of adaptive rate response provided by accelerometer, minute ventilation and dual sensor compared with normal sinus rhythm during exercise: a self-controlled study in chronotropically competent subjects

Background:

Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing.

Methods:

This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1^st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively).

Conclusions:

The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS.

Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode

PURPOSE

The EVOCAV(DS) trial aimed to quantify the paradoxal atrioventricular (AV) conduction time lengthening in sinus node (SD) patients (pts) paced in AAIR-based pacing mode.

METHODS

SD pts, implanted with dual-chamber pacemaker programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode, were randomized in two arms for a 1-month period: the low atrial pacing (LAP; basic rate at 60 bpm, dual sensor with minimal slope) and the high atrial pacing (HAP; basic rate at 70 bpm, dual sensor with optimized slope, overdrive pacing) arm. At 1 month, crossover was performed for an additional 1-month period. AV conduction time, AV block occurrence and AV conduction time adaptation during exercise were ascertained from device memories at each follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine pts participated to the analysis (75 ± 8 years; 32 male; PR = 184 ± 38 ms; bundle branch block n = 12; AF history n = 36; antiarrhythmic treatment n = 53; beta-blockers n = 27; class III/Ic n = 18; both n = 8). The mean AV conduction time was significantly greater during the HAP (275 ± 51 ms) vs. LAP (263 ± 49 ms) period (p < 0.0001). Class III/Ic drugs were the only predictors of this abnormal behaviour. Degree II/III AV blocks occurred in 49 % of pts in the HAP vs. 19 % in the LAP period (p < 0.0001). Fifty-two patients (66 %) presented a lengthening of AV conduction time during exercise.

CONCLUSION

AAIR-based pacing in SD pts may induce a significant lengthening of pts' AV conduction time, including frequent abnormal adaptation of AV conduction time during exercise.

The contribution of rate adaptive pacing with single or dual sensors to health-related quality of life

AIMS

The characteristics of sensors to perform rate adaptive pacing are well established but whether their contribution improves health-related quality of life (QoL) remains disputable. To compare the effects on QoL with an integrated dual sensor [minute ventilation (MV) and acceleration, TT sensor] with a single MV sensor, and with no rate adaptive pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This Dutch multi centre, prospective, single- (patient) blind study was performed in patients after first pacemaker (PM) implant for sick sinus syndrome or AV block. After a 3-month 'sensor off'-period following DDD PM implantation, where the latter 2 months permitted the MV sensor to learn the intrinsic rhythm, a 2-month period of DDDR with TT sensor or 2 months of DDDR with MV sensor, subsequently the two modes were crossed over. Quality of life was determined with Aquarel, the disease-specific instrument for PM patients. Heart rate, percentages of sensor driven and intrinsic rhythm were retrieved from PM memories. Sixty-four patients completed the 7-month study. In sick sinus patients, percentages of sensor-driven pacing occurred significantly more frequently than in AV block patients After implant QoL improved significantly: before 71.3 and after 83.5% (P < 0.001) measured with Aquarel and in 3 of 9 SF-36 scales, but no significant additive QoL benefit with dual or MV sensor pacing was observed. Pacing diagnosis, percentages of rate adaptive pacing, and heart rate influencing medication did not influence this result.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker implantation strongly improves QoL, but neither single- nor dual- sensor-driven pacing offered additional improvement in QoL during the initial 8 months after the first PM implant.

Comparison of the cardiopulmonary response to exercise in recipients of dual sensor DDDR pacemakers Versus a Healthy control group

The authors previously have shown in healthy subjects that age related loss of muscular strength did not alter the chronotropic response during treadmill exercise, whether with sudden onset of effort, as in the chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP) or more gradual effort as in the Harbor exercise protocol. This study was performed to verify that in patients suffering from chronotropic insufficiency, and in absence of other effort-limiting disorders, "physiologic" pacing enables a cardiorespiratory response comparable to that of age-matched healthy subjects. Furthermore, the aim of the study was to confirm that the response of a new dual sensor-based pacing system was properly adapted to the metabolic demand, whether during CAEP or during Harbor test, by subjecting patients to both protocols. All study participants were able to undergo treadmill exercise testing, had normal cardiopulmonary function tests at rest, and no cardiac, muscular, or pulmonary disease. A healthy group (control) included 16 subjects (mean age 70.4 +/- 3.9 years), and the test group (pacemaker [PM] included 9 subjects (mean age 67.1 +/- 10.8 years) permanently paced for isolated chronotropic insufficiency with a dual sensor pacing system. All subjects underwent CAEP and Harbor tests with measurements of gas exchange, 24 hours apart, in randomized order. All subjects reached an appropriate level of exercise, as expressed by mean lactate plasma concentrations, which were slightly higher in the control than the PM group during CAEP (4.9 +/- 1.9 vs 3.7 +/- 1.9 mmol/L, NS) and Harbor (5.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.8 +/- 1.8 mmol/L, P < 0.05) tests. No statistical difference was observed in VO2 and VE at peak exercise between the two groups during either test. In the PM group, heart rate at peak exercise and metabolic reserve slope were higher during the CAEP than the Harbor protocol. These two measurements were significantly lower than in the control group. The PM group also had lower plasma lactate concentrations and dyspnea/fatigue scores. The Harbor test seems less suitable than the CAEP test to study the chronotropic response of pacemakers with dual sensors during exercise. A high performance of the new dual sensor-based pulse generator was confirmed in this physically fit patient population, whose peak heart rate was considerably higher than in other similar studies.

Cardiac pacing. A review

Pacing is a field of rapid clinical progress and technologic advances. Clinical progress in the 1990s included the refinement of indications for pacing as well as the use of pacemakers for new, nonbradycardiac indications, such as the treatment of cardiomyopathies and CHF and the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Important published data and studies in progress are shedding new light on issues of pacing mode selection, and they may influence future practice significantly. Important technologic advances include development of new rate-adaptive sensors and sensor combinations and the evolution of pacemakers into sophisticated diagnostic devices with the capability to store data and ECGs. Automatic algorithms monitor the patient for appropriate capture, sensing, battery status, and lead impedance, providing better patient safety and pacemaker longevity.

Current status of dual-sensor pacemaker systems for correction of chronotropic incompetence

Rate-adaptive pacing has been shown to improve exercise capacity in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, all sensors used to adapt the pacing rate to meet metabolic demands show typical limitations. To overcome these, concepts using 2 sensors for rate adaptation have been developed, combining an unspecific but fast-reacting sensor with a specific but slower-reacting one. Clinical performance of these dual-sensor pacemaker systems is related to 3 factors: (1) choice of sensors, (2) mode of sensor integration, and (3) algorithms for automatic optimization of the integrated sensor response. Clinical studies using dual-sensor rate-adaptive pacing systems have demonstrated their ability to mimic normal sinus rate during different forms of exercise, avoiding inadequate or delayed rate response. However, to avoid combining the disadvantages of both single sensors, dual-sensor rate-adaptive systems need effective automatic algorithms. Sensor cross-check should be quick and combine fast reactivity and high specificity, particularly so as to prevent overpacing. Programmable rate response-related parameters should continuously be optimized. The pacemaker should provide diagnostic facilities during exercise to simulate short-term sensor performance at different settings and memory functions to evaluate long-term sensor performance. Assessment and eventually deactivation of all automatic functions should be possible. Finally, even with automatic algorithms for sensor optimization, maximal benefit from a dual-sensor system can only be achieved if the physician is able to identify and correct pitfalls of each system.