Proarrhythmic effects of ibutilide in a canine model of pacing induced cardiomyopathy

Increasing gap junction coupling suppresses ibutilide-induced torsades de pointes

Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) is common with class III antiarrhythmic drugs. Increased transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) contributes significantly to the development of TdP. Gap junctions play an important role in maintaining TDR in long QT syndrome. The present study examined the effect of a gap junction enhancer, antiarrhythmic peptide 10 (AAP10), on ibutilide-induced TdP. Coronary-perfused rabbit ventricular wedge preparations were used to evaluate the effect of AAP10 on ibutilide-induced arrhythmia. Transmural electrocardiograms and action potentials were recorded simultaneously. Early afterdepolarizations (EADs), R-on-T extrasystole, TdP and changes in Tpeak-end (Tp-e) and the Tp-e/QT ratio were observed. Changes in the levels of non-phosphorylated connexin 43 (Cx43) were measured by immunoblotting. Compared with those in the control group, the QT interval, Tp-e/QT and incidence rates of EAD and TdP increased with augmented dephosphorylation in the ventricular wedge preparations perfused with ibutilide under conditions of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia. In the presence of AAP10, the incidence rates of EAD and TdP were reduced and the Tp-e/QT ratio decreased, with a parallel reduction in the level of non-phosphorylated Cx43. The results indicate that AAP10 suppressed ibutilide-induced TdP under conditions of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia by decreasing TDR. AAP10 reduced TDR, possibly by preventing the dephosphorylation of Cx43 and thereby increasing myocardial cell gap junction coupling.

Ibutilide – recent molecular insights and accumulating evidence for use in atrial flutter and fibrillation

Ibutilide is a 'pure' class III antiarrhythmic drug, used intravenously against atrial flutter and fibrillation. At a cellular level it exerts two main actions: induction of a persistent Na+ current sensitive to dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel blockers and potent inhibition of the cardiac rapid delayed rectifier K+ current, by binding within the channel pore cavity upon channel gating. Ibutilide has been shown to terminate atrial flutter and fibrillation in animal studies, with some risk of ventricular pro-arrhythmia. Experimental models of hypertrophy/heart failure show altered sensitivity to ibutilide, with increased dispersion of repolarisation and incidence of pro-arrhythmia. Patient trials show that ibutilide is effective at terminating atrial arrhythmias when given alone, and that it can increase effectiveness and reduce energy requirements of electrical cardioversion. The risk to patients of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia necessitates careful patient selection and monitoring during and after treatment. An ibutilide analogue, trecetilide, requires further investigation but may offer a less readily metabolised and pro-arrhythmic alternative to ibutilide.

Electrophysiologic parameters and predisposing factors in the generation of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias

When a new (cardiovascular) drug shows signs of QT interval prolongation on the ECG (delay in repolarization time), the regulatory agencies demand screening of its possible proarrhythmic potential before approving it for clinical practice. In this review, identified predisposing factors have been related to specific electrophysiological parameters, allowing quantification of their contribution to Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias. In addition, arrhythmogenic mechanisms involved in the initiation and perpetuation of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes are discussed.

Azimilide and dofetilide produce similar electrophysiological and proarrhythmic effects in a canine model of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias

Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias are a feared proarrhythmic effect of (antiarrhythmic) drugs. In dogs with chronic complete AV-block bradycardia-induced volume overload leads to electrical remodeling, which includes increased susceptibility to drug-induced Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias. The IKr channel blocker, dofetilide (Tikosyn, 0.025 mg/kg/5 min), and the less specific ion channel blocker, azimilide (5 mg/kg/5 min), were compared in nine anesthetized dogs at 4 and 6 weeks of AV-block in a randomized cross-over design. Dosages were based on our own dose-dependence studies and on anti-arrhythmic dosages reported in the literature. Monophasic action potential catheters were placed endocardially in both the left and right ventricle to measure action potential duration, visualize early afterdepolarizations, and to assess interventricular dispersion of repolarization (i.e. left ventricular monophasic action potential duration (at 100%) minus right ventricular monophasic action potential duration (at 100%). Cycle length of idioventricular rhythm, QT-time and the occurrence of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias were determined using the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Before drug administration, the electrophysiological parameters were identical at 4 and 6 weeks. Both azimilide and dofetilide increased monophasic action potential duration, cycle length of idioventricular rhythm, and QT-time. Dissimilar lengthening of left ventricular and right ventricular monophasic action potential duration increased the interventricular dispersion significantly from 55 to 110 ms for both drugs. All dogs had early afterdepolarizations, while, in the majority, ectopic ventricular beats developed (dofetilide 8/9 and azimilide 7/9). Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias incidence was comparable for dofetilide (6/9) and azimilide (5/9). In conclusion, azimilide and dofetilide show similar electrophysiological and proarrhythmic effects in our canine model with a high incidence of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias.

Nonselective I(Kr)-blockers do not induce torsades de pointes in the anesthetized rabbit during alpha1-adrenoceptor stimulation

Selective I(Kr)- (the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current) blockers are known to induce torsades de pointes (TdPs) in anesthetized rabbits during alpha1-adrenoreceptor stimulation. However, effects of nonselective I(Kr)-blockers, which produce TdPs in other animal models and in humans, are not known in this model. We examined two nonselective I(Kr)-blockers (quinidine, 1.25 mg/kg/min i.v [n = 7]; and terfenadine, 0.31 mg/kg/min i.v. [n = 7]) for their effects on electrocardiographic parameters and on incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in anesthetized rabbits during alpha1-adrenoceptor stimulation with methoxamine. We compared the drugs with two highly selective I(Kr)-blockers (dofetilide, 0.04 mg/kg/min i.v. [n = 7]; and clofilium, 0.08 mg/kg/min i.v. [n = 6]). Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia or TdPs were induced by dofetilide and clofilium at mean doses > or =0.33 mg/kg and 0.4 mg/kg i.v., in all animals tested (vs. none in solvent; p < 0.05). TdPs usually developed into ventricular fibrillation and developed after prolongation of QT/JT interval and of QT dispersion. Terfenadine and quinidine significantly increased PQ, QT, and QTc interval and largely increased QRS duration and QT dispersion. These compounds elicited intraventricular conduction defects and cardiac arrest, due to asystole, in all animals tested (vs. 0% in solvent; p < 0.05). Interestingly, these two nonselective I(Kr)-blockers did not produce TdPs or ventricular fibrillation in any animals tested. Our results thus indicate that selective I(Kr)-blockers elicit TdPs, whereas nonselective I(Kr)-blockers do not induce this type of arrhythmia in this rabbit model. Consequently, it should be noted that this rabbit model is not always useful to evaluate nonselective I(Kr)-blocker-induced TdPs and QT interval and QT dispersion, rather than TdPs, are also important indicators for drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias.