1
|
Świerżyńska E, Oręziak A, Główczyńska R, Rossillo A, Grabowski M, Szumowski Ł, Caprioglio F, Sterliński M. Rate-Responsive Cardiac Pacing: Technological Solutions and Their Applications. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:s23031427. [PMID: 36772467 PMCID: PMC9920425 DOI: 10.3390/s23031427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Modern cardiac pacemakers are equipped with a function that allows the heart rate to adapt to the current needs of the patient in situations of increased demand related to exercise and stress ("rate-response" function). This function may be based on a variety of mechanisms, such as a built-in accelerometer responding to increased chest movement or algorithms sensing metabolic demand for oxygen, analysis of intrathoracic impedance, and analysis of the heart rhythm (Q-T interval). The latest technologies in the field of rate-response functionality relate to the use of an accelerometer in leadless endocavitary pacemakers; in these devices, the accelerometer enables mapping of the mechanical wave of the heart's work cycle, enabling the pacemaker to correctly sense native impulses and stimulate the ventricles in synchrony with the cycles of atria and heart valves. Another modern system for synchronizing pacing rate with the patient's real-time needs requires a closed-loop system that continuously monitors changes in the dynamics of heart contractions. This article discusses the technical details of various solutions for detecting and responding to situations related to increased oxygen demand (e.g., exercise or stress) in implantable pacemakers, and reviews the results of clinical trials regarding the use of these algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Świerżyńska
- Department of Arrhythmia, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Artur Oręziak
- Department of Arrhythmia, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Renata Główczyńska
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Antonio Rossillo
- Department of Cardiology, San Bortolo Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy
| | - Marcin Grabowski
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Łukasz Szumowski
- Department of Arrhythmia, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Maciej Sterliński
- Department of Arrhythmia, The Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trohman RG, Huang HD, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Sharma PS. Sensors for rate-adaptive pacing: How they work, strengths, and limitations. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2020; 31:3009-3027. [PMID: 32877004 DOI: 10.1111/jce.14733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Chronotropic incompetence is the inability of the sinus node to increase heart rate commensurate with increased metabolic demand. Cardiac pacing alone may be insufficient to address exercise intolerance, fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, and other symptoms of chronotropic incompetence. Rate-responsive (adaptive) pacing employs sensors to detect physical or physiological indices and mimic the response of the normal sinus node. This review describes the development, strengths, and limitations of a variety of sensors that have been employed to address chronotropic incompetence. A mini-tutorial on programming rate-adaptive parameters is included along with emphasis that patients' lifestyles and underlying medical conditions require careful consideration. In addition, special sensor applications used to respond prophylactically to physiologic signals are detailed and an in-depth discussion of sensors as a potential aid in heart failure management is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard G Trohman
- Department of Medicine, Section of Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Services, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Henry D Huang
- Department of Medicine, Section of Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Services, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Timothy Larsen
- Department of Medicine, Section of Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Services, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kousik Krishnan
- Department of Medicine, Section of Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Services, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Parikshit S Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Section of Electrophysiology, Arrhythmia and Pacemaker Services, Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
|
4
|
Munawar DA, Mahajan R, Linz D, Wong GR, Khokhar KB, Thiyagarajah A, Kadhim K, Emami M, Mishima R, Elliott AD, Middeldorp ME, Roberts-Thompson KC, Young GD, Sanders P, Lau DH. Predicted longevity of contemporary cardiac implantable electronic devices: A call for industry-wide "standardized" reporting. Heart Rhythm 2018; 15:1756-1763. [PMID: 30063990 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Battery longevity is an important factor that may influence the selection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, there remains a lack of industry-wide standardized reporting of predicted CIED longevity to facilitate informed decision-making for implanting physicians and payers. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the predicted longevity of current generation CIEDs using best-matched CIEDs settings to assess differences between brands and models. METHODS Data were extracted for current model pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (CRT-Ds) from product manuals and, where absent, by communication with the manufacturers. Pacemaker longevity estimations were based on standardized pacing outputs (2.5V, 0.40-ms pulse width, 500-Ω impedance) and pacing loads of 50% or 100% at 60 bpm. ICD and CRT-D longevity were estimated at 0% pacing and 15% atrial plus 100% biventricular pacing, with essential capacitor reforms and zero clinical shocks. RESULTS Mean maximum predicted longevity of single- and dual-chamber pacemakers was 12.0 ± 2.1 and 9.8 ± 1.9 years, respectively. Use of advanced features such as remote monitoring, prearrhythmia electrogram storage, and rate response can result in ∼1.4 years of reduction in longevity. Mean maximum predicted longevity of ICDs and CRT-Ds was 12.4 ± 3.0 and 8.8 ± 2.1 years, respectively. Of note, there were significant variations in predicted CIED longevity according to device manufacturers, with up to 44%, 42%, and 44% difference for pacemakers, ICDs, and CRT-Ds, respectively. CONCLUSION Contemporary CIEDs demonstrate highly variable predicted longevity according to device manufacturers. This may impact on health care costs and long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dian A Munawar
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Rajiv Mahajan
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dominik Linz
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Geoffrey R Wong
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kashif B Khokhar
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anand Thiyagarajah
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kadhim Kadhim
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Emami
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ricardo Mishima
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Adrian D Elliott
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Melissa E Middeldorp
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kurt C Roberts-Thompson
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Glenn D Young
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dennis H Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders (CHRD), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quality of life assessment in heart failure interventions: a 10-year (1996–2005) review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 14:589-607. [DOI: 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32828622c3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The increasing prevalence and poor prognosis associated with heart failure have prompted research to focus on improving quality of life (QoL) for heart failure patients. Research from 1996–2005 was systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed QoL in heart failure. In 120 studies, 44 were medication trials; 19 surgical/procedural interventions; and 57 patient care/service delivery interventions. Studies were summarized in terms of aim, population, QoL measures used and QoL findings. Studies used 47 different measures of QoL-generic, health-related, condition-specific, domain-specific and utility measures. Most used a single QoL measure. In 87%, a condition specific QoL measure was used, with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire being the favoured assessment tool. The range of QoL measures in use poses challenges for development of cumulative knowledge. Although comparability across studies is important, this must be informed by the responsiveness of the instrument selected. As carried out in other cardiac groups, comparative evaluations of instrument responsiveness are needed in heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14:589-607 © 2007 The European Society of Cardiology
Collapse
|
6
|
Edwards SJ, Karner C, Trevor N, Wakefield V, Salih F. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2016; 19:1-210. [PMID: 26293406 DOI: 10.3310/hta19650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bradycardia [resting heart rate below 60 beats per minute (b.p.m.)] can be caused by conditions affecting the natural pacemakers of the heart, such as sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and atrioventricular (AV) blocks. People suffering from bradycardia may present with palpitations, exercise intolerance and fainting. The only effective treatment for patients suffering from symptomatic bradycardia is implantation of a permanent pacemaker. OBJECTIVE To appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia in people with SSS and no evidence of AV block. DATA SOURCES All databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment database, NHS Economic Evaluations Database) were searched from inception to June 2014. METHODS A systematic review of the clinical and economic literature was carried out in accordance with the general principles published by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating dual-chamber and single-chamber atrial pacemakers and economic evaluations were included. Pairwise meta-analysis was carried out. A de novo economic model was developed. RESULTS Of 493 references, six RCTs were included in the review. The results were predominantly influenced by the largest trial DANPACE. Dual-chamber pacing was associated with a statistically significant reduction in reoperation [odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.63] compared with single-chamber atrial pacing. The difference is primarily because of the development of AV block requiring upgrade to a dual-chamber device. The risk of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was also reduced with dual-chamber pacing compared with single-chamber atrial pacing (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96). No statistically significant difference was found between the pacing modes for mortality, heart failure, stroke, chronic atrial fibrillation or quality of life. However, the risk of developing heart failure may vary with age and device. The de novo economic model shows that dual-chamber pacemakers are more expensive and more effective than single-chamber atrial devices, resulting in a base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £6506. The ICER remains below £20,000 in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, structural sensitivity analysis and most scenario analyses and one-way sensitivity analyses. The risk of heart failure may have an impact on the decision to use dual-chamber or single-chamber atrial pacemakers. Results from an analysis based on age (> 75 years or ≤ 75 years) and risk of heart failure indicate that dual-chamber pacemakers dominate single-chamber atrial pacemakers (i.e. are less expensive and more effective) in older patients, whereas dual-chamber pacemakers are dominated by (i.e. more expensive and less effective) single-chamber atrial pacemakers in younger patients. However, these results are based on a subgroup analysis and should be treated with caution. CONCLUSIONS In patients with SSS without evidence of impaired AV conduction, dual-chamber pacemakers appear to be cost-effective compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers. The risk of developing a complete AV block and the lack of tools to identify patients at high risk of developing the condition argue for the implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker programmed to minimise unnecessary ventricular pacing. However, considerations have to be made around the risk of developing heart failure, which may depend on age and device. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013006708. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
|
7
|
Banchs JE, Scher DL. Emerging role of digital technology and remote monitoring in the care of cardiac patients. Med Clin North Am 2015; 99:877-96. [PMID: 26042888 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Current available mobile health technologies make possible earlier diagnosis and long-term monitoring of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Remote monitoring of patients with implantable devices and chronic diseases has resulted in better outcomes reducing health care costs and hospital admissions. New care models, which shift point of care to the outpatient setting and the patient's home, necessitate innovations in technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier E Banchs
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
| | - David Lee Scher
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Penn State Hershey Heart & Vascular Institute, 500 University Drive, H047, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cao Y, Zhang Y, Su Y, Bai J, Wang W, Ge J. Assessment of adaptive rate response provided by accelerometer, minute ventilation and dual sensor compared with normal sinus rhythm during exercise: a self-controlled study in chronotropically competent subjects. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015; 128:25-31. [PMID: 25563309 PMCID: PMC4837815 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.147798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods: This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis. Results: Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively). Conclusions: The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yangang Su
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lindovská M, Kameník L, Pollock B, Hoenen S, Bökelmann T, Spitzer W, Salbach P, Behroz A, Frey A. Clinical observations with Closed Loop Stimulation pacemakers in a large patient cohort: the CYLOS routine documentation registry (RECORD). Europace 2012; 14:1587-95. [PMID: 22455935 DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) pacemakers couple pacing rate to myocardial contraction dynamics by monitoring unipolar right ventricular impedance on a beat-to-beat basis. The aim of this large-scale registry was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CLS therapy under clinical routine conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 706 patients was enrolled in the clinical investigation 'Registry: CYLOS Routine Documentation' (RECORD) at 57 investigational sites in Europe and Hong Kong. Not to interfere with clinical routine and therapeutic decisions of health care providers, the registry was implemented as a part of the standard follow-up schedule. Two follow-ups were conducted within 12 months of enrolment in order to evaluate typical programming of CLS-related parameters, reasons for their later reprogramming, frequency of patient intolerance to CLS, and physicians' satisfaction with medical benefits and technical performance of CLS in each patient. The investigators' medical and technical notes on CLS rated it excellent in ~80% of patients, poor in 1.4% (medical benefit) or 0.5% (technical performance), and adequate in rest of the patients. Closed Loop Stimulation functionality was not influenced by pacing site variation within the right ventricle (septal, outflow tract) or by advanced heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-IV). Permanent or temporary CLS deactivation was undertaken for various reasons in 6.2% of patients. Signs of intolerance to CLS or rate-adaptive pacing were reported by 2.3% of patients. Reprogramming of CLS-related parameters was seldom undertaken, with >90% of pacemakers operating with default settings in the long term. CONCLUSION Clinical performance of CLS was very satisfactory in the large cohort studied.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaszala K, Ellenbogen KA. Device sensing: sensors and algorithms for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Circulation 2010; 122:1328-40. [PMID: 20876446 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.919704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Károly Kaszala
- VCU School of Medicine, PO Box 980053, Richmond, VA 23298-0053, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Coman J, Freedman R, Koplan BA, Reeves R, Santucci P, Stolen KQ, Kraus SM, Meyer TE. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2009; 31:1433-42. [PMID: 18950301 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01207.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adaptive rate sensors used in permanent pacemakers incorporate an accelerometer (XL) to increase heart rate with activity. Limited data exists regarding the relative benefit of a blended sensor (BS) (XL and minute ventilation) versus XL alone in restoring chronotropic response (CR) in chronotropically incompetent (CI) patients. METHODS One thousand five hundred thirty-eight patients from the limiting chronotropic incompetence for pacemaker recipients (LIFE) study were implanted with a pacemaker and 1,256 patients had data collected at 1 month. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month postimplant while programmed in nonrate responsive mode (DDD-60) to determine CI. Only patients who completed at least three exercise stages and achieved a peak perceived exertion >or=16 were included in the analyses. The metabolic chronotropic relationship (MCR) slope was used to evaluate CR in 547 patients. Patients were randomized to XL or BS with a conservative fixed rate response factor (XL = 8, MV = 4). CI patients performed a follow-up 6-month treadmill test. RESULTS CI prevalence in this patient population (n = 547) was 34%. No differences in baseline characteristics existed between groups. Although both groups showed significant within-group improvements in MCR slope from 1 to 6 months (both P < 0.001), the BS group had a significantly higher MCR slope at 6 months compared to the XL group (P = 0.011). Improvement in quality of life (QOL) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS In this general pacemaker population with CI, a BS programmed empirically restores CR more favorably than an XL sensor programmed nominally. Further studies are needed to determine if individual sensor optimization would lead to improvement in functional capacity, higher MCR slopes, and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Coman
- Hillcrest Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shaber JD, Fisher JD, Ramachandra I, Gonzalez C, Rosenberg L, Ferrick KJ, Gross JN, Kim SG. Rate Responsive Pacemakers: A Rapid Assessment Protocol. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2008; 31:192-7. [PMID: 18233972 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00968.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin D Shaber
- Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Arrhythmia Service, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10467, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Brignole M, Giada F, Raviele A, Blanc JJ. Pacing for syncope: what role? which perspective? Eur Heart J Suppl 2007. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/sum061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
16
|
Sweesy MW, Wilkoff BL, Smith KW, Holland JL. Group Purchasing Organizations: Optimizing Cardiac Device Selection, Therapy Delivery, and Fiscal Responsibility. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2006; 29:1404-9. [PMID: 17201849 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00554.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Group purchasing organizations (GPOs) have played a major role in supporting health care delivery in recent years as the healthcare industry has faced stronger economic pressures. Consequently, a position statement was drafted to act as a guideline for a GPO in creating a fiscally responsible, yet unrestricted environment for physicians to select the most appropriate cardiac device for their patients. This cardiac device selection guideline is to be implemented in hundreds of member hospitals but may be of use in non-member hospitals as well. The guideline will only be effective when the physicians or cardiac device caregivers have the knowledge and skills to optimally program and match device therapies and algorithms to individual patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W Sweesy
- Arrhythmia Technologies Institute, Greenville, South Carolina, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|