Vector Mapping in Localizing the Transverse Conduction Site of the Crista Terminalis in Patients with Typical Atrial Flutter

The undetermined geometrical factors contributing to the transverse conduction block of the crista terminalis

BACKGROUND

The crista terminalis (CT) is known to be a functional barrier during typical atrial flutter (AFL). The relationship between the CT structural characteristics and its transverse conduction block, however, has not been understood well.

METHODS

This study consisted of AFL (group 1, N = 15) and non-AFL patients (group 2, N = 13). The CT structural characteristics were determined with intracardiac echocardiography. A 20-pole electrode catheter was located along the CT and pacing at progressively faster rates from either low anterolateral right atrium (LRA) or coronary sinus (CS) was applied.

RESULTS

The CT height, width, and area were significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 (P < 0.001). In both groups, at the longest pacing cycle length during CS pacing resulting in CT transverse conduction block at some levels, the width and area were significantly greater at the levels with block than at those without block. During LRA pacing, the area was also significantly larger at the levels with block than at those without in group 1, but not in group 2. The slope angle of CT ridge was significantly steeper at the levels with block than at those without in both groups (P < 0.01), but that was not the case with CS pacing. CT arborization in its inferior portion was more frequently documented in group 1 than group 2 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CT structural characteristics that may influence its transverse conduction differ between LRA and CS pacing. Steep slope and arborization of the CT are implicated as a geometric factor in its transverse conduction block.

Tachycardia circuit in typical atrial flutter: the role of a posterolateral line of block in the perpetuation of the tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The essential boundaries in typical atrial flutter (AF) are unknown.

METHODS

To examine the role of the tricuspid annulus (TA) and posterolateral line of block (LB) in maintaining AF, single extrastimuli were delivered during AF both around the LB and the TA in 29 patients. Single extrastimuli were delivered from the superior, middle, and inferior third of the anterior LB, superior, middle, and inferior third of the posterior LB, and the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA. The longest coupling interval (LCI) of single extrastimuli that reset AF and subsequent return cycle (RC) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The resetting response showed two patterns (groups 1 and 2). The differences between the AF cycle length (AFCL) and the LCI (AFCL-LCI) at the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA were the shortest, and were significantly shorter than those at the other sites (P < 0.0001) in group 1. However, the AFCL-LCI at the superior, middle, and inferior third of the anterior LB, and the superior, lateral, inferior, and septal portions of the TA were the shortest, and were significantly shorter than those at the other sites (P < 0.0001) in group 2. The difference between the RC and the AFCL exhibited the same two patterns, similar to the AFCL-LCI. In group 1, a single extrastimulus produced an artificial conduction across the LB, but AF was not reset.

CONCLUSIONS

Two types of reentry circuits exist in AF; one has its essential reentry circuit confined to the TA and thus the LB acts as a bystander, while the LB and the TA are essential boundaries in the other one.

Electrophysiologic and Anatomical Characteristics of the Right Atrial Posterior Wall in Patients With and Without Atrial Flutter Analysis by Intracardiac Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The posterior right atrial transverse conduction capability during typical atrial flutter (AFL) is well known, but its relationship to the anatomical characteristics remains controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-four AFL and 16 controls underwent intracardiac echocardiography after placement of a 20-polar catheter at the posterior block site during AFL or pacing. In 31 patients, the effective refractory period (ERP) at the block site was determined as the longest coupling interval that resulted in double potentials during extrastimuli from the mid-septal (SW) and free (FW) walls. The block site was located 3.0-29.0 mm posterior to the crista terminalis (CT) in each AFL and control patient. The CT area indexed to the body surface area was larger in AFL patients than in control patients (16.4+/-6.5 mm(2)/m(2) vs 11.3+/-6.4 mm(2)/m(2), p=0.01), and was positively correlated to age (r=0.34, p=0.02). The ERP was longer in the AFL patients than in controls (SW: median value 600 [270-725] ms vs 220 [200-253] ms; FW: 280 [230-675] ms vs 215 [188-260] ms, p<0.05 for each).

CONCLUSIONS

A functional block line was located on the septal side of the CT in all patients. A limited conduction capability and age-related CT enlargement might have important implications for the pathogenesis in AFL.