Electrophysiological Evaluation of the Sinus Node and the Cardiac Conduction System Following the Maze Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Acute Sinus Node Dysfunction after Atrial Ablation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management

BACKGROUND

Many patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (Aflutter) have concomitant sinus node dysfunction (SND). Ablation may result in injury to the sinus node complex or its blood supply resulting in sinus arrest and need for temporary pacing. We sought to characterize patients who develop acute SND (ASND) during/immediately after AF/Aflutter ablation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of AF/Aflutter ablation patients between January 1, 2010 and February 28, 2015 to characterize those who required temporary pacemaker (TPM) implantation due to ASND (sinus arrest, sinus bradycardia <40 beats/min, or junctional rhythm with hemodynamic compromise) following atrial ablation.

RESULTS

Of 2,151 patients, eight patients (<0.5%) with ASND manifesting as sinus arrest (n = 2), severe sinus bradycardia (n = 2), and junctional rhythm with hemodynamic compromise (n = 4) were identified (all male, age 66 ± 9.9 years, 4/8 [50%] persistent AF). AF ablation was performed in four, atypical Aflutter in one, and AF/Aflutter in three patients. The ablation set consisted of: pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (n = 6), roof line ablation (n = 6), mitral annulus-left inferior PV line ablation (n = 5), left atrial appendage-mitral annulus ablation (n = 1), cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (n = 5), and isolation or ablation near the superior vena cava (SVC, n = 4). Patients with peri-SVC ablation were more likely to develop ASND (P = 0.03). All patients received TPM; six received permanent pacemaker before discharge, performed 3.5 days postablation (range 2-6 days). At 3-month device interrogation, all patients were atrially paced >50%.

CONCLUSION

ASND is a rare complication of atrial ablation. It may be more common when peri-SVC ablation is performed and may necessitate permanent pacemaker implantation.

Right Atrial Isolation After Maze Procedure Discovered at the Time of Pacemaker Implantation

This article describes the case of a gentleman who required a permanent pacemaker after mitral valve replacement and a modified maze procedure, with an unusual observation after right atrial lead insertion.

Pulmonary vein isolation and the Cox maze procedure only partially denervate the atrium

OBJECTIVES

The effects of ablation lines on myocardial innervation and response to autonomic stimuli are unclear. This study examined the effects of radiofrequency ablation on atrial autonomic innervation and compared pulmonary vein isolation and the biatrial Cox maze procedure.

METHODS

In 12 acute canines right and left vagosympathetic trunks and right and left stellate ganglia were isolated. Each nerve was stimulated before bipolar ablation, after pulmonary vein isolation, and after the Cox maze procedure. Nadolol (n = 6) and atropine (n = 6) were administered to block sympathetic and parasympathetic responses, respectively. Changes in heart rate and atrioventricular interval were compared. Changes in QRST area relative to an isoelectric baseline (index of local innervation) were calculated.

RESULTS

Sympathetic stimulation of each nerve and parasympathetic stimulation of the vagosympathetic trunks caused significant changes in heart rate and atrioventricular interval. After pulmonary vein isolation, the effect of 33% of the nerves on heart rate changes was eliminated. The Cox maze procedure eliminated right stellate sympathetic effects on heart rate. Fifty percent of the nerves caused heart rate changes after the Cox maze procedure. There was no significant effect of either lesion set on atrioventricular interval changes. Stimulation of 50% of nerves after pulmonary vein isolation produced local area changes significantly different from control area. After the Cox maze procedure, a different 50% of the nerves produced local changes different from those seen after pulmonary vein isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical ablation procedures disrupted innervation, affecting heart rate but not atrioventricular interval. Autonomic innervation affecting the atria was changed by pulmonary vein isolation and additionally by the Cox maze procedure. Residual autonomic effects were present even after the complete Cox maze procedure.

Freedom from atrial arrhythmias after classic maze III surgery: A 10-year experience

OBJECTIVES

We studied the persistence of favorable outcome, the occurrence of new atrial arrhythmias, and sinus node dysfunction in patients who underwent the maze III procedure.

METHODS

Preoperative, in-hospital, and follow-up data of 203 patients who underwent the maze III procedure between June 1993 and June 2003 were collected. A total of 139 patients underwent the maze procedure for lone atrial fibrillation, and 64 patients underwent the maze procedure and concomitant cardiac surgery.

RESULTS

There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 +/- 2.6 years, 12 patients (6%) died (2 cardiac related). At the end of follow-up, freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias was 80% for the lone atrial fibrillation group and 64% for the concomitant atrial fibrillation group. Freedom from stroke during follow-up was 100% in the lone atrial fibrillation group and 97% in the concomitant group. Multivariate analysis revealed that rhythm at 1-year follow-up (P < .001; odds ratio 9.56, 95% confidence limits 3.92-23.31) and preoperative left atrium dimension (P = .028; odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter, 95% confidence limits 1.01-1.12) were predictors of success at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the favorable results of the maze III procedure in terms of freedom from supraventricular arrhythmias persist in most patients for at least 4 years.

Atrial Arrhythmias After Surgical Maze

OBJECTIVES

We describe the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics and management of post "cut and sew" Maze arrhythmias in symptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND

The Cox Maze procedure was developed as a surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Until recently, invasive electrophysiologic studies in patients with symptomatic post-operative arrhythmias in this patient population have not been described.

METHODS

The management and clinical course of consecutive patients with post-Maze arrhythmias refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) between January 2000 and December 2003 are presented.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (15 men) presented 14 +/- 14 months after Maze surgery for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Eight patients underwent "cut and sew" Maze for lone AF with no other surgical indication. Fifteen patients underwent the "cut and sew" Maze procedure in addition to another surgical procedure: mitral valve surgery (11 patients) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (4 patients). Eight patients (35%) had recurrent AF secondary to recovered conduction around the lines encircling the pulmonary veins. Five patients were documented to have focal atrial tachycardia, which was mapped to the coronary sinus in 3 patients, to the posterolateral right atrium in 1 patient, and to the left atrial (LA) septum in 1 patient. Four patients had right atrium incisional atrial flutter (AFL), and 6 had LA incisional AFL, which was mapped around the mitral valve annulus in 4 patients and around the right pulmonary veins in 2 patients. Twenty-two of the 23 patients were treated successfully with radiofrequency ablation. At 1-year follow-up, 19 patients were arrhythmia-free and taking no AADs.

CONCLUSIONS

After surgical "cut and sew" Maze, approximately one-third of patients experiencing atrial arrhythmias have AF secondary to pulmonary vein-left atrium conduction recovery. Moreover, incisional AFL seems to be a common finding in this group of patients. Catheter-based mapping and ablation of these arrhythmias seems to be feasible and effective.