A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study

Ventricular tachycardia induced by a backup pacing stimulus in a patient with a dual chamber pacemaker with AutoCapture

Manufacturers of cardiac implantable electronic devices have incorporated automatic features to allow for remote monitoring, improve device longevity, and additional safety. Algorithms to automatically measure capture threshold and adjust output to preserve battery life are one such feature. Automatic features may occasionally result in unexpected or undesirable clinical outcomes. We report on a patient who developed ventricular tachycardia inadvertently induced by the AutoCapture. feature of an Abbott/St. Jude Medical (SJM) pacemaker.

Basic Properties And Clinical Applications Of The Intracardiac

The electric signals detected by intracardiac electrodes provide information on the occurrence and timing of myocardial depolarization, but are not generally helpful to characterize the nature and origin of the sensed event. A novel recording technique referred to as intracardiac ECG (iECG) has overcome this limitation. The iECG is a multipolar signal, which combines the input from both atrial and ventricular electrodes of a dual-chamber pacing system in order to assess the global electric activity of the heart. The tracing resembles a surface ECG lead, featuring P, QRS and T waves. The time-course of the waveform representing ventricular depolarization (iQRS) does correspond to the time-course of the surface QRS with any ventricular activation modality. Morphological variants of the iQRS waveform are specifically associated with each activity pattern, which can therefore be diagnosed by evaluation of the iECG tracing. In the event of tachycardia, SVTs with narrow QRS can be distinguished from other arrhythmia forms based upon the preservation of the same iQRS waveform recorded in sinus rhythm. In ventricular capture surveillance, real pacing failure can be reliably discriminated from fusion beats by the analysis of the area delimited by the iQRS signal. Assessing the iQRS waveform correspondence with a reference template could be a way to check the effectiveness of biventricular pacing, and to discriminate myocardial capture alone from additional His bundle recruitment in para-Hisian stimulation. The iECG is not intended as an alternative to conventional intracavitary sensing, which remains the only tool suitable to drive the sensing function of a pacing device. Nevertheless, this new electric signal can add the benefits of morphological data processing, which might have important implications on the quality of the pacing therapy.

Technologies for Prolonging Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Longevity

Prolonged longevity of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is needed not only as a passive response to match the prolonging life expectancy of patient recipients, but will also actively prolong their life expectancy by avoiding/deferring the risks (and costs) associated with device replacement. CIEDs are still exclusively powered by nonrechargeable primary batteries, and energy exhaustion is the dominant and an inevitable cause of device replacement. The longevity of a CIED is thus determined by the attrition rate of its finite energy reserve. The energy available from a battery depends on its capacity (total amount of electric charge), chemistry (anode, cathode, and electrolyte), and internal architecture (stacked plate, folded plate, and spiral wound). The energy uses of a CIED vary and include a background current for running electronic circuitry, periodic radiofrequency telemetry, high-voltage capacitor reformation, constant ventricular pacing, and sporadic shocks for the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. The energy use by a CIED is primarily determined by the patient recipient's clinical needs, but the energy stored in the device battery is entirely under the manufacturer's control. A larger battery capacity generally results in a longer-lasting device, but improved battery chemistry and architecture may allow more space-efficient designs. Armed with the necessary technical knowledge, healthcare professionals and purchasers will be empowered to make judicious selection on device models and maximize the utilization of all their energy-saving features, to prolong device longevity for the benefits of their patients and healthcare systems.

Health economic concerns on cardiac rhythm management devices longevity and how to overcome them

The number of device implantations is in constant increase due to the ageing population, extended indications to implant for preventing sudden cardiac death and treating heart failure. An increase in the number of implants is directly related to a higher number of device replacements and that is one of the most important risk factors for device infection. Therefore, all the above mentioned factors contribute to an increase in the cost for health care system. Currently, several methods help to prolong device battery longevity and consequently reduce the costs, such as: a new battery, drug eluting leads, high impedance leads, algorithm to minimize unnecessary pacing, capture management and correct programming to avoid inappropriate and unnecessary shock in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy devices. Furthermore remote monitoring is very promising to reduce health system costs related to devices.

Hemodynamic Surveillance of Ventricular Pacing Effectiveness with the Transvalvular Impedance Sensor

The Transvalvular Impedance (TVI) is derived between atrial and ventricular pacing electrodes. A sharp TVI increase in systole is an ejection marker, allowing the hemodynamic surveillance of ventricular stimulation effectiveness in pacemaker patients. At routine follow-up checks, the ventricular threshold test was managed by the stimulator with the supervision of a physician, who monitored the surface ECG. When the energy scan resulted in capture loss, the TVI system must detect the failure and increase the output voltage. A TVI signal suitable to this purpose was present in 85% of the tested patients. A total of 230 capture failures, induced in 115 patients in both supine and sitting upright positions, were all promptly recognized by real-time TVI analysis (100% sensitivity). The procedure was never interrupted by the physician, as the automatic energy regulation ensured full patient's safety. The pulse energy was then set at 4 times the threshold to test the alarm specificity during daily activity (sitting, standing up, and walking). The median prevalence of false alarms was 0.336%. The study shows that TVI-based ejection assessment is a valuable approach to the verification of pacing reliability and the autoregulation of ventricular stimulation energy.

Long-term RV threshold behavior by automated measurements: safety is the standpoint of pacemaker longevity!

BACKGROUND

We studied long-term right ventricular (RV) pacing threshold (RVPT) behavior in patients consecutively implanted with pacemakers capable of automatic output reprogramming tracked by automatic RV threshold measurement (automatic verification of capture [AVC]).

METHODS

All the patients had state-of-the art steroid-eluting bipolar pacing leads and were RV-paced by an AVC algorithm from the three American manufacturers. Follow-up occurred twice in the first year after implantation, then yearly until approaching elective replacement indicator.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-one patients aged 73 ± 12 years were observed for 49 ± 26 months on average. At implantation, RVPT was 0.54 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms at an average 774 ± 217 Ω impedance. Forty-one of the 321 patients (12.8%) had a permanent RVPT increase above 1.5 V at 0.4 ms: RVPT was between 1.6 and 2.5 V in 29 of 321 (9%) patients, whereas it was between 2.6 and 3.5 V in seven of 321 (2.2%) patients, and >3.5 V in five of 321 (1.5%) patients. No exit block occurred because of automatic RV output adjustment by AVC algorithms. No predictor of RVPT increase was found at multivariable analysis. The maximum RVPT increase occurred within 12 months from implantation in 19 of 321 (5.9%) patients, between the first and the second year in 12 of 321 (3.7%), between the second and the sixth year in eight of 321 (2.5%), and after the sixth year in two of 321 (0.6%).

CONCLUSION

Despite technologic improvement in lead manufacturing, long-term increase of the RVPT occurs in about 13% of patients, possibly representing a serious safety issue in 3.7% when 2.5 V at 0.4 ms is exceeded. AVC algorithms can improve patients' safety by automatic tailoring of the pacing output to threshold fluctuations, while maximizing device longevity.

Actual pacemaker longevity: the benefit of stimulation by automatic capture verification

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the impact of an algorithm for automatic right ventricular (RV) stimulation compared to fixed-output pacing (FOP) stimulation on actual pacemaker longevity over a 9-year follow-up.

METHODS

Prospective observation of 300 patients implanted with VDDR/DDDR pacemakers in 1999-2000 up to October 31, 2008. Sixty-one patients were paced by Autocapture pacing (ACP), 239 were paced by FOP; they were seen twice yearly at the pacemaker clinic. Factors known to affect pacemaker longevity were collected: median heart rate, %A&V paced activity, pacing output, and impedance. Patients dead before pacemaker replacement, lost to follow-up, or who developed permanent atrial fibrillation were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six of three hundred patients completed the study. Adverse clinical events due to an increased RV threshold occurred in two FOP patients compared to none among ACP. Pacemaker replacement occurred in 1/34 ACP patients versus 60/92 FOP patients (P < 0.001). ACP was the single independent predictor of pacemaker longevity at multivariable analysis (hazard ratio = 0.03, P < 0.001) either in the overall population or in the specific patients subgroups (sick sinus syndrome, atrioventricular block, and neurally mediated syncope).

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic verification of stimulation is reliable at long term, and warrants superior safety in the event of pacing threshold changes. It allows a significant longevity increase compared to FOP stimulation that may heavily impact the patients' quality of life and the cost of pacing therapy. Moreover, it is a fundamental technology in a strategy of remote patient and device monitoring, and may enable automatic device follow-up operated by trained, nonmedical personnel.

Clinical Evaluation of Two Different Evoked Response Sensing Methods for Automatic Capture Detection in the Left Ventricle

BACKGROUND

This acute feasibility study compared two different automatic capture detection methodologies, the reduced coupling capacitor (RCC) and the independent pace/sense (IPS) methods, for the left ventricle (LV).

METHODS

LV threshold tests were performed in DDD mode, with LV-only and bi-ventricular (BiV) pacing using an external cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator. Evoked response (ER) signals from LV leads were recorded using the LV(Tip) (LV(Tip)-->Can) and LV(Ring) (LV(Ring)-->Can) to empty pulse generator (Can) housing sensing vectors to evaluate the two methodologies. Pacing vector, pulse duration, atrioventricular delay, and interventricular delay were varied to assess their effects on ER. The minimum ER amplitude (ER(min)), signal-to-artifact ratio (SAR), and ER amplitude voltage dependence were evaluated. ER(min)>2 mV and SAR(min)>2 define potential automatic LV capture detection for the two methodologies.

RESULTS

Data collected from 43 patients (63.7 +/- 11.0 years) were analyzed, including unipolar and bipolar (14/29) LV leads. Neither ER sensing method was affected by changing the pacing vector. The LV(Tip)-->Can ER(min) was significantly decreased at the 1.0-ms pulse duration when compared to 0.4-ms (p < 0.05). During BiV pacing, LV(Tip)-->Can ER(min) increased at negative interventricular delays and decreased at positive interventricular delays relative to simultaneous pacing. LV(Tip)-->Can resulted in fewer patients with sufficient ER characteristics for capture detection, albeit only significantly at the extended pulse duration (79% vs 97%, p < 0.05) and at simultaneous and positive interventricular delays (81% vs 97%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Though LV capture detection was feasible using both investigated methods, the RCC method (LV(Tip)-->Can) sensitivity to the evaluated pacing parameters suggests the IPS method (LV(Ring)-->Can) provides a more robust performance.

Underestimation of Pacing Threshold as Determined by an Automatic Ventricular Threshold Testing Algorithm

In this case report, we describe markedly different pacing thresholds determined by a manual threshold test and the automatic Ventricular Capture Management algorithm. The discrepancy in pacing threshold values reported was due to the difference in the AV intervals used with the different testing methods. We propose that the differences in right ventricular dimensions with altered diastolic filling periods affected the threshold in this patient with a new passive fixation lead in the right ventricular apex.

Role of ventricular Autocapture function in increasing longevity of DDDR pacemakers: a prospective study

AIMS

Autocapture is an algorithm for automatic adaptation of ventricular output to capture threshold. The aim of this prospective study was to estimate the effects of ventricular Autocapture algorithm on DDD-DDDR pacemaker longevity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-three patients implanted with a DDD-DDDR pacemaker (Affinity or Entity; St Jude Medical, USA) were enrolled and the Autocapture function was activated pre-discharge. Ventricular pulse duration was randomly programmed at 0.3 or 0.4 ms, with a cross-over at 8-12 weeks and again at 13-14 months. Diagnostic data were retrieved from device memory and by calculating battery current drain from long-term threshold recordings; device longevity was estimated at the following settings: Autocapture with a pulse duration of 0.3 and 0.4 ms, respectively, standard output (3.5 V, 0.4 ms) and conventional low output programming (2.5 V, 0.4 ms). According to a series of assumptions, Autocapture was associated with a 55-60% increase in estimated device longevity compared with standard output programming and a 6-7% increase in longevity compared with low output programming. No significant differences were found between Autocapture programmed with a pulse duration of 0.3 or 0.4 ms. In projections to a 10-year follow-up, use of the Autocapture function resulted in a 42% reduction in pacing-related estimated costs compared with standard output programming at 3.5 V, 0.4 ms.

CONCLUSION

Pacing with constant adaptation of ventricular output in dual-chamber devices has the potential to increase generator longevity and to reduce sizeably pacing-related costs compared with standard programming.

Acute performance evaluation of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm

AIMS

This study evaluated the acute clinical performance of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm developed to work with all lead types and pacing vectors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During regular pacemaker implant or replacement, AutoThreshold and manual threshold tests were performed in ventricular unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP, if applicable) pacing using a customized external prototype INSIGNIA pacemaker. The success rate and accuracy of two different modes (commanded and ambulatory) of the automatic capture algorithm were used to evaluate the performance. Loss-of-capture events (two consecutive non-captured beats without backup pacing) were used to assess safety. Data of 53 patients (33 DDD/20 VVI) from four medical centres were analysed. Tested leads included 43 BP and 10 UP from nine manufacturers, and seven had electrodes with low polarization. The rate of successful commanded and ambulatory AutoThreshold tests was 96 and 94%, respectively, with an average absolute threshold difference compared with manual threshold of < 0.1 V at 0.4 ms (commanded 0.07 +/- 0.07 V and ambulatory 0.08 +/- 0.07 V). There was no significant difference in performance between UP/BP pacing, polarization, and lead type. No loss-of-capture event was observed.

CONCLUSION

When successful, the ventricular automatic capture algorithm accurately determined pacing thresholds in either a UP or BP pacing configuration among all leads tested.

Failure of automatic capture verification in an epicardial pacemaker system

Epicardial pacing is frequently used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Automatic threshold determination has been reported to be safe in epicardial lead systems. We report a case of falsely low ventricular thresholds determined by automatic capture verification in a patient with complete loss of capture due to a lead fracture.

Clinical testing of a new pacemaker function to monitor ventricular capture

Automatic beat-by-beat capture functions are designed to minimize the pacing energy delivered, while maintaining the highest safety by delivering an immediate back-up stimulus in case of loss of capture. The objective of this study was to estimate the lowering of ventricular pacing amplitude allowed by such a function, compared to amplitudes usually set manually in routine practice. An automatic ventricular pacing threshold test is launched every 6 hours to measure the automatic capture threshold (AT). From AT the function calculates: (1) the"capture amplitude"(V(c)) = AT + 0.5 V at a minimum output of 1 V and (2) the"safety amplitude" (V(s)) = twice AT at a minimum output of 2.5 V. The function preferentially uses V(c) and verifies capture after each paced beat. In case of loss of capture, a back-up spike is delivered and V(s) is implemented until the next threshold measurement. We estimated the ventricular amplitude delivered by the pacemaker from data stored in the pacemaker memory. We compared these values with the pacing amplitude typically programmed manually (MPA) by physicians at twice AT and a minimum of 2.5 V. Data from 57 recipients of Talent 3 DR pacemakers were analyzed. Complete data sets were available in 25 patients at 1 day, 28 at 1 month, and 39 between 1 day and 1 month. No loss of capture or ventricular pause was observed on 53 ambulatory electrocardiograms (ECG); and pulse amplitude automatically delivered by the device was significantly lower than the MPA at each of the three time points analyzed. This new beat-by-beat capture function allows a significant lowering of the pacing amplitude compared to manual settings, while preserving a 100% safety.

An Algorithm for Verifying Biventricular Capture Based on Evoked-Response Morphology

Cardiac resynchronization therapy relies on consistent beat-by-beat myocardial capture in both ventricles. A pacemaker ensuring right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) capture through reliable capture verification and automatic output adjustment would contribute to patients' safety and quality of life. We studied the feasibility of an algorithm based on evoked-response (ER) morphology for capture verification in both the ventricles. RV and LV ER signals were recorded in 20 patients (mean age 72.5 years, range 64.3-80.4 years, 4 females and 16 males) during implantation of biventricular (BiV) pacing systems. Leads of several manufacturers were tested. Pacing and intracardiac electrogram (IEGM) recording were performed using an external pulse generator. IEGM and surface-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) signals were recorded under different pacing conditions for 10 seconds each: RV pacing only, LV pacing only, and BiV pacing with several interventricular delays. Based on morphology characteristics, ERs were classified manually for capture and failure to capture, and the validity of the classification was assessed by reference to the ECG. A total of 3,401 LV- and 3,345 RV-paced events were examined. In the RV and LV, the sensitivities of the algorithm were 95.6% and 96.1% in the RV and LV, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 91.4% and 95.2%, respectively. The lower sensitivity in the RV was attributed to signal blanking in both channels during BiV pacing with a nonzero interventricular delay. The analysis revealed that the algorithm for identifying capture and failure to capture based on the ER-signal morphology was safe and effective in each ventricle with all leads tested in the study.

Use of Automatic Threshold Tracking Function with Non-Low Polarization Leads:. Risk for Algorithm Malfunction

The AutoCapture (AC) function of new pacemakers (PM) from St Jude Medical (SJM) was originally recommended for use with low polarization (LP) ventricular leads only.However, recent reports have encouraged the use of the AC function with various leads, including those lacking a special LP design. The objective of this study was to analyze the reliability and safety of the AC algorithm application with different types of pacing leads. The study group comprised 30 consecutive patients with AC PMs connected to three different types of non-LP leads. Ten patients with SJM LP leads served as the control group. The study protocol included a complete AC function test using four different pulse widths (PW). The pacing threshold was independently assessed by a manual/semiautomatic check. Erratic behavior of polarization measurements with increasing PWs was demonstrated in 43% (n = 13) of the study group. Invalid polarization measurements resulted in erroneous algorithm recommendation to apply AC function in 17% (n = 5) of the study patients. Subsequent AC function activation lead to incorrect threshold determination due to missed noncapture in three patients. AC function should be applied with caution with non-LP leads. "Off label" use of these leads may cause erroneous polarization signal measurements which, in some cases, may result in incorrect pacing threshold determination, rendering a potential risk to dependent patients.

Automatic adjustment of pacing output in the clinical setting

BACKGROUND

AutoCapture (AC) is a programmable feature that enables the pacemaker to both track the capture threshold and automatically adjust the output on a beat-by-beat basis. Although AC safely and significantly reduces the current drainage, some authors have argued that the longevity benefit of such a system is overstated. This study aims to estimate the longevity extension that can be obtained, in the clinical routine, by turning the AC on in comparison to pacemakers programmed to operate at the shipped and manually optimized output.

METHODS

We selected 83 consecutive patients who received implanted St Jude's Affinity pacemakers >6 months earlier. Eight patients died or were lost to follow-up and in 9 subjects the AC could not be turned on. In the remaining 66 patients, current drain and estimated longevity were compared in 3 situations: (1) AC on; (2) AC off, optimized programming (100%-150% voltage threshold); (3) AC off, shipped output (3.5 V).

RESULTS

Five patients had large variations (>1 V) of the AC threshold. Current drainage was 8.0 +/- 0.9 mA in the AC group, 8.7 +/- 1.8 mA with AC off and optimized programming, and 11.3 +/- 2.3 mA at shipped output (P <.01). Estimated longevity was significantly extended (P <.01) by AC (12.1 +/- 1.0 years) when compared to shipped (8.9 +/- 1.7 years) and optimized programming (11.3 +/- 1.4 years).

CONCLUSION

Reprogramming the pacemaker output significantly enhanced its estimated longevity; AC added a moderate but significant extension over manual reprogramming and was associated with increased safety in patients with large ventricular threshold variations.

Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads

Beat-by-beat Autocapture maximizes device longevity by minimizing stimulus amplitude while assuring patient safety. Currently, Autocapture permits use of only bipolar leads. The authors have devised a detection method that operates with unipolar and bipolar leads and covers all pacing and sensing combinations (but bipolar pace and sense simultaneously). This new detection method for unipolar sensing uses the integral of the negative portion of the unipolar evoked response as a robust capture detection feature. When using bipolar leads, the method provides the flexibility of bipolar or unipolar pacing. In this study, unipolar ventricular intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) were recorded in 71 patients, 73.7 +/- 9.9 years of age; 9 with high polarization, 62 with low polarization. High polarization had polished platinum or activated carbon electrodes. Low polarization had TiN, platinized platinum, or IrOx electrodes. The intracardiac EGMs were recorded 544 +/- 796 days after implant. The pacemakers performed an automatic capture threshold test while the intracardiac EGM signals were recorded in a programmer. These digitized signals were saved for off-line analysis. The unipolar evoked response was calculated at up to six (depending on capture threshold) pacing voltages and the polarization integral at 4.5 V and at loss of capture. An automatic calibration algorithm determined if the signal-to-noise ratio was adequate for Autocapture operation. Autocapture was possible with 60 of 62 of the low polarizations, and with 6 of 9 of the high polarizations. The average values form the data collected were: average unipolar evoked response--4.1 +/- 2.1 mV, average peak negative voltage--10.0 +/- 3.7 mV, average polarization 0.3 +/- 0.34 mV, and average signal-to-noise ratio (unipolar evoked response/ polarization) 38 +/- 71. In all cases the algorithm correctly determined the appropriateness of using Autocapture with the electrodes tested and the unipolar evoked response threshold to be used.

Bachmann's bundle versus right atrial appendage capture

The tissue in the high intraatrial septum in the region of Bachmann's Bundle (BB) exhibits electrophysiological properties that differ from the right atrial appendage (RAA). As BB pacing emerges as an alternative to RAA pacing, the feasibility of using automatic capture recognition technology in this location should be examined. At implant, active-fixation leads were consecutively placed in the RAA, then the BB in 18 patients (55.5% men, mean age 77.1 +/- 9.1). There was no significant difference between BB and RAA in the average capture threshold (1.12 vs 1.77 V, P = 0.09), sensing threshold (3.85 vs 3.69 mV, P = 0.84), impedance (508 vs 529 Ohms, P = 0.64), evoked response (1.78 vs 1.67 mV, P = 0.83), and polarization (0.41 vs 0.46 mV, P = 0.84) between. The difference in tissue characteristics was not associated with a different evoked response measured by the ventricular capture recognition algorithm. Based on the analogous evoked response and polarization values, capture recognition technology designed for the atrium will most likely be applicable at both pacing sites.

Use of the AutoCapture Pacing System with implantable defibrillator leads

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies using various bipolar pacemaker leads have shown that the AutoCapture (AC) Pacing System is able to verify ventricular capture and regulate pacing output, increasing patient safety with respect to unexpected threshold changes and potentially prolonging device longevity. An increasing number of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) require ventricular pacing that contributes to a shortening of longevity of these systems. This prospective study tested the compatibility of the AC system with bipolar ICD leads.

METHODS

The AC algorithm was evaluated prior to ICD testing in 30 ICD recipients. A single coil, active fixation, true bipolar ventricular lead was implanted in 21 patients, and a dual coil, passive fixation, integrated bipolar ventricular lead was implanted in 9 patients. A ventricular evoked response sensitivity test and an AC threshold test were performed using a pacemaker with the ventricular AC algorithm.

RESULTS

AC was recommended in 22/30 (73.3%) of implants, including 20/21 (95.2%) with the single coil and 2/9 (22.2%) with the dual coil lead. Mean polarization was lower (1.23 +/- 0.95 mV vs 3.70 +/- 2.33 mV, P = 0.013) while the mean evoked response was higher (18.04 +/- 8.29 mV vs 10.13 +/- 4.22 mV, P = 0.002) with the single coil leads.

CONCLUSION

Automatic threshold tracking using the AC is compatible with ICD leads. Leads with lower polarization and greater evoked response are more likely to result in recommendation of AC use. Use of this system offers the potential for increasing ICD generator longevity and improving patient safety in response to late unexpected threshold increases.

Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Autocapture pacing system during a 5-year follow-up period. The study was conducted retrospectively between May 1996 and May 2001. Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone VVI pacemaker implantation using an Autocapture program with leads 1402T (n: 31) and 1452T (n: 29) were included in the study. Intraoperative measurements including a ventricular stimulation threshold test, sensing of intrinsic R wave (mV), and lead impedance (W) were done by a standard pacing system analyzer. Evoked responses (ER, mV) and polarization signals (PS, mV) were measured after the pocket was closed. Pacing thresholds by Autocapture (AC thrd, V) and Vario (Vario thrd, V), battery current (mA), and battery impedance (kW) were also repeated during predischarge and 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 40, 50, and 60 months after discharge. According to the ER and PS values an Autocapture algorithm could be activated in 49 patients (88%). The Autocapture algorithm remained active during the follow-up in all of these patients. In patients with inappropriate ER and PS values (11 patients, 12%), pacemakers were programmed to a VVIR pacing mode and Autocapture algorithm was inactivated. ER and PS values did not reach appropriate values to activate the Autocapture algorithm in any of these patients in consecutive follow-ups. Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring could be conducted in 32 patients (53%). In all recordings, when the loss of capture occurred, it was confirmed that back-up pacing continued. When the first measurements recorded during implantation were compared to approximately the 5th year measurements; ER (9.2 mV vs 9.6 mV), PS signal (1.13 +/- 0.30 mV vs 1.15 +/- 0.72 mV), AC thrd (0.4 V vs 1.2 V), Vario thrd (0.7 V vs 1.3 V), and lead impedance (502 ohm vs 620 ohm) were not changed significantly. Battery impedance increased 1 kOhm between 30-40 months of the implantation. Seven deaths occurred during follow-up. Three patients had fatal myocardial infarction, one died due to a non-cardiac event, and the remaining three died due to progressive heart failure.

CONCLUSION

ER, R wave amplitude, and PS, which are the main parameters for the continuation of Autocapture function, did not change significantly during long-term follow-up. High output back up pacing provided additional safety for sudden rises in threshold. The Autocapture pacing algorithm was found to be effective and reliable during long-term follow-up.